To Protect or Not to Protect: Guide for Deciding on Public Release or Intellectual Property Protection of New Plant Cultivars and Germplasm

in HortScience

The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Agricultural Research Service (ARS) and universities have a long and successful history of developing enhanced germplasm and cultivars that are transferred through public release. Today, nonprotected public release may not be the most appropriate mechanism. Intellectual property (IP) protection as it pertains to the plant germplasm and cultivars is involved and complex. Unlike other scientific areas, in the United States there are three distinct mechanisms to protect plants—namely, utility patents, plant patents, and plant variety protection certificates. Each of these mechanisms offers different criteria for protection and covers different types of plants. This article is a practical tool to help research institutions and scientists decide when to consider releasing a germplasm or cultivar, which factors to consider, who should be involved, and whether IP protection is appropriate.

Contributor Notes

Corresponding author. E-mail:

Article Sections

Article Figures

Article References

BaturF.DedeurwaerdereT.2014The use of agrobiodiversity for plant improvement and the intellectual property paradigm: Institutional fit and legal tools for mass selection, conventional and molecular plant breedingLife Sci. Soc. Policy1014763765

ChenJ.2005The parable of the seeds: Interpreting the Plant Variety Protection Act in furtherance of innovation policyNotre Dame Law Rev.81106166

ClarkJ.R.2011Intellectual property and horticultural science: The path from idea, technology development, commercialization, and impactHortScience4645

FinnC.E.StrikB.C.YorgeyB.M.MartinR.R.2011‘Onyx’ trailing blackberryHortScience46657659

FowlerC.2000The Plant Patent Act of 1930: A sociological history of its creationJ. Pat. Trademark Off. Soc.829763765

HaleC.HunterD.RobertsW.IkinR.McMaughS.(eds.).2014XXIX International Horticultural Congress on Horticulture: Sustaining lives livelihoods and landscapes (IHC2014): International symposia on innovative plant protection in horticulture biosecurity quarantine pests and market access. Acta Horticulturea Proceeding 1105

International Association for Plant Taxonomists2012International code of nomenclature for algae fungi and plants. 19 July 2018. <>

International Society for Horticultural Science2009International code of nomenclature for cultivated plants. 19 July 2018. <>

International Society for Horticultural Science2018International cultivar registration authority. 19 July 2018. <>

LubyJ.J.BedfordD.S.2015Cultivars as consumer brands: Trends in protecting and commercializing apple cultivars via intellectual property rightsCrop Sci.556763765

NirwanP.2017Trade secrets: The hidden IP rightWIPO Magazine63134

PardeyP.G.KooB.DrewJ.HorwichJ.NottenburgC.2013The evolving landscape of plant varietal rights in the United States, 1930–2008Nat. Biotechnol.311763765

PlowmanR.D.1993Intellectual property protection of plants: The Agricultural Research Service perspective p. 33–40. In: Intellectual property rights: Protection of plant materials. CSSA Special Publ. no. 31

SheltonA.C.TracyW.F.2017Cultivar development in the U.S. public sectorCrop Sci.574763765

StommelJ.GriesbachR.J.2005Capsicum annuum L. ‘Black Pearl’HortScience4015711573

U.S. Department of Agriculture2013Plant Variety Protection Act and regulations and rules of practice. 19 July 2018. <>

U.S. Department of Agriculture2018U.S. national plant germplasm system. 19 July 2018. <>

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office200019 July 2018. <>

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office201819 July 2018. <>

Article Information

Google Scholar

Related Content

Article Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 58 58 58
Full Text Views 19 19 19
PDF Downloads 17 17 17