Abstract
Illumination during storage was proven to extend the storability of seedlings, but little attention has been given to the underlying mechanism. To determine how light conditions affect photosynthetic status in watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. and Nakai] plug seedlings, differences of stomatal development and relative photosynthetic characteristics of expanding new leaves when stored for 8 days at 15 °C in light at a photosynthetic photon flux (PPF) of 15 μmol·m−2·s−1 or darkness were investigated. The stomatal density (SD) increased with time to a peak and then decreased from the start of storage in light to the subsequent transplantation. Dark storage retarded the stomatal development and delayed the appearance of the peak of SD. Compared with those under dark storage, light-stored seedlings showed significantly higher SD and stomatal index (SI) in leaves accompanied by higher maximal photochemical efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm) and quantum yield of PSII (ΦPSII). During storage in darkness, Fv/Fm and ΦPSII declined steeply with increasing storage duration but recovered gradually to reach the same level of those in light at the fourth day after transplanting. Seedlings stored in light for 8 days showed higher net photosynthesis rate (Pn), stomatal conductance (gS), intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), and transpiration rate (Tr) than in darkness. The post-storage recovery of Pn, gS, and Tr were closely related to the SI, which ensured the fast recovery of photosynthesis during the early stage of transplanting. In agreement with the change of SD, no differences in Pn, gS, Ci, and Tr between light and dark storage were observed after 8 days of transplantation. Seedlings stored in light appeared vigorous and the shoot dry weight was significantly higher than that of dark-stored ones. Although seedlings in dark storage had a poor appearance during storage, they showed inhibited regrowth potentials during the subsequent transplanting stage. This study exhibited that light in short-term storage contributed to maintaining stomatal development as well as photosynthetic efficiency in watermelon, which could also extend to post-storage for ensuring the transplant quality of seedlings after removal from storage.
Watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. and Nakai] is an important cucurbit crop, occupying 7% of the worldwide area allocated for vegetable production (Guo et al., 2013). China, as the largest producer of watermelons in the world, provides almost 74% of the world production (<http://faostat.fao.org/>). Considering the high year-round demand for watermelon, it is widely grown in industrial seedling nurseries. To ensure an adequate supply of seedlings, the plants are occasionally stored in some cases such as waiting for optimal weather for transplantation, during shipping, or labor shortages for planting. Low temperature in darkness is widely used to store seedlings (Kaczperski et al., 1996; Sato et al., 2004), which would decrease the quality caused by temperature and light stress.
Providing light during storage could extend the storability of seedlings of many horticultural species, even at very low light intensity (Justus and Kubota, 2010; Kubota et al., 2002; Park and Fujiwara, 2009). Kubota and Kozai (1994) found that broccoli plantlets stored in light could preserve their photosynthetic ability. Similar results were also observed in seedlings of Phalaenopsis (Su et al., 2001) and radiata pine (Mena-Petite et al., 2003). Compared with storage, the recovery of post-storage photosynthetic performance is very crucial for plants (Hou et al., 2010; Sato et al., 2004). A positive correlation was obtained after storage between photosynthetic rate and the new root growth in radiata pine seedlings (Mena-Petite et al., 2003). Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters were also closely related to the survival of Douglas fir seedlings in a greenhouse (Harper et al., 2010).
However, stomata, as physiologic channels for photosynthetic gas exchange in plants, which executed an important function in optimizing photosynthetic carbon dioxide (CO2) uptake and minimizing transpirational water loss (Chaerle et al., 2005), has not been concerned yet. Many researchers observed a correlation between stomatal density and environmental parameters. Light is one of the important environmental factors regulating the stomatal development in plants (Baroli et al., 2008; Liu et al., 2000). To our knowledge, there has been no study yet reporting on stomatal development of seedlings during storage.
This study investigated the differences in stomatal development during storage under light or dark conditions and the associated photosynthetic performance. Accurately assessing these effects is essential for maintaining watermelon seedling quality during storage and improving the capacity of photosynthetic recovery after removal from storage. These findings will further contribute to our understanding of the physiologic mechanisms of plant growth.
Materials and Methods
Plant material and growth conditions.
Seeds of watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai] cv. Zaojia 84-24 were sown in 72-cell plastic plug trays (50 cm3 per cell) filled with a substrate consisting of vermiculite, perlite, and peat (2:2:1, v/v/v) in a greenhouse under natural photoperiod and day/nights of 24/17 ± 3 °C. At 20 d after sowing, uniform seedlings with one fully expanded true leaf and one small true leaf were selected and transferred into growth chambers (Model HP GS1000-D; Wuhan Ruihua Instrument & Equipment, Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China). The conditions in the growth chambers were as follows: 300 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPF at 12-h photoperiod, 25/18 ± 2 °C day/night, and 70% ± 10% relative humidity. All plants were supplied with half-strength Hoagland solution daily.
Storage and transplant conditions.
The storage period began when two true leaves had fully expanded and one small true leaf was expanding. Six plug trays of seedlings were separated into two groups placed in two growth chambers and the air temperature inside chambers was set at 15 ± 1 °C (temperature fluctuations in two chambers were similar), which was recommended as the optimal storage temperature of watermelon plug seedlings (Holcomb, 1994). Seedlings were stored for 8 d in darkness or under light at an average PPF of 15 ± 0.5 μmol·m−2·s−1. The light source during storage was cool white light lamps (Philips Lifemax, TLD 30w/865), which were positioned ≈30 cm above the seedling canopy. The light compensation point is the optimum PPF for low-temperature storage of seedlings (Kubota et al., 2002). Because there is no recommended light intensity for cucurbit storage reported, the light compensation point for watermelon was estimated as ≈15 μmol·m−2·s−1 PPF according to the results reported by Yongjian et al. (2001). There were three trays per treatment, which gave 216 seedlings per treatment. Each tray with 72 seedlings was considered as a replication. Every 2 d, seedling trays were taken from the chambers and subirrigation was applied with the same nutrient solution as that used before storage for 5 min under dim light (less than 1 μmol·m−2·s−1) conditions at ambient room temperatures; then trays were relocated among chambers to minimize environmental differences.
After 8 d of storage, seedlings were transplanted into 20-cm diameter plastic pots and allowed to recover in growth chambers at 25/18 ± 2 °C (day/night) for 8 d. Seedlings were supplied with half-strength Hoagland’s solution once per day.
Seedlings were sampled just before the start of storage (0 d); 2, 4, and 8 d later; and subsequently 2, 4, and 8 d of transplanting. The third true leaves, which were considered as expanding new leaves, were used for all measurements in this experiment.
Stomatal counting.
Epidermis imprints on abaxial leaf from the third true leaves were used to count stomata, and the imprints were removed using transparent adhesive tape and were placed on a microscope slide (Bahareh et al., 2012). The light microscope with a 40× magnification lenses was used to count the number of stomata and epidermal cells. The counting was replicated on three plants in total 30 fields of view for each treatment during storage and recovery. The obtained values were expressed in number of stomata per mm2. The stomatal index was calculated as SI = 100 SD/(SD + ECD) where SD is stomatal density and ECD is epidermal cells density as defined by Rengifo et al. (2002).
Chlorophyll fluorescence measurements and photosynthetic gas exchange.
Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters were monitored using a portable modulated chlorophyll fluorometer (FMS-2; Hansatech, Norfolk, U.K.). The initial fluorescence (Fo) and maximal fluorescence (Fm) were measured after dark adaptation for 30 min. The maximal photochemical efficiency of PSII (Fv/Fm) was calculated as Fv/Fm = (Fm– Fo)/Fm. During illumination, the steady-state fluorescence (Fs) was obtained. The light-adapted maximum fluorescence (Fm′) was also determined by applying a saturating pulse at 8000 μmol·m−2·s−1 (PPF). The ΦPSII was calculated according to the method described previously (Van and Snel, 1990). Six plants from each treatment were measured.
The Pn, gS, Ci, and Tr were measured using a Ciras-2 portable photosynthesis system (PP Systems, Amesbury, MA) with a light-emitting diode light source at 800 μmol·m−2·s−1 (PPF). The leaf area clipped by the chamber was 1.7 cm2. The temperature, relative humidity, and CO2 concentration for measurement were maintained at 25 °C, 45% ± 5%, and 375 μmol·mol−1, respectively. The measurements were from at least three plants for each treatment.
Plant growth parameters and tissue biomass.
Nine plants from each treatment were sampled. Sampled plants were washed carefully to remove the medium and the shoots were cut from plants. The washing procedure was carried out at room temperature within a few minutes for each plant. Then the third true leaves were cut from shoots; after that, the leaves were scanned using an Epson Perfection V700 Photo scanner (Japan) to determine the leaf area by WinRHIZO Pro software (Regent Instruments, Canada); subsequently, the leaves and the other part of shoots were dried at 80 °C for 48 h in folded paper envelopes to obtain shoot dry weight.
Statistical analysis.
The experiment was conducted three times; similar trends were observed in the three repetitions of this experiment, and the data obtained with the third repetition are presented subsequently. All the statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 16.0 for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL). Data were subjected to analysis of variance and mean values were compared by the Tukey test (P < 0.05) when a significant difference was detected.
Results and Discussion
Stomatal characteristics.
Stomatal initiation is most active in the early development of the leaf, which was observed within 3 d of a change in light intensity (Gay and Hurd, 1975). In this test, significantly higher SD in plants under light than those under darkness was observed at 2 d after storage (Fig. 1A), which indicated that stomatal development was delayed by dark storage. Seedlings stored for 8 d in darkness showed more small unfledged stomata including meristemoid and guard mother cells on the epidermis of leaves than those in light (Fig. 2A–B). Increase in SD associated with leaf expansion and subsequent decrease in SD after SD peak was reached have been widely reported in several plant species (Fu et al., 2010; Gay and Hurd, 1975; Turner and Heichel, 1977). In this test, the peak SD of the plants stored in light appeared at 2 d after transplanting, then decreased with time, whereas the SD continuously increased in the plants stored in darkness during the experiment (i.e., storage and transplanting). These data indicated the inhibition of stomatal development in leaves caused by dark storage. Similar results were also observed in cotyledons of dark-grown wild-type Arabidopsis (Kang et al., 2009).
SD at the end of the transplanting period was the same between light- and dark-stored plants (Fig. 1A), but the epidermal cell density (ECD) was significantly lower in light than in darkness (Fig. 1C), which could largely be explained by the increase in epidermal cell expansion (Fig. 2C–D) and by the enlargement of the leaf area in light (Fig. 1D). The plants in light and dark storage exhibited different trends in their SI. SI increased gradually during storage in light but decreased with time during dark storage (Fig. 1B). After removal from storage, SI of two treatments initially increased quickly and then was stably maintained, but the plants under light storage showed pronounced higher SI throughout the experiment than those under dark storage. SD is influenced by epidermal cell size, and SI directly measures the proportion of epidermal cells that differentiated into stomata, which is modified by light intensity (Ferris et al., 2002). In the current data, the SI reduction in leaves from the dark treatment was mainly caused by the increase in ECD (Fig. 1C).
Chlorophyll fluorescence measurements.
Fv/Fm was usually used to estimate the degree of photoinhibition (Tezara et al., 2005). As shown in Figure 3A, the plants stored in light maintained high Fv/Fm values, whereas the Fv/Fm continuously decreased during 8 d of dark storage, which was throughout lower than in light. After 4 d of post-storage, Fv/Fm from two treatments reached the same level and were not different from those before storage. These results showed that there was no photoinhibition of the plants in light storage; however, slight and reversible photoinhibition occurred in dark storage.
Unlike the Fv/Fm, storage induced the decrease in ΦPSII regardless of light conditions (Fig. 3B), and the reduction of ΦPSII during storage was more pronounced in dark than in light. The decline in ΦPSII was accompanied by similar decreases in both photochemical quenching coefficient and efficiency of excitation energy capture by open PSII reaction centers (Fv′/Fm′) (data not shown), which confirmed the reduced linear electron passage through PSII during storage. However, no difference was obtained in ΦPSII from two treatments as well as in Fv/Fm after 4 d of transplanting.
Fv/Fm and ΦPSII were widely used as effective indicators for a variety of seedlings of conifers during storage and closely related to the survival of post-storage seedlings (L'Hirondelle et al., 2007; Maki and Colombo, 2001). As shown in Figure 3 (Fv/Fm and ΦPSII), the damage extent to PSII reaction center in light-stored seedlings was less than that of dark-stored ones, which suggests that a temporary and reversible decrease of PSII photochemical activity plays an indispensable photoprotective function during storage.
Carbon assimilation and dry mass accumulation.
One important reason for better quality of seedlings stored in light mainly the result of the preservation of the photosynthetic ability (Kubota and Kozai, 1994; Mena-Petite et al., 2003), which would ensure the transplant quality of post-storage seedlings effectively (Hou et al., 2010; Sato et al., 2004). As shown in Figure 4, plants stored in light showed a marked high value in Pn accompanied by higher gS, Ci, and Tr than in darkness after 8 d of storage, which is in agreement with the changes in Fv/Fm and ΦPSII. This result demonstrated the preservation of photosynthetic capabilities in light during storage, which ensured the quick recovery of post-storage photosynthesis during the early stage of transplanting. On the fourth day after removal from storage, seedlings stored in light showed higher Pn, gS, Ci, and Tr than that of dark-stored ones (Fig. 4). However, no differences were observed between two treatments after 8 d of transplantation, which were consistent with the change in SD (Fig. 1A).
In principle, an increase in SD could allow plants under well-adapted conditions to increase conductance for gas exchange at the leaf surface and thus avoid photosynthetic limitation by suboptimal CO2 supply (Schlüter et al., 2003). A close relation between the number of stomata and the increase of leaf photosynthesis has been found in many species (Das and Ghose, 2005; Fu et al., 2010; Lee et al., 2007). In this test, seedlings stored in light showed higher SD and SI in leaves accompanied by higher Fv/Fm, ΦPSII, Pn, gS, Ci, and Tr during storage than that of dark-stored ones, and also, the post-storage Pn, gS, and Tr closely related to SI in leaves (Fig. 5). These data indicated that the preservation of photosynthetic capacity of light-stored seedlings might be attributed to the higher SD and SI of leaves under light, which led to favorable stomatal aperture and thus increased the amount of CO2 in the interior of cells to avoid the decrease of photosynthesis by stomatal limitation during storage and the subsequent recovery period.
Dry mass is an important factor in plant storage because it indicates how environmental conditions affect growth rate and dry mass accumulation (Justus and Kubota, 2010). Illumination during storage was proven to preserve the dry weight of seedlings of horticultural crops (Kubota et al., 2002; Wilson et al., 1998a). As shown in Figure 6, seedlings stored in darkness for 8 d had significantly lower shoot dry weight than those stored in light, which is the result of the continuous respiration that occurred in darkness. Plants stored in light for 8 d appeared vigorous and similar to the plants before storage. All the seedlings stored in light survived, whereas seedlings stored in darkness deteriorated by some necrosis or chlorosis on old leaves or cotyledons, which resulted in 35% death of seedlings after transplanting (data not shown). The shoot dry weight (Fig. 6) of seedlings stored in darkness was obviously lower than that of seedlings stored in light throughout the period of recovery in this experiment, which indicated that the deterioration of seedlings stored in darkness significantly suppressed the early growth of seedlings after storage.
S previous study showed that light-stored seedlings maintained high chlorophyll content (Kubota et al., 2002; Wilson et al., 1998a) and carbohydrate reserve (Wilson et al., 1998b), which could be beneficial for maintaining high photosynthetic rate and faster recovery after transplanting (Ding et al., 2011). Despite these, the current data in this experiment showed the possible reasons for better quality in light-stored watermelon seedlings: 1) the promotion of stomatal development in leaves during light storage with better stomata morphology and higher SD and SI contributed to photosynthesis; 2) higher photochemical activities of PSII in seedlings of light storage reduced the damage extent of PSII reaction center and protected the photosynthetic system during storage; and 3) favorable appearance and vigor of seedlings in light storage dedicated to the preservation of dry weight during storage and regrowth potentials after transplanting.
In conclusion, the stomata of watermelon plug seedlings stored in light developed well in morphology with higher SD and SI, which seemed to improve the physiological functions showing significantly higher Pn, gS, Ci, and Tr than in darkness not only during storage, but also after transplanting (until the eighth day). Furthermore, seedlings stored in light showed obvious higher shoot dry mass than in darkness during the entire recovery period. This study exhibited that light in short-term storage contributed to maintaining stomatal development as well as photosynthetic efficiency in watermelon, and this benefit could also extend to the early stage of post-storage for ensuring the transplant quality of seedlings after removal from storage.
Literature Cited
Bahareh, K., Seyed Reza, T.A., Mohammad, M., Amir, M. & Aliashraf, J. 2012 Some physiological and enzymatic characterizations of Damask Rose accessions (Rosa damascena Mill.) Aust. J. Crop. Sci. 6 283 290
Baroli, I., Price, G.D., Badger, M.R. & Caemmerer, S. 2008 The contribution of photosynthesis to the red light response of stomatal conductance Plant Physiol. 146 737 747
Chaerle, L., Saibo, N. & Van Der Straeten, D. 2005 Tuning the pores: Towards engineering plants for improved water use efficiency Trends Biotechnol. 23 308 315
Das, S. & Ghose, M. 2005 Relation of leaf micromorphology with photosynthesis and water efflux in some Indian mangroves Acta Bot. Croat. 64 331 340
Ding, M., Bie, B., Jiang, W., Duan, Q., Du, H. & Huang, D. 2011 Physiological advantages of grafted watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) seedlings under low-temperature storage in darkness HortScience 46 993 996
Ferris, R., Long, L., Bunn, S.M., Robinson, K.M., Bradshaw, H.D., Rae, A.M. & Taylor, G. 2002 Leaf stomatal and epidermal cell development: Identification of putative quantitative trait loci in relation to elevated carbon dioxide concentration in poplar Tree Physiol. 22 633 640
Fu, Q.S., Zhao, B., Wang, Y.J., Ren, S. & Guo, Y.D. 2010 Stomatal development and associated photosynthetic performance of capsicum in response to differential light availabilities Photosynthetica 48 189 198
Gay, A.P. & Hurd, R.G. 1975 The influence of light on stomatal density in the tomato New Phytol. 75 37 46
Guo, S., Zhang, J., Sun, H., Salse, J., Lucas, W.J., Zhang, H., Zheng, Y., Mao, L., Ren, Y. & Wang, Z. 2013 The draft genome of watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) and resequencing of 20 diverse accessions Nat. Genet. 45 51 58
Harper, R.C., O'Reilly, C. & Perks, M. 2010 Rapidly detecting the effects of warm storage stress on Douglas fir seedlings Plant Biosyst. 144 769 777
Holcomb, E.J. 1994 Bedding plants IV. 4th Ed. Ball Publishing, Batavia, IL.
Hou, J.Y., Setter, T.L. & Chang, Y. 2010 Effects of simulated dark shipping on photosynthetic status and post-shipping performance in Phalaenopsis Sogo Yukidian ‘V3’ J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 135 183 190
Justus, I. & Kubota, C. 2010 Effects of low temperature storage on growth and transplant quality of non-grafted and grafted cantaloupe-type muskmelon seedlings Sci. Hort. 125 47 54
Kaczperski, M.P., Armitage, A.M. & Lewis, P.M. 1996 Performance of plug-grown geranium seedlings preconditioned with nitrogen fertilizer or low-temperature storage HortScience 31 361 363
Kang, C., Lian, H.L., Wang, F.F., Huang, J.R. & Yang, H.Q. 2009 Cryptochromes, phytochromes, and COP1 regulate light-controlled stomatal development in Arabidopsis The Plant Cell Online. 21 2624 2641
Kubota, C. & Kozai, T. 1994 Low-temperature storage for quality preservation and growth suppression of broccoli plantlets cultured photoautotrophically in vitro HortScience 29 1191 1194
Kubota, C., Seiyama, S. & Kozai, T. 2002 Manipulation of photoperiod and light intensity in low-temperature storage of eggplant plug seedlings Sci. Hort. 94 13 20
Lee, S.H., Tewari, R.K., Hahn, E.J. & Paek, K.Y. 2007 Photon flux density and light quality induce changes in growth, stomatal development, photosynthesis and transpiration of Withania Somnifera (L.) Dunal. plantlets Plant Cell Tiss. Org. 90 141 151
L'Hirondelle, S.J., Simpson, D.G. & Binder, W.D. 2007 Chlorophyll fluorescence, root growth potential, and stomatal conductance as estimates of field performance potential in conifer seedlings New For. 34 235 251
Liu, G.L., Britz, S.J. & Wergin, W.P. 2000 Blue light inhibits stomatal development in soybean isolines containing kaempferol-3-O-2G-glycosyl–gentiobioside (K9), a unique flavanoid glycoside Plant Cell Environ. 23 883 891
Maki, D.S. & Colombo, S.J. 2001 Early detection of the effects of warm storage on conifer seedlings using physiological tests For. Ecol. Mgt. 154 237 249
Mena-Petite, A., Robredo, A., Alcalde, S., Dunabeitia, M.K., Gonzalez-Moro, M.B., Lacuesta, M. & Munoz-Rueda, A. 2003 Gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence responses of Pinus radiata D. Don seedlings during and after several storage regimes and their effects on post-planting survival Trees Struct. Funct. 17 133 143
Park, J.S. & Fujiwara, K. 2009 Quality preservation of tomato seedlings affected by different wavelengths of LED-low light during storage Eur. J. Hort. Sci. 74 21 23
Rengifo, E., Urich, R. & Herrera, A. 2002 Water relations and leaf anatomy of the tropical species, Jatropha gossypifolia and Alternanthera crucis, grown under elevated CO2 concentration Photosynthetica 40 397 403
Sato, F., Yoshioka, H., Fujiwara, T., Higashio, H., Uragami, A. & Tokuda, S. 2004 Physiological responses of cabbage plug seedlings to water stress during low-temperature storage in darkness Sci. Hort. 101 349 357
Schlüter, U., Muschak, M., Berger, D. & Altmann, T. 2003 Photosynthetic performance of an Arabidopsis mutant with elevated stomatal density (sdd1-1) under different light regimes J. Expt. Bot. 54 867 874
Su, V., Hsu, B.D. & Chen, W.H. 2001 The photosynthetic activities of bare rooted Phalaenopsis during storage Sci. Hort. 87 311 318
Tezara, W., Marín, O., Rengifo, E., Martínez, D. & Herrera, A. 2005 Photosynthesis and photoinhibition in two xerophytic shrubs during drought Photosynthetica 43 37 45
Turner, N.C. & Heichel, G.H. 1977 Stomatal development and seasonal changes in diffusive resistance of primary and regrowth foliage of red oak (Quercus rubra L.) and red maple (Acer rubrum L.) New Phytol. 78 71 81
Van, K.O. & Snel, J.F.H. 1990 The use of chlorophyll fluorescence nomenclature in plant stress physiology Photosynth. Res. 25 147 150
Wilson, S.B., Iwabuchi, K., Rajapakse, N.C. & Young, R.E. 1998a Responses of broccoli seedlings to light quality during low-temperature storage in vitro: I. Morphology and survival HortScience 33 1253 1257
Wilson, S.B., Iwabuchi, K., Rajapakse, N.C. & Young, R.E. 1998b Responses of broccoli seedlings to light quality during low-temperature storage in vitro: II. Sugar content and photosynthetic efficiency HortScience 33 1258 1261
Yongjian, W., Haiying, Z., Feng, Z., Yong, X., Wanhong, C. & Guobin, K. 2001 Effects of low temperature and low light intensity stress on photosynthesis in seedlings of different cucumber varieties Acta Horticulturae Sinica 28 230 234 [in Chinese with English abstract]