‘Novablue’, a Seed-propagated Lowbush Blueberry Family

Author:
Andrew Raymond Jamieson Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Atlantic Food and Horticulture Research Centre, 32 Main St., Kentville, Nova Scotia, B4N 1J5, Canada

Search for other papers by Andrew Raymond Jamieson in
This Site
Google Scholar
Close

Click on author name to view affiliation information

‘Novablue’ is the first seed-propagated lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium Aiton) introduced from the Atlantic Food and Horticulture Research Center, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Kentville, Nova Scotia. Previously, six clonally propagated cultivars have been released from this program (Hall et al., 1988). Plants propagated from cuttings can be difficult to establish in the field (Jamieson and Nickerson, 2003). The advantages of seed propagation over clonal propagation include a lower cost of plants, better establishment in the field with more rhizome formation, and the lack of requirement for planting a second cultivar for cross-pollination. Previous studies have shown that seed-propagated lowbush blueberries are typically low yielding (Aalders and Hall, 1975; Aalders et al., 1979; Hall, 1983), but these same studies suggest that high-yielding populations can be developed.

Origin

‘Novablue’ was chosen as a top performer among 42 Kentville Blueberry Families (KBFs) grown at the Sheffield Farm, Sheffield Mills, Nova Scotia (Jamieson, 2008). ‘Novablue’, tested as KBF-7, is a population of plants grown from ‘Fundy’ pollenized by ‘Brunswick’. ‘Brunswick’ is a tall-stemmed, very flavorful, large-fruited native selection found in New Brunswick, Canada, and introduced in 1977 (Aalders et al., 1977). ‘Fundy’ is a more recent cultivar noted for its consistently high yields of large, firm, light blue fruit (Hall et al., 1988). Both cultivars are considered to be pure V. angustifolium. ‘Novablue’ was introduced and briefly described in 2006 (Clark and Finn, 2006).

Description and Performance

‘Novablue’ was initially tested in plots established in 1990 and harvested from 1992 to 2000 (Jamieson, 2008). In addition to the initial trial, plants of ‘Novablue’ were grown and compared with parental cultivar ‘Fundy’ in a trial set out on 9 June 1998 at the Sheffield Farm.

This second trial was established with similar-sized plants grown from seed of ‘Novablue’ or from softwood cuttings of ‘Fundy’. The rhizome growth of ‘Novablue’ and ‘Fundy’ was compared in September of the third growing season. Most plants of ‘Fundy’ had produced no new shoots from rhizomes, but ‘Novablue’ plants had a mean of 3.1 shoots (Table 1). In the same plots in 2004, stems and flowers were evaluated. Stems of ‘Novablue’ were shorter than those of ‘Fundy’ and generally unbranched (Table 1). Unbranched stems are more amenable to mechanical harvesting. ‘Novablue’ had fewer flower buds per stem but a similar number of flowers per bud. The flowers of ‘Novablue’ are similar to ‘Fundy’ in size but shorter than those of ‘Brunswick’, which was growing in an adjacent plot (Table 2). ‘Novablue’ and its parents have white flowers; however, red–purple stripes or blotches are present in some years if temperatures are low (near 0 °C) during flower development. The leaves of ‘Novablue’ are ovate to ovate–elliptic and the size range encompasses the smaller-leaved ‘Fundy’ and the larger ‘Brunswick’ (data not shown). Stem color, as observed in June, is typically green for ‘Fundy’, red for ‘Brunswick’, and either red or green for ‘Novablue’.

Table 1.

Rhizome shoot counts and stem measurements of ‘Novablue’ and ‘Fundy’.

Table 1.
Table 2.

Mean flower size of ‘Novablue’, ‘Fundy’, and ‘Brunswick’.

Table 2.

In the original trial in which ‘Novablue’ (KBF-7) was chosen for release, it was in the top group for yield over six harvest seasons (Jamieson, 2008). The mean yield was 5.6 t·ha−1 and the maximum was 11.2 t·ha−1 in 1998. Because these plots were not always ideally managed for maximum production—they were on imperfectly drained soil, weeds provided competition in the later years, and natural pollinators were relied on—it is expected that yields in excess of the mean can be attained biennially in a commercial setting. In the same trial, the berries of ‘Novablue’ had a mean weight of 0.57 g, larger than unselected blueberries produced commercially (0.2 to 0.4 g) but a bit smaller than ‘Fundy’ and ‘Brunswick’ (Hall et al., 1988). ‘Novablue’ fruit are firm with an attractive, light powdery blue color similar to ‘Fundy’ (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

A pint of ‘Fundy’ (left), ‘Novablue’ (center), and ‘Brunswick’ (right).

Citation: HortScience horts 43, 6; 10.21273/HORTSCI.43.6.1902

Seed Production

Plants of ‘Fundy’ and ‘Brunswick’ were established in 1998 in field soil under a tunnel house structure (4.9 × 29.3 m) to investigate seed production. Initially, the structure was divided into four sections to produce four hybrid seed populations, but it was subsequently converted to produce only ‘Fundy’ × ‘Brunswick’. The ‘Novablue’ section contained five rows planted 1 m apart; the central row was ‘Brunswick’ and the four outer rows were ‘Fundy’. Before flowering, the tunnel was covered with 50% shadecloth, which forms a barrier to bees. One colony of bumblebees (Koppert Canada Ltd., Scarborough, Canada) was placed in the tunnel at ≈10% bloom to ensure pollination. The shadecloth was left in place until after harvest to protect the crop from predators. In 1999, the seed content of eleven 250-g samples of ‘Fundy’ was examined. Seed was extracted in a blender, dried on a laboratory bench, and then screened by passing through sieves (Aalders et al., 1980). Seeds passing through the 600-μm (No. 30) sieve were classed as small and those collected on this sieve were classed as large. Large seeds are known to have higher germination rates (Aalders and Hall, 1979). The mean weight of seeds per gram of fresh fruit was 6.41 mg (sd = 0.58). Of these, 2.70 mg (sd = 0.17) were large seeds. Average individual seed weight was 0.256 mg (sd = 0.01) for large and 0.101 mg (sd = 0.01) for small seeds. In this study, we calculated that there would be 10,500 large seeds and 35,700 small seeds per kilogram of fresh berries. One gram of large seed contained ≈3900 seeds. Germination of large ‘Fundy’ seed exceeds 70% (Aalders et al., 1980) and a commercial nursery achieved 79% germination from ‘Novablue’ seeds produced in 1999. In the seed production tunnel, yields of fruit increased from 0.25 kg·m−2 in 2003 to 0.45 kg·m−2 in 2007. Assuming a berry yield biennially of 0.5 kg·m−2 from a mature seed production plot, and a germination rate of 75%, a seed production area of ≈450 m2 would be required to annually produce enough large seed for a million ‘Novablue’ plants. If seed production were isolated from other wild or cultivated blueberries, then a protective structure would not be required.

Availability

‘Novablue’ is introduced without plant variety protection. Seed samples of ‘Novablue’ may be requested from the breeder until a commercial source is available. Sources of the parental plants, ‘Fundy’ and ‘Brunswick’, will be provided by the breeder on request. ‘Fundy’ and ‘Brunswick’ are present in the National Clonal Germplasm Repository at Corvallis, OR.

Literature Cited

  • Aalders, L.E. & Hall, I.V. 1975 A study of variation in fruit yield and related characteristics in two diallels of the lowbush blueberry, Vaccinium angustifolium Ait Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 17 401 404

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Aalders, L.E. & Hall, I.V. 1979 Germination of lowbush blueberry seeds as affected by sizing, planting cover, storage, and pelleting Can. J. Plant Sci. 59 527 530

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Aalders, L.E. , Hall, I.V. & Brydon, A.C. 1979 A comparison of fruit yields of lowbush blueberry clonal lines and related seedling progenies Can. J. Plant Sci. 59 875 877

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Aalders, L.E. , Hall, I.V. & Brydon, A.C. 1980 Seed production and germination in four lowbush blueberry clones HortScience 15 587 588

  • Aalders, L.E. , Hall, I.V. & Jackson, L.P. 1977 Brunswick lowbush blueberry Can. J. Plant Sci. 57 301

  • Clark, J.R. & Finn, C.E. 2006 Register of new fruit and nut cultivars: List 43 HortScience 41 1101 1133

  • Hall, I.V. 1983 Genetic improvement of the lowbush blueberry, Vaccinium angustifolium Can. J. Plant Sci. 63 1091 1092

  • Hall, I.V. , Jamieson, A.R. & Brydon, A.C. 1988 Cumberland and Fundy lowbush blueberries Can. J. Plant Sci. 68 553 555

  • Jamieson, A.R. 2008 Developing seed-propagated lowbush blueberry families J HortScience 43 1686 1689

  • Jamieson, A.R. & Nickerson, N.L. 2003 Field performance of the lowbush blueberry propagated by seed, stem cuttings and micropropagation Acta Hort. 626 423 428

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • A pint of ‘Fundy’ (left), ‘Novablue’ (center), and ‘Brunswick’ (right).

  • Aalders, L.E. & Hall, I.V. 1975 A study of variation in fruit yield and related characteristics in two diallels of the lowbush blueberry, Vaccinium angustifolium Ait Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 17 401 404

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Aalders, L.E. & Hall, I.V. 1979 Germination of lowbush blueberry seeds as affected by sizing, planting cover, storage, and pelleting Can. J. Plant Sci. 59 527 530

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Aalders, L.E. , Hall, I.V. & Brydon, A.C. 1979 A comparison of fruit yields of lowbush blueberry clonal lines and related seedling progenies Can. J. Plant Sci. 59 875 877

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Aalders, L.E. , Hall, I.V. & Brydon, A.C. 1980 Seed production and germination in four lowbush blueberry clones HortScience 15 587 588

  • Aalders, L.E. , Hall, I.V. & Jackson, L.P. 1977 Brunswick lowbush blueberry Can. J. Plant Sci. 57 301

  • Clark, J.R. & Finn, C.E. 2006 Register of new fruit and nut cultivars: List 43 HortScience 41 1101 1133

  • Hall, I.V. 1983 Genetic improvement of the lowbush blueberry, Vaccinium angustifolium Can. J. Plant Sci. 63 1091 1092

  • Hall, I.V. , Jamieson, A.R. & Brydon, A.C. 1988 Cumberland and Fundy lowbush blueberries Can. J. Plant Sci. 68 553 555

  • Jamieson, A.R. 2008 Developing seed-propagated lowbush blueberry families J HortScience 43 1686 1689

  • Jamieson, A.R. & Nickerson, N.L. 2003 Field performance of the lowbush blueberry propagated by seed, stem cuttings and micropropagation Acta Hort. 626 423 428

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
Andrew Raymond Jamieson Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Atlantic Food and Horticulture Research Centre, 32 Main St., Kentville, Nova Scotia, B4N 1J5, Canada

Search for other papers by Andrew Raymond Jamieson in
Google Scholar
Close

Contributor Notes

Atlantic Food and Horticulture Research Centre Contribution no. 2347.

I thank Avard Brydon for the initial technical responsibilities followed by Pansy Rand and Michael Graves. I thank Dr. John DeLong and Dr. Nancy Nickerson for reviewing the manuscript.

Fruit Breeder.

To whom reprint requests should be addressed; e-mail jamiesona@agr.gc.ca

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 334 215 97
PDF Downloads 172 83 7
  • A pint of ‘Fundy’ (left), ‘Novablue’ (center), and ‘Brunswick’ (right).

Advertisement
Advertisement
Save