Habitat installations rich in floral pollen, nectar, and nesting resources can support local pollinator populations on farms, thus providing a farmscaping tool to alleviate native and managed pollinator declines and the accompanying declines in pollination ecosystem services (Vaughan and Skinner, 2008, 2015). Pollinator habitat installation is supported by federal programs such as the Environmental Quality Incentives Program and the Conservation Reserve Program, through which technical and financial assistance is provided to participating farmers by, respectively, the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA NRCS) and the Farm Service Agency (Vaughan and Skinner, 2008, 2015). Pollinator refuge habitats (PRs) in these programs are designed to provide blooms throughout the entire growing season and may also contain grasses depending on regional recommendations (FSA, 2013). As interest in these programs develops, there have been calls for research into the factors affecting PR establishment and effectiveness. Specifically, how can wildflower establishment success be maximized to obtain the full diversity of the mix planted (Williams et al., 2015)? Furthermore, how does PR establishment success and species composition affect pollinator communities (Venturini et al., 2017)? We conducted a study to address these questions, investigating PR establishment and pollinator conservation value relative to seedbed preparation, seed mix composition, and herbicide treatments.
Seedbed preparation is one of the most important actions affecting PR establishment success because of its long-term impacts on weed management (Aldrich, 2002; Martin, 1986; Wilson, 1992). Previous studies indicate that weed competition can be a critical factor limiting PR success (Aldrich, 2002; Howell and Kline, 1992; Norcini and Aldrich, 2004; Perry, 2005). Although seedbed preparation recommendations for PR installations vary (NRCS, 2007, 2012; Vaughan et al., 2013), a review of the literature suggested repeated tilling, herbicide applications, or both are better methods for perennial weed management than other strategies such as grazing, solarization, or burning (Aldrich, 2002). Studies comparing the results of a no-till/preemergent herbicide method with repeated tillage have yielded conflicting results (Ahern et al., 1992; Corley, 1991; Corley et al., 1993; Skousen and Venable, 2008), but a recent study showed that in the first establishment year, a mixture of annual, biennial, and perennial wildflowers planted on cropland is more successful in a no-till than a tilled system (Angelella and O’Rourke, 2017).
After preparing a PR seedbed, a critical question is which species of wildflowers to plant. Pollinator habitat mix composition may affect both wildflower and weed establishment as well as pollinator conservation. Annual wildflowers can reduce weed competition during the critical initial phases of establishment (Aldrich, 2002) and can provide floral resources in the first year, but species should be selected so as to minimize the risk of becoming weeds themselves if seeds get dispersed outside PRs (Menz et al., 2011). The benefits of perennial wildflowers include that they compete well with annual weed species once they are established (Lulow, 2006) and that they do not require frequent overseeding (Aldrich, 2002). Moreover, some research suggests bumblebees and butterflies prefer perennials over annuals (Feber and Smith, 1995; Fussell and Corbet, 1992), although other studies report a lack of preference (Carreck et al., 1999), or that a combination of annuals and perennials can work complementarily to attract more pollinators (Williams et al., 2015). Although PRs will certainly be influenced by the species-specific preferences of growers, more can be done to develop general recommendations about the benefits and trade-offs of species mixes that consist of all perennials or a combination of short- and long-lived species.
Managing weeds after planting wildflowers is another major challenge that growers and advisors must address during the PR establishment process. Some studies indicate that herbicides improve PR establishment, whereas others indicate that it is an unnecessary expense. The selective herbicide imazapic, for example, can enhance the establishment of tolerant wildflower species (Beran et al., 1999), but effects can vary by site and species (Frances, 2008) as well as by weather conditions, soil quality, and seed source (Norcini and Aldrich, 2004). Similarly, the graminicide sethoxydim enhanced wildflower establishment and richness in two studies (Hitchmough et al., 2008; Trowbridge et al., 2017), but was found to be ineffective in another (Frances, 2008). Further investigation into the consistency of herbicide effectiveness applied during the early stages of PR growth would enhance our ability to make recommendations regarding weed management practices for successful PR establishment.
To address questions of how to best establish PRs on cropland and the subsequent impacts on pollinators, we examined the effects of seedbed preparation, seed mix composition, and herbicide use on PR establishment in a controlled field experiment over two years. We hypothesized that 1) wildflower establishment would be higher and weed establishment would be lower following a no-till than a tillage seedbed preparation; 2) herbicide applications following PR planting would suppress weeds and enhance wildflower growth; 3) mixes containing both annuals and perennials would have more wildflower growth, more bloom coverage, and less weed growth than a mix containing only perennials; and 4) pollinator abundance would correlate positively to bloom density.
AhernJ.NiednerC.BarkerA.1992Roadside wildflower meadows: Summary of benefits and guidelines to successful establishment and managementTransportation Res. Council19924653
AngelellaG.M.O’RourkeM.E.2017Pollinator habitat establishment after organic and no-till seedbed preparation methodsHortScience5213491355
BalzanM.V.BocciG.MoonenA-C.2014Augmenting flower trait diversity in wildflower strips to optimise the conservation of arthropod functional groups for multiple agroecosystem servicesJ. Insect Conserv.18713728
BenvenutiS.MacchiaM.MieleS.2001Quantitative analysis of emergence of seedlings from buried weed seeds with increasing soil depthWeed Sci.49528535
CorleyW.1991Seedbed preparation alternatives for establishment of wildflower meadows and beauty spots. Southern Nurserymen’s Assn. Res. Conf. Proc. 36. p. 280–281
CorleyW.MurphyT.ReynoldsK.1993Weed management options for wildflower meadows and beauty spots. Southern Nurserymen’s Assn. Res. Conf. Proc. 38. p. 315–316
DerksenD.A.LafondG.P.ThomasA.G.LoeppkyH.A.SwantonC.J.1993Impact of agronomic practices on weed communities: Tillage systemsWeed Sci.41409417
ElmhirstJ.F.CainN.P.1990Review of roadside wildflower programs and assessment of feasibility in Ontario. Technical Report MAT-90-05. Ontario Ministry of Transport. Res. Dev. Branch Downsville Canada
FeberR.SmithH.1995Butterfly conservation on arable farmland p. 84–97. In: A.S. Pullin (ed.). Ecology and conservation of butterflies. Springer Dordrecht The Netherlands
FeberR.SmithH.MacdonaldD.1996The effects on butterfly abundance of the management of uncropped edges of arable fieldsJ. Appl. Ecol.3311911205
FrancesA.2008Establishment and management of native wildflowers on Florida roadsides and former pastures. Univ. Florida Gainesville FL PhD Diss
Froud-WilliamsR.J.ChancellorR.J.DrennanD.S.H.1981Potential changes in weed floras associated with reduced-cultivation systems for cereal production in temperate regionsWeed Res.2199109
FSA2013CP42 pollinator habitat: Establishing and supporting diverse pollinator-friendly habitat. Farm Serv. Agency U.S. Dept. Agr. Washington D.C
Harmon-ThreattA.N.HendrixS.D.2015Prairie restorations and bees: The potential ability of seed mixes to foster native bee communitiesBasic Appl. Ecol.166472
HitchmoughJ.ParaskevopoulouA.DunnettN.2008Influence of grass suppression and sowing rate on the establishment and persistence of forb dominated urban meadowsUrban Ecosyst.113344
HowellE.A.KlineV.M.1992The role of competition in the successful establishment of selected prairie species. Proc. 13th N. Amer. Prairie Conf. p. 193–197
IsaacsR.TuellJ.FiedlerA.GardinerM.LandisD.2009Maximizing arthropod-mediated ecosystem services in agricultural landscapes: The role of native plantsFront. Ecol. Environ.7196203
JungeX.JacotK.A.BosshardA.Lindemann-MatthiesP.2009Swiss people’s attitudes towards field margins for biodiversity conservationJ. Natl. Conserv.17150159
KhachatryanH.RihnA.2015Are consumers interested in ornamental plants that benefit pollinator insects? Food Resource Econ. Dept. Univ. Florida. Inst. Food Agr. Sci. FE 997
LoveS.L.HutchinsonP.J.PriceW.J.2016Managing weeds during wildflower meadow establishment in the arid intermountain west: Efficacy of a grass-first strategy for sites with heavy annual weed pressureNative Plants J.17216229
LulowM.E.2006Invasion by non-native annual grasses: The importance of species biomass, composition, and time among California native grasses of the Central ValleyRestor. Ecol.14616626
MartinL.C.1986The wildflower meadow book. East Woods Press Charlotte NC
MenzM.H.PhillipsR.D.WinfreeR.KremenC.AizenM.A.JohnsonS.D.DixonK.W.2011Reconnecting plants and pollinators: Challenges in the restoration of pollination mutualismsTrends Plant Sci.16412
NorciniJ.G.AldrichJ.H.2004Establishment of native wildflower plantings by seed. Univ. Flor. Inst. Food Agr. Sci. ENH 968
NRCS2007Conservation cover (327a): Virginia conservation practice VA job sheet. U.S. Dept. Agr. Washington D.C
NRCS2012Conservation cover (327): Maryland herbaceous plantings for pollinator habitat. U.S. Dept. Agr. Washington D.C
OttoC.R.O’DellS.BryantR.EulissN.BushR.SmartM.D.2017Using publicly available data to quantify plant–pollinator interactions and evaluate conservation seeding mixes in the Northern Great PlainsEnviron. Entomol.46565578
PerryL.P.2005Successful wildflower meadows. Univ. Vermont Ext. Bul. OH 84
RollinO.BretagnolleV.DecourtyeA.AptelJ.MichelN.VaissièreB.E.HenryM.2013Differences of floral resource use between honey bees and wild bees in an intensive farming systemAgr. Ecosyst. Environ.1797886
RussellC.SchultzC.B.2010Effects of grass-specific herbicides on butterflies: An experimental investigation to advance conservation effortsJ. Insect Conserv.145363
SkousenJ.G.VenableC.2008Establishing native plants on newly-constructed and older-reclaimed sites along West Virginia highwaysLand Degrad. Dev.19388396
TrowbridgeC.C.StanleyA.KayeT.N.DunwiddieP.W.WilliamsJ.L.2017Long-term effects of prairie restoration on plant community structure and native population dynamicsRestor. Ecol.25559568
TuellJ.K.FiedlerA.K.LandisD.IsaacsR.2008Visitation by wild and managed bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) to eastern US native plants for use in conservation programsEnviron. Entomol.37707718
VaughanM.MäderE.GuisseJ.Goldenetz-DollarJ.BordersB.GillK.WinfreeR.MacLeodM.2013Conservation cover (327) for pollinators: New Jersey installation guide and job sheet. Xerces Soc. Invertebrate Conserv. Portland OR
VaughanM.SkinnerM.2008Using farm bill programs for pollinator conservation. U.S. Dept. Agr. Natl. Resource Conserv. Serv. National Plant Data Center. <http://www.xerces.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/using_farm_bill_programs_xerces_society.pdf>.
VaughanM.SkinnerM.2015Using 2014 Farm Bill programs for pollinator conservation. U.S. Dept. Agr. Biol. Tech. Note 78
VenturiniE.M.DrummondF.A.HoshideA.K.DibbleA.C.StackL.B.2017Pollination reservoirs for wild bee habitat enhancement in cropping systems: A reviewAgroecol. Sustain. Food Syst.41101142
WilliamsN.M.WardK.L.PopeN.IsaacsR.WilsonJ.MayE.A.EllisJ.DanielsJ.PenceA.UllmannK.2015Native wildflower plantings support wild bee abundance and diversity in agricultural landscapes across the United StatesEcol. Appl.2521192131
WilsonJ.W.1992Landscaping with wildflowers: An environmental approach to gardening. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Co. Boston MA
ZaninG.OttoS.RielloL.BorinM.1997Ecological interpretation of weed flora dynamics under different tillage systemsAgr. Ecosyst. Environ.66177188
Species and seeding rates of pollinator refuge plantings.
Wildflower bloom counts by mix, seedbed preparation, and a mix-by-seedbed preparation interaction effect, for 2016 and 2017. Counts are the number of blooming plants per species in 2016, and the number of blooming stems per species in 2017, in which the number of blooming branches off of the main stem was counted individually and umbels and composites were considered a single flower.