A wide variety of variables, both genetic and environmental in origin, are known to influence plant growth and development. In agricultural systems, light intensity, air quality, soil nutrients, moisture, and air and soil temperature are particularly important environmental factors (Pessarakli, 2002). Monitoring environmental conditions can be crucial for farmers wishing to implement management practices at specific stages of crop development. For example, the phenological development of pollination-dependent agricultural crops is important to farmers seeking to maximize yield. Many farmers depend on rented honeybee hives for pollination (Delaplane and Mayer, 2000; James and Pitts-Singer, 2008). It is important for these managed pollinators to be introduced into agricultural crops only after flowering has begun to ensure pollination of the crop of interest as opposed to alternative foraging resources such as wildflowers (Free, 1993). The ability to predict timing of crop flowering can improve placement of managed bee colonies near fields at the optimal time for pollination and also aid in maximizing crop yield.
Accurate prediction of biological events is fundamental to planting at an appropriate time, protecting crops from pests and inclement weather conditions, ensuring sufficient pollination, and planning the eventual harvest of crops (Bailey, 1947; Wielgolaski, 1999). The ability to predict important components of flower development such as flower opening and viability after anthesis would be useful for growers of crops dependent on insect-mediated pollination. If a crop requires cross-pollination, as is the case for many fruit crops (McGregor, 1976), it is also important to know the phenology of each participant cultivar to ensure that reproductively compatible varieties within the same area are in bloom at the same time. Finally, knowledge of the period of time during which flowers remain viable for pollination enables sufficient bee colonies to be purchased or rented to achieve the concentration of bees required for full crop pollination and yield potential.
For a large majority of fruit crop species, temperature and consequent heat accumulation are the most influential environmental factors that control development (Rathcke and Lacey, 1985; Schaffer and Anderson, 1994) and these are commonly monitored by farmers in early spring. One method of measuring heat accumulation incorporates both time and temperature into a unit called a growing degree-day (GDD), described in detail by Baskerville and Emin (1969). Because GDDs are calculated using a species-specific value for the critical lower threshold temperature below which plant development does not occur (base temperature), these heat units are universally functional and therefore allow bloom phenology to be predicted in many regions across a range of environments. The prediction of crop bloom based on GDD has been used in the past to predict bloom in almond [Prunus dultis (Mill) D.A. Webb] (DeGrandi-Hoffman et al., 1996; Rattigan and Hill, 1986), apple [Malus ×sylvestris (L.) Mill. Var. domestica (Borkh.) Mansf.] (Anstey, 1966; DeGrandi-Hoffman et al., 1987), tomato [Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.] (Zalom and Wilson, 1999), apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.), cherry (Prunus avium L.), peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch], pear (Pyrus communis L.) (Anstey, 1966), and sunflower (Helianthus anuus L.) (Goyne et al., 1977), but this has not been accomplished for highbush blueberry [Vaccinium corymbosum (L.)].
Similarly, few studies have focused on the duration of flower viability in modern blueberry cultivars. An early study of ‘Rubel’ suggested that viability is greatest 1 to 2 d after flower opening (Merrill, 1936); however, this cultivar has been planted less frequently in recent years. In 1964, Moore documented that ‘Bluecrop’ flowers were receptive to pollen up to 5 d after flower opening under greenhouse conditions, whereas fruit set and seed number both decreased if the flower was pollinated more than 4 d after opening. Moore (1964) also investigated flower viability under field conditions for ‘Coville’ and ‘Blueray’. His results indicate significant differences in flower viability for these cultivars, with flowers of ‘Blueray’ receptive to pollination for a longer period of time than those of ‘Coville’. Rabbiteye blueberry (Vaccinium virgatum Ait. syn. V. ashei Reade) flowers are viable up to 5 d after anthesis (Brevis and NeSmith, 2006).
Additional data for highbush blueberry phenology and flower viability can be incorporated into mathematical models that predict bloom dependent on accumulated GDDs. Such decision support tools would provide highbush blueberry growers with a means to predict the dynamics of flower opening and flower viability using forecasted weather conditions. It would also allow for pollination strategies and management practices to be adapted depending on the projected length of blueberry bloom.
This study characterized and compared the bloom phenology of five common cultivars of highbush blueberry with respect to temperature accumulation. This was accomplished by first measuring bloom phenology as a function of temperature so that a lower threshold base temperature could be determined. Base temperatures were then used to calculate accumulated GDDs and relate that temperature accumulation to the bloom phenology of bushes grown under greenhouse and field conditions. In addition, flower viability was examined in each of the five cultivars under greenhouse and field conditions to determine the relationship between flower age and viability within and among cultivars.
Aizen, M.A., Garibaldi, L.A., Cunningham, S.A. & Klein, A.M. 2008 Long-term global trends in crop yield and production reveal no current pollination shortage but increasing pollinator dependency Curr. Biol. 18 1572 1575
Anstey, T.H. 1966 Prediction of full bloom date for apple, pear, cherry, peach and apricot from air temperature data Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 88 57 66
Brevis, P.A. & NeSmith, D.S 2006 Flower age affects fruit set and stigmatic receptivity in rabbiteye blueberry HortScience 41 1537 1540
Bryla, D.R., Yorgey, B. & Shireman, A.D. 2009 Irrigation management effects on yield and fruit quality of highbush blueberry Acta Hort. 810 649 656
Carlson, J.D. & Hancock, J.F. Jr 1991 A methodology for determining suitable heat-unit requirements for harvest of highbush blueberry J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 116 774 779
Coville, F.V. 1910 Experiments in blueberry culture. U.S. Dept. Agr. Bul. 193
DeGrandi-Hoffman, G., Hoopingarner, R.A. & Pulcer, R. 1987 REDAPOL: Pollination and fruit set prediction model for ‘Delicious’ apples Environ. Entomol. 16 309 318
DeGrandi-Hoffman, G., Thorp, R., Loper, G. & Eisikowitch, D. 1996 Describing the progression of almond bloom using accumulated heat units J. Appl. Ecol. 33 812 818
Delaplane, K.S. & Mayer, D.F. 2000 Crop pollination by bees. CABI Publishing, New York, NY
Dogterom, M.H., Winston, M.L. & Mukai, A. 2000 Effect of pollen load size and source (self, outcross) on seed and fruit production in highbush blueberry cv. ‘Bluecrop’ (Vaccinium corymbosum; Ericaceae) Amer. J. Bot. 87 1584 1591
Eck, P. 1988 Blueberry science. Rutgers Univ. Press, NJ
Eck, P. & Childers, N.F. 1966 Blueberry culture. Quinn and Boden, NJ
Evans, G.C. 1972 The quantitative analysis of plant growth. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK
Free, J.B. 1993 Insect pollination of crops. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA
Gough, R.E. 1994 The highbush blueberry and its management. Food Products Press, New York, NY
Goulart, B.L., Demchak, K. & Yang, W.Q. 1997 Effect of cultural practices on field grown ‘Bluecrop’ highbush blueberries, with emphasis on mycorrhizal infection levels Acta Hort. 466 271 278
Hall, I.V., Craig, D.L. & Aalders, L.E. 1963 The effect of photoperiod on the growth and flowering of the highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 82 260 263
Hancock, J., Hanson, E. & Trinka, D. 2001 Blueberry varieties for Michigan. Ext. Bul. E-1456
Hancock, J.F. 2004 Blueberry plant denominated Liberty. U.S. Plant Patent No. P115,146
Howell, G.S., Kilby, M.W. & Nelson, J.W. 1972 Influence of timing of hive introduction on production of highbush blueberries HortScience 7 129 131
James, R. & Pitts-Singer, T.L. 2008 Bee pollination in agricultural eco-systems. Oxford University Press, New York, NY
Luby, J.J., Ballington, J.R., Draper, A.D., Pliszka, K. & Austin, M.E. 1991 Blueberries and cranberries (Vaccinium) Acta Hort. 290 393 458
MacKenzie, K.E. 1997 Pollination requirements of three highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) cultivars J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 122 891 896
McGregor, S.E. 1976 Insect pollination of cultivated crop plants. U.S. Dept. Agr., Agr. Res. Serv. Hdbk. 496
Merrill, T.A. 1936 Pollination of the highbush blueberry. Mich. Agr. Expt. Sta. Bul. 151
Moore, J.N. 1964 Duration of receptivity to pollination of flowers of the highbush blueberry and the cultivated strawberry Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 85 295 301
NeSmith, D.S. & Bridges, D.C. 1992 Modeling chilling influence on cumulative flowering: A case study using ‘Tifblue’ rabbiteye blueberry J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 117 698 702
Pessarakli, M. 2002 Handbook of plant and crop physiology. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY
Pritts M.P. & Hancock J.F. 1992 Highbush blueberry production guide. Northeast Reg. Agr. Eng. Serv. Publ. 55
Schaffer B. & Anderson P.C. 1994 Handbook of environmental physiology of fruit crops. 2 Vols. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
Strik, B. & Buller, G. 2003 Pruning severity affects yield, berry weight and hand harvest efficiency of highbush blueberry HortScience 38 196 199
Vander Kloet, S.P. 1982 Effects of pollen donors on seed production, seed weight, germination and seedling vigor in Vaccinium corymbosum L Amer. Midl. Nat. 112 392 396
Wielgolaski, F.E. 1999 Starting dates and basic temperatures in phenological observations of plants Intl. J. Biometeorol. 42 158 168