The profit potential of pecan increased in 2009 with sudden growth in the Asian pecan export market. As a result, there has been a renewed interest in the crop, which has led to the planting of additional pecan acreage throughout the United States pecan belt (USDA, 2012; Wells, 2014). Georgia pecan producers planted at least 391,488 pecan trees and 6203 additional pecan ha from 2010 to 2014. These new plantings coincided with a shift toward the planting of pecan trees at higher density by Georgia pecan producers since 2010 in anticipation of maintaining these densities through hedge pruning (Wells, 2014).
As pecan trees grow in an orchard, their tree canopies encroach on one another, causing excessive shading, which has been shown to increase alternate bearing intensity and reduce tree health and orchard profitability (Pearce and Dobersek-Urbanc, 1967; Wood and Stahmann, 2004). Historically, limb pruning and tree removal have been the solution to this problem, particularly in the low-light environment of the southeastern United States (Wells, 2007). Mechanical hedge pruning has been used successfully in high-light environments to mitigate the effects of orchard shading (Wood and Stahmann, 2004) and has become the standard method used for this purpose in the arid production regions of the western United States (Andales et al., 2006; Herrera and White, 2000).
Mature pecan orchard canopies typically intercept 65% to 70% of available sunlight (Wood, 1996) with up to 95% light interception in overcrowded, unpruned orchards (Lombardini, 2006). The southeastern United States is a relatively low-light environment, exhibiting significant cloud cover and atmospheric water vapor throughout the growing season, which can further limit sunlight in orchard systems (Wood, 2009). Initial studies of mechanical hedge pruning in these low-light environments have failed to show significant benefits to pecan production. Worley (1985) determined that annual cuts to one of each of four sides of the canopy and topping at 6 m was unsuitable for southeastern commercial pecan orchards. Lombardini (2006) found that one-time mechanical hedge pruning of nonirrigated pecan trees initially increased light within tree canopies but did not increase orchard productivity, nut yield, or quality. Wood (2009) suggested that moderate-width (2.4 m from the tree axis), short-cycle (annual or biennial pruning) mechanical hedging did not appear efficacious for southeastern pecan production in the short term; however, it would be likely that over the long term, it would prove superior to nonpruned trees. Anecdotal experience by pecan producers in the southeastern United States following 2010 suggested a promising approach for mechanical hedge pruning in the region, which has since led to an increase in popularity of the hedge-pruned system among growers (Stevenson, 2013). Bock et al. (2017) found a reduced risk of pecan scab (Fusicladium effusum G. Winter) with hedge pruning of pecans in Georgia as a result of enhanced fungicide coverage through a reduction in tree size.
Pecans are a relatively high water use crop (Wang et al., 2007). As a result, irrigation is one of the most important management tools used in pecan production and results in increased nut size, yield, nut quality, and precocity (Alben, 1957; Brison, 1974; Daniell et al., 1979; Stein et al., 1989; Wells, 2015; Worley, 1982). Water stress in pecan is correlated with soil moisture from budbreak through the end of nut sizing. Pecan trees bearing a moderate to heavy crop load may undergo water stress during the kernel filling stage regardless of soil moisture level (Wells, 2015). Management practices that alleviate water stress have the potential to improve pecan production.
The objectives of this study were to compare the effects of hedge pruning on pecan nut quality, yield, and midday stem water potential of pecan trees in the temperate climate of the southeastern United States and to evaluate the effect of hedge pruning on windstorm damage to pecan trees.
Andales, A., Wang, J., Sammis, T.W., Mexal, J.G., Simmons, L.J., Miller, D.R. & Gutschick, V.P. 2006 A model of pecan tree growth for the management of pruning and irrigation Agr. Water Mgt. 84 77 88
Bock, C.H., Hotchkiss, M.W., Brenneman, T.B., Stevenson, K.L., Goff, W.D., Smith, M.W., Wells, L. & Wood, B.W. 2017 Severity of scab and its effects on fruit weight in mechanically hedge-pruned and topped pecan trees Plant Dis. 101 785 793
Brison, F.R. 1974 Pecan culture. Capital Printing, Austin, TX
Campbell, R.J., Campbell, C.W., Crane, J., Balerdi, C. & Goldweber, S. 1993 Hurricane Andrew damages tropical fruit crops in south Florida Fruit Var. J. 47 218 225
Deb, S.K., Shukla, M.K. & Mexal, J.G. 2012 Estimating midday leaf and stem water otentials of mature pecan trees from soil water content and climate parameters HortScience 47 907 916
Hellkvist, J., Richards, G.P. & Jamis, P.G. 1974 Vertical gradients of water potential and tissue water relations in Sitka spruce trees measured with the pressure chamber J. Appl. Ecol. 11 637 668
Herrera, E. & White, J.M. 2000 Pruning mature trees. New Mexico State Univ. Guide H-629
Hudson, W., Brock, J., Culpepper, S. & Wells, L. 2017 Georgia pecan pest management guide. Univ. Georgia Coop. Ext. Bull. 841
Lombardini, L. 2006 One-time pruning of pecan trees induced limited and short term benefits in canopy light penetration, yield, and nut quality HortScience 41 1469 1473
Marsal, J., Lopez, G., Mata, M. & Girona, J. 2006 Branch removal and defruiting for the amelioration of water stress effects on fruit growth during stage III of peach fruit development Scientia Hort. 108 55 60
Marsal, J., Mata, M., Arbones, A., Del Campo, J., Girona, J. & Lopez, G. 2008 Factors involved in alleviating water stress by partial crop removal in pear trees Tree Physiol. 28 1375 1382
McCutchan, H. & Shackel, K.A. 1992 Stem water potential as a sensitive indicator of water stress in prune trees (Prunus domestica L. cv. French) J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 117 607 611
Othman, Y., Van Leeuwen, D., Heerema, R. & St. Hilaire, R. 2014 Midday stem water potential values needed to maintain photosynthesis and leaf gas exchange established for pecan J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 139 537 546
Sadras, V.O. & Trentacoste, E.R. 2011 Phenotypic plasticity of stem water potential correlates with crop load in horticultural trees Tree Physiol. 31 494 499
Shackel, K.A., Lampinen, B., Sibbett, S. & Olson, W. 2000 The relation of midday stem water potential to the growth and physiology of fruit trees under water limited conditions Acta Hort. 537 425 430
Smith, M.W., Reid, W., Carroll, B. & Cheary, B. 1993 Mechanical fruit thinning influences fruit quality, yield, return fruit set, and cold injury of pecan HortScience 28 1081 1084
Sparks, D. 2001 Managing pecan nut growth. Proc. S.E. Pecan Growers Assn. 94:129–147
Stein, L.A., McEachern, G.R. & Storey, J.B. 1989 Summer and fall moisture stress and irrigation scheduling influence pecan growth and production HortScience 24 607 611
U.S. Department of Agriculture 2012 Noncitrus fruits and nuts: 2011 summary. Natl. Agr. Stat. Serv., U.S. Dept. Agr., Washington, DC
Wang, J., Miller, D.R., Sammis, T.W., Gutschick, V.P. & Simmons, L.J. 2007 Energy balance measurements and a simple model for estimating pecan water use efficiency Agr. Water Mgt. 91 92 101
Wells M.L. 2007 Southeastern pecan growers handbook. Publ. 1327. Univ. Georgia Coop. Ext. Ser., Athens, GA
Wells, M.L. 2017 Pecan water requirements and irrigation scheduling. Univ. Georgia Coop. Ext. Circ. 1106.
Wells, M.L., Carlson, D.S. & Edwards, R.P. 2009 Profitability of mechanical fruit thinning of ‘Sumner’ and ‘Cape Fear’ pecan HortTechnology 19 518 520
Worley, R.E. 1985 Effects of hedging and selective limb pruning of Elliott, Deisrable, and Farley pecan trees under three irrigation regimes J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 110 12 16
Worley, R.E. & Mullinix, B. 1997 Selective limb pruning of large pecan trees reduces yield but improves nut size and tree characteristics HortScience 32 50 52