Florida produced 6.5 million t of sweet oranges [Citrus ×sinensis (L.) Osbeck] during the 2008–2009 harvest season from ≈200,000 ha (Florida Agricultural Statistics Service, 2010). More than 95% of this fruit is used to produce orange juice, making Florida the second largest orange juice producer in the world. Harvesting is the single largest cost associated with citrus production in Florida, accounting for up to 50% of the total cost of production (Muraro, 2009). This is in contrast with Brazil, the largest producer of orange juice in the world, where harvesting costs are much lower such that during the 2000–2001 harvest season, Brazilian citrus growers were able to deliver frozen concentrated orange juice to the port of Tampa, FL, for only $0.0757 more per pound soluble solids than Florida growers. This discrepancy in production costs has been a major driving force in Florida's efforts to develop mechanical harvesting technology (Florida Department of Citrus, 2010; Whitney, 1995).
Adoption of mechanical harvesting systems has been slow. During the 2008–2009 harvest season, less than 15,000 ha (7% of total acreage) of citrus was mechanically harvested in Florida (Florida Department of Citrus, 2009). A number of issues have contributed to the slow adoption of mechanical harvesting technology, including processor concerns about the quantity of debris mixed with mechanically harvested fruit (Spann and Danyluk, 2010), production manager concerns about the effects of mechanical harvesting on tree health (Li et al., 2005), and issues related to the late-season harvesting of ‘Valencia’ oranges (Melgar et al., 2010).
‘Valencia’ orange trees typically bloom in late February through March in Florida and the mature crop is harvested beginning in March and extending into mid-June. Thus, there is an overlap between the young growing fruit and mature fruit. Studies have shown a significant reduction in the subsequent year's yield when ‘Valencia’ orange trees are mechanically harvested after ≈1 May (Hedden et al., 1984; Roka et al., 2005; Whitney, 1975). This is approximately the point when the young developing fruit have obtained a large enough size (≈2.5 cm diameter) and mass that they will be removed by the canopy shaker mechanism along with the mature fruit. Because of the ever-growing demand for not-from-concentrate (NFC) orange juice, processors require that growers hold fruit on the trees later into the season to provide fresh fruit as long as possible. Thus, efforts have been underway to find a viable way to harvest ‘Valencia’ orange fruit after 1 May without impacting subsequent year yields.
The abscission agent CMNP effectively loosens mature citrus fruit without affecting immature fruit, allowing mechanical harvest of ‘Valencia’ orange fruit after 1 May without impacting subsequent year yields (Burns et al., 2006). However, CMNP can sometimes cause peel injury consisting of a brown ring of depressed flavedo tissue around the stylar end of fruit where the CMNP spray solution accumulates (Alferez et al., 2006). This injury, commonly referred to as peel scarring, is associated with phospholipase A2 (PLA2) activity and can be prevented by inhibiting PLA2 with aristolochic acid (Alferez et al., 2006). No further characterization of this scarring has been conducted and processors are concerned that it may reduce peel integrity and/or increase fruit decay before processing.
In Florida, harvested oranges for processing are transported to the processing plant in open-topped semitrailers that hold 27 t of fruit. Fruit are stored until processing in these trailers under ambient conditions. Generally, fruit are transported from the orchard to the processing plant the day of harvest and are processed within 24 h. However, processors are concerned that fruit treated with CMNP, because of the scarring that can occur, may have weaker peels and be more susceptible to damage during transport and storage or may begin to decay more quickly than untreated fruit.
Our objective was to determine if fruit treated with CMNP and subjected to mechanical harvesting have reduced peel integrity, measured as peel puncture force and fruit crush force, or are more susceptible to postharvest decay within the commercial timeframe of normal harvest to processing.
Alferez, F., Pozo, L. & Burns, J.K. 2006 Physiological changes associated with senescence and abscission in mature citrus fruit induced by 5-chloro-3-methyl-4-nitro-1H-pyrazole and ethephon application Physiol. Plant. 127 66 73
Burns, J.K., Roka, F.M., Li, K.-T., Pozo, L. & Buker, R.S. 2006 Late-season ‘Valencia’ orange mechanical harvesting with an abscission agent and low-frequency harvesting HortScience 41 660 663
Churchill, D.B., Sumner, H.R. & Whitney, J.D. 1980 Peel strength properties of three orange varieties. Trans Amer. Soc. Agr. Engin. 23 173 176
Ebel, R.C., Burns, J.K. & Morgan, K.T. 2009 Spray volume, distribution, and efficacy of 5-chloro-3-methyl-4-nitro-1H-pyrazole for loosening sweet orange HortScience 44 1895 1899
Flood, S.J., Burks, T.F. & Teixeira, A.A. 2006 Physical properties of oranges in response to applied gripping forces for robotic harvesting Trans. Amer. Soc. Agr. Biol. Engin. 49 341 346
Florida Automated Weather Network 2010 19 Dec. 2010. <http://fawn.ifas.ufl.edu/>
Florida Department of Citrus 2009 Mechanically harvested acres and boxes 16 Apr. 2010. <http://citrusmh.ifas.ufl.edu/index.asp?s=2&p=2>
Florida Department of Citrus 2010 Harvesting research 16 Apr. 2010. <http://www.fdocgrower.com/sr/harvestingresearch.php>
Kader, A.A. 1992 Postharvest technology of horticultural crops 2nd Ed University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Oakland, CA
Li, K.-T., Syvertsen, J. & Burns, J. 2005 Mechanical harvesting of Florida citrus trees has little effect on leaf water relations or return bloom Proc. Fla State Hort. Soc 118 22 24
Melgar, J.C., Dunlop, J.M., Albrigo, L.G. & Syvertsen, J.P. 2010 Winter drought stress can delay flowering and avoid immature fruit loss during late-season mechanical harvesting of ‘Valencia’ oranges HortScience 45 271 276
Muraro, R.P. 2009 Estimated average picking, roadsiding and hauling charges for Florida citrus, 2008–09 season 15 Apr. 2010. <http://www.crec.ifas.ufl.edu/extension/economics/pdf/Estimated_Average_Picking_2008-09.pdf>
Obreza, T.A. & Morgan, K.T. 2008 Nutrition of Florida citrus trees 2nd Ed Florida Cooperative Extension Service Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
Parsons, L.R. & Morgan, K.T. 2010 Florida citrus microsprinkler irrigation scheduler 18 Dec. 2010. <http://fawn.ifas.ufl.edu/tools/irrigation/citrus/tables/>
Ritenour, M.A. 2004 Orange The commercial storage of fruits, vegetables, and florist and nursery stocks. USDA Handbook No. 66 USDA-ARS Washington, DC 19 Dec. 2010. <http://www.ba.ars.usda.gov/hb66/contents.html>
Roka, F.M., Burns, J.K. & Buker, R.S. 2005 Mechanical harvesting without abscission agents—Yield impacts on late season ‘Valencia’ oranges Proc. Fla State Hort. Soc 118 25 27
Spann, T.M. & Danyluk, M.D. 2010 Mechanical harvesting increases leaf and stem debris in loads of mechanically harvested citrus fruit HortScience 45 1297 1300
Whitney, J.D. 1975 Orange yield and removal studies with air and trunk shakers using two abscission chemicals Proc. Fla State Hort. Soc 89 41 43
Whitney, J.D. 1995 A review of citrus harvesting in Florida. Proc. Citrus Eng Conf., Univ. of FL, Citrus Res. Educ Ctr., Lake Alfred, FL 33 60