Influence of Pine Bark on the Efficacy of Different Growth Retardants Applied as a Drench

in HortScience
Authors:
Jeff B. MillionDepartment of Environmental Horticulture, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0670

Search for other papers by Jeff B. Million in
ASHS
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
James E. BarrettDepartment of Environmental Horticulture, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0670

Search for other papers by James E. Barrett in
ASHS
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Terril A. NellDepartment of Environmental Horticulture, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0670

Search for other papers by Terril A. Nell in
ASHS
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
David G. ClarkDepartment of Environmental Horticulture, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-0670

Search for other papers by David G. Clark in
ASHS
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Dendranthema×grandiflorum (Ramat.) were grown in either a peat-based or pine bark—based medium and drenched with growth retardants at a range of concentrations to generate dose : response curves. The effect of ancymidol, paclobutrazol, and uniconazole on stem elongation was less in the pine bark—based than in the peat-based medium. Generally, the concentrations required to achieve the same response were 3- to 4-fold as high in the pine bark—based medium as in the peat-based medium. However, chlormequat was slightly more active in the pine bark—based medium than in the peat-based medium. Chemical names used: α-cyclopropyl-α—(4-methoxyphenyl)-5-pyrimidinemethanol (ancymidol); (±)-(R*,R*)-β-[(4-chlorophenyl)methyl]-α-(1,1-di methyl)-1H-1,2,4-triazole-1-ethanol (paclobutrazol); (E)-(RS)-1-(4-chlorophenyl)-4,4-dimethyl-2-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)pent -l-en-3-ol (uniconazole); 2-chloroethyltrimethylammonium chloride (chlormequat).

  • Collapse
  • Expand

 

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 6 6 3
PDF Downloads 35 35 3