Traditional vegetative propagation methods such as cuttings and grafting are important for propagation of plant cultivars heterozygous for some loci, because those loci segregate in selfed progeny. In tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), although cultivars are usually propagated from seeds, several cultivars propagated by vegetative methods have been developed recently in Japan, i.e., ‘Koshi-no-Ruby’ developed at Fukui Prefectural University and ‘Koshi-no-Ruby Sayaka’ and ‘Koshi-no-Ruby Urara’ developed in Fukui Prefecture (Sato et al., 2009). However, the efficiency of vegetative propagation by traditional methods is insufficient for mass propagation of plantlets.
Adventitious shoots can be regenerated from cut surfaces of hypocotyls or stems in decapitated plants in vivo. Such a phenomenon has been observed in many plant species, including tomato (Harada et al., 2005; Steinitz et al., 2006), Cucurbita pepo (Amutha et al., 2009), and poinsettia (Nielsen et al., 2003). Taking advantage of the inherent regenerative ability of plants, a new method, termed the complete decapitation method (CDM) by Johkan et al. (2008c), was developed for mass propagation in tomato and poinsettia (Harada et al., 2005; Nielsen et al., 2003). This method enables in vivo adventitious shoot regeneration from stumps after decapitation of the primary shoot and all lateral branches. Harada et al. (2005) reported that 79 shoots were regenerated from the cut surface of primary shoots and lateral branches 36 d after CDM treatment without exogenous plant growth regulator (PGR) application in ‘Petit’ tomato.
Increasing the efficiency of adventitious shoot regeneration is important if CDM is to be applied to plantlet production in tomatoes. Etiolation of stems by covering the cut surface with an aluminum cap increased the number of regenerated shoots (Johkan et al., 2008a, 2008c, 2011). Foliar application of ascorbic acid after decapitation also promoted adventitious shoot formation (Johkan et al., 2008b, 2011). However, efficiency of shoot regeneration might be further improved by incorporation of other techniques such as treatment with PGRs. In plant tissue culture, organ differentiation is influenced by the relative concentration of PGRs in the culture medium; relatively high levels of cytokinin promote shoot formation, whereas high levels of auxin promote rooting, and intermediate levels induce callus formation (Thorpe, 2007). In CDM, adventitious shoots are likely to be regenerated from calli formed on the cut surface of primary shoots and lateral branches (Harada et al., 2005), which indicates there are similarities between shoot regeneration by CDM and tissue culture methods. Thus, PGRs might influence in vivo adventitious shoot formation from decapitated tomato plants.
In the present study, the number of adventitious shoots regenerated after decapitation was investigated using four cultivars of tomato. Histological observations were conducted to determine whether the shoots originated from calli formed on the cut surface of stems. It is well known that auxin is synthesized in the shoot apex (Leyser, 2005). Therefore, we investigated the effects of the presence of lateral branches on shoot regeneration. The PGRs 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) and 6-benzyladenine (BA), which are commonly used in tissue culture, were applied to decapitated plants as foliar sprays to understand the physiology of shoot regeneration by CDM and to improve the efficiency of shoot regeneration.
AmuthaS.KathiravanK.SingerS.JashiL.ShomerI.SteinitzB.GabaV.2009Adventitious shoot formation in decapitated dicotyledonous seedlings starts with regeneration of abnormal leaves from cells not located in a shoot apical meristemIn Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant45758768
AreneL.PellegrinoC.GudinS.1993A comparison of the somaclonal variation level of Rosa hybrida L. cv Meirutral plants regenerated from callus or direct induction from different vegetative and embryonic tissuesEuphytica718390
de la PuenteR.GonzálezA.I.RuizM.L.PolancoC.2008Somaclonal variation in rye (Secale cereale L.) analyzed using polymorphic and sequenced AFLP markersIn Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant44419426
DwivediK.SrivastavaP.VermaH.N.ChaturvediH.C.1990Direct regeneration of shoots from leaf segments of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) cultured in vitro and production of plantsIndian J. Exp. Biol.283235
HaradaM.OdaM.MoriG.IkedaH.2005Mass regeneration of shoots from cut surfaces of stems in tomato stock plantsJ. Jpn. Soc. Hort. Sci.74479481
JohkanM.ImahoriY.FurukawaH.MitsukuriK.YamasakiS.TanakaH.OdaM.2011Effect of ascorbic acid and etiolation on antioxidant enzyme activity and phenylpropanoid metabolism during shoot regeneration from cut ends of tomato stemsJ. Jpn. Soc. Hort. Sci.804551
JohkanM.MoriG.ImahoriY.MitsukuriK.YamasakiS.MishibaK.MorikawaT.OdaM.2008aShading the cut stems of tomato plants promotes in vivo shoot regeneration via control of the phenolic metabolismEnviron. Control Biol.46203209
JohkanM.MoriG.MitsukuriK.MishibaK.MorikawaT.ImahoriY.OdaM.2008bEffect of ascorbic acid on in vivo organogenesis in tomato plantsJ. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol.83624628
JohkanM.MoriG.MitsukuriK.MishibaK.MorikawaT.OdaM.2008cIn vivo shoot regeneration promoted by shading the cut surface of the stem in tomato plantsHortScience43220222
LarkinP.J.ScowcroftW.R.1981Somaclonal variation—A novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvementTheor. Appl. Genet.60197214
NgezahayoF.DongY.LiuB.2007Somaclonal variation at the nucleotide sequence level in rice (Oryza sativa L.) as revealed by RAPD and ISSR markers, and by pairwise sequence analysisJ. Appl. Genet.48329336
NielsenM.D.FarestveitB.AndersenA.S.2003Adventitious shoot development from decapitated plants of periclinal chimeric poinsettia plants (Euphorbia pulcherrima Willd ex Klotsch)Europ. J. Hortic. Sci.68161168
OhkiS.BigotC.MousseauJ.1978Analysis of shoot-forming capacity in vitro in two lines of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) and their hybridsPlant Cell Physiol.192742
PhillipsR.L.KaepplerS.M.OlhoftP.1994Genetic instability of plant tissue cultures: Breakdown of normal controlsProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA9152225226
PotteraR.JonesM.G.K.1991An assessment of genetic stability of potato in vitro by molecular and phenotypic analysisPlant Sci.76239248
RostianaO.NiwaM.MarubashiW.1999Efficiency of inter-simple sequence repeat PCR for detecting somaclonal variation among leaf-culture-regenerated plants of horseradishBreed. Sci.49245250
SatoN.NomuraY.TayasuT.HatanakaY.KatoK.SaitoM.OkudaT.2009Breeding of ToMV resistant variety of middle-sized tomato, ‘No.5’ and ‘No.11’Bulletin of the Fukui Agricultural Experiment Station462833[in Japanese with English summary].
SteinitzB.AmitayA.GabaV.TabibY.KellerM.LevinI.2006A simple plant regeneration-ability assay in a range of Lycopersicon speciesPlant Cell Tiss. Org. Cult.84269278
TabeiY.KannoT.NishioT.1991Regulation of organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis by auxin in melon, Cucumis melo LPlant Cell Rpt.10225229
TanakaM.TakeiK.KojimaM.SakakibaraH.MoriH.2006Auxin controls local cytokinin biosynthesis in the nodal stem in apical dominancePlant J.4510281036
van den BulkR.W.LöfflerH.J.M.LindhoutW.H.KoornneefM.1990Somaclonal variation in tomato: Effect of explant source and a comparison with chemical mutagenesisTheor. Appl. Genet.80817825