Use of Plant Growth Regulators for Feathering and Flower Suppression of Apple Nursery Trees

in HortScience

The use of highly feathered trees can make high-density apple plantings more profitable through enhanced precocity and increased early yield. Currently, nurseries are asked to provide highly feathered trees with wide branch crotch angles. The use of plant growth regulators (PGRs) can play a key role when it comes to branch induction; however, dose and timing both need to be tested to enhance branching without compromising other tree quality attributes. Over the last 4 years, we have conducted studies of the use of MaxCel® (6-benzyladenine) and Promalin® (a mixture of 1.8% 6-benzyladenine and 1.8% GA4+7) in comparison with Tiberon™ SC (cyclanilide) at several nurseries in NY, WA, DE, Ontario (Canada), and Chile. The best results were obtained with four applications of MaxCel® or Promalin® (400 mg·L−1) beginning when leader growth reached 70 cm above the soil line and reapplied at 10–14 days intervals. Promalin® was a slightly less effective branching agent than MaxCel®. On the other hand, Promalin® stimulated leader growth resulting in improved final tree height, whereas MaxCel® induced the widest branch angles. Overall, we observed good response and quality ratings with ‘Cameo’, ‘Cripps Pink’, ‘Enterprise’, ‘Fuji’, ‘Ambrosia’, ‘Crimson Crisp’, ‘Gingergold’, and ‘Granny Smith’, whereas less quality ratings were observed on ‘Ambrosia’, ‘Cortland’, ‘Goldrush’, ‘Honeycrisp’, and ‘Suncrisp’. Response with ‘Gala’ varied depending on the temperature range. Multiple sprays of Gibberellins (GA4+7, or GA3) at 250 mg·L−1 applied to nursery trees in the late summer inhibited flower bud development and flowering in the orchard the next year. This reduces the risk of fire blight infection in newly planted trees.

Contributor Notes

This research was partially supported by the International Fruit Tree Association, the Northwest Nursery Improvement Institute, the New Jersey State Horticultural Society, and the New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station, with additional support from the Utah Agricultural Experiment Station (Journal paper #8959).

We thank John Baugher, Taun Beddes, Mike Beese, Shaun Calahan, Ricardo Chalhub Z., Gregory Clarke, Bill Howell, Dave Johnson, Wayne Kessinger, Bill Lawler, Rebecca Magron, and JD Obermiller for technical support and guidance. We also thank the cooperating nurseries Adams County, C&O, Univiveros, VanWell, and Willow Drive.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Corresponding author. E-mail: jl3325@cornell.edu.

Article Sections

Article Figures

  • View in gallery

    Average daily maximum and minimum temperature (°C) and relative humidity (RH, %) for Santiago de Chile 2012 (Experiment 4), Quincy, WA, 2012–13 (Experiments 3 and 8), and Ellendale, DE, 2014 (Experiment 9). Bottom chart represents average daily minimum temperature (°C) for Geneva, NY, and Payson, UT, in 2014 (Experiment 11).

  • View in gallery

    Effects of plant growth regulator treatments at 500, 750, 800, or 1000 mg·L−1 sprayed from two to five times (2× to 5×) on leader growth rate (cm per day) on ‘Fuji’, ‘Gala’, and ‘Granny Smith’ in the nursery at Chile in 2012 (Experiment 4). All the treatments included Regulaid® at 0.125% (v/v) as a surfactant. Vertical bars indicate least significant difference (LSD) at P < 0.05.

  • View in gallery

    Effects of plant growth regulator treatments at 500, 750, 800, or 1000 mg·L−1 on number and length of feathers on ‘Fuji’, ‘Gala’, and ‘Granny Smith’ in the nursery at Chile in 2012 (Experiment 4). All the treatments included Regulaid® at 0.125% (v/v) as a surfactant. Vertical bars indicate least significant difference (LSD) at P < 0.05.

  • View in gallery

    Effects of four or five applications of either MaxCel® or Promalin® on the overall tree quality of 17 apple varieties in Ellendale, DE, in 2014 and 2015 (Experiment 10). Tree quality (1 = poor, 5 = excellent) was subjectively assessed, taking into account overall tree height, number of feathers, and their angle. Excellent quality trees had a tree height of 180–200 cm and 12–15 wide-angle feathers, whereas poor quality trees were short in height and with no feathers at all. All the Promalin® applications included Regulaid® at 0.125% (v/v) as a surfactant. Bars with different letters denote significant differences among varieties (Tukey’s honestly significant difference, P ≤ 0.05).

Article References

  • BasakA.KolodziejczakP.BubanT.1992Paturyl 10 WSC as a branching agent for young apple trees in nursery and orchardsActa Hort.329201203

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CodyC.LarsenF.FrittsR.Jr1985Stimulation of lateral branch development in tree fruit nursery stock with GA4+7 + BAHortScience20758759

  • DavisD.E.2002Inhibition of flower bud initiation and development in apple by defoliation gibberellic acid and crop load manipulation. Virginia Polytechnic Inst. State Univ. PhD Diss

  • ElfvingD.C.VisserD.B.2005Cyclanilide induces lateral branching in apple treesHortScience40119122

  • ElfvingD.C.VisserD.B.2006aCyclanilide induces lateral branching in sweet cherry treesHortScience41149153

  • ElfvingD.C.VisserD.B.2006bTiming cyclanilide and cytokinin applications in the nursery to obtain desired lateral branch height in apple and sweet cherry treesHortScience4112381242

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FerreeD.C.WarringtonI.J.2003Apples: Botany production and uses. CABI publishing Cambridge MA

  • ForsheyC.1982Branching responses of young apple trees to applications of 6-benzylamino purine and gibberellin A4+7J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.10710921097

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GreeneD.MillerP.1988Effects of growth regulator sprays and notching on growth and branching of ‘Starkrimson Delicious’ apple treesJ. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.1131823

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GreeneD.W.2000Reducing floral initiation and return bloom in pome fruit trees—applications and implicationsHortTechnology10740743

  • GreeneD.W.AutioW.R.1994Notching techniques increase branching of young apple treesJ. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.119678682

  • HrotkoK.MagyarL.RonayZ.2000Improved feathering on apple nursery trees by BA applicationActa Hort.514113122

  • JacynaT.BarnardJ.2008Modification of branching behavior in apical-dominant apple trees with plant growth regulators and their residual effects on tree growth after transplantingJ. Amer. Pomol. Soc.624160172

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • JaumienF.CzarneckiB.PoniedzialekW.MitrutT.1993Very similar effects of a mixture of GA3 and BA (6-benzylaminopurine) and of GA4+7 and BA on branching of some apple cultivars in nurseryActa Hort.3293542

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • JonkersH.1979Biennial bearing in apple and pear: A literature surveySci. Hort.114303317

  • KapłanM.2010Effect of growth regulators on the branching ability of maiden apple trees of the ‘Šampion’ and ‘Jonica’ cultivarsFolia Hort.22237

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KeeverG.J.FosterW.OliveJ.WestM.S.1993Increasing ‘Bradford’ pear crotch angles and lateral shoot counts with benzyladenine or promalin spraysHortScience28678

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McArtneyS.ObermillerJ.D.2015Effect of notching, 6-benzyladenine, and 6-benzyladenine plus gibberellin A4 + A7 on budbreak and shoot development from paradormant buds on the leader of young apple treesHortTechnology25233237

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • McArtneyS.J.LiS.-H.1998Selective inhibition of flowering on ‘Braeburn’ apple trees with gibberellinsHortScience33699700

  • MillerS.S.EldridgeB.J.1986Use of 6-benzylamino purine and Promalin for improved canopy development in selected apple cultivarsSci. Hort.284355368

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Miranda SazoM.RobinsonT.L.2011The use of plant growth regulators for branching of nursery trees in NY stateNew York Fruit Qrtly.19259

  • PalmerJ.W.SeymourS.M.DiackR.2011Feathering of ‘Doyenne du Comice’ pear in the nursery using repeat sprays of benzyladenine and gibberellinsSci. Hort.1302393397

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RobinsonT.StilesW.1995Maximizing the performance of young apple treesNew York Fruit Qrtly.321016

  • RobinsonT.L.2008The evolution towards more competitive apple orchard systems in the USAActa Hort.772491500

  • RobinsonT.L.BlackB.CowgilW.2014Use of multiple applications of Maxcel and Promalin to produce feathered treesCompact Fruit Tree4712328

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RobinsonT.L.DeMarreeA.M.HoyingS.A.2007An economic comparison of five high density apple planting systemsActa Hort.732481489

  • UnrathC.WhitworthJ.1991Suppression of apple bloom with gibberellin spraysJ. Hort. Sci.662155157

  • van den BergA.2003Certified nursery tree production in HollandCompact Fruit Tree3624345

  • VannesteJ.L.2000Fire blight: The disease and its causative agent Erwinia amylovora. CABI Wallingford UK

  • WeisH.2004Characteristics of the ideal nursery tree and its advantages in the orchardCompact Fruit Tree3712325

  • WertheimS.1978Induction of side-shoot formation in the fruit-tree nurseryActa Hort.804954

  • WertheimS.WebsterA.D.2003Propagation and nursery tree quality p. 125–151. In: D. Ferree and I. Warrington (eds.). Apples: Botany production and uses. CABI Wallingford UK

Article Information

Google Scholar

Related Content

Article Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 129 129 23
Full Text Views 93 93 28
PDF Downloads 18 18 7