Georgia is the largest pecan producer in the United States (U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2009). A substantial amount of Georgia’s production is from orchards planted 60 to 100 years ago. Typically, these orchards were planted at 14.2 m × 14.2-m spacing, requiring removal of a portion of the trees to avoid excessive crowding. Many cultivars in these orchards are obsolete and perform poorly. In addition, disease or canopy loss has rendered many trees unproductive or their nut value is less than production costs.
Old orchards may be renewed by removing all trees and establishing new orchards with currently recommended cultivars. However, this approach eliminates cash flow for 6 to 8 years and profitability is unlikely for at least 9 years (Foshee et al., 1997). Orchards are renewed by selective removal of inferior trees (Goff and Browne, 2004) followed by interplanting recommended cultivars (seedling rootstock grafted to scion cultivar) or seedling rootstocks for later grafting (Wells, 2013). This approach maintains cash flow and reduces competition for remaining established trees, frequently resulting in increased total production, improved nut quality, and less disease pressure from pecan scab [Cladosporium caryigenum (Ellis and Langl.) Gottwald].
Cultivar pecan orchards are started by planting seed at the desired orchard spacing to produce a rootstock followed by grafting to acceptable cultivars, planting nursery-produced seedlings at orchard spacings followed by grafting or planting nursery-grafted trees (rootstock grafted to scion cultivar). Some advantages and disadvantages are obvious for each tree type. For instance, seed or seedlings are inexpensive, decisions regarding the scion cultivar can be delayed, and limited availability of the preferred cultivar is avoided (normally graft or bud wood is not limiting). Disadvantages include the expense of grafting and, depending on the skill of those involved, may require 3 or more years to successfully graft all seedlings. The time required to begin production may be longer using seed or seedlings. One significant advantage, particularly in northern production areas, of establishing seedlings and then grafting is greater cold-hardiness when grafted higher on the rootstock trunk (Sparks and Payne, 1977). Observations also suggest most seedling trunks (juvenile growth) are less prone to damage than cultivar trunks (adult phase growth) when mechanically thinning fruit. In hurricane-prone areas of the Southeast, whip-grafted trees that are grafted near or below ground level are frequently planted too deep resulting in poor anchorage and are subject to wind-throw.
Data are unavailable comparing pecan orchard renovation with grafted vs. seedling trees; however, one study compared seed, seedling, and grafted pecan trees when establishing a new orchard (Thompson et al., 1982). Pecan yields during initial production were similar 3 of 5 years for trees started from seed, 1- or 3-year-old seedlings that were budded their third growing season, and nursery-budded trees. In walnut (Juglans regia L.), cumulative yield (8 years) was greater using grafted trees or planting seed and then grafting to the desired cultivar than those planted as seedlings and then grafted (Reil, 2001).
One problem encountered with interplanted pecan trees was a symptom called “mouse-ear or little-leaf,” a disorder formerly thought to be a manganese shortage (Gammon and Sharpe, 1956). In its most severe form, young trees were severely stunted and unproductive. Wood et al. (2004a, 2004b) conclusively demonstrated that mouse-ear was caused by nickel deficiency. Routine foliar application of a commercially available nickel product eliminated this problem.
Crown gall has the broadest host range of any plant pathogen with over 600 characterized plant hosts (DeCleene and Deley, 1976). This disease is widespread in most old Georgia pecan orchards with 25% to 60% of the trees infected (Bouzar et al., 1983). Galled trees are stunted and less productive. Diseased trees may have resulted from contaminated nursery stock (Moore, 1976) or the soil inhabiting bacterium was present when trees were planted. A common weed control practice before herbicides came into widespread use was soil disking. This practice repeatedly wounded roots increasing the likelihood of infection (Formica, 1989) and probably contributed to the pervasive infection common in these old orchards (Bouzar et al., 1983).
Removal of old trees is accomplished using several options. These range from removal with a chainsaw, tree cutter, bulldozer, or track hoe. Removal with a chainsaw or tree cutter leaves the stump and roots intact, whereas a bulldozer or track hoe removes the stump and a portion of the root system.
No data are available regarding performance of transplanted trees into an existing orchard. Concerns include transfer of crown gall from stumps of removed trees or remaining old trees and negative impacts of stumps or remaining trees on growth of transplanted trees. Because renovation practices include the use of nursery grafted trees and seedling trees grafted after establishment, both tree types were included in the study. We report performance of transplanted trees before production.
Bouzar, H., Moore, L.W. & Schaad, N.W. 1983 Crown gall of pecan: A survey of Agrobacterium strains and potential for biological control in Georgia Plant Dis. 67 310 312
Draper, N.R. & Smith, H. 1966 Applied regression analysis. Wiley, New York, NY
Epstein, L., Kaur, S., McKenna, J.R., Grant, J.A., Olson, W.H. & Reil, W.O. 2008 Crown gall can spread between walnut trees in nurseries and reduce future yields Calif. Agr. 62 111 115
Formica, J.V. 1989 Crown gall neoplasms, p. 497–512. In: Sirica, A.E. (ed.). The pathobiology of neoplasia. Plenum Publishing, New York, NY
Foshee, W.G. III, Goodman, R.W., Patterson, M.G., Goff, W.D. & Dozier, W.A. Jr 1997 Weed control increases yield and economic returns from young ‘Desirable’ pecan trees J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 122 588 593
Futch, S.H., Graham, J.H. & Duncan, L.W. 2008 Citrus tree removal method does not affect performance of reset trees HortTechnology 18 559 562
Harmon, M.E., Franklin, J.F., Swanson, F.J., Sollins, P., Gregory, S.V., Lattin, J.D., Anderson, N.H., Cline, S.P., Aumen, N.G., Sedell, J.R., Lienkaemper, G.W., Cromack, K. Jr & Cummins, K.W. 1986 Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems Adv. Ecol. Res 15 133 302
Kluepfel, D.A., McClean, A.E., Yakabe, L.E., Maccree, M.M. & Parker, S.R. 2010 Detection and implication of early Agrobacterium tumefaciens infection of Paradox seeds and seedlings Acta Hort. 861 497 500
Moore, L.W. 1976 Latent infections and seasonal variability of crown gall development in seedlings of three Prunus species Phytopathology 66 101
Moore, L.W. 2002 Disease caused by a bacterium: Crown gall, p. 10–11. In: Teviotdale, B.L., T.J. Michailides, and J.W. Pscheidt (eds.). Compendium of nut crop diseases in temperate crops. APS Press, St. Paul, MN
Olsen, S.R. & Sommers, L.E. 1982 Phosphorus, p. 404–430. In: Page, A.L., R.H. Miller, and D.R. Keeney (eds.). Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. Amer. Soc. Agron. and Soil Sci. Soc. Amer., Madison, WI
Reil, W.O. 2001 Comparison of Chandler walnut grown on both Paradox and northern California black walnut rootstock that were planted as seed, seedling or grafted trees Acta Hort. 544 481 488
Thompson, T.E., Hunter, R.E., Madden, G.D. & Brown, E.J. 1982 A comparison of four methods of pecan orchard establishment HortScience 17 972 973
U.S. Department of Agriculture 2009 2007 Census of Agriculture. Natl Agri. Stat. Ser., Washington, DC
Van Lear, D.H., Kapeluck, P.R. & Carroll, W.D. 2000 Productivity of loblolly pine as affected by decomposing root systems For. Ecol. Mgt. 138 435 443
Yoemans, J.C. & Bremner, J.M. 1991 Carbon and nitrogen analysis of soils by automated combustion techniques Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 22 795 807