Water conservation efforts have recently intensified in the arid Southwest as a result of increases in urbanization and local drought conditions, which have resulted in reduced amounts of water available for irrigating turfgrass (Ervin and Koski, 1998; Kjelgren et al., 2000). The fact that urban expansion is occurring simultaneously with overuse of water supplies (i.e., the Ogallala Aquifer) has created a challenge for water conservation in this region (Rodiek, 1984; Sophocleous, 2012). Therefore, exploration of species with increased drought tolerance is advantageous.
The present water supply concerns in western Texas and other areas of the arid Southwest have led to the examination of buffalograss as a viable option for managed turfgrass environments (Frank et al., 2002, 2004). Research efforts have identified buffalograss as a reduced irrigation and fertilization input turfgrass relative to traditional turfgrass species grown in the arid Southwest (Frank et al., 2004). Qian and Engelke (1999) reported that ‘Prairie’ buffalograss only required 26% irrigation based on pan evaporation to maintain acceptable turfgrass quality over a four-year period. Henry et al. (2005) observed that buffalograss performed equally at 100% and 70% of calculated evapotranspiration when receiving 0.98 kg/100 m2 or 1.96 kg/100 m2 of nitrogen fertility, respectively. Wu and Lin (1994) characterized the salt tolerance of buffalograss as moderate and attributed this response to an exclusion mechanism found in root tissue. Recent breeding efforts led to the release of improved turf-type buffalograss varieties such as ‘Cody’ and ‘Bowie’ in 2005 (Severmutlu et al., 2005a, 2005b). These new varieties were denser, finer-textured, and adapted to a wider range of environments compared with older varieties when tested in the 1991 and 1996 National Turfgrass Evaluation Program buffalograss trials (Morris, 1996). Increases in appearance and adaptability of buffalograss through breeding efforts have further enhanced its acceptance as a viable turfgrass option for home lawns and golf courses (Kenworthy et al., 1999; Koski et al., 2001; Zhang et al., 2007).
Buffalograss is typically established from seed as a result of increased availability, reduced cost, and ease of application (Fry, 1995; Wu et al., 1989). Recommended seeding rates range from 147 to 294 kg·ha−1 (Fry, 1995; Gaitan-Gaitan et al., 1999; Harivandi and Wu, 1995; Riordan et al., 1997) depending on the cultivar and seed pre-treatment (i.e., deburring) (Shearman et al., 2005). Buffalograss seed burrs are difficult to degrade and contain oil that may inhibit germination and seedling development (Ahring and Todd, 1977; Gaitan-Gaitan et al., 1999; Harivandi and Wu, 1995; Hickey et al., 1983; Riordan et al., 1997; Shearman et al., 2005; Wenger, 1943). Although sufficient work on seeding rates has been conducted, minimal research has been conducted on the influence of cultural practices on establishment.
Bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.] is the primary warm-season turfgrass species grown in the United States (Christians, 2011). The abundant production of aggressive rhizomes and stolons enables bermudagrass to tolerate wear and recover from stress (Beard, 1973; Youngner, 1961); however, this may also make it difficult to control during conversion to buffalograss.
Traditional renovation practices usually involve the desiccation of existing turfgrass through the application of a non-selective herbicide followed by seedbed preparation (Turgeon, 2011). Jordan (1977) reported 91% bermudagrass control 21 d after treatment in response to glyphosate applied at 1.1 kg ae/ha in the greenhouse. However, Johnson (1988) noted that three applications (May, June, and August) of glyphosate at 2.2 kg ae/ha were necessary to reduce bermudagrass cover of ‘Tifway’, ‘Tifgreen’, ‘Tifdwarf’, and ‘Ormond’ to less than 2% one year after treatment. Griffin et al. (1994) observed similar results (greater than 95% control) of common bermudagrass in response to sequential applications of glyphosate (2.2 kg ae/ha) in June, July, and September. Multiple applications of glyphosate are commonly recommended as an effective method for the conversion of turfgrass sites (Hartwiger, 2007; Roundup Pro® Specimen Label, 2010).
The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of seedbed preparation methods and seeding rate on the establishment of buffalograss after bermudagrass desiccation with glyphosate. Results may provide turfgrass managers insight into effective conversion practices for the establishment of buffalograss.
Ahring, R.M. & Todd, G.W. 1977 The bur enclosure of the caryopses of buffalograss as a factors affecting germination Agron. J. 69 15 17
Beard, J.B. 1973 Turfgrass: Science and culture. Prentice Hall, New York, NY
Bowley, S.R. 2008 A hitchhiker’s guide to statistics in plant biology. 2nd Ed. Any Old Subject Books, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
Christians, N. 2011 Fundamentals of turfgrass management. 4th Ed. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ
Ervin, E.H. & Koski, A.J. 1998 Drought avoidance aspects and crop coefficients of Kentucky bluegrass and tall fescue in the semiarid west Crop Sci. 38 788 795
Frank, K.W., Gaussoin, R.E., Fry, J.D., Frost, M.D. & Baird, J.H. 2002 Nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium effects on seeded buffalograss establishment HortScience 37 371 373
Frank, K.W., Gaussoin, R.E., Riordan, T.P. & Milter, E.D. 1998 Date and planting effects on seeded turf-type buffalograss Crop Sci. 38 1210 1213
Frank, K.W., Gaussoin, R.E., Riordan, T.P., Shearman, R.C., Fry, J.D., Miltner, E.D. & Johnson, P.G. 2004 Nitrogen rate and mowing height effects on turf-type buffalograss Crop Sci. 44 1615 1621
Gaitan-Gaitan, F., McKenney, C.B. & Auld, D.L. 1999 Planting rate and caryopses effects on establishment of buffalograss on the southern Great Plains J. Turfgrass Mgt. 3 1 11
Harivandi, A., Wu, L., Elmore, C. & Hagan, W.L. 1995 Buffalograss—A promising drought resistant turf for California Univ. of California Coop. Ext. 45 7 10
Heckman, N.L., Horst, G.L. & Gaussoin, R.E. 2002 Planting date effect on emergence and morphology of buffalograss seedlings HortScience 37 506 507
Henry, J.M., Wegulo, S.N., Gibeault, V.A. & Autio, R. 2005 Turfgrass performance with reduced irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer Intl. Turfgrass Soc. Res. J. 10 93 101
Hickey, V.G., Miller, F.A. & Engelke, M.C. 1983 Buffalograss seed pretreatment germination. Texas. Turfgrass Proc. PR 4169. p. 126–128
Jordan, T.N. 1977 Effects of temperature and relative humidity on the toxicity of glyphosate to bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) Weed Sci. 25 448 451
Kenworthy, K.E., Auld, D.L., Wester, D.B., Durham, R.E. & McKenney, C.B. 1999 Evaluation of buffalograss germplasm for induction of fall dormancy and spring green-up J. Turfgrass Mgt. 3 23 42
Koski, A.J., Qian, Y.L., Wilhelm, S.J., Ball, S. & Tan, Z. 2001 Freezing tolerance of six cultivars of buffalograss Crop Sci. 41 1174 1178
Morris, K.N. 1996 National buffalograss test—1991. NTEP Final Rep. No. 96-14. National Turfgrass Evaluation Program, USDA-ARS, Beltsville, MD
Riordan, T.P., Johnson, P.G., Gaussoin, R.E. & Svoboda, J.F. 1997 Seedling germination and establishment of Buchloe dactyloides caryopses vs. burrs Intl. Turfgrass Soc. Res. J. 8 749 756
Roundup Pro® Specimen Label 2010 Monsanto Company, St. Louis, MO
Shearman, R.C., Budak, H., Severmutlu, S. & Gaussoin, R.E. 2005 Burr seeding rate effect on turf-type buffalograss establishment HortTechnology 15 246 249
Sophocleous, M. 2012 Conserving and extending the useful life of the largest aquifer in North America: The future of the High Plains/Ogallala aquifer Ground Water. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2012.00965.x
Turgeon, A.J. 2011 Turfgrass management. 9th Ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
Wenger, L.E. 1943 Buffalograss. Kansas Agr. Expt. Stn. Manhatten. Bul. 321. p. 1–78
Wu, L. & Lin, H. 1994 Salt tolerance and salt uptake in diploid and polyploid buffalograsses (Buchloe dactyloides) J. Plant Nutr. 17 1905 1928
Zhang, X., Su, D., Ma, L. & Zhao, Y. 2007 Analysis of genetic diversity in buffalograss determined by random amplified polymorphic DNA markers HortScience 42 474 477