Precision irrigation of ornamental plants can be a difficult task for nursery growers as a result of the lack of quantitative information regarding the specific water needs of different plant species. To prevent drought stress and ultimately crop losses and/or reductions in growth rate resulting from dehydration, many growers apply excessive amounts of irrigation (Kim et al., 2011; Mathers et al., 2005). This strategy can lead to leaching and runoff of fertilizer and pesticides from the substrate. Majsztrik et al. (2011) and Million et al. (2007) have shown that by reducing leaching of fertilizer from container-grown ornamentals, nurseries can reduce production costs and increase profits. Previous research has also shown that efficient irrigation systems and proper scheduling can save significant amounts of irrigation water without adversely affecting crop yield or quality in ornamental production (Bacci et al., 2008; Beeson, 2012; Fereres et al., 2003). By using soil moisture sensor-based, automated irrigation systems, precision irrigation can be effectively implemented in ornamental plant production (Chappell et al., 2013). One critical piece of information for the implementation of soil moisture sensor-based irrigation is the substrate water content at which plants need to be irrigated. Because not all water in substrates is available to plants, it is important to know how much of the water in the substrate can be used by plants. It is generally proposed that plants can no longer take up water from a soilless substrate at a VWC less than 0.20 m3·m−3 (Drzal et al., 1999; Milks et al., 1989b). However, previous studies have shown that various species can grow below this proposed threshold for water availability (e.g., Burnett and van Iersel, 2008; van Iersel et al., 2010). Thus, the effect of VWC on the ability of different species to take up water from soilless substrates needs further research.
When plants are exposed to decreasing water availability, they respond by progressively closing their stomates to reduce transpiration and prevent dehydration (Sperry et al., 2002; Tezara et al., 1999), although the severity of the drought response is species-specific (Niu et al., 2006). Some of the more drought-tolerant plants can undergo osmotic adjustment in the root and leaf tissues that enable the plant to preserve the water potential gradient necessary to facilitate water uptake under drought conditions (Hsiao and Xu, 2000). As the water content within the plant decreases, cells will begin to lose turgor, resulting in decreased leaf expansion and root elongation. When cell turgor approaches zero, leaves wilt (Taiz and Zeiger, 2002). When the substrate becomes too dry for a plant to extract water from the substrate, the plant will no longer be able to maintain transpiration, ultimately causing the death of the plant. The soil/substrate water potential at which plants can no longer take up enough water to recover, even if transpiration is negligible, has been termed the permanent wilting point (PWP) (Tolk, 2003). A common assumption for field crops is that there is no plant-available water at a soil water potential less than –1.5 MPa based on research conducted by Furr and Reeve (1945) on the PWP of sunflowers. As a consequence, a pressure plate apparatus is commonly used to determine the VWC at which the matric potential is –1.5 MPa to determine the PWP in different soils/substrates (Tolk, 2003). However, the actual water potential threshold for the PWP of different plants is dependent on the relationship among plant species, soil type, and weather (Taiz and Zeiger, 2002; Tolk, 2003). In addition, the ability of plants to take up water from soils or soilless substrates not only depends on the matric potential, but also on the hydraulic conductivity of that soil or substrate. The hydraulic conductivity of soils and substrates decreases as the soil or substrate dries out (Campbell and Campbell, 1982). As a consequence, low hydraulic conductivity may slow water movement in drying substrates and thus limit plant water uptake (van Iersel et al., 2013).
When comparing soilless substrates and soil, VWC at a matric potential of –1.5 MPa differs significantly between a mineral soil (0.162 m3·m−3; Cecil clay loam) and a bark-based substrate [0.215 m3·m−3; 3 bark:1 sand:1 peat (v:v:v)] (Milks et al., 1989b). Drzal et al. (1999) suggested that water present in a soilless substrate at a water potential below –1.5 MPa is bound within ultramicropores and is unavailable to plants based on the pressure/tension required to extract such water in a laboratory setting. However, when applied to actual plant material grown in soilless substrates, moisture release theory may not accurately reflect the ability of plants to take up water from soilless substrates. Lobet et al. (2014) recently emphasized the importance of combining soil and plant hydraulic properties for predicting plant water uptake and the same likely holds true for soilless substrates.
In studies conducted on the water requirements of bedding plants in peat-based substrates, a VWC of 0.15 m3·m−3 was not low enough to cause a severe inhibition of growth in vinca (Catharanthus roseus), petunia (Petunia ×hybrida) (Nemali and van Iersel, 2005), or chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum ×morifolium) (Olson et al., 2002). van Iersel and Dove (2005) also concluded that there was no effect of VWC on whole-plant photosynthesis of abelia (Abelia ×grandiflora) or hydrangea (Hydrangea macrophylla) at a VWC greater than 0.15 m3·m−3 in a bark-based substrate and that wilting did not occur until VWC reached 0.06 m3·m−3 for abelia and 0.08 m3·m−3 for hydrangea. Thus, plants can grow at VWC levels well below the commonly used 0.20 m3·m−3 threshold for plant-available water. Plant water use at different VWCs may be more indicative of the actual availability of substrate water to plants than measuring substrate hydraulic properties. Therefore, we conducted this study to quantify the hydraulic properties of a bark-based substrate and to determine the relationship between substrate VWC and plant water uptake and conductance in Hydrangea macrophylla and Gardenia jasminoides. Our objectives were to determine how much of the water present in a pine bark-based substrate is actually plant-available and to test whether this is species-dependent, as suggested by van Iersel and Dove (2005).
Altland, J.E., Owen, J.S. & Fonteno, W.C. 2010 Developing moisture characteristic curves and their descriptive functions at low tensions for soilless substrates J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 135 563 567
Beeson, R.C. Jr 2012 Development of a simple reference evapotranspiration model for irrigation of woody ornamentals HortScience 47 264 268
Bramley, H., Turner, N.C., Turner, D.W. & Tylerman, S.D. 2009 Roles of morphology, anatomy, and aquaporins in determining contrasting hydraulic behavior of roots Plant Physiol. 150 348 364
Burnett, S.E. & van Iersel, M.W. 2008 Morphology and irrigation efficiency of Gaura lindheimeri grown with capacitance sensor-controlled irrigation HortScience 43 1555 1560
Chappell, M., Dove, S.K., van Iersel, M.W., Thomas, P.A. & Ruter, J. 2013 Implementation of wireless sensor networks for irrigation control in three container nurseries HortTechnology 23 747 753
Furr, J.R. & Reeve, J.O. 1945 Range of soil-moisture percentages through which plants undergo permanent wilting in some soils from semi-arid irrigated areas J. Agr. Res. 71 149 170
Hsiao, T.C. & Xu, L.-K. 2000 Sensitivity of growth of roots versus leaves to water stress: Biophysical analysis and relation to water transport J. Expt. Bot. 51 1595 1616
Kim, J., van Iersel, M.W. & Burnett, S. 2011 Estimating daily water use of two petunia cultivars based on plant and environmental factors HortScience 46 1287 1293
Majsztrik, J., Ristvey, A.G. & Lea-Cox, J.D. 2011 Water and nutrient management in the production of container-grown ornamentals. In: Janick, J. (ed.). Hort. Reviews. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ. 38:253–297
McElrone, A.J., Pockman, W.T., Vilata, J.M. & Jackson, R.B. 2004 Variation in xylem structure and function in stems and roots of trees to 20 m depth New Phytol. 163 507 517
Milks, R.R., Fonteno, W.C. & Larson, R.A. 1989a Hydrology of horticultural substrates: I. Mathematical models for moisture characteristics of horticultural container media J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 114 48 52
Milks, R.R., Fonteno, W.C. & Larson, R.A. 1989b Hydrology of horticultural substrates: II. Predicting physical properties of media in containers J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 114 53 56
Million, J., Yeager, T. & Albano, J. 2007 Consequences of excessive overhead irrigation on runoff during container production of sweet viburnum J. Environ. Hort. 25 117 125
Nemali, K.S. & van Iersel, M.W. 2008 Physiological responses to different substrate water contents: Screening for high water-use efficiency in bedding plants J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 133 333 340
Niu, G., Rodriguez, D.S. & Wang, Y.-T. 2006 Impact of drought and temperature on growth and leaf gas exchange of six bedding plant species under greenhouse conditions HortScience 41 1408 1411
Olson, D.L., Oetting, R.D. & van Iersel, M.W. 2002 Effect of soilless potting media and water management on development of fungus gnats (Diptera: Sciaridae) and plant growth HortScience 37 919 923
Pertassek, T., Peters, A. & Durner, W. 2011 HYPROP data evaluation software user’s manual, V.1.0. UMS GmbH, Munich, Germany
Peters, A. & Durner, W. 2008b A simple model for describing hydraulic conductivity in unsaturated porous media accounting for film and capillary flow Water Resour. Res. 44 W11417
Sperry, J.S., Hacke, U.G., Oren, R. & Comstock, J.P. 2002 Water deficits and hydraulic limitations to leaf water supply Plant Cell Environ. 25 251 263
Taiz, L. & Zeiger, E. 2002 Plant physiology. 3rd Ed. Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, MA
Tezara, W., Mitchell, V.J., Driscoll, S.D. & Lawlor, D.W. 1999 Water stress inhibits plant photosynthesis by decreasing coupling factor and ATP Nature 401 914 917
Tolk, J.A. 2003 Soils, permanent wilting points. Encyclopedia of water science. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY
van Iersel, M.W., Chappell, M.R. & Lea-Cox, J. 2013 Sensors for improved efficiency of irrigation in greenhouse and nursery production HortTechnology 23 735 746
van Iersel, M.W. & Dove, S. 2005 Whole-plant photosynthesis of containerized hydrangeas and abelias as affected by substrate moisture content HortScience 40 1111 (abstr.)
van Iersel, M.W., Dove, S., Kang, J.-G. & Burnett, S.E. 2010 Growth and water use of petunia as affected by substrate water content and daily light integral HortScience 45 277 282
Wallach, R., Da Silva, F.F. & Chen, Y. 1992 Unsaturated hydraulic characteristics of composted agricultural wastes, tuff, and their mixtures Soil Sci. 153 434 441 (abstr.)