Pear psyllids [Cacopsylla pyri (L.), C. pyricola (Förster), and C. pyrisuga (Förster)] are major arthropod pests of pear (Pyrus communis L.) throughout North America and Europe. Both adults and nymphs feed primarily in the vascular tissue of the leaves, petioles, and succulent shoots. Prolonged feeding in the phloem by nymphs affects the plant directly by inducing necrosis and premature defoliation. The nymphs excrete excess sugar as honeydew, which can cause russetting of young fruit. Sooty mold fungus grows on the honeydew, resulting in reduced photosynthesis and marked fruit. The insect is also the vector of the pear decline phytoplasma (Hibino et al., 1971). In North America, Cacopsylla pyricola has rapidly developed resistance to commonly used pesticides, including organophosphates and pyrethroids, and biological controls are not always sufficiently effective. Resistant cultivars would reduce grower costs and enhance the sustainability of the pear industry.
Resistance within the genus Pyrus to pear psylla has been demonstrated in the East Asian pear species P. betulifolia Bunge, P. calleryana Decne., P. fauriei Schneid., P. pyrifolia (Burm.) Nakai, P. ussuriensis Maxim., and P. ×bretschneideri Rehd.; in P. ussuriensis × P. communis hybrids (Berrada et al., 1995; Harris, 1973; Harris and Lamb, 1973; Quamme, 1984; Westigard et al., 1970); and in a few genotypes of the European “snow pear”; P. nivalis Jacq. (Quamme, 1984; Westigard et al., 1970). Cultivars within the European pear species, P. communis L., with moderate to high levels of resistance include the Italian cultivar Spina Carpi (Briolini et al., 1988; Quarta and Ruggioni, 1985), ‘Doyenne du Poitiers’ (Robert et al., 1999), and 15 landrace cultivars from Europe (Bell, 1992, 2003; Bell and Stuart, 1990; Bell and van der Zwet, 1998). These studies used a variety of objective orchard and laboratory studies, including choice and no-choice tests of oviposition and antibiosis. Ovipositional antixenosis (i.e., inhibition of egg laying), feeding antixenosis (i.e., inhibition of feeding), and antibiosis have all been identified as modes of resistance. Nymphal feeding antixenosis has been associated with inhibition of oviposition, increased mortality, and delayed development of nymphs (Bell, 1991; Butt et al., 1988, 1989; Puterka, 1997; Puterka et al., 1993) in both P. communis and P. ussuriensis-derived germplasm and, thus, was used as the measure of host resistance in this study.
Based on the distribution of counts of pear psylla nymphs in seedling trees derived from crosses of susceptible P. communis cultivars with P. ussuriensis 65, a resistant open-pollinated selection, Harris and Lamb (1973) concluded that resistance was heritable and dominant. The only other published study of the inheritance of resistance to this pest confirmed the multigenic nature of genetic control and identified one quantitative trait locus (QTL) that explained 15% of the phenotypic variability in a cross of ‘Angelys’ and NY 10355 and a few other minor QTLs (Bouvier et al., 2012). The variable analyzed was a subjective estimate of the number of first to third instar nymphs and presence of honeydew. The purpose of the present study was to assess the degree of inheritance of resistance to pear psylla nymphal feeding antixenosis as a key indicator of resistance and to determine the relative breeding values of a set of six resistant P. communis cultivars of European origin.
Bell, R.L. 1991 Ovipositional antixenosis-based host resistance to the pear psylla in Pyrus germplasm of east European origin HortScience 26 710
Berrada, S., Nguyen, T.X., Lemoine, J., Vanpoucke, J. & Fournier, D. 1995 Thirteen pear species and cultivars evaluated for resistance to Cacopsylla pyri (Homoptera: Psyllidae) Environ. Entomol. 24 1604 1607
Bouvier, L., Bourcy, M., Boulay, M., Tellier, M., Guérif, P., Denancé, C., Durel, C.-E. & Lespinasse, Y. 2012 European pear cultivar resistance to bio-pests: Scab (Venturia pirina) and psylla (Cacopsylla pyri) Acta Hort. 909 459 470
Butt, B.A., Stuart, L.C. & Bell, R.L. 1988 Feeding behavior of pear psylla (Homoptera: Psyllidae) nymphs on susceptible and resistant Pyrus germplasm J. Econ. Entomol. 81 1394 1397
Butt, B.A., Stuart, L.C. & Bell, R.L. 1989 Feeding, longevity, and development of pear psylla (Homoptera: Psyllidae) nymphs on resistant and susceptible pear genotypes J. Econ. Entomol. 82 458 461
Falconer, F.D.S. 1989 Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman, Burnt Mill, Harlow, UK
Pasqualini, E., Civolani, S., Musacchi, S., Ancarani, V. & Dondini, L. 2006 Cacopyslla pyri behavior on new pear selections for host resistance programs Bull. Insectology 59 27 37
Puterka, G. 1997 Intraspecific variation in pear psylla (Homoptera: Psyllidae) nymphal survival and development on resistant and susceptible pear Environ. Entomol. 26 552 558
Puterka, G.L., Bell, R.L. & Jones, S.K. 1993 Ovipositional preference of pear psylla (Homoptera: Psyllidae) for resistant and susceptible pear J. Econ. Entomol. 86 1297 1302
Robert, P., Chausset, J. & Le Lézec, M. 1999 Larval development of Cacopsylla pyri (L.) [Homoptera: Psyllidae] on two resistant Pyrus genotypes IOBC WPRS Bull. 22 89 91
SAS Institute, Inc 2010 SAS for Windows, Version 9.22, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC
Smith, C.M., Khan, Z.R. & Pathak, M.D. 1994 Techniques for evaluating insect resistance in crop plants. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
Westigard, P.H., Westwood, M.N. & Lombard, P.B. 1970 Host preference and resistance of Pyrus species to the pear psylla, Psylla pyricola Föerster J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 95 34 36