As decomposers, predators, and pollinators, insects play a vital role in ecosystem health, e.g., decomposers help aerate the soil, turning more soil than earthworms, and increasing soil rainwater retention and tillage (Pimentel, 2002). Predatory insects help keep the natural system in balance and prevent explosive pest population growth from taking over essential natural resources. There are over 6000 insect species that have been considered biological control agents and are being used to fight insect and weed pests (Pimentel, 2002). Moreover, countless other insect species act as pest population regulators but often go unnoticed. Insects also are a crucial part of food security in the United States, with 87 of the leading 115 food crops depending on insect pollinators (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2016).
Plants use a variety of characteristics, such as color, shape, and odor, to attract insects ensuring that these flower visitors will not leave without being dusted with pollen. Certain flower types are adapted for attracting particular insect groups, such as bees, butterflies, wasps, moths, beetles, and flies (Lázaro and Totland, 2014). Many plants depend on their mutualistic relationships with pollinating arthropods for survival. In turn, pollinators rely on flowering plants to acquire food including pollen and nectar (Kearns and Inouye, 1997).
Research shows that pollinators contribute to 35% of the world’s food production and 24 billion dollars in the U.S. economy (Astegiano et al., 2015). Likewise, native pollinators, such as bumble bees, sweat bees, and leafcutter bees, provide crop benefits that are valued at more than 9 billion dollars (Astegiano et al., 2015). Evidence suggests that pollinating insects of many important plants are declining worldwide (Astegiano et al., 2015; Fukase and Simons, 2016; NRC National Research Council, 2007). Land use, loss, and fragmentation of habitat, modern agricultural practices, and pesticide use pose great threats to insect pollinators and natural enemies (Nicholls and Altieri, 2013). Since 2006, it has been reported that western honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) colony loss rates have increased to an average of 30% each winter due to a variety of factors including loss of natural forage and inadequate diets, mite infestation and diseases, loss of genetic diversity, and exposure to certain pesticides (Astegiano et al., 2015). Other native pollinators, including bumble bees and monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus L.), have experienced population declines as well (NRC National Research Council, 2007). Systemic pesticides used in production of agricultural products, including ornamental plants, as one of the factors contributing to declining pollinator health (Astegiano et al., 2015).
Providing essential floral resources to natural enemies and pollinating insects can increase biological control and pollination (Fiedler and Landis, 2007; Woltz et al., 2012). Research suggests a diverse butterfly population can be attained through the addition of annual, perennial, and woody shrub ornamental species to a landscape (Poythress and Affolter, 2015; Wilde et al., 2015). Several studies have noted that gardens provide resources through flowers as well as nesting areas that contribute to the survival and reproduction of bees (Frankie et al., 2005; Matteson et al., 2008; McIntyre and Hostetler, 2001). Likewise by attracting pollinators and beneficial insects, ecosystem services can also be attained.
By monitoring pollinator and beneficial insect occurrence within habitat management sites through the use of sweep-net sampling and visual observations, ornamental plant species can be evaluated for their arthropod attractiveness and the provision of arthropod-mediated ecosystem services including pollination and biological control in southeastern landscapes (Kremen et al., 2007). The goal of this study was to provide detailed information on the attractiveness of a wide selection of ornamental floral resources to pollinators, natural enemies, and phytophagous insects as detailed and systematic assessment of pollinators and biological predators on plant species have been limited.
Astegiano, J., Massol, F., Vidal, M.M., Cheptou, P.O. & Guimarães, P.R. Jr 2015 The robustness of plant-pollinator assemblages: Linking plant interaction patterns and sensitivity to pollinator loss PLoS One 10 2 E0117243
Fiedler, A.K. & Landis, D.A. 2007 Attractiveness of Michigan native plants to arthropod natural enemies and herbivores Environ. Entomol. 36 4 751 765
Frankie, G.W., Thorp, R.W., Schindler, M., Hernandez, J., Ertter, B. & Rizzardi, M. 2005 Ecological patterns of bees and their host ornamental flowers in two northern California cities J. Kans. Entomol. Soc. 78 3 227 246
Fukase, J. & Simons, A. 2016 Increased pollinator activity in urban gardens with more native flora Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 14 1 297 310
Kremen, C., Williams, N., Aizen, M., Gemmill-Herren, B., LeBuhn, G., Minckley, R., Packer, L. & Potts, S. 2007 Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: A conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change Ecol. Lett. 10 4 239 314
Lázaro, A. & Totland, Ø. 2014 The influence of floral symmetry, dependence on pollinators and pollination generalization on flower size variation Ann. Bot. (Lond.) 114 1 157 165
Matteson, K.C., Ascher, J.S. & Langellotto, G.A. 2008 Bee richness and abundance in New York City urban gardens Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amer. 101 1 140 150
McIntyre, N.E. & Hostetler, M.E. 2001 Effects of urban land use on pollinator (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) communities in a desert metropolis Basic Appl. Ecol. 2 3 209 218
Nicholls, C.I. & Altieri, M.A. 2013 Plant biodiversity enhances bees and other insect pollinators in agro-ecosystems. A review Agron. Sustain. Dev. 33 2 257 274
NRC National Research Council 2007 Status of pollinators in North America. Washington, DC. Nat. Acad. Pr. 307–308
Pimentel, D. 2002 Encyclopedia of pest management, p. 1–931. 2nd ed. CRC Press, New York City, NY
Poythress, J.C. & Affolter, J.M. 2015 Gardening for wildlife: Are native plant cultivars as effective as native plants propagated from local, wild populations for promoting native insect diversity Acta Hort. 1085 487 492
SAS Institute Version 9.2 2010 SAS guide for personal computers, p. 1–429. 6th ed. SAS Institute, Cary, NC
Tuell, J.K., Fiedler, A.K., Landis, D. & Isaacs, R. 2008 Visitation by wild and managed bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) to eastern U.S. native plants for use in conservation programs Environ. Entomol. 37 3 707 718
Wilde, H.D., Gandhi, K.J. & Colson, G. 2015 State of the science and challenges of breeding landscape plants with ecological function Hort. Res. 2 1 8
Woltz, J.M., Isaacs, R. & Landis, D.A. 2012 Landscape structure and habitat management differentially influence insect natural enemies in an agricultural landscape Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 152 40 49
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2016 Pollinators Home Page. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DC. 1 Mar. 2016. <http://www.fws.gov/pollinators/>.