Fraser fir [Abies fraseri (Pursh) Poir.] is widely planted for Christmas tree production in the midwest and eastern United States. The species has a unique natural distribution, restricted to the southern Appalachian Mountains of southwestern Virginia, western North Carolina, and eastern Tennessee, characterized by high elevations, prevalent fog cover, lower summer temperature extremes, and regular summer rainfall. The species has been intensively planted elsewhere in the United States as a result of its desirable attributes (Beck, 1990; Nzokou and Leefers, 2007); however, the physiological consequences of planting this species under summer drought stress-susceptible conditions are not well understood.
Drought stress is characterized by reduction of water content, increased closure of stomata, and decrease in cell enlargement and growth. Severe water stress may result in the arrest of photosynthesis, progressive suppression of photosynthetic carbon assimilation, disturbance of metabolism, and finally the death of the plant (Deltoro et al., 1998; Jaleel et al., 2008). After stomatal closure, there is a decrease in CO2 intake and intercellular CO2 partial pressure, thereby a reduction in CO2 assimilation and net photosynthesis (Deltoro et al., 1998; Dubey 1997; Farquhar et al., 2001). Stomatal closure is the result of either hydropassive or hydroactive mechanisms (Dubey, 1997). In the hydropassive mechanism, guard cells loose water so rapidly that the loss cannot be balanced by water movement from adjacent cells (Shope et al., 2008). In the hydroactive mechanism, stomatal closure is the result of the reduction in stored abscisic acid from the mesophyll chloroplast to the apoplasts (Hartung, 1983). In addition, the rate of CO2 assimilation is depressed at very moderate water deficits or even before the plant’s water status changes in response to the drop in water pressure deficit (Bunce, 1981) or soil potential (Gollan et al., 1986). Therefore, it can be expected that diurnal changes in plant water potential caused by daily variation associated with environmental conditions will interact with water stress to affect the photosynthetic system. Direct consequences of these processes are inhibition of cell expansion, which adversely affects crop growth and yield. On the other hand, water stress causes ultrastructural changes in the chloroplasts that adversely affect photosynthesis (Dubey, 1997). Under drought stress, contents of photosynthetic pigments (Chl a, Chl b, and carotenes) diminish (Pukacki and Kaminska-Rozek, 2005; Terzi et al., 2010; Yordanov et al., 2000). For example, in fully active leaves of Xerophyta scabrida submitted to drought stress, the CO2 assimilation, thylakoid activity, and respiration rate declined, whereas chlorophyll and carotene contents were successively broken down (Deltoro et al., 1998). When drought coincided with high radiation, it led to a decrease in carotenoid content in evergreen woody species Quercus ilex, Quercus coccifera, Pinus halepensis, and Juniperus phoenicea (Baquedano and Castillo, 2007).
However, photosynthetic systems have the ability to recover from drought stress when water becomes available (Nar et al., 2009). This process involves a complex of signals comprising metabolites produced during rehydration. For example, re-accumulation of Chl (a + b) and carotenoid synthesis was observed in stressed plants once leaves reached ≈91% of the maximum leaf water content (Schwab et al., 1989; Tuba et al., 1996). This underscores the need to understand not only diurnal patterns, but also seasonal changes in photosynthetic pigments caused by variations in stress conditions that plants are subjected to during a growing season.
Another possible physiological response to drought stress is the alteration in the synthesis of both starch and sucrose in stressed plants (Vassey and Sharkey, 1989). Impairment of photosynthesis resulting from drought stress can result in the utilization rate of photosynthates exceeding their production rates, thus making carbon and energy metabolism dependent on non-structural carbohydrate reserves (Guehl et al., 1993). However, in some species, drought can enhance carbohydrate accumulation (Guehl et al., 1993; Thomas, 1990). In that situation, the increase in soluble sugars in response to water stress can be attributed to less translocation from the leaf, slower consumption resulting from decreased growth, and other changes such as starch hydrolysis (Kameli and Losel, 1996).
We are hypothesizing that under increased drought conditions, trees will respond by decreasing their photosynthetic abilities resulting from stomatal closure, leading to a decrease in quantities of photosynthates produced. We also expect diurnal variation with a midday depression in measurements resulting from environmental conditions. The aim of this study was to determine diurnal and seasonal patterns in photosynthetic pigments (Chl a, Chl b, carotenes), carbohydrate accumulation, and growth of Abies fraseri under controlled drought stress created by varying irrigation regimes. The results of this study could help in understanding the drought tolerance and adaptation potential of this species to drought-prone environments.
AmeglioT.DecourteixM.AlvesG.ValentinV.SakrS.JulienJ.L.PeterG.GuilliotA.LacointeA.2004Temperature effects on xylem sap osmolarity in walnut trees: Evidence for a vitalistic model of winter embolism repairTree Physiol.24785793
AndersonJ.V.ChevoneB.I.HessJ.L.1992Seasonal-variation in the antioxidant system of eastern white-pine needles—Evidence for thermal-dependencePlant Physiol.98501508
AshrafM.2003Relationships between leaf gas exchange characteristics and growth of differently adapted populations of Blue panic grass (Panicum antidotale Retz.) under salinity or waterloggingPlant Sci.1656975
BaquedanoF.J.CastilloF.J.2007Drought tolerance in the Mediterranean species Quercus coccifera, Quercus ilex, Pinus halepensis, and Juniperus phoeniceaPhotosynthetica45229238
BeckD.E.1990Abies fraseri (Pursh) Poir. Fraser fir p. 47–51. In: Burns R.M. and B.H. Honkala (eds.). Silvics of North America. Vol. 1. Conifers. Agric. Handb. 654. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Washington DC
BrettW.J.SingerA.C.1973Chlorophyll concentration in leaves of Juniperus-virginiana L—Measured over a 2-year periodAmer. Midl. Nat.90194200
BunceJ.A.1981Relationships between maximum photosynthetic rates and photosynthetic tolerance of low leaf water potentialsCan. J. Bot.59769774
DeltoroV.I.CalatayudA.GimenoC.AbadiaA.BarrenoE.1998Changes in chlorophyll a fluorescence, photosynthetic CO2 assimilation and xanthophyll cycle interconversions during dehydration in desiccation-tolerant and intolerant liverwortsPlanta207224228
DubeyR.S.1997Photosynthesis in plants under stressful conditions p. 859–875. In: Pessarakli M. (ed.). Handbook of photosynthesis. Marcel Dekker New York NY
DuboisM.GillesK.A.HamiltonJ.K.RebersP.A.SmithF.1956Colorimetric method for the determination of sugars and related substancesAnnals of Chemistry28350356
GollanY.PassiouraJ.B.MunnsR.1986Soil water status affects the stomatal conductance of fully turgid wheat and sunflower leavesAust. J. Plant Physiol.48575579
GuehlJ.M.ClementA.KaushalP.AussenacG.1993Planting stress, water status and nonstructural carbohydrate concentrations in Corsican pine seedlingsTree Physiol.12173183
JaleelC.A.GopiR.ManivannanP.GomathinayagamM.ShaoH.B.ZhaoC.X.PanneerselvamR.2008Endogenous hormonal and enzymatic responses of Catharanthus roseus with triadimefon application under water deficitsC. R. Biol.331844852
LansacA.R.ZaballosJ.P.MartinA.1994Seasonal water potential changes and proline accumulation in Mediterranean shrubland speciesVegetation113141154
LeiY.YinC.LiC.2006Differences in some morphological, physiological, and biochemical responses to drought stress in two contrasting populations of Populus przewalskiiPlant Physiol.127182191
LiM.H.XiaoW.F.WangS.G.ChengG.W.CherubiniP.CaiX.H.LiuX.L.WangX.D.ZhuW.Z.2008Mobile carbohydrates in Himalayan treeline trees. Evidence for carbon gain limitation but not for growth limitationTree Physiol.2812871296
McDowellN.PockmanW.T.AllenC.D.BreshearsD.D.CobbN.KolbT.PlautJ.SperryJ.WestA.WilliamsD.G.YepezE.A.2008Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: Why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought?New Phytol.178719739
MonclusR.DreyerE.VillarM.DelmotteF.M.DelayD.PetitJ.M.BarbarouxC.ThiecD.BrechetC.BrignolasF.2006Impact of drought on productivity and water use efficiency in 29 genotypes of Populus deltoides × Populus nigraNew Phytol.169765777
Munne-BoschS.AlegreL.2000Changes in carotenoids, tocopherols and diterpenes during drought and recovery, and the biological significance of chlorophyll loss in Rosmarinus officinalis plantsPlanta210925931
NarH.SaglamA.TerziR.VarkonyiZ.KadiogluA.2009Leaf rolling and photosystem II efficiency in Ctenanthe setosa exposed to drought stressPhotosynthetica47429436
PichlerP.OberhuberW.2007Radial growth response of coniferous forest trees in an inner Alpine environment to heat-wave in 2003For. Ecol. Mgt.242688699
PukackiP.M.Kaminska-RozekE.2005Effect of drought stress on chlorophyll a fluorescence and electrical admittance of shoots in Norway spruce seedlingsTrees (Berl.)19539544
RibeiroR.V.MachadoE.C.SantosM.G.OliveiraR.F.2009Seasonal and diurnal changes in photosynthetic limitation of young sweet orange treesEnviron. Exp. Bot.66203211
SakrS.AlvesG.MorillonR.L.MaurelK.DecourteixM.GuilliotA.Fleurat-LessardP.JulienJ.L.ChrispeelsM.J.2003Plasma membrane aquaporins are involved in winter embolism recovery in walnut treePlant Physiol.133630641
SchwabK.B.SchreiberU.HeberU.1989Response of photosynthesis and respiration of resurrection plants to desiccation and rehydrationPlanta177217227
SobradoM.A.1986Aspects of tissue water relations and seasonal changes of leaf water potential components of evergreen and deciduous species coexisting in tropical dry forestsOecologia68413416
SudachkovaN.E.MilyutinaI.L.RomanovaL.I.2009Adaptive responses of scots pine to the impact of adverse abiotic factors on the rhizosphereRuss. J. Ecol.40387392
TerziR.SağlamA.KutluH.NarH.KadioğluA.2010Impact of soil drought stress on photochemical efficiency of photosystem II and antioxidant enzyme activities of Phaseolus vulgaris cultivarsTurk. J. Bot.34110
TubaZ.LichtenthalerH.K.CsintalanZ.S.NagyZ.SzenteK.1996Loss of chlorophylls, cessation of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation and respiration in the poikilochlorophyllous plant Xerophyta scabrida during desiccationPhysiol. Plant.9633833388
TyreeM.T.CheungY.N.S.MacgregorM.E.TalbotA.J.B.1978Characteristics of seasonal and ontogenetic changes in tissue–water relations of Acer, Populus, Tsuga, and PiceaCan. J. Bot.56635647
VasseyT.L.SharkeyT.D.1989Mild water stress of Phaseolus vulgaris plants leads to reduced starch synthesis and extractable sucrose phosphate synthase activityPlant Physiol.8910661070
WellburnA.R.GounarisI.FasslerL.LichtenthalerH.K.1983Changes in plastid ultrastructure and fluctuations of cellular isoprenoid and carbohydrate coumpounds during continued etiolation of dark-grown oat seedlingsPhysiol. Plant.59347354
WilliamsL.E.AraujoF.J.2002Correlations among predawn leaf, midday leaf, and midday stem water potential and their correlations with other measures of soil and plant water status in Vitis viniferaJ. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.127448454
YinC.Y.PangX.Y.LeiY.B.2009Populus from high altitude has more efficient protective mechanisms under water stress than from low-altitude habitats: A study in greenhouse for cuttingsPhysiol. Plant.1372235