Advertisement
LI-Cor Connect 2023

 

Nitrogen Management in Organic Processing Tomato Production: Nitrogen Sufficiency Prediction Through Early-season Soil and Plant Monitoring

Authors:
S. Castro Bustamante Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616

Search for other papers by S. Castro Bustamante in
This Site
Google Scholar
Close
and
T.K. Hartz Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616

Search for other papers by T.K. Hartz in
This Site
Google Scholar
Close

Abstract

Organic processing tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) production is a significant industry in California, yet little nitrogen (N) fertility research is available to guide N management. A total of 37 certified organic processing tomato fields in the Sacramento Valley of California were monitored during the 2012 and 2013 production seasons, with two objectives: 1) to document current N management practices and 2) to investigate the utility of early-season soil and plant N monitoring techniques in predicting seasonal crop N sufficiency. Between ≈3 and 11 weeks after transplanting (WAT) soil mineral N (SMN), leaf N and petiole NO3-N were determined every other week. In 22 fields, whole plant N concentration at ≈11 WAT was determined as a measure of crop N sufficiency. Growers were surveyed regarding N management practices used and fruit yields achieved. Net N mineralization (Nmin) was measured for 20 fields soils by aerobic laboratory incubation. Carbon mineralization (Cmin) in 24 hours following rewetting of air-dried soil and water extractable organic nitrogen (WEON) and carbon (WEOC) were also determined and evaluated as predictors of Nmin. Nitrogen management was primarily based on the application of manure or manure compost in the fall. Organic fertilizers were applied mainly in spring (pre- and post-transplanting). SMN in the top 60 cm at 3 WAT ranged from 6 to 32 mg·kg−1. About 30% of fields were N deficient by 11 WAT. Sensitivity analysis showed that SMN (whether measured from 0 to 30 or 0 to 60 cm) and leaf N at 5 WAT correctly predicted late-season plant N status in >60% of the fields. Nmin in 28 days ranged from 8 to 31 mg·kg−1, representing an average of 2% of total soil N. Correlation between Nmin and Cmin was weak (r = 0.44, P = 0.051) while stronger correlations were observed between Nmin and WEOC, WEON and total soil N (r = 0.63, 0.61 and 0.51, respectively, all P < 0.03). A multiple linear regression model that used 3 WAT SMN (0–30 cm) and WEON as independent variables improved Nmin prediction (adj. R2 = 0.67). Significant fruit yield increase with sidedress N application of feather meal at 5–6 WAT was observed in 2 of 4 field trials, demonstrating the ability to remedy a soil N limitation identified by early-season N monitoring.

California is a leader in the organic production of processing tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.), with >3,400 ha produced annually (Klonsky, 2010). Nitrogen is often the most limiting nutrient in organic vegetable production systems, especially in high N demand crops such as tomato (Gaskell and Smith, 2007). Not only must organic soil management provide sufficient plant-available N to maximize crop productivity, but also do so in a timely manner to ensure that crops are not N limited at any growth stage. Achieving synchrony between soil N availability and crop N demand has been recognized as a central challenge of organic N management (Berry et al., 2002; Bhogal et al., 2001; Gaskell and Smith, 2007; Gill et al., 1995; Hatch et al., 1991).

Processing tomato has a high N requirement for peak production. Hartz and Bottoms (2009) reported a mean aboveground biomass N accumulation of 296 kg·ha−1 in high yield conventionally farmed fields. Crop N uptake was slow in the initial month after transplanting, with the rate increasing to >4 kg·ha−1·d−1 during fruit set and early ripening. This pattern of crop N uptake highlights the problem of synchronizing N availability in organic production. The rate of Nmin from cover crops or organic amendments incorporated before planting has been shown to peak before the period of highest crop N demand (Gaskell and Smith, 2007). This suggests that measuring SMN (NH4-N and NO3-N) concentration after transplanting, but before rapid crop N uptake, might be useful in predicting the N sufficiency of organic fields (Muramoto et al., 2011). The value of considering residual SMN in determining sidedress N requirement has been documented in conventional production of many crops (Breschini and Hartz, 2002; Fox et al., 1989; Hartz et al., 2000; Heckman et al., 1995, 2002; Krusekopf et al., 2002), but the utility of this practice in organic vegetable production has not been widely investigated.

The ability to predict seasonal soil Nmin potential would also be useful to inform in-season N management. In recent years, several laboratory methods for soil Nmin prediction have been proposed that could be practical for routine agronomic use. Short-term Cmin following rewetting of dry soil has been reported to correlate well with soil Nmin, as measured in longer term, aerobic soil incubation (Haney et al., 2001, 2008a, 2008b). The measurement of WEOC and WEON has been reported to be highly correlated with Cmin, and this additional information regarding the labile C:N ratio may improve soil Nmin prediction (Haney et al., 2012).

Plant tissue analysis has been widely used to document crop N sufficiency. For tomato, leaf N and petiole NO3-N sufficiency standards are available (Hartz et al., 1998; Jones et al., 1991; Lorenz and Tyler, 1983). Historically, tissue N analysis has been used as a measure of current sufficiency; it is unclear from existing literature the degree to which tissue analysis can give inference on future N fertilization requirement.

There is little data available on efficient N management in organic processing tomato production, or the adequacy of current practices to maximize productivity. Similarly, data are lacking on the effectiveness of soil and tissue N monitoring in guiding in-season N management. This study was undertaken with two objectives. First, to document current N management practices in organic tomato production in the Sacramento Valley of California. Second, to investigate the utility of soil and plant N monitoring in predicting seasonal crop N sufficiency, and the need for in-season N fertilization.

Materials and Methods

Field monitoring.

A total of 37 certified organic processing tomato fields were monitored during the 2012 and 2013 productions seasons, 10 fields in 2012, and 27 fields in 2013. All fields were located in the Sacramento Valley of California (about lat. 38°50′N, long. 121°50′ W). Fields were transplanted between 3 Apr. and 1 May in 2012 and between 18 Mar. and 10 May in 2013; a total of 13 hybrid, determinate processing cultivars were used. The planting configuration was 1.5-m wide soil beds, with either one or two rows of plants per bed. Plant population ranged from ≈16,000 to 20,000 plants/ha. All fields were furrow irrigated except field 19, which was drip irrigated. Information regarding all fertility-related practices (cover cropping, organic fertilizer, and amendment applications) and data on the marketable yields achieved were obtained from the cooperating growers records.

Soil samples (top 30 cm) were collected in all fields at 2-week intervals from ≈3 to 11 WAT; each sample was composed of at least 12 soil cores (2.5 cm diameter) representing each of two locations within the bed (in the plant rows, and midway between the plant row and the edge of the bed). These soil cores were collected in a “X” pattern throughout the field to encompass field variability, and were composited to form a single sample per field for each collection date. At the first sampling date in each field soil samples from 30 to 60 cm depth were also collected in the same manner. Soil mineral N was determined in 2 N KCl extracts of field-moist soil by the spectrophotometric methods of Doane and Horwath (2003, for NO3-N) and Forster (1995, for NH4-N).

Additional analyses were conducted on the initial 0–30 cm sample collected from each field. Soil texture was quantified by the hydrometer method by Sheldrick and Wang (1993). Phosphorus availability was estimated by the bicarbonate extraction method by Olsen and Sommers (1982). Soil organic matter (SOM) was estimated by the procedure by Storer (1984). Total soil N and C were determined by combustion using an Elemental Combustion System 4010 (Costech Analytical Technologies Inc., Valencia, CA).

About 36 recently mature leaves were collected on each soil sampling date. On half of these leaves the petioles were detached from leaf blades. Whole leaf and petiole samples were oven-dried at 65 °C to constant mass and ground to pass a 0.4 mm mesh. Whole leaf N concentration was determined by the same procedure as for total soil N. Petiole NO3-N was determined spectrophotometrically (Doane and Horwath, 2003) after extraction with 2% acetic acid.

Overall, crop N status was evaluated in 22 of the 37 fields at ≈11 WAT by determining whole plant N concentration, and comparing it to the critical N concentration for processing tomato (Nc, the minimum whole plant N concentration required to maximize growth) developed by Tei et al. (2002) and confirmed for California conditions by Hartz and Bottoms (2009). In each of these fields, which were at the early red fruit growth stage, aboveground plant biomass was estimated by collecting all plant tissue in six representative 60 cm sections of soil bed. Each sample was divided into vegetative material and fruit, and the fresh weight of each was recorded. Subsamples of both tissue types were prepared by randomly selecting 10–15 fruit, or 0.5–1.0 kg of intact braches of vine (stems and leaves). These subsamples were oven dried at 65 °C, reweighed and total crop dry biomass was calculated. Dry tissue was ground to pass a 0.4 mm mesh (Thomas Wiley® Mini-Mill, Swedesboro, NJ) and the N concentration of both tissue types was determined as previously described for leaf tissue. Aboveground biomass N and whole plant N concentration were calculated.

To adjust for the effects of season and planting date on the rate of crop development cumulative growing degree days (GDD) from the date of transplanting were calculated based on air temperature data obtained from the California Irrigation Management Information System [CIMIS, Pruitt et al., 1987, stations #6 (Davis), 32 (Colusa), 139 (Winters), and 226 (Woodland)]. Fields were generally within 10 km of the monitoring station. Daily GDD was calculated using a single sine method (Allen, 1976) with upper and lower thresholds temperature of 30 and 10 °C, respectively. For phenological reference, 300, 600, and 900 GDD roughly corresponded to early bloom, full bloom, and early red fruit growth stages.

Sidedress N trials.

Four field trials were conducted in 2013 to evaluate crop response to sidedress N application. These trials were conducted in fields 12, 16, and 18, and in an organically managed processing tomato field at the UC Russell Ranch (RR) Sustainable Agriculture facility near Winters, CA. The cultivars planted were Nunhems 6404 (fields 12 and 18), Seminis 4606 (field 16), and Seminis AB2 (RR). All fields were furrow irrigated. Transplanting occurred on 13 Apr. (field 12), 21 Mar. (field 16), 21 Mar. (field 18), and 17 Apr. (RR). Each trial was conducted using a randomized complete block experimental design with six replications. Experimental units were three 1.5 m beds wide by 30 m long in the commercial fields, and 23 m long at RR. The treatments compared were in-season N sidedressing, and no in-season N application. All data were collected from the middle bed of each plot.

Fields 16 and 18 were sidedressed on 3 May with a feather meal-based fertilizer (12N–1.3P–0K) at a rate of 30 kg·ha−1 N. Field 12 was sidedressed 15 May with feather meal (12N–0P–0K) at 34 kg·ha−1 N. The RR trial was sidedressed on 20 May using a feather meal-based fertilizer (12N–1.3P–0K) at a rate of 35 kg·ha−1 N. Immediately before the sidedress N application 8 soil cores were collected from 0 to 30 and 30 to 60 cm deep in each block at all trial sites. Recently mature whole leaves were collected concurrently with soil sampling. About 4 weeks after N sidedressing leaf and petiole samples were again collected in each replicate plot of both treatments. SMN, leaf N, and petiole NO3-N were determined as previously described.

In the commercial fields, fruit yields were determined several days before the growers’ once over, mechanical harvest by manually harvesting all fruit in a 5 m section in each plot. At RR, a mechanical harvest was done in a 15 m section of each plot. In all fields, an 18 L sample of randomly selected fruit from each plot was collected for quality determination. Fruit were graded to separate intact, marketable red fruit from cull fruit (green, rot, and sunburn); fruit size was not evaluated as it is not an important quality parameter for processing tomatoes. A total of 4 kg samples of marketable fruit were transported to the Processing Tomato Advisory Board inspection station in Dixon, CA. There the fruit were mechanically juiced and soluble solids’ concentration were measured by refractometer according to the standard industry protocol.

Soil Nmin potential.

Additional analyses were performed on the first soil samples (0–30 cm depth) collected in 20 of the 37 monitored fields (10 from 2012 and 10 from 2013) to evaluate net Nmin potential. Soils were air-dried and sieved through 2 mm mesh, then analyzed for SMN as previously outlined. Nmin was determined by aerobic incubation at constant moisture and temperature. In 2012, this was accomplished by placing 40 g of dry soil in 50 mL beakers and wetting to 50% water-filled pore space (WFPS), as estimated by the method of Haney and Haney (2010). Three replicate beakers of each field soil were incubated in sealed 300 mL glass jars at 25 °C for 28 d; the jars were vented after 7 d to maintain aerobic conditions. After 28 d the soil samples were extracted in 2 N KCl and SMN was determined. Nitrogen mineralization was calculated as the increase in mineral N over the incubation period. In 2013 the incubation assay was performed with 14 g samples of dry soil placed in 50 mL centrifuge tubes. Soils were wetted to 50% WFPS, and incubated at 25 °C in sealed 1 L glass jars, 4 tubes per jar. After 7, 28, 42, and 70 d four replicate tubes of each soil were extracted with 40 mL 2 N KCl for determination of mineral N, as previously described.

Three additional laboratory soil analyses were conducted. Cmin in 24 h following rewetting of air-dried soil was determined by a proprietary procedure, the Solvita® test (Haney et al., 2008a, 2008b). Cmin analysis was performed on triplicate samples of each field soil. Water-extractable organic C and N (WEOC, WEON) were measured by the procedure of Haney et al. (2012). WEOC and WEON were measured on duplicate samples of each field soil.

Statistical analysis.

Correlation and regression analyses were performed using SigmaStat imbedded in SigmaPlot version 11 (Systat Sofware, Inc., San Jose, CA). N sidedressing effects on plant N status and fruit yield were evaluated using the GLM procedure and Tukey’s Studentized range test provided by the SAS statistical package (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, version 9.3). Sensitivity analysis (Pannell, 1997) was performed to assess the ability to predict the development of late-season crop N deficiency from early-season soil and plant monitoring.

Results

Field monitoring.

Field soils ranged in texture from loam to clay, and pH from 6.1 to 7.7 (Table 1). Soil organic matter varied from 13 to 30 g·kg−1. Soil mineral N at 3 WAT ranged from 6 to 43 mg·kg−1 (top 30 cm) and 6 to 32 mg·kg−1 (0–60 cm), with >90% in NO3-N form in all fields. Large differences in bicarbonate extractable (Olsen) soil P (4–98 mg·kg−1) were also observed.

Table 1.

Soil characteristics, nitrogen management practices and marketable (Mkt.) yield for 37 organic processing tomato fields.

Table 1.

Substantial differences in fertility management were apparent in the grower-reported practices. Most fields received a fall application of manure or manure compost (Table 1). Three fields received a spring, pretransplanting application of compost, whereas in 14 fields an organic fertilizer (typically a high-N content material such as feather meal) was applied before transplanting. A post-transplanting application of fertilizer was made in 11 fields, with common materials being feather meal and Chilean nitrate (NaNO3). Pre- and post-transplanting fertilization was typically limited to <35 kg·ha−1 N. Field 10 was the only field in which a winter cover crop was grown preceding tomato planting. Marketable fruit yield varied from 38 to 116 t·ha−1, averaging 86 t·ha−1; for context, mean fruit yield in conventionally grown Sacramento Valley fields in these years was ≈105 t·ha−1.

Across years, SMN declined as the season progressed [Fig. 1; ln(SMN) = 3.285 − (0.00197 × GDD), r = 0.55, P < 0.001]. By the full bloom growth stage (roughly 9 WAT), most fields had <10 mg·kg−1 SMN. At the last sample date (which roughly corresponded to the early red fruit growth stage), SMN in many fields was <5 mg·kg−1.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

Trends in soil mineral N (0–30 cm depth) in 37 fields produced during the 2012 (●) and 2013 (○) growing seasons; 300, 600 and 900 growing degree days corresponded to early bloom, full bloom and early red fruit growth stages.

Citation: HortScience horts 50, 7; 10.21273/HORTSCI.50.7.1055

Leaf N concentration also declined as the season progressed in both years [Fig. 2; Leaf N = 57.78 − (0.0313 × GDD), r = 0.75, P < 0.001]. In 16 fields, the last sample showed leaf N below the sufficiency level proposed by Hartz et al. (1998); in only 11 fields was the last leaf sample below the sufficiency guidelines of Lorenz and Tyler (1983). Both reference standards were based on determinate, processing cultivars grown in California. It should be noted that the sufficiency guidelines of Hartz et al. (1998) were developed from an industry survey of conventional fields, and were acknowledged to likely be higher than actually required for optimum growth. By the last sampling date, leaf N varied from <20 to >40 g·kg−1, suggesting a wide range of crop N status among fields.

Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

Trends in leaf N concentration in 37 fields produced during the 2012 (●) and 2013 (○) growing seasons; 300, 600, and 900 growing degree days corresponded to early bloom, full bloom and early red fruit growth stages. N sufficiency standards proposed by Hartz et al. (1998; black line) and Lorenz and Tyler (1983; gray line).

Citation: HortScience horts 50, 7; 10.21273/HORTSCI.50.7.1055

Petiole NO3-N concentration showed a more rapid decline through the season [Fig. 3; Petiole NO3-N = 14.8 − (0.017 × GDD), r = 0.82, P < 0.001]. Initial values (3 WAT) ranged from 6 to 18 g·kg−1, with 11 WAT values <2 g·kg−1 in most fields. The majority of petiole samples in both years fell below the NO3-N sufficiency level suggested by Lorenz and Tyler (1983). However, the validity of that standard appeared questionable, as Hartz and Bottoms (2009) reported that even high-yield conventional fields had lower petiole NO3-N at full bloom and beyond. Compared with the conventional field data reported by Hartz and Bottoms (2009), a number of these organic fields showed much steeper decline in petiole NO3-N, dropping below 5 g·kg−1 earlier in the season.

Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.

Trends in petiole NO3-N concentration in 37 fields produced during the 2012 (●) and 2013 (○) growing seasons; 300, 600, and 900 growing degree days corresponded to early bloom, full bloom and early red fruit growth stages. NO3-N sufficiency standards proposed by Lorenz and Tyler (1983; gray line).

Citation: HortScience horts 50, 7; 10.21273/HORTSCI.50.7.1055

Eight of the 22 fields in which 11 WAT plant biomass samples were collected had whole plant N concentration below Nc, suggesting N deficiency (Fig. 4). Nc declines over time, as older leaves senesce and fruit constitutes a larger fraction of plant biomass; therefore, Nc is expressed as a function of aboveground dry biomass. Fields 1, 4, 5, 6, 10, 11, 15, and 33 were those presumed to be N-deficient. Marketable fruit yield in these fields averaged only 66 t·ha−1, whereas the fields of assumed N sufficiency (those with whole plant N greater than Nc) averaged 89 t·ha−1. Biomass N at 11 WAT averaged 122 kg·ha−1 in N-deficient fields compared with 200 kg·ha−1 in the N-sufficient fields.

Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.

Whole plant total N concentration at ≈11 weeks after transplanting (WAT) in 22 fields sampled during the 2012 (●) and 2013 (○) growing seasons; whole plant critical N concentration (Nc) from Tei et al. (2002, gray line).

Citation: HortScience horts 50, 7; 10.21273/HORTSCI.50.7.1055

Sensitivity analysis (Pannell, 1997) was conducted to determine the accuracy of early-season soil or plant monitoring in predicting the development of N deficiency later in the season. Two criteria were used to assess N deficiency: leaf N at 11 WAT below the sufficiency level of Lorenz and Tyler (1983), or whole plant N concentration at 11 WAT below Nc (Tei et al., 2002). In this analysis, classification of a field at or above a specified level of the early-season monitoring variable that was subsequently diagnosed as N sufficient was considered an accurate diagnosis. Similarly, fields below the early monitoring threshold that became N deficient were accurate diagnoses. Fields at or above a specified level of the early monitoring variable that were later diagnosed as N-deficient were classified as “false positive.” Conversely, fields below the specified level of the early-season monitoring variable that were later diagnosed as N-sufficient were classified as “false negative.”

SMN at 3 WAT showed promise as a predictor of late season N deficiency (Fig. 5). SMN correctly predicted late season plant N status in 60% to 80% of fields. Fields below 10–15 mg·kg−1 (whether measured at 0–30 or 0–60 cm) were likely to become N deficient, whereas those above this range were likely to remain N sufficient. As a practical matter, using the higher end of this range would be agronomically justified, as it would lessen the likelihood of classifying a field as N sufficient when in fact it would become N-deficient (a false positive diagnosis).

Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.

Sensitivity analysis of 3-week after transplanting (WAT) soil mineral N (0–30 or 0–60 cm depth), comparing various threshold values as predictors of late-season N deficiency, as evaluated by comparison of 11 WAT leaf N with proposed sufficiency standards (Lorenz and Tyler, 1983) or by comparison of 11 WAT whole plant N concentration with proposed whole plant critical N concentration (Tei et al., 2002).

Citation: HortScience horts 50, 7; 10.21273/HORTSCI.50.7.1055

Similarly, leaf N at 5 WAT between 42 and 50 g·kg−1 correctly predicted late season plant N status in ≈70% of fields (Fig. 6). Using the upper end of that range (48–50 g·kg−1) as an action threshold would minimize the false positive risk. Petiole NO3-N at 5 WAT was a less useful diagnostic. Use of a 9 g·kg−1 threshold appeared to be a reasonable compromise between overall diagnostic accuracy and false positive minimization.

Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.

Sensitivity analysis of 5-week after transplanting (WAT) leaf N or petiole NO3-N, comparing various threshold values as predictors of late-season N deficiency, as evaluated by comparison of 11 WAT leaf N with proposed sufficiency standards (Lorenz and Tyler, 1983) or by comparison of 11 WAT whole plant N concentration with proposed whole plant critical N concentration (Tei et al., 2002).

Citation: HortScience horts 50, 7; 10.21273/HORTSCI.50.7.1055

Sidedress N trials.

The fields in which replicated sidedress N trials were conducted varied in pre-sidedress SMN from 15 to 17 mg·kg−1 (0–30 cm) and 11 to 20 mg·kg−1 (0–60 cm, Table 2). In all fields, N application significantly increased leaf N ≈4 weeks after sidedressing, whereas petiole NO3-N was significantly increased in two of the four fields. This confirmed that feather meal mineralized rapidly, as reported by Hartz and Johnstone (2006a). Total fruit yield was significantly increased with sidedress N by 8% and 14% in field 16 and at RR, respectively. No yield response to N sidedressing was observed in the other fields. In the responsive fields, marketable yield was increased by about the same percentages, but within-treatment variability in cull percentage reduced the statistical significance of the treatment differences (P = 0.12 and 0.11 in field 16 and at RR, respectively). N sidedressing did not affect fruit soluble solids at any site.

Table 2.

Effects of nitrogen sidedressing on organic processing tomato fruit yield and crop N status.

Table 2.

Applying the 10–15 mg·kg−1, SMN threshold suggested by the sensitivity analysis on the 0–30 cm soil depth, none of these fields would have been expected to be responsive to sidedress N. However, based on 0–60 cm SMN, three of the four fields may have been responsive, including both sites at which total fruit yield increased. These results suggested that while 0–30 cm SMN and 0–60 SMN were highly correlated (r = 0.87, P < 0.01), 0–60 cm measurement provided a more comprehensive evaluation of soil N supply. Three fields, including both responsive fields, were at the upper end of the leaf N threshold range suggested by the sensitivity analysis. Although both responsive fields had lower petiole NO3-N than the nonresponsive fields, only field 16 was lower than the proposed 9 g·kg−1 sensitivity analysis threshold.

Soil Nmin.

Net Nmin in 28 d of incubation ranged from 8 to 31 mg·kg−1, averaging 22 mg·kg−1. On the basis of the longer term (70 d) incubation performed on 2013 soils a logarithmic function best described Nmin over time [Nmin (mg·kg−1) = 4.643 ln(days) + 5.628, R2 = 0.29, P = 0.0002). Nmin increased between 28 and 70 d of incubation by only 13% on average. Net Nmin in 28 d represented an average of ∼2% of total soil N, similar to prior studies on California soils in annual crop rotations (Hartz et al., 2000; Krusekopf et al., 2002).

Carbon mineralization, WEON and WEOC ranged between 20 and 47 mg·kg−1 C, 5 and 21 mg·kg−1 N, and 131 and 428 mg·kg−1 C, respectively. Correlation of Nmin to Cmin was weak (r = 0.44, P = 0.051, Table 3). Stronger correlations were observed between Nmin and WEOC, WEON, and total soil N as r = 0.63, 0.61, and 0.51, respectively, (all P < 0.03). Soil mineral N at 3 WAT was also correlated with Nmin (r = 0.56 and 0.54 in the 0–30 and 0–60 cm depths, respectively). Stepwise (backward) regression analysis using the five independent variables most highly correlated with Nmin (total soil N, SMN: 0–30 cm, SMN: 0–60 cm, WEON and WEOC) showed that a two variable model [Nmin = 7.659 + 0.303 (SMN: 0–30 cm) + 0.629 (WEON)] dramatically improved prediction of Nmin (adj. R2 = 0.67, P < 0.001, Fig. 7).

Table 3.

Correlation (r) of soil characteristics with soil N mineralization potential, as estimated by a 28 d aerobic incubation at 25 °C.

Table 3.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.

Observed (●) and predicted (plane) values of 0–28 d net N mineralization (mg·kg−1) from a multiple linear regression model using 0–30 cm soil mineral N (X1, mg·kg−1) and water extractable organic N (WEON, X2, mg·kg−1) as independent variables (Y = 0.303 × X1 + 0.629 × X2 + 7.659).

Citation: HortScience horts 50, 7; 10.21273/HORTSCI.50.7.1055

Discussion

Providing sufficient available soil N to achieve maximum crop productivity is a challenge in organic production systems. A cornerstone of organic N management is the use of legume cover crops (Gaskell et al., 2011; Gosling and Ryans, 2005). However, in this study, the use of cover crops was uncommon (only one of the 37 fields monitored had a cover crop preceding tomato planting). Cover cropping in this production system presents logistical hurdles; primarily, the inability in wet years to incorporate cover crop biomass in a timely manner to allow relatively early spring tomato planting. Since the contract with the tomato-processing company specifies harvest timing, growers do not have the luxury of delaying spring planting to make cover cropping more practical.

In lieu of cover cropping, these growers used the application of manure, compost, and organic fertilizers to provide N fertility. The cooperating growers clearly differed in their use of these materials, as suggested both by the management records provided, and by the wide range of soil P availability among fields. Manures have relatively high P:N ratios, and reliance on such products to supply N results in soil P buildup (Daniel et al., 1994; Maltais-Landry et al., 2015). Fields ranged from 4 to 98 mg·kg−1 bicarbonate extractable P, averaging 39 mg·kg−1. For context, Hartz et al. (1998) reported that the mean soil extractable P level of conventionallymanaged California processing tomato fields was 18 mg·kg−1. This soil P buildup in organic culture has potential environmental implications, as winter surface runoff from Sacramento Valley fields is common, and soil P level is strongly predictive of P concentration in runoff (Hartz and Johnstone, 2006b).

Processing tomato is a high-N demand crop. Hartz and Bottoms (2009) reported that for high-yielding drip-irrigated tomato fields (mean fruit yield of 143 Mg·ha−1) the mean critical N uptake requirement (Nupt, the N uptake required to maintain whole plant N above Nc and therefore nonlimiting to growth) averaged ≈260 kg·ha−1. At a realistic yield goal for furrow-irrigated organic processing tomato fields (100–120 Mg·ha−1, based on the high-yielding fields in this study), Nupt would be proportionally lower, in the range of 180–220 kg·ha−1. That estimate matched the biomass N uptake observed in fields deemed N-sufficient, which averaged 200 kg·ha−1 by 11 WAT.

In this study, SMN (0–60 cm) at 3 WAT ranged from 6 to 32 mg·kg−1. At a typical soil bulk density of 1.35 g·cm3, each mg·kg−1 SMN represented ≈8 kg·ha−1 N in the top 60 cm of soil. Therefore the observed SMN range was ≈50–260 kg·ha−1, with a mean of 130 kg·ha−1. Soil Nmin potential represented a similar amount of N supply. Nmin ranged from 8 to 31 mg·kg−1, or ≈30–120 kg N/ha in the top 30 cm of soil in 28 d, and marginally higher in 70 d. While in the field the majority of Nmin occurs in the top 30 cm of soil (Cassman and Munns, 1980; Hadas et al., 1986), substantial Nmin can occur below that depth, suggesting that in-field Nmin over a production season may be still higher.

These calculations highlight several important points about organic N management. First, residual SMN was clearly important in determining the adequacy of soil N supply because in most fields SMN represented >50% of crop N requirement, and in some fields SMN alone was adequate to support the entire crop, absent leaching by irrigation. Second, these fields differed substantially in soil Nmin potential, and practical laboratory tests that accurately rank this potential could be useful in predicting N sidedressing requirements in fields with low to intermediate SMN. Unfortunately, we found Cmin, WEON, and WEOC to be less strongly correlated to Nmin than did Haney et al. (2001, 2008b, 2012). However, the combination of WEON and SMN (0–30 cm) was highly predictive of Nmin, and appeared to provide timely and practical guidance. The relationship between Nmin and SMN may be unique to semiarid areas such as the Sacramento Valley in which NO3-N leaching by rainfall is limited, and it could be confounded by seasonal or management effects.

In this study, sensitivity analysis suggested an action threshold range of 10–15 mg·kg−1 for post-transplanting SMN; without N sidedressing, N deficiency was likely to develop in fields below this range, and unlikely in fields above it. This finding agreed with Krusekopf et al. (2002). Working in conventionally farmed California tomato fields, they found that only 4 of 10 fields were responsive to N sidedressing, all with post-transplanting SMN <16 mg·kg−1. They also reported that SMN varied from 4 to 29 mg·kg−1, similar to the range observed in these organic fields.

The similarity of the results of Krusekopf et al. (2002) with those of this study suggests that N dynamics in organic production are not radically different from in conventional production. In both systems, residual SMN plays a significant role in crop fertility. Organically managed soils, by virtue of higher organic N content, may have somewhat higher Nmin potential. However, in neither system does Nmin keep pace with crop N uptake during the peak uptake phase of the season. This was demonstrated by the substantial decline in SMN over the season in all organic fields. Furthermore, leaf N and Nc diagnostic criteria developed for conventional production appeared to be applicable to organic production.

Obtaining a fruit yield response to N sidedressing as late as 5–6 WAT (as occurred in the N trials) confirmed that early-season soil and plant monitoring can be practical N management tools. Because >60% of the N in high-N fertilizers such as feather meal can mineralize within 4 weeks at summer soil temperature (Hartz and Johnstone, 2006a), a relatively high N uptake efficiency should be possible, as was suggested by the significantly enhanced crop N status documented in the sidedress N trials. SMN sampling earlier than 3 WAT would give a grower more time to respond to the test result, but may require a lower action threshold. Tissue sampling earlier than 4–5 WAT would be of questionable value, given the slow growth rate in the initial WAT, and potential carryover effects of the initial N status of the transplants, which can vary considerably (Hartz et al., 2002).

There is a level of inaccuracy inherent in predicting seasonal N sufficiency from early-season monitoring because factors other than soil N supply can affect crop N status. In particular, excessive irrigation could result in nitrate leaching, and inadequate irrigation could restrict root development. Weed competition, a serious problem in some organic fields, could also limit crop N uptake. These (or other) management factors may have been responsible for some of the false positive results of the sensitivity analysis.

Given the high value of organic processing tomatoes (in recent years >$100 per Mg), sidedressing an organic fertilizer such as feather meal can be a profitable practice despite the high cost of this material (currently about $8 per kg N). Sidedressing 30–35 kg·ha−1 N increased total fruit yield by 8 and 16 Mg·ha−1 in the responsive fields, which represented a clear economic benefit. The fact that only 30% of fields became N deficient highlights the importance of being able to accurately identify fields potentially responsive to in-season N fertilization.

The results of this study have implications for the organic production of other high-N demand vegetable crops. Because in-season soil Nmin appears unlikely to keep pace with crop N uptake, fields that do not begin the season with substantial SMN are at greater risk of developing yield-limiting N deficiency. Although SMN and leaf N action thresholds may be crop and production area specific, we hypothesize that early-season soil and plant N monitoring could provide practical guidance to in-season N management across a range of organically produced crops. Laboratory proxy measurement of soil Nmin such as WEON may be a useful adjunct to soil and plant testing.

Literature Cited

  • Allen, J.C. 1976 A modified sine wave method for calculating degree-days Environ. Entomol. 5 388 396

  • Berry, P.M., Sylvester-Bradley, R., Philipps, L., Hatch, D.J., Cuttle, S.P., Ryans, F.W. & Gosling, P. 2002 Is the productivity of organic farms restricted by the supply of available nitrogen? Soil Use Mgt. 18 248 255

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bhogal, A., Shepherd, M.A., Hatch, D.J., Brown, L. & Jarvis, S.C. 2001 Evaluation of two N cycle models for the prediction of N mineralization from grassland soils in the UK Soil Use Mgt. 17 163 172

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cassman, K.G. & Munns, D.N. 1980 Nitrogen mineralization as affected by soil moisture, temperature and depth Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 44 1233 1237

  • Breschini, S.J. & Hartz, T.K. 2002 Presidedress soil nitrate testing reduces nitrogen fertilizer use and nitrate leaching hazard in lettuce production HortScience 37 1061 1064

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Daniel, T.C., Sharpley, A.N., Edwards, D.R., Wedepohl, R. & Lemunyon, J.L. 1994 Minimizing surface water eutrophication from agriculture by phosphorus management J. Soil Water Conserv. 49 30 38

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Doane, T.A. & Horwath, W.R. 2003 Spectrophotometric determination of nitrate with a single reagent Anal. Lett. 36 2713 2722

  • Forster, J.C. 1995 Soil nitrogen, p. 79–87. In: K. Alef and P. Nannipieri (eds.). Methods in applied soil microbiology and biochemistry. Academic Press, San Diego, CA

  • Fox, R.H., Roth, G.W., Iversen, K.V. & Piekielek, W.P. 1989 Soil and tissue nitrate tests compared for predicting soil nitrogen availability to corn Agron. J. 81 971 974

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gaskell, M. & Smith, R. 2007 Nitrogen sources for organic vegetable crops HortTechnology 17 431 441

  • Gaskell, M., Smith, R.F., Mitchell, J., Koike, S.T., Fouche, C., Hartz, T.K., Horwarth, W. & Jackson, L. 2011 Soil fertility management for organic crops, p. 29–38. In: M.E. McGiffen, Jr. (ed.). Organic vegetable production manual. University of California. Publication 3509

  • Gill, K., Jarvis, S.C. & Hatch, D.J. 1995 Mineralization of nitrogen in long-term pasture soils: Effects of management Plant Soil 172 153 162

  • Gosling, P. & Ryans, F. 2005 Fertility building, p. 67–98. In: G. Davis and M. Lennartsson (eds.). Organic vegetable production a complete Guide. 1st ed. Crowood Press, Wiltshire, UK

  • Hadas, A., Feigenbaum, S., Feigin, A. & Portnoy, R. 1986 Nitrogen mineralization in profiles of differently managed soil types Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 50 314 319

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Haney, R.L., Hons, F.M., Sanderson, M.A. & Franzluebbers, A.J. 2001 A rapid procedure for estimating nitrogen mineralization in manured soil Biol. Fertil. Soils 33 100 104

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Haney, R.L., Briton, W.F. & Evans, E. 2008a Soil CO2 respiration: Comparison of chemical titration, CO2 IRGA analysis and solvita gel system Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 23 171 176

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Haney, R.L., Briton, W.F. & Evans, E. 2008b Estimating soil carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus mineralization from short-term carbon dioxide respiration Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 39 2706 2720

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Haney, R.L. & Haney, E.B. 2010 Simple and rapid laboratory method for rewetting dry soil for incubations Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 4 1493 1501

  • Haney, R.L., Franzluebbers, A.J., Jin, V.L., Johnson, M., Haney, E.B., White, M.J. & Harmel, R.D. 2012 Soil organic C:N vs water-extractable organic C:N Open J. Soil Sci. 2 269 274

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hartz, T.K., Miyao, E.M. & Valencia, J.G. 1998 DRIS evaluation of the nutritional status of processing tomato HortScience 33 830 832

  • Hartz, T.K., Bendixen, W.E. & Wierdsma, L. 2000 The value of presidedress soil nitrate testing as a nitrogen management tool in irrigated vegetable production HortScience 35 651 656

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hartz, T.K., Giannini, C., Miyao, E.M. & Valencia, J.G. 2002 Divergent transplant production practices produce comparable growth, yield and quality of processing tomato HortScience 37 296 299

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hartz, T.K. & Johnstone, P.R. 2006a Nitrogen Availability from high nitrogen-containing organic fertilizers HortTechnology 16 39 42

  • Hartz, T.K. & Johnstone, P.R. 2006b Relationship between soil phosphorus availability and phosphorus loss potential in runoff and drainage Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 37 1525 1536

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hartz, T.K. & Bottoms, T.G. 2009 Nitrogen requirements of drip-irrigated processing tomatoes HortScience 47 1988 1993

  • Hatch, D.J., Jarvis, S.C. & Reynolds, S.E. 1991 An assessment of the contribution of net mineralization to N cycling in grass swards using a field incubation method Plant Soil 138 23 32

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Heckman, J.R., Hlubick, W.T., Prostak, D.J. & Paterson, J.W. 1995 Pre-sidedress soil nitrate test for sweetcorn HortScience 30 1033 1036

  • Heckman, J.R., Morris, T., Sims, J.B., Sieczka, U., Krogmann, U., Nitzsche, P. & Ashley, R. 2002 Presidedress soil nitrate test is effective for fall cabagge HortScience 37 113 117

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jones, J.B., Wolf, B. & Mills, H.A. 1991 Plant analysis handbook. Macro-Micro Publishing, Athens, GA

  • Klonsky, K. 2010 A Look at California’s Organic Agriculture Production. ARE update 14(2):8–11. University of California Giannini Fundation of Agricultural Economics. 10 Sept. 2014. <http://giannini.ucop.edu/media/are-update/files/articles/v14n2_3.pdf>

  • Krusekopf, H.H., Mitchell, J.P., Hartz, T.K., May, D.M., Miyao, E.M. & Cahn, M.D. 2002 Pre-sidedress soil nitrate testing identifies processing tomato fields not requiring sidedress N fertilizer HortScience 37 520 524

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lorenz, O.A. & Tyler, K.B. 1983 Plant tissue analysis of vegetable crops, p. 24–29. In: H.M. Reisenaur (ed.). Soil and plant tissue testing in California. California Coop. Exten. Bul. 1879

  • Maltais-Landry, G., Scow, K., Brennan, E. & Vitousek, P. 2015 Long-term effcts of Compost and cover crops on soil phosphorus in two California agroecosystems Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 79 688 697

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Muramoto, J., Smith, R., Shennan, C., Klonsky, K., Leap, J., Silva Ruiz, M. & Gliessman, S.R. 2011 Nitrogen contribution of legume/cereal mixed cover crops and organic fertilizers to an organic broccoli crop HortScience 46 1154 1162

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Olsen, S.R. & Sommers, L.E. 1982 Phosphorus, p. 403–430. In: A.L. Page, R.H. Miller, and D.R. Keeney (eds.). Methods of soil analysis: Part 2 Chemical and microbiological properties. Monogr. No. 9. Amer. Soc. Agron. Madison, WI

  • Pannell, D.J. 1997 Sensitivity analysis of normative economic models: Theoretical framework and practical strategies Agr. Econ. 16 139 152

  • Pruitt, W.D., Fereres, E. & Snyder, R.L. 1987 Reference evapotranspiration (ETo) for California. Univ. of Calif. Coop. Ext. Bul. 1922

  • Sheldrick, B.H. & Wang, C. 1993 Particle size distribution, p. 499–511. In: M.R. Carter (ed.). Soil sampling and methods of analysis. Can. Soc. Soil Sci., Lewis Publishers, Ann Arbor, MI

  • Storer, D.A. 1984 A simple high sample volume ashing procedure for determination of soil organic matter Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 15 759 772

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tei, F., Benincasa, P. & Guiducci, M. 2002 Critical nitrogen concentration in processing tomato Eur. J. Agron. 18 45 55

  • Trends in soil mineral N (0–30 cm depth) in 37 fields produced during the 2012 (●) and 2013 (○) growing seasons; 300, 600 and 900 growing degree days corresponded to early bloom, full bloom and early red fruit growth stages.

  • Trends in leaf N concentration in 37 fields produced during the 2012 (●) and 2013 (○) growing seasons; 300, 600, and 900 growing degree days corresponded to early bloom, full bloom and early red fruit growth stages. N sufficiency standards proposed by Hartz et al. (1998; black line) and Lorenz and Tyler (1983; gray line).

  • Trends in petiole NO3-N concentration in 37 fields produced during the 2012 (●) and 2013 (○) growing seasons; 300, 600, and 900 growing degree days corresponded to early bloom, full bloom and early red fruit growth stages. NO3-N sufficiency standards proposed by Lorenz and Tyler (1983; gray line).

  • Whole plant total N concentration at ≈11 weeks after transplanting (WAT) in 22 fields sampled during the 2012 (●) and 2013 (○) growing seasons; whole plant critical N concentration (Nc) from Tei et al. (2002, gray line).

  • Sensitivity analysis of 3-week after transplanting (WAT) soil mineral N (0–30 or 0–60 cm depth), comparing various threshold values as predictors of late-season N deficiency, as evaluated by comparison of 11 WAT leaf N with proposed sufficiency standards (Lorenz and Tyler, 1983) or by comparison of 11 WAT whole plant N concentration with proposed whole plant critical N concentration (Tei et al., 2002).

  • Sensitivity analysis of 5-week after transplanting (WAT) leaf N or petiole NO3-N, comparing various threshold values as predictors of late-season N deficiency, as evaluated by comparison of 11 WAT leaf N with proposed sufficiency standards (Lorenz and Tyler, 1983) or by comparison of 11 WAT whole plant N concentration with proposed whole plant critical N concentration (Tei et al., 2002).

  • Observed (●) and predicted (plane) values of 0–28 d net N mineralization (mg·kg−1) from a multiple linear regression model using 0–30 cm soil mineral N (X1, mg·kg−1) and water extractable organic N (WEON, X2, mg·kg−1) as independent variables (Y = 0.303 × X1 + 0.629 × X2 + 7.659).

  • Allen, J.C. 1976 A modified sine wave method for calculating degree-days Environ. Entomol. 5 388 396

  • Berry, P.M., Sylvester-Bradley, R., Philipps, L., Hatch, D.J., Cuttle, S.P., Ryans, F.W. & Gosling, P. 2002 Is the productivity of organic farms restricted by the supply of available nitrogen? Soil Use Mgt. 18 248 255

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Bhogal, A., Shepherd, M.A., Hatch, D.J., Brown, L. & Jarvis, S.C. 2001 Evaluation of two N cycle models for the prediction of N mineralization from grassland soils in the UK Soil Use Mgt. 17 163 172

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Cassman, K.G. & Munns, D.N. 1980 Nitrogen mineralization as affected by soil moisture, temperature and depth Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 44 1233 1237

  • Breschini, S.J. & Hartz, T.K. 2002 Presidedress soil nitrate testing reduces nitrogen fertilizer use and nitrate leaching hazard in lettuce production HortScience 37 1061 1064

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Daniel, T.C., Sharpley, A.N., Edwards, D.R., Wedepohl, R. & Lemunyon, J.L. 1994 Minimizing surface water eutrophication from agriculture by phosphorus management J. Soil Water Conserv. 49 30 38

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Doane, T.A. & Horwath, W.R. 2003 Spectrophotometric determination of nitrate with a single reagent Anal. Lett. 36 2713 2722

  • Forster, J.C. 1995 Soil nitrogen, p. 79–87. In: K. Alef and P. Nannipieri (eds.). Methods in applied soil microbiology and biochemistry. Academic Press, San Diego, CA

  • Fox, R.H., Roth, G.W., Iversen, K.V. & Piekielek, W.P. 1989 Soil and tissue nitrate tests compared for predicting soil nitrogen availability to corn Agron. J. 81 971 974

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Gaskell, M. & Smith, R. 2007 Nitrogen sources for organic vegetable crops HortTechnology 17 431 441

  • Gaskell, M., Smith, R.F., Mitchell, J., Koike, S.T., Fouche, C., Hartz, T.K., Horwarth, W. & Jackson, L. 2011 Soil fertility management for organic crops, p. 29–38. In: M.E. McGiffen, Jr. (ed.). Organic vegetable production manual. University of California. Publication 3509

  • Gill, K., Jarvis, S.C. & Hatch, D.J. 1995 Mineralization of nitrogen in long-term pasture soils: Effects of management Plant Soil 172 153 162

  • Gosling, P. & Ryans, F. 2005 Fertility building, p. 67–98. In: G. Davis and M. Lennartsson (eds.). Organic vegetable production a complete Guide. 1st ed. Crowood Press, Wiltshire, UK

  • Hadas, A., Feigenbaum, S., Feigin, A. & Portnoy, R. 1986 Nitrogen mineralization in profiles of differently managed soil types Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 50 314 319

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Haney, R.L., Hons, F.M., Sanderson, M.A. & Franzluebbers, A.J. 2001 A rapid procedure for estimating nitrogen mineralization in manured soil Biol. Fertil. Soils 33 100 104

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Haney, R.L., Briton, W.F. & Evans, E. 2008a Soil CO2 respiration: Comparison of chemical titration, CO2 IRGA analysis and solvita gel system Renew. Agric. Food Syst. 23 171 176

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Haney, R.L., Briton, W.F. & Evans, E. 2008b Estimating soil carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus mineralization from short-term carbon dioxide respiration Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 39 2706 2720

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Haney, R.L. & Haney, E.B. 2010 Simple and rapid laboratory method for rewetting dry soil for incubations Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 4 1493 1501

  • Haney, R.L., Franzluebbers, A.J., Jin, V.L., Johnson, M., Haney, E.B., White, M.J. & Harmel, R.D. 2012 Soil organic C:N vs water-extractable organic C:N Open J. Soil Sci. 2 269 274

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hartz, T.K., Miyao, E.M. & Valencia, J.G. 1998 DRIS evaluation of the nutritional status of processing tomato HortScience 33 830 832

  • Hartz, T.K., Bendixen, W.E. & Wierdsma, L. 2000 The value of presidedress soil nitrate testing as a nitrogen management tool in irrigated vegetable production HortScience 35 651 656

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hartz, T.K., Giannini, C., Miyao, E.M. & Valencia, J.G. 2002 Divergent transplant production practices produce comparable growth, yield and quality of processing tomato HortScience 37 296 299

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hartz, T.K. & Johnstone, P.R. 2006a Nitrogen Availability from high nitrogen-containing organic fertilizers HortTechnology 16 39 42

  • Hartz, T.K. & Johnstone, P.R. 2006b Relationship between soil phosphorus availability and phosphorus loss potential in runoff and drainage Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 37 1525 1536

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Hartz, T.K. & Bottoms, T.G. 2009 Nitrogen requirements of drip-irrigated processing tomatoes HortScience 47 1988 1993

  • Hatch, D.J., Jarvis, S.C. & Reynolds, S.E. 1991 An assessment of the contribution of net mineralization to N cycling in grass swards using a field incubation method Plant Soil 138 23 32

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Heckman, J.R., Hlubick, W.T., Prostak, D.J. & Paterson, J.W. 1995 Pre-sidedress soil nitrate test for sweetcorn HortScience 30 1033 1036

  • Heckman, J.R., Morris, T., Sims, J.B., Sieczka, U., Krogmann, U., Nitzsche, P. & Ashley, R. 2002 Presidedress soil nitrate test is effective for fall cabagge HortScience 37 113 117

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Jones, J.B., Wolf, B. & Mills, H.A. 1991 Plant analysis handbook. Macro-Micro Publishing, Athens, GA

  • Klonsky, K. 2010 A Look at California’s Organic Agriculture Production. ARE update 14(2):8–11. University of California Giannini Fundation of Agricultural Economics. 10 Sept. 2014. <http://giannini.ucop.edu/media/are-update/files/articles/v14n2_3.pdf>

  • Krusekopf, H.H., Mitchell, J.P., Hartz, T.K., May, D.M., Miyao, E.M. & Cahn, M.D. 2002 Pre-sidedress soil nitrate testing identifies processing tomato fields not requiring sidedress N fertilizer HortScience 37 520 524

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lorenz, O.A. & Tyler, K.B. 1983 Plant tissue analysis of vegetable crops, p. 24–29. In: H.M. Reisenaur (ed.). Soil and plant tissue testing in California. California Coop. Exten. Bul. 1879

  • Maltais-Landry, G., Scow, K., Brennan, E. & Vitousek, P. 2015 Long-term effcts of Compost and cover crops on soil phosphorus in two California agroecosystems Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. J. 79 688 697

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Muramoto, J., Smith, R., Shennan, C., Klonsky, K., Leap, J., Silva Ruiz, M. & Gliessman, S.R. 2011 Nitrogen contribution of legume/cereal mixed cover crops and organic fertilizers to an organic broccoli crop HortScience 46 1154 1162

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Olsen, S.R. & Sommers, L.E. 1982 Phosphorus, p. 403–430. In: A.L. Page, R.H. Miller, and D.R. Keeney (eds.). Methods of soil analysis: Part 2 Chemical and microbiological properties. Monogr. No. 9. Amer. Soc. Agron. Madison, WI

  • Pannell, D.J. 1997 Sensitivity analysis of normative economic models: Theoretical framework and practical strategies Agr. Econ. 16 139 152

  • Pruitt, W.D., Fereres, E. & Snyder, R.L. 1987 Reference evapotranspiration (ETo) for California. Univ. of Calif. Coop. Ext. Bul. 1922

  • Sheldrick, B.H. & Wang, C. 1993 Particle size distribution, p. 499–511. In: M.R. Carter (ed.). Soil sampling and methods of analysis. Can. Soc. Soil Sci., Lewis Publishers, Ann Arbor, MI

  • Storer, D.A. 1984 A simple high sample volume ashing procedure for determination of soil organic matter Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 15 759 772

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Tei, F., Benincasa, P. & Guiducci, M. 2002 Critical nitrogen concentration in processing tomato Eur. J. Agron. 18 45 55

S. Castro Bustamante Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616

Search for other papers by S. Castro Bustamante in
Google Scholar
Close
and
T.K. Hartz Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616

Search for other papers by T.K. Hartz in
Google Scholar
Close

Contributor Notes

To whom reprint requests should be addressed; e-mail tkhartz@ucdavis.edu.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 338 235 7
PDF Downloads 251 129 6
Save