The worldwide production of mango (Mangifera indica L.) is frequently reduced by severe losses of fruit numbers throughout the growing season, a phenomenon that is referred to as premature fruit drop (Singh et al., 2005).
Mango produces an abundance of male and polygamous flowers, but only a small proportion of the latter group is successfully pollinated and has the potential for setting fruit (Mukherjee, 1953; Singh et al., 1966). Numerous abiotic and biotic factors reduce pollen viability (Issarakraisila and Considine, 1994), the fertilization process of the flower, and embryo survival (Lakshminarayana and Aguilar, 1975), which are all commonly associated with extensive fruit drop in early season (Singh et al., 2005). Fruit that remains attracts a greater share of the available tree resources for continued growth and development. Subsequent fruit drop is induced by any factor reducing carbohydrate availability and thus the demand of the growing fruit is not sufficiently matched by its supply (Wünsche and Ferguson, 2005). This carbohydrate imbalance can occur, for example, by air temperatures below 13 °C or exceeding 36 °C as a result of heavily reduced leaf photosynthesis rates (Issarakraisila and Considine, 1994; Whiley et al., 1999; Yamada et al., 1996).
For mango, principal phenological growth stages are distinguished (Hernández Delgado et al., 2011) according to the general BBCH-scale (Biologische Bundesanstalt, Bundessortenamt und Chemische Industrie); however, fruit drop is only described in Stage 7 with “beginning and end of the physiological fruit drop” when fruits have attained 10% or 30% of final fruit size, respectively. The premature fruit drop stages have been named invariably and there is also no common agreement on the number of drop stages as well as the onset and duration of each. Dahshan and Habib (1985) originally described three distinct stages of premature fruit drop of mango and this classification was also used in the review of Singh et al. (2005). The first stage is referred to as “post-setting drop” and ceases 60 d after “fruit set” (BBCH-scale 619). The second stage is termed “mid-season drop,” characterized by a duration of 15 d with lesser intensity than during the “post-setting drop.” The third stage is the “pre-harvest drop” with only moderate losses.
These descriptions of premature fruit drop, commonly found in the literature, represent some considerable limitations. The onset of each fruit drop stage is based on a “fixed” number of days from “fruit set” as used for example in the review of Singh et al. (2005). Fruit set, however, is variably related to: 1) time after all flowers have dried out at the end of bloom (Malik and Singh, 2003); 2) 14 d after full bloom (DAFB) (Notodimedjo, 2000); or 3) size of fruitlets (Lam et al., 1985). The flowering of mango is a very prolonged and sometimes non-synchronized process, especially in the tropics where erratic flowering is common but also in the subtropics flowering can occur from a few days of an individual flower, 1 to 2 weeks within a panicle to up to 1 month within a tree canopy (Goguey, 1997; Mukherjee, 1953; Verheij, 1986). Typically, panicles exhibit a hierarchical flowering pattern from distal to proximal with an overlapping continuum of flowering and fruit development (Mukherjee, 1953; Singh, 1954). The terms “full bloom” and “fruitlet size” are often subjectively assessed by scoring and variably defined and thus do not offer precise occurrences that justify a valid comparison of published fruit set data. The duration of each fruit drop stage is clearly dependent on seasonal, regional, and cultivar-specific variability and therefore the “fixed time after fruit set” definition might be useful for characterizing the annual drop pattern of a given cultivar in one location but is not appropriate when comparing multiple data sets. Consequently, the main objective of this study is to provide a new approach for interpreting and evaluating fruit drop data, attempting to overcome or at least to alleviate the limitations described. Consequently, fruit drop of two mango cultivars was monitored in largely different cropping and management systems over six seasons in the Province Sơn La in North Vietnam and data were tested and validated in a mathematical model.
Unfavorable environmental cues, particularly when temperature extremes coincide with severe drought conditions (Elsheery et al., 2007), are thought to be key triggers for the extensive premature fruit drop patterns in this province. Huong (2010) further suggested poor orchard management, in particular insufficient pest management, as an additional cause of fruit drop for the local mango cultivars Hôi and Tròn predominantly cultivated in this region.
Despite extremely low orchard productivity of ≈1 t·ha−1 (Yên Châu, 2008, Statistical Data of Yên Châu District, Statistical Department, unpublished data), mango trees are often planted either in monoculture or in intercropping systems with mainly maize in the mountainous Province of Sơn La with steep, sloping hillsides. Indeed, tree crops, including mango, provide a more appropriate and sustainable land use system for steep, deforested slope sites (Roberts-Nkrumah, 2000; Young, 1989), because the cultivation of annual crops in monocropping systems under those topographical conditions will lead to reduced soil fertility and severe soil erosion (Clemens et al., 2010). In particular during the juvenile phase of tree crops, intercropping with annuals is a common practice (Musvoto and Campbell, 1995; Roberts-Nkrumah, 2004). However, it has been reported that some plant species enhance mango fruit drop in intercropping systems (Singh et al., 2005).
Crop management strategies such as irrigation or plant growth regulator (PGR) applications may also offer opportunities for fruit drop prevention. Galán Saúco (1997) suggested that the water requirement of mango is ≈100 mm monthly during the fruit development period to ensure good productivity. However, this level is typically lower during early fruit development in the Province of Sơn La (Roemer et al., 2011) with water deficiency particularly prevalent from bloom to midseason drop as a result of the lack of precipitation or irrigation sources. Alternatively, applications of PGRs are commonly used for enhancing fruit retention in many perennial fruit crops, including mango. For example, CPPU increased fruit retention in different mango cultivars and growing regions (Burondkar et al., 2009; Notodimedjo, 2000). Similar effects were shown when GA was applied either alone or in combination with other PGRs (Benjawan et al., 2006; Chen, 1983; Notodimedjo, 2000; Oosthuyse, 1993, 1995; Ram, 1983; Singh, 2009). Moreover, the synthetic auxin NAA is another fruit drop-reducing PGR with a timely different efficacy; fruit retention is less affected when applied around post-bloom rather than at later fruit developmental stages (Chattha et al., 1999; Notodimedjo, 2000).
In summary, the largely equivocal assessment and description of fruit drop in mango render the comparison and interpretation of published data extremely difficult to draw general conclusions and providing horticultural recommendations. We therefore attempt to offer not only a new approach for assessing fruit drop data, based on a simple mathematical model, but also to newly characterize this process that occurs throughout the growing season from first flower to just before harvest. In particular, describing the fruit drop process, we are re-evaluating the appropriateness of existing terminologies in this context and offering more precise benchmarks for onset and duration of each fruit drop stage. For a robust evaluation and validation of our model as well as the interpretation of the seasonal fruit drop continuum, fruit abscission was monitored over several years in varying mango production systems.
Asif, M., Usman, M., Fatima, B., Laskani, M.I. & Khan, M.M. 2002 Fruit set and drop behaviour of three commercial cultivars of mango Pak. J. Agr. Sci. 39 129 131
Benjawan, C., Chutichudet, P. & Chanaboon, T. 2006 Effect of gibberellin (GA3) on fruit yield and quality of Kaew mango (Mangifera indica L.) cv. Srisaket 007 in Northeast Thailand Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 9 1542 1546
Bhuyan, M.A.J. & Irabagon, J.A. 1993 Effect of fertilizer, potassium nitrate and irrigation on fruit drop of ‘Carabao’ mango South Indian Hort. 41 315 321
Bolker, B.M., Brooks, M.E., Clark, C.J., Geange, S.W., Poulsen, J.R., Stevens, M.H.H. & White, J.-S.S. 2009 Generalized linear mixed models: A practical guide for ecology and evolution Trends Ecol. Evol. 24 127 135
Burondkar, M.M., Jadhav, B.B. & Chetti, M.B. 2009 Post-flowering morpho-physiological behavior of Alphonso mango as influenced by plant growth regulators, polyamine and nutrients under rainfed conditions Acta Hort. 820 425 432
Chattha, G.A., Anjum, M.A. & Hussain, A. 1999 Effect of various growth regulators on reducing fruit drop on mango (Mangifera indica L.) Intl. J. Agr. Biol. 1 288 289
Chen, W.-S. 1983 Cytokinins of the developing mango fruit: Isolation, identification, and changes in levels during maturation Plant Physiol. 71 356 361
Clemens, G., Fiedler, S., Cong, N.D., Van Dung, N., Schuler, U. & Stahr, K. 2010 Soil fertility affected by land use history, relief position, and parent material under a tropical climate in NW-Vietnam Catena 81 87 96
Dahshan, D.I. & Habib, S. 1985 Seasonal changes in endogenous auxin like substances in relation to fruit drop in mango Proc. Egypt. Bot. Soc. 4 769 780
Damour, G., Vandame, M. & Urban, L. 2009 Long-term drought results in a reversible decline in photosynthetic capacity in mango leaves, not just a decrease in stomatal conductance Tree Physiol. 29 675 684
Davenport, T.L. 2006 Pruning strategies to maximize tropical mango production from the time of planting to restoration of old orchards HortScience 41 544 548
Dhanalakshmi, R., Prasad, T.G. & Udayakumar, M. 2003 Is auxin a diffusible signal mediating abscission of recessive sinks? Plant Sci. 164 689 696
Elsheery, N.I., Wilske, B., Zhang, J.-L. & Cao, K.-F. 2007 Seasonal variations in gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence in the leaves of five mango cultivars in southern Yunnan, China J. Hort. Sci. Biotechnol. 82 855 862
FAO 2006 World reference base for soil resources: A framework for international classification, correlation and communication. World soil resources report No. 103. Food Agric. Organ
FAOSTAT 2012 Statistical database of the Food Agric. Organ. 20 July 2013. <http://faostat.fao.org>
González, A., Lu, P. & Müller, W. 2004 Effect of pre-flowering irrigation on leaf photosynthesis, whole-tree water use and fruit yield of mango trees receiving two flowering treatments Sci. Hort. 102 189 211
Hernández Delgado, P.M., Aranguren, M., Reig, C., Fernández Galván, D., Mesejo, C., Martínez Fuentes, A., Galán Saúco, V. & Agusti, M. 2011 Phenological growth stages of mango (Mangifera indica L.) according to the BBCH scale Sci. Hort. 130 536 540
Huong, P.T. 2004 Impacts of thinning and pre-harvest bagging on growth, yield and fruit’s appearance of mango grown in Sap Vat commune, Yên Châu district, Sơn La province J. Sci. Dev. 5 234 328
IFPRI 2002 Fruits and vegetables in Vietnam: Adding value from farmer to consumer. Int. Food Policy Res. Inst., Washington, DC
Iwahori, S., Tominaga, S. & Yamasaki, T. 1988 Stimulation of fruit growth of kiwifruit, Actinidia chinensis Planch., by N-(2-chloro-4-pyridyl)-N'-phenylurea, a diphenylurea-derivative cytokinin Sci. Hort. 35 109 115
Lakshminarayana, S. & Aguilar, P.H. 1975 Effect of orchard heating in reducing parthenocarpic fruit in ‘Haden’ mango Proc. Fl. St. Hort. Soc. 88 502 505
Lam, P.F., Ng, K.H., Omar, D. & Talib, Y. 1985 Fruit-drop and growth, respiration and chemical changes in ‘Golek’ mango Malaysian Agr. Res. Dev. Inst. Bul. Penyelidikan. 13 8 14
Larson, K.D., Schaffer, B. & Davies, F.S. 1989 Effect of irrigation on leaf water potential, growth and yield of mango trees Proc. Fl. St. Hort. Soc. 102 226 228
Mehouachi, J., Serna, D., Zaragoza, S., Agusti, M., Talon, M. & Primo-Millo, E. 1995 Defoliation increases fruit abscission and reduces carbohydrate levels in developing fruits and woody tissues of Citrus unshiu Plant Sci. 107 189 197
Notodimedjo, S. 2000 Effect of GA3, NAA and CPPU on fruit retention, yield and quality of mango (cv. Arumanis) in East Java Acta Hort. 509 587 600
Núñez-Elisea, R. & Davenport, T.L. 1983 Abscission and ethylene production in mango (Mangifera indica L.) fruit cv. Tommy Atkins Proc. Fla. Hort. Soc. 96 185 188
Oosthuyse, S.A. 1993 Effect of spray application of KNO3, urea and growth regulators on the yield of ‘Tommy Atkins’ mango South African Mango Grow. Assn Yrbk. 13 58 62
Oosthuyse, S.A. 1995 Effect of post-bloom aqueous spray application of GA3, NAA, and CPPU on fruit retention, fruit size and yield in Tommy Atkins and Heidi mango South African Mango Grow. Assn. Yrbk. 15 31 33
Prakash, S. & Ram, S. 1984 Naturally occurring auxins and inhibitor and their role in fruit growth and drop of mango ‘Dashehari’ Sci. Hort. 22 241 248
Roberts-Nkrumah, L.B. 2000 The establishment and growth of young mango trees in on-farm hillside trials in Trinidad, W.I Acta Hort. 509 705 712
Roemer, M.G., Hegele, M., Wünsche, J.N. & Huong, P.T. 2011 Possible physiological mechanisms of premature fruit drop in mango (Mangifera indica L.) in Northern Vietnam Acta Hort. 903 999 1006
Ruiz, R., García-Luis, A., Monerri, C. & Guardiola, J.L. 2001 Carbohydrate availability in relation to fruitlet abscission in citrus Ann. Bot. (Lond.) 87 805 812
Singh, R.N. 1954 Studies on the floral biology and subsequent developments of fruits in the mango (Mangifera indica L.) varieties of Dashehari and Langra Indian J. Hort. 11 69 88
Singh, R.N., Majumdar, P.K. & Sharma, D.K. 1966 Sex-expression in mango (Mangifera indica L.) with reference to prevailing temperature Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 89 228 229
Spreer, W., Ongprasert, S., Hegele, M., Wünsche, J.N. & Müller, J. 2009 Yield and fruit development in mango (Mangifera indica L. cv. Chok Anan) under different irrigation regimes Agr. Water Mgt. 96 574 584
Stino, R.G., El-Wahab, S.A.M.A., Habashy, S.A. & Kelani, R.A. 2011 Productivity and fruit quality of three mango cultivars in relation to foliar sprays of calcium, zinc, boron or potassium J. Hort. Sci. Ornam. Plant. 3 91 98
Sukhvibul, N., Whiley, A.W., Smith, M.K. & Hetherington, S.E. 2000 Susceptibility of mango (Mangifera indica L.) to cold-induced photoinhibition and recovery at different temperatures Austral. J. Agr. Res. 51 503 513
Whiley, A.W., Saranah, J.B., Rasmussen, T.S., Winston, E.C. & Wolstenholme, B.N. 1988 Effect of temperature on growth of ten cultivars of mango with relevance to production in Australia. Proc. 4th Austral. Conf. Tree and Nut Crops. p. 176–185
Whiley, W.A., Searle, C., Schaffer, B. & Wolstenholme, N.B. 1999 Cool orchard temperatures or growing trees in containers can inhibit leaf gas exchange of avocado and mango J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 124 46 51
Yamada, F., Fukamachi, H. & Hidaka, T. 1996 Photosynthesis in longan and mango as influenced by high temperatures under high irradiance J. Jpn. Soc. Hort. Sci. 64 749 756
Young, A. 1989 Agroforestry for soil conservation. CAB International, Wallingford, UK
Yuan, R. & Huang, H. 1988 Litchi fruit abscission: Its patterns, effect of shading and relation to endogenous abscisic acid Sci. Hort. 36 281 292