Consumer potting mixes are designed for container gardening, hanging baskets, indoor plants, and raised beds. They are often purchased at mass merchants or garden centers in plastic bags to facilitate transportation and storage by consumers. The primary component of these potting mixes is sphagnum peatmoss. The United States used over 14 million cubic meters of peat for horticultural applications in 2014, while worldwide usage was 100 million cubic meters (Apodaca, 2016). Specific uses of imported peat within the horticulture industry are not known. However, Slivka et al. (1992) estimate 4.5–6.0 million cubic meters of bagged potting soil are purchased by homeowners and landscapers annually.
Some bagged potting mixes include one or more types of fertilizer to provide plant nutrients. There can be a significant delay, weeks or months, from the time the potting mixes are bagged and stored until they are purchased and used by consumers. As such, nutrient release from the fertilizers and changes in the chemical properties of bagged potting mixes in storage have been studied. Carlile (2004) warned that in potting mixes containing CRFs, the slow release of the nutrients over time can lead to serious problems stemming from high nutrient levels and soluble salts at the time of use. It has been suggested by both manufacturers (Hulme, 2011) and researchers (Carlile, 2004; Zaccheo et al., 2013) that media with CRF be used immediately after mixing (within 30 d) to avoid problems with soluble salts.
Temperature and moisture content are the primary factors affecting CRF release and microbial activities, such as nitrification and nitrogen (N)-immobilization, in bagged potting mixes during storage (Cabrera, 1997; Husby et al., 2003). Zaccheo et al. (2013) measured the chemical properties of two peat-based substrates amended with CRF (product not specified) and stored over a 12-month period at either 21 °C (which the authors considered proper) or stored for 15 d at 40 °C and the remainder of the time at 21 °C (considered improper). Elevated temperatures for just 15 d resulted in greater dissolution of lime in the substrate and greater release of ammonium (NH4+) through the first 120 d compared with the substrates stored at constant 21 °C. Selmer-Olsen and Gislerod (1986) evaluated the change in N form in a peat substrate stored at 4 to 35 °C. They observed greater reductions in the amount of recoverable N, as well as greater changes of N form, in substrates stored at 12 to 35 °C compared with substrates stored at 4 °C. Dickinson and Carlile (1995) showed that a peat substrate amended with inorganic nutrients (unspecified) at 2 kg·m−3 stored at 20 °C resulted in a greater increase in nitrate (NO3−) and decrease in NH4+ over a 12-month period compared with storage at 10 °C. This was attributed to an increased microbial activity at the higher temperature.
Moisture content during storage can also affect substrate quality and nutrient release. Selmer-Olsen and Gislerod (1986) also evaluated substrate quality when stored at 30% to 75% moisture content. They observed greater nitrification rates in peat stored at higher moisture contents and speculated that N loss in drier substrates (30% moisture content) was due to N-immobilization and not nitrification. Likewise, Saadi et al. (2010) reported that microbial activity of composts using organic nutrient sources stored at 55% to 65% moisture content was greater than those stored at 15% to 35% moisture content, which resulted in higher NO3− concentration due to increased nitrification under wet conditions.
One of the most important implications of nutrient release from CRFs in bagged substrates is how it affects shelf life. While research has shown general trends in how moisture content and temperature affect pH, EC, and nutrient dynamics in stored substrates, they do not provide specific information on 1) how quickly nutrients are released from a CRF, 2) how much nutrients are immobilized, and 3) how N forms are transformed between inorganic forms (NH4+ and NO3−). The objective of this research was to determine over time how initial substrate moisture content and storage temperature affect the chemical properties and available nutrients derived from a CRF incorporated into a bagged peat-based substrate and stored for up to 180 d.
Altland, J.E. & Jeong, K.Y. 2016 Dolomitic lime amendment affects pine bark substrate pH, nutrient availability, and plant growth: A review HortTechnology 26 565 573
Apodaca, L.E. 2016 Peat: US Geological Survey 2014 minerals yearbook. 13 Oct. 2017. <https://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/peat/myb1-2014-peat.pdf>
Birrenkott, B.A., Craig, J. & McVey, G.R. 2005 A leach collection system to track the release of nitrogen from controlled-release fertilizers in container ornamentals HortScience 40 1887 1891
Cabrera, R.I. 1997 Comparative evaluation of nitrogen release patterns from controlled-release fertilizer by nitrogen leaching analysis HortScience 32 669 673
Chang-wen, D., Zhou, J. & Shaviv, A. 2006 Release characteristics of nutrients from polymer-coated compound controlled release fertilizers J. Polymer Environ. 14 223 230
De Oliveira, S.F., Fisher, P., Huang, J. & Mello, S. 2016 Strategies to provide fertilizer for both production and consumer phases of petunia HortTechnology 26 164 175
Huett, D.O. & Gogel, B.J. 2000 Longevities and nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium release patterns of polymer-coated controlled-release fertilizer at 30 °C and 40 °C Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 31 959 973
Husby, C.E., Niemiera, A.X., Harris, J.R. & Wright, R.D. 2003 Influence of diurnal temperature on nutrient release patterns of three polymer-coated fertilizers HortScience 38 387 389
Lindsay, W.L. 1979 Chemical equilibria in soils: Carbonate equilibria. The Blackburn Press, Caldwell, NJ
Saadi, I., Laor, Y., Medina, S., Krassnovsky, A. & Raviv, M. 2010 Compost suppressiveness against Fusarium oxysporum was not reduced after one-year storage under various moisture and temperature conditions Soil Biol. Biochem. 42 626 634
Scott, M. 1985 Efford gives guidance on bark. Garden Centre Hort. Trade J. Jan.:11–17
Shaviv, A., Raban, S. & Zaidel, E. 2003 Modeling controlled nutrient release from polymer coated fertilizer: Diffusion release from single granules Environ. Sci. Technol. 37 2251 2256
Todar, K. 2012 Todar’s online textbook of bacteriology. 5 May 2017. <http://textbookofbacteriology.net/nutgro.html>
Zaccheo, P., Crippa, L. & Cattivello, C. 2013 Effect of controlled-release fertilizers on chemical parameters of two growing media during 12 months storage Acta Hort. 1013 327 332