Pitaya is increasing in popularity as a crop partial as a result of its tolerance to arid environments and resistance to pathogens (Mizrahi et al., 1997, 2002; Mizrahi and Nerd, 1999; Nobel and De La Barrera, 2004). Both Hylocereus undatus (Haworth) Britt. & Rose and red pitaya (H. sp.) have been introduced to Taiwan in recent decades. The most commonly grown red pitaya varieties were selected from crosses between H. undatus and H. spp., and they produce fruit in summer and fall (Hsu, 2004). Breeding for winter-bearing cultivars as well as developing methods to regulate flowering to produce winter crops would benefit the red pitaya industry (Chang, 2003; Jiang, 2005; Jiang et al., 2011; Yen and Chang, 1997).
Factors affecting flowering of pitaya include shoot age, temperature, light, and application of growth regulators. For yellow pitaya (Selenicereus megalanthus), shoots that sprout in spring normally flower in winter, whereas shoots that sprout in winter flower in the next fall (Jiang et al., 2011). Regardless of daylength, extreme temperatures in summer may restrict the flowering of pitaya (Nerd et al., 2002). Light intensity may affect the nutritional status of shoots and thus influence the number of flowers produced, but it does not promote off-season flowering in H. undatus (Khaimov and Mizrahi, 2006; Raveh et al., 1998). Flower thinning and application of growth regulators such as [N-(2-chloro-4-pyridinyl)-N-phenylurea] (CPPU) and gibberellic acid (GA3) could accelerate flowering or extend the flowering period and therefore result in earlier or later harvest, but they did not reverse the seasonal flowering phenology in H. undatus (Khaimov and Mizrahi, 2006). A number of other chemicals related to floral initiation, including sodium naphthalene acetic acid, ethephon (EthrelTM), ethephon with urea, a commercial mixture of gibberellins (GA4 and GA7) with benzyl adenine known as PerlanTM, paclobutrazol, hydrogen cyanamide, 2-ethylene chlorohydrin, KNO3, and CaC2, have been tested but did not promote winter flowering of pitaya (Chang, 2003; Khaimov and Mizrahi, 2006; Yen and Chang, 1997).
Pitaya is generally known as a long-day plant, which flowers in several flushes between May and October in the northern hemisphere according to Luders and McMahon (2006). To verify the long-day plant status of pitaya, other researchers have conducted experiments involving daylength manipulation. Yen and Chang (1997) prolonged the light period to 2200 hr between November and March to encourage H. undatus plants to flower inside a plastic house but only had limited success. Khaimov and Mizrahi (2006) obtained a contradictory result from their experiments extending daylength between March and July. To date, the photoperiodism of pitaya has not been clearly demonstrated by conclusive data, and the application of night-breaking or daylength extension for winter crop production remains unstable in subtropical Taiwan. This study verified that red pitaya is a long-day plant and that night-breaking treatment can promote its winter crop production.
Almeida, O.J.G., Sartori-Paoli, A.A. & Souza, L.A. 2010 Flower morpho-anatomy in Epiphyllum phyllanthus (Cactaceae) Rev. Mex. Biodiv. 81 65 80
Borchert, R., Renner, S., Calle, Z., Navarrete, D., Tye, A., Gautier, L., Spichiger, R. & von Hildebrand, P. 2005 Photoperiodic induction of synchronous flowering near the Equator Nature 433 627 629
Boyle, T. 1991 Temperature and photoperiodic regulation of flowering in ‘Crimson Giant’ Easter cactus J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 116 618 622
Chang, T. 2003 Yield and quality of pitaya (Hylocereus undatus Britt. & Rose) as affected by fruiting regulation. MS thesis, Natl. Chung Hsing Univ., Taiwan
Garner, W.W. & Allard, H.A. 1920 Effect of the relative length of day and night and other factors of the environment on growth and reproduction in plants J. Agr. Res. 18 553 606
Gutterman, Y. 1995 Environmental factors affecting flowering and fruit development of Opuntia ficus-indica cuttings during the 3 weeks before planting Isr. J. Plant Sci. 43 151 157
Hsu, W. 2004 Investigations on culture, growth habits and phenology in pitaya (Hylocereus spp.). MS thesis, Natl. Taiwan Univ., Taiwan
Jiang, Y., Lin, T., Lee, C., Yen, C. & Yang, W. 2011 Phenology, canopy composition, and fruit quality of yellow pitaya in tropical Taiwan HortScience 46 1497 1502
Jiang, Y.L. 2005 Classification, flowering and fruiting characteristics, and pruning of climbing cactus. MS thesis, Natl. Taiwan Univ., Taiwan
Khaimov, A. & Mizrahi, Y. 2006 Effects of day-length, radiation, flower thinning and growth regulators on flowering of the vine cacti Hylocereus undatus and Selenicereus megalanthus J. Hort. Sci. Biotechnol. 81 465 470
Luders, L. & McMahon, G. 2006 The pitaya or dragon (Hylocereus undatus). Agnote 778, No. D42. Northern Territory Government
Mizrahi, Y. & Nerd, A. 1999 Climbing and columnar cacti: New arid land fruit crops. Perspectives on new crops and new uses, p. 358–366. In: Janick, J. (ed.). ASHS Press, Alexandria, VA
Mizrahi, Y., Nerd, A. & Sitrit, Y. 2002 New fruit for arid climates, p. 378–384. In: Janick, J. (ed.). Trends in new crops and new uses. ASHS, Alexandria, VA
Nerd, A., Sitrit, Y., Kaushik, R.A. & Mizrahi, Y. 2002 High summer temperatures inhibit flowering in vine pitaya crops (Hylocereus spp.) Sci. Hort. 96 343 350
Raveh, E., Nerd, A. & Mizrahi, Y. 1998 Responses of two hemiepiphytic fruit crop cacti to different degrees of shade Sci. Hort. 73 151 164
Yen, C. & Chang, F. 1997 Forcing pitaya (Hylocereus undatus Britt. & Rose) by chemicals, controlled daylength and temperature. Proc. Symp. Enhancing Competitiveness of Fruit Ind., Taichung District Agricultural Improvement Station. Taiwan. 3:163–170