Soil solarization uses solar radiation to disinfest the soil from pests detrimental to crop plants (Katan, 1981; Stapleton, 2000). Soil solarization is used most in areas with high solar radiation and temperatures during the summer season (Gill et al., 2009; Stapleton, 2000). It is used as an alternative to soil fumigation for pathogen and pest control either alone or in combination with fumigants (Elmore et al., 1997; Hartz et al., 1993). Disinfestation is achieved by using solar radiation to passively heat moist soil covered with clear plastic sheeting for a period of a few weeks to increase soil temperatures to the point where they are lethal to soilborne organisms (Katan, 1981; Pullman et al., 1981; Stapleton, 2000). Higher soil moisture during solarization can increase the soil heat conductivity resulting in higher temperatures compared with soil that is less moist (Katan et al., 1976). Low-density PE film and ethylene vinyl acetate film have the best solarizing properties for increasing temperatures in production beds (D’Addabbo et al., 2010). Solarization is a strategy used to reduce the soilborne pests and diseases such as Verticillium dahliae (verticillium wilt), Fusarium spp. (fusarium wilt), Phytophthora cinnamomi (Phytophthora root rot), Meloidogyne incognita (root knot nematodes) and weed species (Dahlquist et al., 2007; Stapleton et al., 2000). The elevated soil temperatures are also beneficial for soil physical and chemical structure, accelerating the release of minerals from decomposition and increasing soil aggregation (Elmore et al., 1997; Stapleton, 2000).
The effectiveness of solarization is based on the actual maximum soil temperature achieved under the plastic cover and the amount of time that this temperature can be sustained (Chase et al., 1999). Soil temperatures of 37 °C can be effective in controlling some pests and pathogens if they are maintained for 4 to 6 weeks (Elmore et al., 1997). The optimal temperature for the solarization process depends on which organisms are present in the soil and their susceptibility to high temperatures. Some organisms and their thermal thresholds for inactivation are listed in Table 1. Studies have shown a logarithmic relationship between temperature and pathogen mortality where less time is required to kill pests and disease-causing organisms as soil temperature increases (McLean et al., 1999; Pullman et al., 1981). In laboratory studies, pathogens such as Verticillium dahliae, Pythium ultimum, and Thielaviopsis basicola required 29, 18, and 33 d to kill 90% of propagules at 37 °C, respectively (Pullman et al., 1981). However, at 50 °C those times were reduced to 23, 33, and 68 min. Temperatures of 50 °C or greater dramatically reduce the amount of time required to inactivate various pest organisms (Dahlquist et al., 2007; Mihail and Alcorn, 1984; Pullman et al., 1981; Stapleton et al., 2000).
Temperature and time period required for the inactivation of some pests.
Solarization in a greenhouse or high tunnel structure will yield higher soil temperatures than in fields or gardens (Elmore et al., 1997). Using PE mulch inside a greenhouse will further increase the effectiveness of the soil solarization process (Mahrer et al., 1987), especially in cooler coastal climates (Larson, 2007). Although temperatures in soils covered with PE mulch will be highest in a glass house, a structure with PE glazing will also be effective in raising soil temperatures above mulched soil exposed to open air conditions. Soil solarizaion in a Mediterranean climate using PE mulch for 7- to 9-week intervals was successful in raising soil temperatures at 15-cm depth between 37 and 50 °C in beds used for strawberry (Fragaria xananassa Duch.) cultivation under plastic tunnel conditions (Iapichino et al., 2008). Solarization in a high tunnel in Costa Rica increased the soil temperature of covered soil to ≈60 °C compared with 30 °C for uncovered soil (Santos et al., 2008). A double-tent system within a greenhouse facilitated structural solarization by raising temperatures to 60 °C and resulted in effective inactivation of Fusarium sp. (Shlevin et al., 2004). The same temperature was effective in killing weed species in containers filled with soil and exposed to solarization in a double tent (Stapleton et al., 2002). At present there are no studies for the semiarid southwestern United States region comparing solarization inside and outside of a high tunnel. One goal of this study was to provide growers using high tunnels with information that may be beneficial to protecting their crops from weed and other pest populations.
The semiarid climate in southern Arizona is ideal for soil solarization as a result of high solar radiation. June is the optimal time for solarization because the daily solar radiation can reach 30 MJ·m−2 and temperatures are higher for this month than others [Arizona Meteorological Network (AZMET), 2013; Mihail and Alcorn, 1984]. In Tucson, AZ, daily fluctuations in temperature are typically 8 to 17 °C with June average highs and lows of 38 °C and 21 to 27 °C, respectively (AZMET). Although these are averages, temperatures can reach extreme highs such as 47 °C in June of 1990. Low relative humidity during early summer months combined with high temperatures and high solar radiation provides growers with an opportunity for using solarization when production areas are fallow. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of clear PE mulch on the soil surface and glazing on a high tunnel to raise soil temperatures to solarize the soil during the hottest time of the year in the semiarid southwestern United States.
Arizona Meteorological Network (AZMET)201320 July 2013. <http://ag.arizona.edu/azmet/>
CandidoV.D’AddabboT.MiccolisV.CastronuovoD.2011Weed control and yield response of soil solarization with different plastic films in lettuceSci. Hort.130491497
ChaseC.A.SinclairT.R.ChellemiD.O.OlsonS.M.GilreathJ.P.LocascioS.J.1999Heat-retentive films for increasing soil temperatures during solarization in a humid, cloudy environmentHortScience3410851089
D’AddabboT.MiccolisV.BasileM.CandidoV.2010Soil solarization and sustainable agriculture: A review p. 217–274. In: Lichtfouse E. (ed.). Sustainable agriculture reviews 3—Sociology organic farming climate change and soil science. Springer London UK
DyerA.T.WindelsC.E.CookR.D.LeonardK.J.2007Survival dynamics of Aphanomyces cochliodes oospores exposed to heat stressPhytopathology97484491
ElmoreC.L.StapletonJ.J.BellC.E.DevayJ.E.1997Soil solarization: A nonpesticidal method for controlling diseases nematodes and weeds. Publication no. 21377. University of California. 12 Oct. 2013. <http://vric.ucdavis.edu/pdf/soil_solarization.pdf>
GillH.K.McSorleyR.TreadwellD.D.2009Comparative performance of different plastic films for soil solarization and weed suppressionHortTechnology19769774
HartzT.K.DevayJ.E.ElmoreC.L.1993Solarization is an effective soil disinfestation technique for strawberry productionHortScience28104106
IapichinoG.PrinzivalliC.D’AnnaF.2008Soil solarization as an alternative to methyl bromide fumigation for annual strawberry production in a Mediterranean areaJ. Sustain. Agr.32365375
Juarez-PalaciosC.Felix-GastelumR.WakemanR.J.PaplomatasE.J.DeVayJ.E.1991Thermal sensitivity of three species of Phytophthora and the effect of solarization on their survivalPlant Dis.7511601164
KatanJ.GreenbergerA.AlonH.GrinsteinA.1976Solar heating by polyethylene mulching for the control of diseases caused by soil-borne pathogensPhytopathology66683688
LichterA.ZhouH.W.VakninM.DvirO.ZutchiY.KaplunovT.LurieS.2003Survival and responses of Botrytis cinerea after exposure to ethanol and heatJ. Phytopathol.151553563
MahrerY.AvissarR.NaotO.KatanJ.1987Intensified soil solarization with closed greenhouses: Numerical and experimental studiesAgr. For. Meteorol.41325334
MatheronM.E.ProchasM.2010Evaluation of soil solarization and flooding as management tools for fusarium wilt of lettucePlant Dis.9413231328
McLeanK.L.SwaminathanJ.StewartA.1999Increasing soil temperature to reduce sclerotial viability of Sclerotium cepivorum in New Zealand soilsSoil Biol. Biochem.33137143
Ozores-HamptonM.StanslyP.A.McSorleyR.ObrezaT.A.2005Effects of long-term organic amendments and soil solarization on pepper and watermelon growth, yield, and soil fertilityHortScience408084
PinkertonJ.N.BristowP.R.WindomG.E.WaltersT.W.2009Soil solarization as a component of an integrated program for control of raspberry root rotPlant Dis.93452458
PullmanG.S.DeVayJ.E.GarberR.H.1981Soil solarization and thermal death: A logarithmic relationship between time and temperature for four soilborne plant pathogensPhytopathology71959964
SantosB.M.Mora-BolañosJ.E.Solórzano-ArroyoJ.A.2008Impact of solarization and soil fumigants on hot pepper production in high tunnelsAsian J. Plant Sci.7113115
SherwoodR.T.1970Physiology of Rhizoctonia solani p. 69–92. In: Parmeter Jr. J.R. (ed.). Rhizoctonia solani Biology and pathology. Univ. California Press Berkeley CA
ShlevinE.MahrerY.KatanJ.2004Effect of moisture on thermal inactivation of soilborne pathogens under structural solarizationPhytopathology94132137
SimmonsC. W.GuoH.ClaypoolJ.T.MarshallM.N.PeranoK.M.StapletonJ.J.VanderGheynstJ.S.2013Managing compost stability and amendment to soil to enhance soil heating during soil solarizationWaste Mgt.3310901096
StapletonJ.J.PratherT.S.MallekS.B.RuizT.S.ElmoreC.L.2002High temperature solarization for production of weed-free container soils and potting mixesHortTechnology12697700
UsowiczB.LipiecJ.UsowiczJ.B.MarczewskiW.2013Effects of aggregate size on soil thermal conductivity: Comparison of measured and model-predicted dataIntl. J. Heat Mass Transfer57536541
WangK.H.McSorelyR.2008Exposure time to lethal temperatures for Meloidogyne incognita suppression and its implication for solarizationJ. Nematol.40712