Rain-related splitting is a detriment to commercial blueberry growers in the southeastern United States. This problem has been reported to have reduced marketable yields and thus profit for these growers by up to 20% (Marshall et al., 2006). Researchers have been working on the problem of fruit splitting in various fruit crops for more than 70 years. If a few key factors that contribute to splitting in blueberries can be identified and implemented as screening tools for new cultivars, then long-term reductions in commercial blueberry fruit splitting are feasible.
Blueberries absorb external water either through the peel or through the pedicel. Yet some blueberry cultivars tend to absorb more water than the berry can sustain, thus resulting in fruit splitting. Studies have suggested many factors that influence fruit splitting. These factors include cultivar, fruit maturity, temperature of water (fruit splitting increases with an increase in water temperature), fruit temperature, period of wetting, soluble solids content, fruit firmness and turgor, relative humidity, soil moisture, peel permeability, and elasticity of the peel (Ackley and Krueger, 1980; Bullock, 1952; Gerhardt et al., 1945; Marshall, 1954; Powers and Bollen, 1947; Zielinski, 1964). It is generally agreed (Ackley and Krueger, 1980; Andersen and Richardson, 1982; Bullock, 1952; Davenport et al., 1972; Marshall, 1954) that the cause of cracking in cherries, whether directly or indirectly, is absorption of external water through the fruit peel. Therefore, protecting fruit from rainwater contacting and remaining on the fruit should reduce or eliminate splitting. However, Marshall (2001) found that covering blueberry plants to prevent rainfall from contacting the fruit was not sufficient to eliminate splitting. After a rainfall, split berries were harvested from both uncovered as well as covered plants. As expected, plants had significantly more split berries if left uncovered (30.40%) than did covered plants (19.90%). Yet some splits apparently occurred from uptake of water by the roots that is transported to the fruit by the xylem.
Susceptibility to splitting in cherries appears to be related to the rate and quantity of water uptake by the fruit (Belman and Keulemans, 1996). Uptake of water into the fruit occurs not only through the pedicel, but also through the peel. Lane et al. (2000) found that split-resistant cherry cultivars absorbed more water before splitting than did split-susceptible cherries. They concluded that water uptake thresholds at which fruit split was a major factor explaining the split susceptibility difference in cherry cultivars. Lane et al. (2000) added that a cultivar difference causally related to splitting susceptibility could be attributed to the amount of air-filled spaces between cells, which would allow water to be taken in without increasing fruit volume. This could be determined by measuring the ratio of percent water uptake to volume increase of resistant and susceptible cultivars. Ratios found to be similar suggest that cell adhesion might be an explanation for cultivar difference. Cultivars with cells weakly adhering to each other may split at lower turgor pressure than those with cells that strongly adhere.
A mature planting (30 plants of each cultivar) of ‘Tifblue’ and ‘Premier’ plants located at the Thad Cochran Southern Horticultural Laboratory in Poplarville, MS, was used for this study. Plants were divided into four replications of four plants/replication ‘Tifblue’ is a split-susceptible (SS) rabbiteye cultivar and ‘Premier’ is a split-resistant (SR) rabbiteye cultivar.
Andersen, P.C. & Richardson, D.G. 1982 A rapid method to estimate fruit water status with special reference to rain cracking of sweet cherries J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 107 441 444
Belman, K. & Keulemans, J. 1996 A study of some fruit skin characteristics in relation to the susceptibility of cherry fruit to cracking Acta Hort. (ISHS) 410 547 550
Bullock, R.M. 1952 A study of some inorganic compounds and growth promoting chemicals in relation to fruit cracking of Bing cherries at maturity Proc. Amer. Cos. Hort. Sci. 59 243 253
Davenport, D.C., Uriu, K. & Hagen, R.M. 1972 Antitranspirant film: Curtailing intake of external water by cherry fruit to reduce cracking HortScience 7 507
Gerhardt, F., English, H. & Smith, E. 1945 Cracking and decay of ‘Bing’ cherries as related to the presence of moisture on the surface of the fruit Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 46 191 198
Lane, W.D., Meheriuk, M. & McKenzie, D.L. 2000 Fruit cracking of susceptible, and intermediate, and a resistant sweet cherry cultivar HortScience 35 239 242
Marshall, D.A. 2001 Incidence of splitting in ‘Premier’ and ‘Tifblue’ rabbiteye blueberries Master's Thesis. University of Southern Mississippi Hattiesburg, MS
Marshall, D.A., Spiers, J.M. & Braswell, J.H. 2006 Splitting severity among rabbiteye (Vaccinium ashei Reade) blueberry varieties in Mississippi and Louisiana Intl. J. Fruit Sci. 6 77 81
Marshall, D.A., Spiers, J.M., Stringer, S.J. & Curry, K.J. 2007 Laboratory method to estimate rain-induced splitting in cultivated blueberries HortScience 42 1551 1553
Zielinski, Q.B. 1964 Resistance of sweet cherry varieties to fruit cracking in relation to fruit and pit size and fruit color Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 84 98 102