Ornamental and native grasses and grass-like species are becoming increasingly popular as landscape plants (Dana, 2002; Ruter and Carter, 2000; Thetford et al., 2009). Numerous species are now widely available and can be selected to fit almost any need (e.g., aesthetic value, drought tolerance, and pest resistance) and many thrive in low-input landscapes (Thetford et al., 2009; Wilson and Knox, 2006, 2009). In addition to their low-maintenance characteristics, recent trends toward a more “naturalist” approach and landscape designs that feature predominately native plants have further increased the use and demand of ornamental or native grass species (Brzuszek and Harkess, 2009; Ozguner and Kendle, 2006).
Golf courses typically have areas referred to as “natural areas,” which are areas on the course beyond the maintained rough (Dunning, 2014). These areas are often promoted for their ecological function (Nelson, 1997) but can present/pose design and maintenance issues for golf course superintendents (Dunning, 2014). These naturalized areas average 25.8 acres or about 17% of the total golf course area (Gelernter et al., 2017), creating a need for readily available, low-input, and aesthetically pleasing plant species in these spaces (Dunning, 2014; Florida Department of Environmental Protection, 2007). Ornamental and native grasses have been previously evaluated to determine their suitability and are now often used in these naturalized areas on golf courses (Dunning, 2014; Maddox et al., 2007; Voigt, 2002; Weston, 1990).
Although many of the most widely planted ornamental grass species are relatively resistant to disease, insect pests, or both (Thetford et al., 2009; Wilson and Knox, 2009), weed control continues to be a challenge for both landscape applicators and golf course superintendents managing large monocultures of ornamental grasses. Most of the research on ornamental grass tolerance to herbicide applications has focused on preemergence (PRE) herbicides labeled for use in container production. Research focusing on container-grown ornamental grasses has shown that many species are tolerant to over-the-top applications of common PRE herbicides including pendimethalin, prodiamine, isoxaben, and others (Cole and Cole, 2007; Glaze et al., 1980; Neal and Senesac, 1991). However, these herbicides would provide little benefit to areas already infested with weeds on golf courses or in landscapes.
A few studies have investigated the impacts of postemergence (POST) herbicides on ornamental grasses. Hubbard and Whitwell (1991) evaluated response of 12 ornamental grasses from nine genera to applications of three graminicides including fenoxaprop-ethyl, fluazifop-P-butyl, and sethoxydim. Significant injury, growth reduction, or both were noted among most species with all three herbicides with the exception of fenoxaprop-ethyl applications to Calamagrostis arundinacea ‘Karl Foerster’. The authors also reported a high degree of tolerance in two other Calamagrostis cultivars [C. arundinacea ssp. brachytricha (Steud.) Tzvel. and Calamagrostis × acutiflora (Schrad.) Reichb. ‘Stricta’] to fenoxaprop-ethyl applications. Gilliam et al. (1992) evaluated the same graminicides for use in Pennisetum alopecuroides ‘Hameln’, Cortaderia selloana ‘Rosea’, Miscanthus sinensis ‘Purpurescens’, and M. sinensis ‘Gracillimus’ and reported similar findings, at least some injury was noted on all four species with each herbicide. Similarly, Voigt and Reicher (2009) reported that Pennisetum alopecuriodes was sensitive to POST applications of fenoxaprop. Everman et al. (2011) evaluated 10 and 18 herbicide treatments for efficacy on Miscanthus ×giganteus (a biofuel crop) and M. sinensis (primarily planted as an ornamental), respectively, two species that have become naturalized and problematic weeds in Asia (Hakoyama et al., 1977; Sugiura et al., 1970). Results showed that imazethapyr, imazamox, and rimsulfuron were the most efficacious treatments on M. sinensis. Miscanthus ×giganteus was most responsive to treatments of glyphosate, foramsulfuron, nicosulfuron, and imazamox, which all reduced above and belowground biomass in comparison with the nontreated control group. Although these studies show that there may be certain POST herbicides that can be used in ornamental grass plantings, graminicides evaluated by Hubbard and Whitwell (1991) would not control broadleaf weed species. Herbicides evaluated by Everman et al. (2011) that did not provide control of M. sinensis would still have likely caused a high degree of injury to plants used for aesthetic purposes. To effectively control broadleaf and grassy weeds, additional POST options are needed for practitioners managing areas planted with ornamental grasses.
Topramezone is a new POST herbicide that controls susceptible species by inhibiting the enzyme 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD) (Grossman and Ehrhardt, 2007) and was registered for use turfgrass in 2014. Similar to other HPPD inhibitors, susceptible weeds turn white in color because of chlorophyll loss and growth stops. Topramezone has become an important tool for turfgrass managers as it effectively controls crabgrass species (Digitaria spp.), goosegrass [Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn.], and many different broadleaf weeds (Elmore et al., 2013; Soltani et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2013). In addition to controlling notable annual broadleaf and grass species, previous research shows that topramezone could be potentially used to selectively control bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) in cool-season turfgrass (Brosnan et al., 2011; Brosnan and Breeden, 2013; Elmore et al., 2011). Mesotrione, another HPPD-inhibiting herbicide, has been shown to have little effect on growth of M. sinensis (Everman et al., 2011) or P. alopecuroides (Voigt and Richer, 2009). As topramezone has shown to be minimally injurious when applied to certain grass species (Johnston et al., 2016), it could be used as a selective POST herbicide for natural areas planted with ornamental grass species. The objective of this research was to evaluate the tolerance of ornamental grass species following over-the-top applications of topramezone.
BrosnanJ.T.KopsellD.A.ElmoreM.T.BreedenG.K.2011Changes in ‘Riviera’ bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.] carotenoid pigments after treatment with three p-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase-inhibiting herbicidesHortScience46493498
ColeJ.T.ColeJ.C.2007Tolerance of lilyturf (Liriope muscari) and four perennial ornamental grasses to preemergent herbicidesJ. Appl. Hort.93136
DanaM.N.2002Ornamental grasses and sedges as new crops p. 473–476. In: J. Janick and A. Whipkey (eds.). Trends in new crops and new uses. ASHS Press Alexandria VA
DunningS.2014Evaluation of ornamental grasses for use as golf course plantings. 28 Mar. 2017. <http://aec.ifas.ufl.edu/media/aecifasufledu/formsdocs/non-thesis-projects/Dunning_Final-NT-Project.pdf>
ElmoreM.T.BrosnanJ.T.BreedenG.K.PattonA.J.2013Mesotrione, tropramezone, and amicarbazone combinations for postemergence annual bluegrass controlWeed Technol.27596603
ElmoreM.T.BrosnanJ.T.KopsellD.A.MuellerT.C.2011Response of hybrid bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon × C. transvaalensis) to three HPPD inhibitorsWeed Sci.59458463
EvermanW.J.LindseyA.J.HentryG.M.GlaspieC.F.PhillipsK.McKenneyC.2011Response of Miscanthus × giganteus and Miscanthus sinensis to postemergence herbicidesWeed Technol.25398403
Florida Department of Environmental Protection2007Best management practices for the enhancement of environmental quality on Florida golf courses. 21 Feb. 2017. <http://lee.ifas.ufl.edu/Hort/GardenPubsAZ/Golf_BMP.pdf>
GelernterW.D.StowellL.J.JohnsonM.E.BrownC.D.2017Documenting trends in land-use characteristics and environmental stewardship programs on U.S. golf courses. Crop Forage and Turfgrass Mgt. 17 Nov. 2017. <https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/cftm/articles/3/1/cftm2016.10.0066>
GlazeN.C.SinghM.PhatakS.C.1980Response of pampas grass and two azalea cultivars to alachlor, oxadiazon and oxyfluorfenProc. Weed Sci. Soc. Amer.204142
GrossmanK.EhrhardtT.2007On the mechanism of action and selectivity of the corn herbicide topramezone: A new inhibitor of 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenasePest Mgt. Sci.63429439
HakoyamaS.TanakaH.AgataW.TakedaT.1977Studies on weed vegetation in noncultivated paddy fields. 1. The vegetation of noncultivated paddy fields in the northwestern parts of Fukuoka PrefectureJpn. J. Crop. Sci.46219227
JohnstonC.R.YuJ.McCulloughP.E.2016Creeping bentgrass, perennial ryegrass, and tall fescue tolerance to tropramezone during establishmentWeed Technol.303644
MaddoxV.L.GoatleyJ.M.PhilleyH.W.StewartB.WellsD.W.2007Maximizing ‘Cimarron’ little bluestem establishment as secondary rough for a golf course. Appl. Turfgrass Sci. 24 Mar. 2017. <https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/ats/pdfs/4/1/2007-0802-01-RS>
NelsonM.1997Natural areas: Establishing natural areas on the golf course. USGA Green Sect. Rec. 31 Mar. 2013. <http://gsrpdf.lib.msu.edu/ticpdf.py?file=/1990s/1997/971107.pdf>
OzgunerH.KendleA.D.2006Public attitudes towards naturalistic versus designed landscapes in the city of Sheffield (UK)Landsc. Urban Plan.74139157
RuterJ.M.CarterA.B.2000Ornamental grass evaluations at NESPAL. Proc. Southern Nursery Assn. Res. Conf. 45:398–400
SoltaniN.KaastraA.C.SwantonC.J.SikkemaP.H.2012Efficacy of topramezone and mesotrione for the control of annual grassesIntl. Res. J. Agr. Sci. Soil Sci.24650
SorengR.J.PetersonP.M.RomaschenkoK.DavidseG.ZuloagaF.O.JudziewiczE.J.FilgueirasT.S.DavisJ.I.MorroneO.2015A worldwide phylogenetic classification of the Poaceae (gramineae)J. Syst. Evol.53117137
SugiuraT.KawanaA.MatsunagaS.1970Study on chemical control of weeds and trees (XIX) treatment with ammonium sulfamate on koshida (Dicranopteris linearis)Tokyo Nogyo Daigaku Nogaku Shuho1597115
ThetfordM.NorciniJ.G.BallardB.AldrichJ.H.2009Ornamental landscape performance of native and nonnative grasses under low-input conditionsHortTechnology19267285
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resource Conservation Service2017The PLANTS database. Carex appalachica J. Webber and P.W. Ball. 20 Nov. 2017. <https://plants.usda.gov/core/profile?symbol=caap5>
VoigtT.2002Unmowed roughs save time and money. Turfgrass Trends. 21 Mar. 2017. <http://archive.lib.msu.edu/tic/golfd/article/2002decT12.pdf>
VoigtT.B.ReicherZ.J.2009Selectively controlling escaped fountain grass in cool-season turf. Appl. Turfgrass Sci. 21 Feb. 2017. <http://turf.unl.edu/research/weeds/Fountain-grass-ATS.pdf>
WestonJ.1990Using native plants in the golf course landscape. USGA Green Sect. Rec. 21 Mar. 2017. <http://gsrpdf.lib.msu.edu/ticpdf.py?file=/1990s/1990/900112.pdf>
WilsonC.R.2011Ornamental grasses. Colorado State Univ. Fact Sheet 7.232. 23 Apr. 2017. <http://extension.colostate.edu/docs/pubs/garden/07232.pdf>
WilsonS.B.KnoxG.W.2006Landscape performance, flowering, and seed viability of 15 Japanese silver grass cultivars grown in northern and southern FloridaHortTechnology16686693
WilsonS.B.KnoxG.W.2009Landscape performance of green fountain grass alternatives grown in northern and southern FloridaHortTechnology19471476
ZhangJ.JaeckO.MenegatA.ZhangZ.GerhardsR.NiH.2013The mechanism of methylated seed oil on enhancing biological efficacy of topramezone on weeds. PLoS One. 31 Mar. 2017. <http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0074280>