Yield and Fruiting Characteristics of 28 Selections in the Kentucky Pawpaw Cultivar Trial

in HortScience
Authors:
Kirk W. Pomper*Kentucky State Univ., Land Grant Program, Frankfort, KY 40601

Search for other papers by Kirk W. Pomper* in
ASHS
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Joseph G. MasabniUniv. of Kentucky, Dept. of Horticulture, Princeton, KY 42445

Search for other papers by Joseph G. Masabni in
ASHS
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Desmond R. LayneClemson Univ., Dept. of Horticulture, Clemson, SC 29634

Search for other papers by Desmond R. Layne in
ASHS
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Sheri B. CrabtreeKentucky State Univ., Land Grant Program, Frankfort, KY 40601

Search for other papers by Sheri B. Crabtree in
ASHS
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
R. Neal PetersonPeterson Pawpaws, Peterson Pawpaws, Harpers Ferry, WV 25425

Search for other papers by R. Neal Peterson in
ASHS
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Dwight WolfeUniv. of Kentucky, Dept. of Horticulture, Princeton, KY 42445

Search for other papers by Dwight Wolfe in
ASHS
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

The pawpaw [Asimina triloba (L.) Dunal] has great potential as a new fruit crop. A pawpaw variety trial was established in Fall 1995 in Princeton, Ky. as a joint Kentucky State Univ.-Univ. of Kentucky research effort with the objective to identify superior varieties for Kentucky. A randomized block experimental design was used with 8 replicates of 28 grafted scion selections on seedling rootstock. Cultivars being tested included Middletown, Mitchell, NC-1, Overleese, PA-Golden, Rappahannock, Shenandoah, Sunflower, Susquehanna, Taylor, Tay-two, Wells, and Wilson. The other 15 clones were selections from the PawPaw Foundation. In 2002 and 2003, the following parameters were examined: tree survival, trunk cross-sectional area (TCSA), average fruit weight, total fruit harvested per tree, average fruit per cluster, total yield per tree, and yield efficiency. In 2003, 54% of the trees had survived, with `Susquehanna' (13%) showing the poorest survival. Based on TCSA, most selections displayed excellent vigor, with the exception of the selections: 5-5 and `Overleese'. Average fruit weight was greatest in 1-7-2 (194 g), 1-68 (167g), 4-2 (321 g), 5-5 (225 g), 7-90 (166g), 9-58 (176 g), 10-35 (167 g), NC-1 (180 g), `Sunflower' (204 g), and `Shenandoah' (168g), with the smallest fruit in `Middletown' (70 g), `Wells' (78 g), and `Wilson' (88 g). The selections `Wilson' (81), `Middletown' (75), and `Wells' (70) had the greatest average number of fruit per tree, whereas 4-2 (9), 5-5 (17) and 8-20 (15) the fewest. Yield efficiency and average fruit per cluster also varied greatly among selections. Several pawpaw selections in the trial show promise for production in Kentucky.

  • Collapse
  • Expand

 

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 17 17 2
PDF Downloads 68 68 29