COMPARISON OF LOW VOLUME DRIP AND SUBIRRIGATION SYSTEMS.

in HortScience
Authors:
Theo J. BlomHorticultural Research Institute of Ontario, Vineland Station, Canada, L0R 2E0

Search for other papers by Theo J. Blom in
ASHS
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Brian D. PiottHorticultural Research Institute of Ontario, Vineland Station, Canada, L0R 2E0

Search for other papers by Brian D. Piott in
ASHS
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Low volume drip (2 l/h) was compared with 2 subirrigation ('trough' and `ebb and flo') systems for production of poinsettias and chrysanthemums in 15 cm diameter (1.6 l) `azalea' pots. Irrigation frequency as well as fertilizer rates were the same for all systems. The drip system received 280 ml per watering.

Two plantings of poinsettias (fall) as well as two plantings of chrysanthemums (spring and summer) showed no differences in plant growth between the drip and the subirrigation systems. Water uptake by the medium was similar for all irrigation systems, but water and fertilizer application was 70% higher for the drip system. Nutrients, measured at 4 depths within the pot at monthly intervals, increased with time and was markedly more concentrated in the top layer, regardless of the irrigation system.

  • Collapse
  • Expand