A Preliminary Assessment of Citrus Spacing on Production Using a “Sub-standard" Rootstock-scion Combination1

Authors:
S. B. Boswell Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521

Search for other papers by S. B. Boswell in
This Site
Google Scholar
Close
,
D. R. Atkin Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521

Search for other papers by D. R. Atkin in
This Site
Google Scholar
Close
,
C. D. McCarty Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521

Search for other papers by C. D. McCarty in
This Site
Google Scholar
Close
, and
R. D. Copeland Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521

Search for other papers by R. D. Copeland in
This Site
Google Scholar
Close

Click on author name to view affiliation information

S. B. Boswell Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521

Search for other papers by S. B. Boswell in
Google Scholar
Close
,
D. R. Atkin Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521

Search for other papers by D. R. Atkin in
Google Scholar
Close
,
C. D. McCarty Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521

Search for other papers by C. D. McCarty in
Google Scholar
Close
, and
R. D. Copeland Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521

Search for other papers by R. D. Copeland in
Google Scholar
Close

Contributor Notes

Received for publication January 30, 1978. The authors thank Carol Adams and C. K. Huszar for statistical analysis and the personnel at Lindcove Field Station for their cooperation.

The cost of publishing this paper was defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. Under postal regulations, this paper must therefore be hereby marked advertisement solely to indicate this fact.

Agricultural Extension Services, Riverside.

Lindcove Field Station Superintendent, Exeter.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 74 42 1
PDF Downloads 58 33 1
Advertisement
Advertisement
Save