The harvest process for most fresh-market tree fruit crops is labor-intensive and time-consuming. For sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.), harvest costs generally account for 50% to 60% of total production costs (Seavert et al., 2008), yet despite its singular importance in fruit production budgets, harvest efficiency is not well studied. Prototype mechanical and robotic systems have been tested for fruit trees to improve harvest efficiency (Brown, 2005; Burks et al., 2005; Li et al., 2011; Sanders, 2005). For sweet cherry, a prototype harvester (Peterson and Wolford, 2001) and a greenhouse robotic harvesting system (Tanigaki et al., 2008), which require minimal or no human intervention in their operation, were manufactured for trial purposes. There are issues with mechanical harvesting systems such as fruit and tree damage, difficulties in selective harvest, cost of machinery, and the need for specific tree architecture. Preliminary testing with a prototype mechanical harvester for sweet cherry revealed the potential to reduce harvest costs by 90% (Seavert and Whiting, 2011). Nevertheless, all sweet cherries for fresh-market consumption are currently harvested manually (Seavert et al., 2008).
Manually harvesting sweet cherries is one of the most labor-intensive of all agricultural endeavors as a result of large tree size, high number of fruit per tree, and small fruit size. During harvest, laborers move along rows picking fruit with a slight twisting–snapping motion, removing fruit by the pedicel in clusters of one to four. Fruit are placed into metal or plastic buckets (≈9 kg capacity) that are secured over their shoulders with strapping. When necessary to access fruit, aluminum ladders, ranging in height from 2.4 to 4 m, are carried and used by pickers. When the picking bucket is full, pickers dump fruit into a larger receptacle (either a plastic lug or bin designed to hold ≈11.60 kg or 180 kg, respectively). When used, full lugs are dumped subsequently into bins, and bins are collected by tractor, loaded on a trailer, and delivered to a local packing shed for sorting, cleaning, and packaging.
Intuitively, there are many factors that will affect harvest efficiency. These may be biological, technological, and sociological, yet there are limited empirical reports of their impact in tree fruit. Among others, tree architecture and age, fruit load, and picker skill are important factors affecting harvest efficiency (Ampatzidis et al., 2012a; Strik and Buller, 2002). Strik et al. (2003) found that pruning method affected hand harvest efficiency of blueberries (‘Bluecrop’ and ‘Berkeley’), in some cases by more than 50%. New high-density training systems for sweet cherry have been introduced in an attempt to produce high-quality fruit and achieve earlier orchard productivity (Lang, 2005; Whiting et al., 2005; Whiting and Smith, 2007). Whiting (2009) described the UFO system, a planar architecture comprised of unbranched vertical wood designed to improve worker safety and harvest efficiency and facilitate the incorporation of mechanization and automation technologies. However, there are limited published reports on the role of canopy architecture on harvest labor efficiency and safety (Ampatzidis et al., 2012a). This is attributable in part to the complexity of collecting reliable data in the field during hand harvest. Data acquisition systems should be automated and timely, eliminate manual entry of data, increase data accuracy, and prevent employee fraud (Ampatzidis, 2010; Ampatzidis et al., 2008).
Various approaches to, and systems for, data collection in orchards such as yield monitoring systems for citrus (Salehi et al., 2000; Schueller et al., 1999; Whitney et al., 1999), in-field traceability systems based on radio frequency identification (RFID) and barcodes registration technologies (Ampatzidis and Vougioukas, 2009; Ampatzidis et al., 2009), tree identification systems (Bowman, 2010; Luvisi et al., 2010, 2011), wearable systems for tracing and locating workers (Ampatzidis et al., 2011) as well as wireless and mobile acquisition devices (Cunha et al., 2010; Kuflik et al., 2009; Morais et al., 2008) have been developed and field-tested. A prototype system for measuring average harvest efficiency, per picking crew, was developed in 2010 (Ampatzidis et al., 2012a) and modified in 2011 (Ampatzidis et al., 2012b) to a real-time LMS with the ability to track and record individual picker efficiency. In the current study, the LMS was used to investigate the role of tree architecture on picker efficiency during sweet cherry harvest in commercial orchards.
Ampatzidis, Y.G. 2010 Modeling and electronic monitoring of activities during manual harvested of specialty crops with application to precision farming and traceability [in Greek]. PhD thesis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
Ampatzidis, Y.G., Tzelepis, G. & Vougioukas, S.G. 2008 A low-cost identification system for yield mapping during manual vine harvesting. Proc. of the International Conference on Agricultural Engineering & Industry Exhibition, Hersonissos (Crete), Greece, 23–25 June
Ampatzidis, Y.G. & Vougioukas, S.G. 2009 Field experiments for evaluating the incorporation of RFID and barcode registration and digital weighing technologies in manual fruit harvesting Comput. Electron. Agr. 66 166 172
Ampatzidis, Y.G., Vougioukas, S.G., Bochtis, D.D. & Tsatsarelis, C.A. 2009 A yield mapping system for hand-harvested fruits based on RFID and GPS location technologies: Field testing Precis. Agr. 10 63 72
Ampatzidis, Y.G., Vougioukas, S.G. & Whiting, M.D. 2011 An automated wearable system for real-time human position monitoring during manual fruit harvesting Comput. Electron. Agr. 78 222 230
Ampatzidis, Y.G., Whiting, M.D., Liu, B., Scharf, P.A. & Pierce, F.J. 2012a Portable weighing system for monitoring picker efficiency during manual harvest of sweet cherry Precis. Agr. <http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11119-012-9284-3>
Ampatzidis, Y.G., Whitng, M.D., Scharf, P.A. & Zhang, Q. 2012b Development and evaluation of a novel system for monitoring harvest labor efficiency Comput. Electron. Agr. 88 85 94
Burks, T., Villegas, F., Hannan, M., Flood, S. & Sivaraman, B. 2005 Engineering and horticultural aspects of robotic fruit harvesting: Opportunities and constrains HortTechnology 15 79 87
Cunha, C.R., Peres, E., Morais, R., Oliveira, A.A., Matos, S.G., Fernandes, M.A., Ferreira, P.J.S.G. & Reis, M.J.S. 2010 The use of mobile devices with multi-tag technologies for an overall contextualized vineyard management Comput. Electron. Agr. 73 154 164
Kuflik, T., Prodorutti, D., Frizzi, A., Gafni, Y., Simon, S. & Pertot, I. 2009 Optimization of copper treatments in organic viticulture by using a web-based decision support system Comput. Electron. Agric. 68 36 43
Li, P., Lee, S.-H. & Hsu, H.-Y. 2011 Review on fruit harvesting method for potential use of automatic fruit harvesting systems Procedia Engineering 23 351 366
Luvisi, A., Panattoni, A., Bandinelli, R., Rinaldelli, E., Pagano, M. & Triolo, E. 2011 Implanting RFIDs into Prunus to facilitate electronic identification in support of sanitary certification Biosystems Eng. 109 167 173
Luvisi, A., Trioloa, E., Rinaldelli, E., Bandinellib, R., Paganob, M. & Gini, B. 2010 Radiofrequency applications in grapevine: From vineyard to web Comput. Electron. Agr. 70 256 259
Morais, R., Fernandes, M.A., Matos, S.G., Serodio, C., Ferreira, P. & Reis, M. 2008 A ZigBee multi-powered wireless acquisition device for remote sensing applications in precision viticulture Comput. Electron. Agr. 62 94 106
Salehi, F., Whitney, J.D., Miller, W.M., Wheaton, T.A. & Drouillard, G. 2000 An automatic triggering system for a citrus yield monitor. Paper No. 001130. ASAE, St. Joseph, MI, USA
Schueller, J.K., Whitney, J.D., Wheaton, T.A., Miller, W.M. & Turner, A.E. 1999 Low–cost automatic yield mapping in hand–harvested citrus Comput. Electron. Agr. 23 145 154
Seavert, C., Freeborn, J. & Long, L. 2008 Orchard economics: Establishing and producing high-density sweet cherries in Wasco County. OSU Extension Service Publication, EM 8802-E
Strik, B. & Buller, G. 2002 Improving yield and machine harvest efficiency of ‘Bluecrop’ through high density planting and trellising Acta Hort. 574 227 231
Strik, B., Buller, G. & Hellman, E. 2003 Pruning severity affects yield, berry weight, and hand harvest efficiency of highbush blueberry HortScience 38 196 199
Whiting, M.D., Lang, G.A. & Ophardt, D. 2005 Rootstock and training system affect sweet cherry growth, yield and fruit quality HortScience 40 582 586
Whiting, M.D. & Smith, E. 2007 Mechanical harvest system has little impact on sweet cherry quality and storability Good Fruit Grower 58 22 24
Whiting, M.D. 2009 Upright fruiting offshoots. Prosser, WA: WSU-IAREC. 8 Mar. 2011. <http://fruit.prosser.wsu.edu/UFO.html>