The genus Rudbeckia consists of ≈30 species endemic to North America (Armitage, 1997; Palmer et al., 2009). The genus includes annuals, biennials, and perennial species (Perdue, 1957) and is divided into two subgenera, Rudbeckia subg. Macrocline and Rudbeckia subg. Rudbeckia (Urbatsch et al., 2000). These two subgenera can be distinguished cytogenetically with R. subg. Macrocline having a base chromosome number of 18 and R. subg. Rudbeckia having a base chromosome number of 19 (Urbatsch et al., 2000). Many of the commercially important species of Rudbeckia are from R. subg. Rudbeckia. Two of these species, R. subtomentosa and R. hirta, are closely allied based on phylogeny and are commonly cultivated wildflowers (Urbatsch et al., 2000).
Rudbeckia subtomentosa is a durable, diploid (2n = 2x = 38) perennial, hardy to USDA zone 4. It is well adapted to many environments and has showy yellow ray florets. The tall stature of R. subtomentosa (2 to 3 m) limits its use within many cultivated landscapes. A reduction in height and an increase in the range of flower colors in R. subtomentosa would be highly desirable. Rudbeckia subtomentosa ‘Henry Eilers’ is a cultivar with showy tubular ray florets providing additional ornamental interest.
The annual species, Rudbeckia hirta, includes diploid (2n = 2x = 38) and tetraploid (2n = 4x = 76) cultivars with a diverse range of flower colors and forms (Palmer et al., 2009). Cultivars of R. hirta range in mature height from 0.5 to 1.0 m with tetraploid cultivars typically having larger flowers and greater height (Hansen and Stahl, 1993; Palmer et al., 2009). However, R. hirta is short-lived and susceptible to certain diseases including cercospora leaf spot (Cercospora sp.) and rhizoctonia blight (Rhizoctonia sp.) (Fulcher et al., 2003; Harkess and Lyons, 1994).
Interspecific hybrids between R. subtomentosa and R. hirta were developed at the Mountain Crop Improvement Laboratory (Palmer et al., 2008) to potentially combine desirable traits from both species including moderate plant height, a range of flower colors and forms, disease resistance, and perennialness. However, like many wide hybrids, these appeared to be infertile. Hybrid sterility may occur when chromosomes of different taxa are sufficiently different that pairing of chromosomes during meiosis fails (asynapsis) (Martin and Jouve, 1992). The different chromosome sizes of R. subtomentosa and R. hirta may be creating a barrier to fertility in hybrids. Palmer et al. (2009) found the 1Cx DNA content (DNA content of one complete set of chromosomes) to vary among Rudbeckia species by 320%. Rudbeckia subtomentosa had a 1Cx DNA content of 11.0 ± 0.1 pg, whereas that of R. hirta ranged from 3.4 ± 0.2 pg to 4.0 ± 0.2 pg.
In many cases, fertility can be restored in wide hybrids by doubling the genomes to create allopolyploids. Allopolyploids have duplicate homologous chromosome sets from each original parent that allows for disomic pairing and the formation of balanced gametes (Contreras et al., 2007; Lu and Bridgen, 1997; Olsen et al., 2006; Ranney, 2006). In addition to restored fertility, allopolyploids may display improved ornamental characteristics that are often intermediate between the two parents (Horn, 2002). Similarly, autopolyploids may also display improved characteristics such as an increase in flower size and vegetative tissues along with a decrease in internode lengths, although morphological responses vary (Horn, 2002). Furthermore, autotetraploids may also have a slower growth rate compared with their diploid cytotypes (Chahal and Gosal, 2002).
A greater understanding of the influence of induced polyploidy on fertility and morphology of Rudbeckia will better enable the development of improved varieties. The objectives of this study were to evaluate fertility, morphology, phenology of flowering, and perennialness for lines of diploid and induced allotetraploids of R. subtomentosa × hirta and diploid and induced autotetraploids lines of R. subtomentosa ‘Henry Eilers’.
Armitage, A.M. 1997 Herbaceous perennial plants: A treatise on their identification, culture, and garden attributes. 2nd Ed. Stipes Publishing, Champaign, IL
Chahal, G.S. & Gosal, S.S. 2002 Principles and procedures of plant breeding: Biotechnological and conventional approaches. Alpha Sci. Intl., Ltd., Pangbourne, UK
Chuang, S.J., Chen, C.L., Chen, J.J. & Sung, J.M. 2010 Using morphological diagnosis and molecular markers to assess the clonal fidelity of micropropagated Echinacea purpurea regenerants Biol. Plant. 54 539 542
Contreras, R.N., Ranney, T.G. & Tallury, S.P. 2007 Reproductive behavior of diploid and allotetraploid Rhododendron L. ‘Fragrant Affinity’ HortScience 42 31 34
Fulcher, A., Dunwell, W.C. & Wolfe, D. 2003 Rudbeckia taxa evaluation. Southern Nurserymen’s Assoc. Res. Conf. 48:510–512
Greihuber, J., Temsch, E.M. & Loureiro, J.C.M. 2007 Nuclear DNA content measurement, p. 67–101. In: Doležel. J., J. Greilhuber, and J. Suda (eds.). Flow cytometry with plant cells: Analysis of genes, chromosomes, and genomes. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Germany
Hansen, R. & Stahl, F. 1993 Perennials and their garden habitats. Timber Press, Portland, OR
Horn, W. 2002 Breeding methods and breeding research, p. 47–83. In: Breeding for ornamentals: Classical and molecular approaches. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
Larkin, P.J. & Scowcroft, W.R. 1981 Somaclonal variation—A novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement Theor. Appl. Genet. 60 197 214
Mackiewicz, H.O. 1965 Studies on di- and tetraploid aslike clover (Trifolium hybridum L.) part II, flower morphology and the problem of fertility Genetica Polonica 6 41 77
Majdi, M., Karimzadeh, G., Malboobi, M.A., Omidbaigi, R. & Mirzaghaderi, G. 2010 Induction of tetraploidy to feverfew (Tanacetum parthenium Schulz-Bip.): Morphological, physiological, cytological, and phytochemical changes HortScience 45 16 21
Martin, A. & Jouve, N. 1992 Cytogenetics of F1 and their progenies, p. 82–105. In: Kalloo, G. and J.B. Chowdhury (eds.). Distant hybridization of crop plants. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany
Olsen, R.T., Ranney, T.G. & Viloria, Z. 2006 Reproductive behavior of induced allotetraploid ×Chitalpa and in vitro embryo culture of polyploidy progeny J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 131 716 724
Osborn, T.C., Pires, J.C., Birchler, J.A., Auger, D.L., Chen, Z.J., Lee, H., Comai, L., Madlung, A., Doerge, R.W., Colot, V. & Martienssen, R.A. 2003 Understanding mechanisms of novel gene expression in polyploids Trends Genet. 19 141 147
Palmer, I.E., Bir, R.E., Lynch, N.P. & Ranney, T.G. 2009 Crossability, cytogenetics, and reproductive pathways in Rudbeckia subgenus Rudbeckia HortScience 44 44 48
Palmer, I.E., Touchell, D.H. & Ranney, T.G. 2008 In-vitro polyploid induction of Rudbeckia spp. Southern Nurserymen’s Assn. Res. Conf. 53:186–189
Turner, S., Krauss, S.L., Bunn, E., Senaratna, T., Dixon, K., Tan, B. & Touchell, D. 2001 Genetic fidelity and viability of Anigozanthos viridis following tissue culture, cold storage, and cryopreservation Plant Sci. 161 1099 1106
Urbatsch, L.E., Baldwin, B.G. & Donoghue, M.J. 2000 Phylogeny of the coneflowers and relatives (heliantheae: Asteraceae) based on nuclear rDNA internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences and chloroplast DNA restriction site data Syst. Bot. 25 539 565
Wang, J., Tian, L., Madlung, A., Lee, H., Chen, M., Lee, J.J., Watson, B., Kagochi, T., Comai, L. & Chen, Z.J. 2004 Stochastic and epigenetic changes of gene expression in Arabidopsis polyploids Genet. 167 1961 1973
Zadoo, S.N., Roy, P.P. & Khoshoo, T.N. 1975 Cytogenetics of cultivated Bouganvilleas. V. Induced tetraploidy and restoration of fertility in sterile cultivars Euphytica 24 517 524