Turfgrass species traditionally used in residential and commercial lawns in Minnesota, such as kentucky bluegrass (P. pratensis) and perennial ryegrass (L. perenne), can require significant management inputs to maintain acceptable cover and quality. For instance, perennial ryegrass generally has better quality at lower mowing heights (3.8 cm compared with 5.0 or 6.3 cm); this increased level of maintenance also results in higher weed pressure than when the grass is maintained at higher heights of cut (Miltner et al., 2005). Kentucky bluegrass typically requires high input levels for maintaining adequate quality (DeBels et al., 2012), and may not perform as well as other species when inputs are limited (Watkins et al., 2014). Turfgrass breeders have worked to improve these species for use in lower-input situations (Bonos and Huff, 2013), but the use of alternative species is another promising approach.
A number of researchers have investigated other species for their adaptation in the north central region (NCR) of the United States and regions with similar climates. Diesburg et al. (1997) evaluated a single cultivar representing each of several grass species at multiple sites in the NCR under low-input management (20 kg N/ha/year after establishment at most locations with limited use of a broadleaf herbicide) and found that most grasses performed best at 7.6 cm. The top performing grasses at that mowing height were ‘Alta’ tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.), ‘Exeter’ colonial bentgrass (A. tenuis Sibth.), ‘Reton’ redtop (Agrostis alba L. Reton), and ‘Covar’ common sheep fescue (Festuca ovina L.). In a separate multistate trial in the NCR, Watkins et al. (2011) found that under low-input management (no fertilization after establishment, no pesticides, no irrigation) at both 5.1- and 10.2-cm mowing heights, the top performing species were colonial bentgrass, tall fescue, hard fescue [F. trachyphylla (Hackel) Krajina], and sheep fescue. Tall fescue, chewings fescue (Festuca rubra spp. fallax Thuill), hard fescue, and colonial bentgrass performed best overall in a follow-up study evaluating greater number of cultivars at 5.1 cm (Watkins et al., 2014).
It is becoming clear that there are a number of lawn grass species that can serve as alternatives to kentucky bluegrass and perennial ryegrass. Yet, for many of these alternative species, information on their performance under various management regimes is lacking. Of the species that have the greatest potential for use in the NCR under low-input management, tall fescue is the best studied, and its mowing height and fertility requirements are well established.
The species both lacking management information and representing the most potential as low-input turfgrasses in Minnesota are hard fescue and colonial bentgrass. Prairie junegrass and tufted hairgrass have also shown potential in field trials in Minnesota (Watkins and Clark, 2009; Watkins et al., 2009). These species have shown varying levels of quality when grown as turfgrass, and there are great differences in the amount of plant breeding effort that has been focused on them. Hard fescue, while underused, has been the focus of some breeding efforts since the middle of the 20th century (Bonos and Huff, 2013), whereas tufted hairgrass and prairie junegrass lacked focused breeding efforts by public breeding programs until recent decades (Watkins et al., 2013). European types of prairie junegrass have been used for a longer period by private breeders in Europe (Alderson and Sharp, 1994), although these have not been able to achieve significant market penetration in the United States.
For the most part, the mowing and fertilization requirements of these species are not well known. Hard fescue has been the focus of the most research of the four; however, the body of literature is much less developed than for other highly used cool-season turfgrass species such as perennial ryegrass and kentucky bluegrass. The objective of this study was to determine the performance of the four low-input cool-season turfgrass species under various mowing heights and nitrogen fertility regimes when grown in Minnesota.
Alderson, J. & Sharp, W.C. 1994 Grass varieties in the United States. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL
Bertin, C., Senesac, A.F., Rossi, F.S., DiTommaso, A. & Weston, L.A. 2009 Evaluation of selected fine-leaf fescue cultivars for their turfgrass quality and weed suppressive ability in field settings HortTechnology 19 660 668
Bonos, S.A. & Huff, D.R. 2013 Cool-season grasses: Biology and breeding, p. 591–660. In: J.C. Stier, B.P. Horgan, and S.A. Bonos (eds.). Turfgrass: Biology, use, and management. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI
Brilman, L. 2003 Redtop, highland bentgrass, and Idaho bentgrass, p. 207–223. In: M.D. Casler and R.R. Duncan (eds.). Turfgrass biology, genetics, and breeding. Wiley, New York, NY
Brilman, L. & Watkins, E. 2003 Hairgrasses, p. 225–231. In: M.D. Casler and R.R. Duncan (eds.). Turfgrass biology, genetics, and breeding. Wiley, New York, NY
Carpenter, P.J. & Meyer, M.H. 1999 Edina goes green part III: A survey of consumer lawn care knowledge and practices HortTechnology 9 491 494
cli-MATE 2015 St. Paul climatological observatory and national weather service Chaska weather data. Midwestern Regional Climate Center. 11 Dec. 2015 <http://mrcc.isws.illinois.edu/CLIMATE/>
DeBels, B.T., Griffith, S.E., Kreuser, W.C., Melby, E.S. & Soldat, D.J. 2012 Evaluation of mowing height and fertilizer application rate on quality and weed abundance of five home lawn grasses Weed Technol. 26 826 831
Dernoeden, P.H., Carroll, M.J. & Krouse, J.M. 1993 Weed management and tall fescue quality as influenced by mowing, nitrogen, and herbicides Crop Sci. 33 1055 1061
Dernoeden, P.H., Fidanza, M.A. & Krouse, J.M. 1998 Low maintenance performance of five Festuca species in monostands and mixtures Crop Sci. 38 434 439
Diesburg, K.L., Christians, N.E., Moore, R., Branham, B., Danneberger, T.K., Reicher, Z., Voigt, T.B., Minner, D.D. & Newman, R. 1997 Species for low-input sustainable turf in the U.S. Upper Midwest Agron. J. 89 690 694
Heckman, J.R., Liu, H., Hill, W., DeMilia, M. & Anastasia, W.L. 2000 Kentucky bluegrass responses to mowing practice and nitrogen fertility management J. Sustain. Agr. 15 25 33
Jagschitz, J.A. & Ebdon, J.S. 1985 Influence of mowing, fertilizer and herbicide on crabgrass infestation in red fescue turf. Intl. Turfgrass Soc. Res. J. 5:699–704
Johnson, P.G.J. 2013 Evaluation of Chinese and Kyrgyzstan grass germplasm collections for maintenance of green cover under limited irrigation in western North America Intl. Turfgrass Soc. Res. J. 12 305 317
Leinauer, B., Serena, M. & Singh, D. 2010 Seed coating and seeding rate effects on turfgrass germination and establishment HortTechnology 20 179 185
McKernan, D.K., Ross, J.B. & Tompkins, D.K. 2001 Evaluation of grasses grown under low maintenance conditions Intl. Turfgrass Soc. Res. J. 9 25 32
Miltner, E.D., Stahnke, G.K. & Rinehart, G.J. 2005 Mowing height, nitrogen rate, and organic and synthetic fertilizer effects on perennial ryegrass quality and pest occurrence Intl. Turfgrass Soc. Res. J. 10 982 988
Mintenko, A.S., Smith, S.R. & Cattani, D.J. 2002 Turfgrass evaluation of native grasses for the northern Great Plains region Crop Sci. 42 2018 2024
Rinehart, G.J., Miltner, E.D. & Stahnke, G.K. 2005 Nitrogen rate and mowing height effects on turfgrass quality and thatch development of colonial, velvet, and dryland bentgrasses Intl. Turfgrass Soc. Res. J. 10 422 427
Watkins, E., Bonos, S.A., Clark, M.D. & Meyer, W.A. 2009 Ploidy determination of tufted hairgrass germplasm using flow cytometry Intl. Turfgrass Soc. Res. J. 11 599 605
Watkins, E., Brilman, L. & Kopec, D. 2013 Development of native grasses for turf, p. 661–681. In: J.C. Stier, B.P. Horgan, and S.A. Bonos (eds). Turfgrass: Biology, use, and management. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI
Watkins, E., Fei, S., Gardner, D., Stier, J., Bughrara, S., Li, D., Bigelow, C., Schleicher, L., Horgan, B. & Diesburg, K. 2011 Low-input turfgrass species for the north central United States. Appl. Turfgrass Sci. doi: 10.1094/ATS-2011-0126-02-RS.
Watkins, E., Gardner, D.S., Stier, J.C., Soldat, D.J., St. John, R.A., Christians, N.E., Hathaway, A.D., Diesburg, K.L., Poppe, S.R. & Gaussoin, R.E. 2014 Cultivar performance of low-input turfgrass species for the north central United States. Appl. Turfgrass Sci. doi: 10.2134/ats-2013-0101-rs.
Watkins, E. & Meyer, W.A. 2005 Evaluation of tufted hairgrass germplasm as low-maintenance turf Intl. Turfgrass Soc. Res. J. 10 666 673
Yue, C., Hugie, K. & Watkins, E. 2012 Are consumers willing to pay more for low-input turfgrasses on residential lawns? Evidence from choice experiments J. Agr. Appl. Econ. 44 549 560