Intercropping Seedless Watermelon and Cotton

in HortScience

Intercropping of seedless watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thumb.) Matsum. & Nak.] and cotton [Gossypium hirsutum (L.)] in the eastern geographical area of South Carolina requires changes in normal crop-management programs but has the potential to improve grower profits compared with typical production of each crop separately. The alteration and timing of several normal crop-production practices for both crops can present challenges and must be well-defined for successful intercropping of watermelon and cotton in the region. Notable adjustments in production for watermelon are delayed planting date, reduced row spacing and bed width, and modification of herbicide applications. Significant changes in normal cotton production also include modification of herbicide applications, but additional considerations, such as temporal limits on side-dressed fertilizer and insecticide applications, are needed because of the raised beds and plasticulture used for watermelons and also because of labeling restrictions for pesticides across crops. Research was conducted to 1) identify modifications in standard crop-management procedures for watermelon and cotton intercropping; and 2) determine the feasibility and profitability of intercropping the crops. Although there was a slight numerical reduction in intercropped watermelon yield each year, there were no significant differences in total watermelon yield between intercropping and watermelon monoculture in any of the years. There were also no significant differences in watermelon fruit quality parameters (size, brix, hard seed, hollow heart) in any of the years. Intercropped cotton yield was significantly less than monoculture cotton yields in each of the three years. The net income from intercropping in each year was slightly less than the net income from watermelon monoculture.

Contributor Notes

This study was partially funded by the South Carolina Watermelon Association. This is technical contribution number 6685 of the Clemson University Experiment Station. This manuscript is based upon the work supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture/U.S. Department of Agriculture, under project number SC-1700441.We acknowledge Dan Robinson for technical assistance in planting, maintaining, and harvesting cotton plots.

Corresponding author. E-mail:

  • BoehnerP.LesoingG.FrancisC.A.1991Strip cropping of grain sorghum/soybeans under dryland and irrigation in eastern Nebraska p. 39. In: Agronomy abstracts. Agronomy Society of America Madison WI

  • BowenJ.F.KratkyB.A.1986Successful multiple cropping requires superior management skillsAgribusiness WorldwideNovember/December2230

  • ClawsonD.L.1985Harvest security and intraspecific diversity in traditional tropical agricultureEcon. Bot.395667

  • EureP.2014Cotton and peanut tolerance to pyroxasulfone and weed management when intercropping cucurbits and cotton in Georgia. (Doctoral dissertation) <>

  • EureP.M.CulpepperA.S.MerchantR.M.2013Weed management and crop response when intercropping cantaloupe and cotton p. 115. In: Southern Weed Science of Society abstracts. Southern Weed Science Society Houston TX

  • EureP.M.CulpepperA.S.TankersleyT.B.MerchantR.M.2012Weed management and crop injury when intercropping melons and cotton p. 1533–1534. In: Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference. National Cotton Council Orlando FL

  • FrancisR.DecoteauD.R.1993Developing an effective southernpea and sweet corn intercrop systemHortTechnology3178184

  • FukaiS.TrenbathB.R.1993Processes determining intercrop productivity and yields of component cropsField Crops Res.14263290

  • GarnierE.NavasM.-L.AustinM.P.LilleyJ.M.GiffordR.M.1997A problem for biodiversity-productivity studies: How to compare the productivity of multispecific plant mixtures to that of monocultures?Acta Oecol.186657670

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HorwithB.1985A role for intercropping in modern agricultureBiological Sciences35286291

  • JonesM.A.GreeneJ.K.MarshallM.MuellerJ.D.2011South Carolina cotton growers’ guide pub. EC 589. Clemson University Clemson SC

  • KahnB.A.2010Intercropping for field production of peppersHortTechnology20530532

  • KeinathA.P.MillerG.A.2012Watermelon spray guide for 2012. Clemson Cooperative Extension Information Leaflet 86. 6 May 2018. <>

  • KembleJ.2012Vegetable crop handbook for the Southeastern US. Vance Publishing Corp. Lincolnshire IL

  • LesoingG.W.FrancisC.A.1999Strip intercropping effects on yield and yield components of corn, grain sorghum, and soybeanAgron. J.91807813

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LithourgidisA.S.DordasC.A.DamalasC.A.VlachostergiosD.N.2011Annual intercrops: An alternative pathway for sustainable agricultureAustral. J. Crop Sci.54396410

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MachadoS.2009Does intercropping have a role in modern agriculture?J. Soil Water Conserv.845557

  • MeadR.WilleyR.W.1980The concept of a “Land Equivalent Ratio” and advantages in yields from intercroppingExpt. Agr.16217228

  • MillerG.A.KhalilianA.AdelbergJ.W.FarahaniH.J.HassellR.L.WellsC.E.2013Grafted watermelon root length density and distribution under different soil moisture treatmentsHortScience4810211026

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PayeroJ.KhalilianA.2017Comparison of irrigated and dryland crop production in SC. Clemson Cooperative Extension Fact Sheet AC07. Oct. 2017. <>

  • RischS.J.1983Intercropping as cultural pest control: Prospects and limitationsEnviron. Mgt.7914

  • RonA.M.2001Interactions of bush bean intercropped with field and sweet maizeEur. J. Agron.15185196

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SAS Institute2011User’s manual version 9.3. SAS Institute Cary NC

  • SullivanP.2003Intercropping principles and production practices. Appropriate technology transfer for rural areas. 31 Dec. 2017. <>

  • TankersleyT.B.ChafinJ.SmithA.RobertsP.CollinsG.LangstonD.DillardJ.DillardW.2011Evaluation of cantaloupe and cotton intercropping to determine economic feasibility and growth compatibility p. 146–147. In: Proceedings Beltwide Conference. National Cotton Council Memphis TN

  • TrenbathB.R.1974Biomass productivity of mixturesAdv. Agron.26177210

  • The Weather Company2018Barnwell SC (29812) monthly weather. 20 Mar. 2018. <>

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture Market Service2014Market research and analysis. 20 Mar. 2018. <>

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service2012Census of Agriculture. 2 Mar. 2018. <>

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service2017State Agriculture Overview for South Carolina. 2017. 6 May 2018. <>

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service2012Web Soil Survey. 26 Sept. 2018. <>

  • WilleyR.W.NatarajanM.ReddyM.S.RaoM.R.NambiarP.T.C.KannaiyanJ.BhatnagarV.S.1983Intercropping studies with annual crops p. 83–100. In: J. Nugent and M. O'Connor (eds.). Ciba Foundation Symposium 97—Better Crops for Food. John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Chichester UK

  • WilleyR.W.RaoM.R.1980A competitive ratio for quantifying competition between intercropsExpt. Agr.16117125

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 221 221 8
Full Text Views 69 69 5
PDF Downloads 20 20 0