Sweetpotato (I. batatas) is one of the world’s most important and widely grown starch crops (FAOSTAT, 2014). Sweetpotato is grown primarily for direct human consumption, or as a processed food product, but sweetpotato biomass can be readily converted to simple sugars, which then have industrial end uses such as for the production of fuels (e.g., ethanol or butanol) or bioplastics (United States Sweet Potato Council, 2011; Ziska et al., 2009).
Sweetpotato has traits that make it attractive as an alternative carbohydrate crop to corn in the eastern United States—ease of propagation, tolerance of different soil types, fast growth rates, and wide harvest windows. The eastern United States also has a pre-existing sweetpotato industry with readily available production equipment, university-based research support, and experienced extension agents, which would facilitate the adoption of sweetpotato as an industrial crop.
In the eastern United States, it has been shown that the carbohydrate yield of sweetpotato can exceed that of corn, 11,000 kg·ha−1 vs. 5,900 kg·ha−1, respectively (Ziska et al., 2009). Historically, sweetpotato breeding programs have focused on developing cultivars for human consumption, but desirable quality traits for food markets differ from those for industrial end uses. In the United States, the dry matter content of sweetpotato roots—which is generally accepted to be closely related to carbohydrate content—is ≈20% for most commercial clones. It should be possible to select for new clones with similar yields to conventional clones but dry matter contents of around 30%, thereby increasing total carbohydrate yield. In addition, by removing the two constraints to breeding sweetpotato for food markets—appearance and size distribution—faster progress can be made toward high carbohydrate production.
The production of sweetpotato is relatively expensive and if it is to be a viable industrial carbohydrate crop it will be necessary to lower production costs. High costs can be attributed in part to the need for manual labor at planting. Sweetpotato is generally propagated using unrooted stem cuttings, called “slips,” and in the U.S. manual labor associated with planting slips is estimated to be between 15% and 20% of total production costs (Estes et al., 2002; Hinson and Boudreaux, 2007; Martin et al., 2000; MSU, 2007). An alternative propagation method is to use root pieces, similar to the system used for potatoes (Solanum tuberosum), which uses cut tubers as “seed” and can be mechanized and therefore reduces labor demands. The yield of existing commercial sweetpotato cultivars planted as root pieces tends to be lower than for slips (George et al., 2011).
It has been found that sweetpotato grown from both slips and root pieces can display significant genotype by environment interaction (G × E), and yield instability (Collins et al., 1987; George et al., 2014; Grüneberg et al., 2005; Kanua and Floyd, 1988; Manrique and Hermann, 2002; Ngeve, 1993), making it difficult to predict the performance of clones across sites and years, and complicating cultivar development.
In our study, the sweetpotato cultivar Beauregard was grown in a multienvironment trial with other sweetpotato clones specifically selected for high dry matter production. All clones were grown from both slips and root pieces. The objectives of the research were: 1) to estimate the carbohydrate yield of all the sweetpotato clones under commercial-like production conditions, 2) to compare the carbohydrate yield of Beauregard with new clones selected for higher carbohydrate content, 3) to directly compare carbohydrate production from slip and root piece planting methods, and 4) to test the significance of G × E effects on the carbohydrate yield of clones grown from both slips and root pieces.
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. 2013 lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.0-5. <http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4>.
Bates, D.M. 2010 lme4: Mixed-effects modeling with R. p. 145. Springer
Beutler, H.-O. 1988 D-Fructose, p. 321–327. In: H.U. Bergmeye (ed.). Methods of enzymatic analysis. VCH Publishers (UK) Ltd., Cambridge, UK
Brabet, C., Reynoso, D., Dufour, D., Mestres, C., Arredondo, J. & Scott, G. 1998 Starch content and properties of 106 sweetpotato clones from the world germplasm collection held at CIP, Peru, p. 279–286, Impact on a changing world. Program Report 1997–98. International Potato Center, Lima, Peru
Carl, P. & Peterson, G. 2013 PerformanceAnalytics: Econometric tools for performance and risk analysis. R package version 1.1.0. <http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=PerformanceAnalytics>.
Collins, W.W., Wilson, L.G., Arrendell, S. & Dickey, L.F. 1987 Genotype x environment interactions in sweet-potato yield and quality factors J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 112 579 583
Estes, E., Schultheis, J. & Sampson, H. 2002 Sweet potato enterprise budget worksheet. NC State University, Raleigh, NC
FAOSTAT 2014 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. July 2015. <http://faostat3.fao.org/home/E>.
George, N., Shankle, M., Main, J., Pecota, K.V., Arellano, C. & Yencho, G.C. 2014 Sweetpotato grown from root pieces displays a significant genotype x environment interaction and yield instability HortScience 49 984 990
George, N.A., Pecota, K.V., Bowen, B.D., Schultheis, J.R. & Yencho, G.C. 2011 Root piece planting in sweetpotato—a synthesis of previous research and directions for the future HortTechnology 21 703 711
Grüneberg, W.J., Manrique, K., Zhang, D. & Hermann, M. 2005 Genotype x environment interactions for a diverse set of sweetpotato clones evaluated across a varying ecogeographic conditions in Peru Crop Sci. 45 2160 2171
Hinson, R.A. & Boudreaux, J.E. 2007 Louisiana vegetable crops. Louisiana State University Department of Agricural Economics & Agribusiness. A.E.A. Information Series No. 246. p. 100
Kanua, M.B. & Floyd, C.N. 1988 Sweet-potato genotype x environment interactions in the highlands of Papua-New-Guinea Trop. Agr. 65 9 15
Kunst, A., Draeger, B. & Zeiegenhorn, J. 1988 D-Glucose, p. 163–172. In: H.U. Bergmeye (ed.). Methods of enzymatic analysis. VCH Publishers (UK) Ltd., Cambridge, UK
Lunven, P. 1992 Maize in human nutrition. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. <http://www.fao.org/docrep/t0395e/t0395e00.HTM>.
Manrique, K. & Hermann, M. 2002 Effect of GxE interaction on root yield and betacarotene content of selected sweetpotato (Ipomoea batatas (L) Lam.) varieties and breeding clones, p. 281–286. Scientist and farmer: Partners in research for the 21st century. Program Report, 1999–2000. Program Report 1999–2000. International Potato Center, Lima, Peru
Martin, D.A., Myers, R.D. & McClurg, C.A. 2000 Growing sweet potatoes. Maryland Cooperative Extension, University of Maryland. Fact Sheet 464
Mendiburu, F.d. 2013 agricolae: Statistical procedures for agricultural research. R package version 1.1-4. <http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=agricolae>.
Mok, I.G., Tjintokohadi, L., Nigsih, L. & Hoang, T.D. 1997 Sweetpotato breeding strategy and germplasm testing in Southeast Asia. International Potato Center Program Report 1995–96. International Potato Center, Lima, Peru. p. 104–109
MSU 2007 Traditional and organic vegetables 2008 planning budgets. Mississippi State University Department of Agricultural Economics. Budget Report 2007–08
NASS 2015 National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), United States Department of Agriculture. July 2015. <http://www.nass.usda.gov/>.
NRCS 2013 Web soil survey. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. <http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/>.
Outlaw, W.H. & Mitchell, C.T. 1988 Sucrose, p. 96–103. In: H.U. Bergmeye (ed.). Methods of enzymatic analysis. VCH Publishers (UK) Ltd., Cambridge, U.K
Pinheiro, J.C. & Bates, D.M. 2000 Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. Springer, New York, NY. p. 528
R Core Team 2014 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
Rolston, L.H., Clark, C.A., Cannon, J.M., Randle, W.M., Riley, E.G., Wilson, P.W. & Robbins, M.L. 1987 ‘Beauregard’ sweet potato HortScience 22 1338 1339
Smith, A.B., Cullis, B.R. & Thompson, R. 2005 The analysis of crop cultivar breeding and evaluation trials: An overview of current mixed model approaches J. Agr. Sci. 143 449 462
Smith, C.W., Betrán, J. & Runge, E.C.A. 2004 Corn: Origin, history, technology, and production, p. 949. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ
Truberg, B. & Huhn, M. 2000 Contributions to the analysis of genotype × environment interactions: Comparison of different parametric and non-parametric Tests for interactions with emphasis on crossover interactions J. Agron. Crop Sci. 185 267 274
United States Sweet Potato Council 2011 The United States Sweet Potato Council Inc. Columbia, SC. <http://www.sweetpotatousa.org>.
USNO 2012 Sun or moon rise/set table for one year. U.S. Navy Astronomical Application Department. <http://aa.usno.navy.mil/data/docs/RS_OneYear.php>.
Villordon, A., Clark, C., Ferrin, D. & LaBonte, D.R. 2009 Using growing degree days, agrometeorological variables, linear regression, and data mining methods to help improve prediction of sweetpotato harvest date in Louisiana HortTechnology 19 133 144
Ziska, L.H., Runion, G.B., Tomecek, M., Prior, S.A., Torbet, H.A. & Sicher, R. 2009 An evaluation of cassava, sweet potato and field corn as potential carbohydrate sources for bioethanol production in Alabama and Maryland Biomass Bioenergy 33 1503 1508