‘Vidal blanc’ (Vitis vinifera × Vitis rupestris) is the most important white wine grape cultivar planted in Kentucky as a result of its adaptability to climate and soil and increased local demand. However, there is lack of information and research on grapevine canopy and cropload management for commercial production of ‘Vidal blanc’ under the long, warm growing season of the lower midwestern United States.
Grapevine crop control is commonly accomplished by balanced pruning. In interspecific hybrid cultivars such as Traminette (Vitis spp.), a balanced pruning formula of retaining 40 buds for the first 454 g of dormant wood removed and 10 additional buds for each additional 454 g of dormant wood resulted in optimum yield and fruit composition with minimal decrease in midwinter primary bud cold hardiness (O’Daniel et al., 2012). However, pruning is a rough regulator of yield and does not adequately control crop level or cropload of interspecific hybrids (Howell et al., 1987; Kaps and Cahoon, 1989; Kurtural et al., 2006). For example, ‘Chambourcin’ (Vitis vinifera × Vitis rupestris) produces a large number of fruitful shoots from non-count positions (Ferree et al., 2003; Kurtural et al., 2006). The fruitfulness of non-count buds is the primary cause of overcropping and ineffectiveness of balanced pruning (Kurtural et al., 2006; Pool et al., 1978). To remedy this problem and regulate cropping levels and cropload in several hybrid cultivars such as Chambourcin, Vidal blanc, and Seyval blanc, balanced pruning combined with cluster or berry thinning have been used together (Howell et al., 1987; Kaps and Cahoon, 1989; Kurtural et al., 2006).
Cluster thinning is a technique used to obtain the needed crop control in medium- and large-clustered interspecific hybrids (Kaps and Cahoon, 1989; Kurtural et al., 2006). Thinning to two clusters per shoot reduced yield but increased the total soluble solids of the grape juice at harvest and invigorated the vine in the following years in a number of French-American hybrid and V. vinifera cultivars (Bravdo et al., 1984; Nonnecke, 1980; Reynolds et al., 1986). Kurtural et al. (2006) reported acceptable crop reduction in ‘Chambourcin’ grapevines with a combination of 20 + 10 balanced pruning formula and cluster thinning to 1.2 clusters per shoot where yield was reduced but fruit quality was improved in addition to maintaining pruning weight per vine. For ‘Vidal blanc’, cluster thinning to one cluster per shoot and a balanced pruning formula of 15 + 10 was advised based on labor cost savings and minimized crop loss resulting from winter damage in Michigan (Howell et al., 1987). These results coupled with improved fruit quality and periderm browning of potted ‘Chambourcin’ led to a new concept, “balanced cropping,” where both balanced pruning, cluster thinning, and shoot thinning are used together for crop adjustment of interspecific hybrids as well as V. vinifera cultivars that can also be achieved mechanically (Geller and Kurtural, 2013; Kurtural et al., 2006, 2013; Main and Morris, 2004; Miller et al., 1996; Terry and Kurtural, 2011).
Vine balance in vineyards is commonly measured with the Ravaz Index (RI). The RI is the ratio between yield and pruning weight (Ravaz, 1911). The RI estimates the leaf area required to ripen clusters on the vine. Cropload management ameliorates the ratio between reproductive and vegetative growth of the grapevine to sustain productivity while optimizing yield, fruit composition, and midwinter, primary bud cold hardiness. Dormancy in grapevines is induced by shorter daylengths and colder temperatures and is essential if the vine is to withstand colder temperatures (Dami et al., 2005). The ability of the vine to enter a dormant state and to withstand freezing may be directly linked to the ratio between reproductive sinks and vegetative sources (O’Daniel et al., 2012).
Growers in Kentucky have had to rely on viticultural information generated in Michigan and New York. However, macroclimatic conditions in these regions are characteristic of cool climate viticulture (Jackson and Schuster, 1987) with growing degree-days (GDD) of 1250 GDD (base 10 °C) and 1275 GDD, respectively (Howell, 2001). Central Kentucky is characterized by warm climate viticulture with more than 2200 GDD accumulation (Kurtural et al., 2008). It was hypothesized that cropping targets for ‘Vidal blanc’ were not similar in cool vs. warm climate conditions. The long, warm growing season in Kentucky coupled with the typical 500 to 635 mm precipitation received during the growing season make proper management more challenging than the cooler and shorter growing seasons in the northern United States where ‘Vidal blanc’ has traditionally been grown. The long season (greater than 200 frost-free days) promotes more shoot growth per week, and the amounts of rain and humidity are key factors for development of fungal diseases as well. Thus, guidelines are needed for the lower Midwest that take into account the longer, warmer, and wetter growing season and the cold winters with fluctuating January temperatures.
The goal of this study was to identify optimal combinations of balanced pruning and cluster thinning levels without adversely affecting yield components, fruit composition, and midwinter primary bud cold hardiness of ‘Vidal blanc’ for commercial production in central Kentucky and the lower midwestern United States. The specific objectives were to determine the effect of pruning and cluster thinning on canopy architecture, yield components, and berry composition of ‘Vidal blanc’ grapevines.
Bernizzoni, F., Civardi, S., Van Zeller, M., Gatti, M. & Poni, S. 2011 Shoot thinning effects on whole season photosynthesis and vine performance in Vitis vinifera L. cv. Barbera Austral. J. Grape and Wine. Res. 17 351 357
Bordelon, B., Ellis, M. & Foster, R. 2006 Midwest small fruit and grape spray guide. University of Kentucky, Extension Bulletin ID-94. Purdue, IN
Bravdo, B., Hepner, Y., Loinger, C., Cohen, S. & Tabacman, H. 1984 Effect of crop level on growth, yield and wine quality of a high yielding ‘Carignane’ vineyard Amer. J. Enol. Viticult. 35 247 252
Dami, I., Bordelon, B., Ferree, D.C., Brown, M., Ellis, M.A., William, R.N. & Doohan, D. 2005 Midwest grape production guide. The Ohio State University Extension Bulletin 919-05
Dami, I.E. & Ji, T. 2008 Characterization of free flavor compounds in Traminette grape and their relationship to vineyard training system and location J. Food Sci. 73 262 267
Fisher, K.H., Bradt, O.A., Wiebe, J. & Kirks, V.A. 1977 Cluster thinning ‘de Chaunac’ French hybrid grapes improves vine vigor and fruit quality in Ontario J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 102 162 165
Geller, J.P. & Kaan Kurtural, S. 2013 Mechanical canopy and crop-load management of Pinot gris in a warm climate Amer. J. Enol. Viticult. 64 65 73
Howell, G.S., Mansfeld, T.K. & Wolpert, J.A. 1987 Influence of training system, pruning severity and thinning on yield, vine size, and fruit quality of ‘Vidal Blanc’ grapevines Amer. J. Enol. Viticult. 38 105 112
Jackson, D. & Schuster, D. 1987 The production of grapes and wines in cool climates. Butterworths, Wellington, New Zealand.
Kaps, M.L. & Cahoon, G.A. 1989 Berry thinning and cluster thinning influence vegetative growth, yield, fruit composition and net photosynthesis of ‘Seyval Blanc’ grapes HortScience 114 20 24
Keller, M. 2010 The science of grapevines—Anatomy and physiology. Academic Press, Burlington, MA
Kliewer, W.M. & Dokoozlian, N.K. 2005 Leaf area/crop weight ratios of grapevines: Influence on fruit composition and wine quality Amer. J. Enol. Viticult. 56 170 181
Kurtural, S.K., Dami, I.E. & Taylor, B.H. 2006 Effects of pruning and cluster thinning on yield and fruit composition of Chambourcin grapevines HortTechnology 16 233 240
Kurtural, S.K., Wessner, L. & Dervishian, G. 2013 Vegetative compensation response of a procumbent cultivar (Vitis vinifera cv. Syrah) under mechanical canopy management HortScience 48 576 583
Kurtural, S.K., Wilson, P.E. & Dami, I.E. 2008 Kentucky viticultural regions and suggested cultivars. University of Kentucky Extension Bulletin HO-88. Lexington, KY
Main, G.L. & Morris, J.R. 2004 Leaf-removal effects on Cynthiana yield, juice composition, and wine composition Amer. J. Enol. Viticult. 55 147 152
Miller, D.P., Howell, G.S. & Flore, J.A. 1996 Influence of shoot number and crop load on potted Chambourcin grapevines. I. Morphology and dry matter partitioning Amer. J. Enol. Viticult. 47 380 388
Nonnecke, G.R. 1980 The influence of cluster thinning and shoot-tip removal on ‘Seyval’ grapevine. PhD diss., Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH
O’Daniel, S.B., Archbold, D. & Kurtural, S.K. 2012 Effects of balanced pruning severity on Traminette (Vitis spp.) in a warm climate Amer. J. Enol. Viticult. 63 284 290
Reynolds, A.G., Pool, R.M. & Mattick, L.R. 1986 Effect of shoot density and crop control on growth, yield, fruit composition and wine quality of ‘Seyval’ grapes J. Amer. Hort. Soc. Sci. 111 55 63
Reynolds, A.G. & Wardle, D.A. 1994 Impact of training system and vine spacing on vine performance and berry composition of Seyval blanc Amer. J. Enol. Viticult. 45 444 451
Smart, R.E. 1985 Principles of grapevine canopy microclimate manipulation with implications for yield and quality. A review Amer. J. Enol. Viticult. 36 230 239
Smart, R.E. & Robinson, M. 1991 Sunlight into wine. A handbook for wine grape canopy management. Winetitles, Adelaide, Australia
Terry, D. & Kurtural, S.K. 2011 Achieving vine balance of Syrah with mechanical canopy management and regulated deficit irrigation Amer. J. Enol. Viticult. 62 426 437
U.S. Department of Agriculture 2011 Soil survey staff Official soil series descriptions. USDA-NRCS. 1 Apr. 2011. <http://soils.usda.gov/technical/classification/osd/index.html>