Growth and Water Use During Establishment of Irrigated Bare Root and Balled-Burlap Green Ash Transplanted Into A High Desert Landscape

in HortScience

We investigated growth, water relations, and water use of bare root (BR) and balled-burlapped (BB) Patmore green ash following transplanting into an irrigated landscape setting in a high desert climate. Treatments were green ash harvested as larger (40 mm caliper) BB and BR trees, and smaller BR stock (25 mm caliper). During establishment, we measured canopy growth for 3 years, and for 2 years plant water relations [predawn water potential and midday stomatal conductance (gS)] and water depletion within the root zone. All treatments expressed varying degrees of isohydric responses to root loss by reducing gS that maintained water potential nearly constant, but least so for the smaller BR trees. gS was greater than that of all larger trees, meaning that for the same cost in water potential as the larger trees, BR-Small benefitted from more open stomates and presumably greater carbon gain. Greater initial conductance apparently translated into more growth. Year 1, BR-Small trees had the least total leaf area, but by Year 3 total leaf area was not different among all treatments. Also during Year 1, the ratio of water use to local reference evapotranspiration [plant factor (PF)] was 0.36 for large BR trees vs. 0.56 for BB trees, similar to the recommended PF of 0.5 for trees in dry climates. These results suggest smaller BR trees are a cheaper alternative for high desert landscapes while reaching nearly equivalent growth to BB trees after 3 years. Achieving high growth of BR trees would need careful scheduling of irrigation amount and frequency based on leaf area, root zone size, and local reference evapotranspiration.

Contributor Notes

We thank the Utah Agricultural Experiment Station for financial support (Utah Agricultural Experiment Station paper 8935).

Corresponding author. E-mail: roger.kjelgren@usu.edu.

Headings

Figures

  • View in gallery

    (A) 30-year (1980–2010) daily probability of precipitation from the Utah State University Logan, UT Global Historical Climate Network (GHCN) weather station. Daily, plus actual precipitation during the study period from an on-site weather station; (B) 30-year average daily reference evapotranspiration (ETo) also from the same GHCN weather station calculated using Tmax/Tmin input into the Hargreaves equation, plus Penman-Monteith ET collected from an on-site weather station during the study.

  • View in gallery

    Midday stomatal conductance and daily high vapor pressure deficit (VPD) in an irrigated high desert environment for green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica ‘Patmore’) for (A) first year following transplanting, and (B) second year following transplanting. Treatments were BB-Large (balled and burlapped, 40 mm trunk diameter), BR-Large (bare root, 40 mm trunk diameter), and BR-Small (bare root 25 mm trunk diameter). Data points represent mean plus standard error.

  • View in gallery

    Rainfall during study period and predawn and midday leaf water potential for green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica ‘Patmore’) over 2 years following transplanting in an irrigated high desert environment. Treatments were BB-Large (balled and burlapped, 40 mm trunk caliper), BR-Large (bare root, 40 mm trunk diameter), and BR-Small (bare root, 25 mm trunk diameter). Data points represent mean plus standard error.

  • View in gallery

    Mean water use of green ash over (Fraxinus pennsylvanica ‘Patmore’) 2 years following transplanting in an irrigated high desert environment. Treatments were BB-Large (balled and burlapped, 40 mm trunk diameter), and BR-Large (bare root, 40 mm trunk diameter). Water use measured as water depletion within root zone and in ambient soil surrounding the hole excavated for planting. Each bar is a mean of four trees, plus standard error.

References

AbodS.A.WebsterA.D.1990Shoot and root pruning effects on the growth and water relations of young Malus, Tilia, and Betula transplantsJ. Hort. Sci.65451459

AllenR.G.WalterI.A.ElliotR.L.HowellT.A.ItenfisuD.JensenM.E.SnyderR.L.2005ASCE standardized reference evapotranspiration equation. American Society Civil Engineers Reston VA

American Nursery and Landscape Association2004American Standard for Nursery Stock. ANSI Z60.1

AnellaL.HennesseyT.C.LorenziE.M.2008Growth of balled-and-burlapped versus bare-root trees in Oklahoma, U.SArboricult. Urban For.34200203

ApostolK.G.JacobsD.F.DumroeseR.K.2009Root desiccation and drought stress responses of bareroot Quercus rubra seedlings treated with a hydrophilic polymer root dipPlant Soil315229240

ArnoldM.A.2005Challenges and benefits of transplanting large trees: An introduction to the workshopHortechnology15115117

ASABE2015Determining landscape plant water demands. American Society Agricultural and Biological Engineers Standard S623. 1 Nov. 2015. <http://elibrary.asabe.org/abstract.asp?search=1&JID=2&AID=46518&Abstract=S623.htm>.

AthertonJ.M.NicholC.J.MencucciniM.SimpsonK.2013The utility of optical remote sensing for characterizing changes in the photosynthetic efficiency of Norway maple saplings following transplantationIntl. J. Remote Sens.34655667

BartonA.J.WalshC.S.2000Effect of transplanting on water relations and canopy development in AcerJ. Environ. Hort.18202206

BeesonR.C.JrGilmanE.F.1992Diurnal water stress during landscape establishment of slash pine differs among three production methodsJ. Arboriculture18281287

Bellett-TraversD.M.HiggsD.E.IrelandC.R.2004The effects of progressive root removal prior to planting on shoot and root growth of Betula pendula RothArboricultural J.27297313

BuckstrupM.J.BassukN.L.2000Transplanting success of balled-and-burlapped versus bare-root trees in the urban landscapeJ. Arboriculture26298308

DagitR.DownerA.J.2002To prune or not to prune: Responses of coast live oaks (Quercus agrifolia) to canopy retention during transplanting p. 369–380. Gen. Tech. Rpt. Pacific Southwest Research Station USDA Forest Service (PSW-GTR-184)

DostalekJ.WeberM.MatulaS.FrantikT.2009Planting of different-sized tree transplants on arable soilCent. Eur. J. Biol.4574584

GilmanE.F.BlackR.J.DehganB.1998Irrigation volume and frequency and tree size affect establishment rateArboricultural J.2419

GriffinA.B.WrightA.N.TiltK.M.EakesJ.D.2010Post-transplant irrigation scheduling for two native deciduous shrub taxaHortScience4516201625

GunnelJ.D.GrosslP.KjelgrenR.2008Nitrogen and media assessment for first-year pot-in-pot production of container and bare root liners in the Intermountain WestJ. Environ. Hort.26247252

HargreavesG.H.AllenR.G.2003History and evaluation of Hargreaves evapotranspiration equationJ. Irr. Drain. Eng.1295363

HensleyD.L.1993Harvest method has no influence on growth of transplanted green ashJ. Arboriculture19379382

HippsN.A.DaviesM.J.DunnJ.M.GriffithsH.AtkinsonC.J.2014Effects of two contrasting canopy manipulations on growth and water use of London plane (Platanus x acerifolia) treesPlant Soil3826174

KjelgrenR.BeesonR.C.PittengerD.MontagueT.2016Simplified landscape irrigation demand estimation: SLIDE rulesAppl. Eng. Agr.(In press)

KjelgrenR.ClevelandB.1994Growth and water relations of Kentucky coffeetree and silver maple following transplantingJ. Environ. Hort.129699

KoeserA.K.StewartJ.R.BolleroG.A.BullockD.G.StruveD.K.2009Impacts of handling and transport on the growth and survival of balled-and-burlapped treesHortScience445358

LevinssonA.SaboA.FranssonA.M.2014Influence of nursery production system on water status in transplanted treesSci. Hort.178124131

MontagueT.FoxL.2008Gas exchange and growth of transplanted and nontransplanted field-grown Shumard red oak trees grown with and without organic mulchHortScience43770775

MontagueT.KjelgrenR.AllenR.WesterD.2004Water loss estimates for five recently transplanted landscape tree species in a semi-arid climateJ. Environ. Hort.22189196

RanneyT.G.BassukN.L.WhitlowT.H.1989Effect of transplanting practices on growth and water relations of ‘Colt’ cherry trees during reestablishmentJ. Environ. Hort.74145

Richardson-CalfeeL.E.HarrisJ.R.FanelliJ.K.2007Post-transplant root and shoot growth periodicity of sugar mapleJ. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.132147157

Richardson-CalfeeL.E.HarrisJ.R.2005A review of the effects of transplant timing on landscape establishment of field-grown deciduous trees in temperate climatesHortechnology15132135

RiikonenA.LindenL.PulkkinenM.NikinmaaE.2011Post-transplant crown allometry and shoot growth of two species of street treesUrban For. Urban Green.108794

ShoberA.L.MooreK.A.WieseC.ScheiberM.S.GilmanE.F.PazM.2010Native and non-native shrub post-transplant performance under low-volume irrigation in three hardiness zonesHortTechnology20751757

SchultzH.R.2003Differences in hydraulic architecture account for near isohydric and anisohydric behaviour of two field-grown Vitis vinifera L. cultivars during droughtPlant Cell Environ.2613931405

WatsonW.T.2005Influence of tree size on transplant establishment and growthHortTechnology15118122

WatsonG.W.KupowskiG.1991Soil moisture uptake by green ash trees after transplantingJ. Environ. Hort.9226227

WatsonG.W.HimelickE.B.1982Root distribution of nursery trees and its relationship to transplanting successJ. Arboriculture8225229

Article Information

Google Scholar

Metrics

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 3 3 3
Full Text Views 0 0 0
PDF Downloads 0 0 0