Ploidy Level, Karyotype, and DNA Content in the Genus Lonicera

in HortScience

Ploidy levels and genome sizes have significant implications in plant evolution and crop improvement. Species of Lonicera L. have long been cultivated as medicinal, ornamental crops, or both. However, chromosome numbers, karyotypes, and DNA contents have only been documented in a few species, of which some controversies regarding basic chromosome numbers and karyotypes remain. This study analyzed the chromosome numbers and karyomorphology of 11 cultivars across four species and also the DNA content of 10 cultivars representing six species of Lonicera. Among them, the chromosome numbers of nine cultivars are reported for the first time. Results showed that the basic chromosome number of x = 9 was constant, and chromosome numbers of 2n = 18, 27, 36, or 54 were observed, suggesting that polyploidy exists in the genus. Five cultivars are diploid with 2n = 18; one cultivar is triploid, four are tetraploid, and one is hexaploid. The karyotypes of all studied cultivars are 3B or 3A, except Lonicera sempervirens ‘Crimson Cascade’ that is 2B based on the Stebbins’ asymmetry classification of karyotypes. The asymmetry index (A1) values vary from 0.47 to 0.60. The chromosome lengths range from 0.77 to 4.09 μm. Total karyotype lengths differ from 33.55 to 78.71 μm. The 1C-value of 10 cultivars varies 3-fold, ranging from 1.158 to 3.664 pg. Information gathered from this study could be valuable for improving breeding efficiency in the development of new cultivars of Lonicera with enhanced medicinal, ornamental value, or both.

Abstract

Ploidy levels and genome sizes have significant implications in plant evolution and crop improvement. Species of Lonicera L. have long been cultivated as medicinal, ornamental crops, or both. However, chromosome numbers, karyotypes, and DNA contents have only been documented in a few species, of which some controversies regarding basic chromosome numbers and karyotypes remain. This study analyzed the chromosome numbers and karyomorphology of 11 cultivars across four species and also the DNA content of 10 cultivars representing six species of Lonicera. Among them, the chromosome numbers of nine cultivars are reported for the first time. Results showed that the basic chromosome number of x = 9 was constant, and chromosome numbers of 2n = 18, 27, 36, or 54 were observed, suggesting that polyploidy exists in the genus. Five cultivars are diploid with 2n = 18; one cultivar is triploid, four are tetraploid, and one is hexaploid. The karyotypes of all studied cultivars are 3B or 3A, except Lonicera sempervirens ‘Crimson Cascade’ that is 2B based on the Stebbins’ asymmetry classification of karyotypes. The asymmetry index (A1) values vary from 0.47 to 0.60. The chromosome lengths range from 0.77 to 4.09 μm. Total karyotype lengths differ from 33.55 to 78.71 μm. The 1C-value of 10 cultivars varies 3-fold, ranging from 1.158 to 3.664 pg. Information gathered from this study could be valuable for improving breeding efficiency in the development of new cultivars of Lonicera with enhanced medicinal, ornamental value, or both.

The genus Lonicera L., commonly known as honeysuckle, is a member of the family Caprifoliaceae and comprises more than 200 species (Naugžemys et al., 2007). This genus is mainly distributed in temperate and subtropical areas, with several species extending their range into tropical areas of India, Malaysia, and the Philippines (Rehder, 1903; van Steenis, 1946). The region of greatest species diversity is the Himalayas and China (Ammal and Saunders, 1952). Some species, including Lonicera confusa (Sweet) DC., Lonicera fulvotomentosa Hsu et S.C. Cheng, Lonicera japonica Thunb., Lonicera hypoglauca Miq., and Lonicera macranthoides Hands.-Mazz., are medicinal plants (Zeng et al., 2017). Dried flowers and buds of honeysuckles are known as flos loniceras and have been a recognized herb of traditional Chinese medicine for more than 1500 years (Li et al., 2015). Flos loniceras have been used to treat arthritis, diabetes mellitus, fever, and viral infections (Li et al., 2015; Shang et al., 2011). Some species have been used as ornamentals worldwide including L. japonica, Lonicera sempervirens L., Lonicera periclymenum L., and Lonicera flava Sims (Georges et al., 1992). Because of their different growth habitats and great adaptability, a few species, such as L. japonica (Schierenbeck, 2004) and Lonicera maackii (Rupr.) Herder. (Gorchov and Trisel, 2003), are considered as invasive plants in some regions. One species, Lonicera caerulea L., also known as blue honeysuckle, is a shrub producing edible fruits (Miyashita et al., 2011).

Despite their economic importance, chromosome numbers have only been documented in less than 30% of the described species based on the index to plant chromosome number databases (IPCN, 2017). The basic chromosome number of x = 9 was reported by Ammal and Saunders (1952). However, Benko-Iseppon and Morawetz (2000) suggested that the basic chromosome number of the family Caprifoliaceae was x = 8 or 9. In addition, karyotypes have only been described in 36 entities (Table 1), of which some controversies remain in L. japonica. As listed in Table 1 (Denda et al., 2007; Guo et al., 1993; Li et al., 2009; Wang and Wang, 2005; Yan et al., 2014; Yang et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2017), there are 17 different karyotypes for L. japonica based on the Stebbins’ karyotypes (Stebbins, 1971).

Table 1.

A summary of somatic chromosome numbers of Lonicera species that have been reported in the literature.

Table 1.

Polyploidy occurs in the genus Lonicera (Ammal and Saunders, 1952; Solov’eva and Plekhanova, 2003). Ploidy levels and genome sizes play important roles in plant evolution (Soltis et al., 2003). The 2C nuclear DNA amount of Lonicera varies 6-fold based on the Plant DNA C-values Database (2012) and reports of Bennett et al. (2000) and Bennett and Leitch (2012). The DNA amount of the unreplicated haploid genome (1C-value) is highly characteristic for different taxa. Species’ DNA amounts (1Cx-value) are key diversity characters of fundamental significance with many important uses (Bennett and Leitch, 2005). However, there are only six 1C-values for Lonicera so far (Bennett and Leitch, 2012; Olszewska and Osiecka, 1984; Zonneveld et al., 2005). Moreover, ploidy levels and genome sizes are important in crop improvement (Bennett, 1998). Because of the lack of reliable chromosome and genomic information, current breeding on Lonicera has been primarily focused on the selection of naturally occurring mutations (Chen et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2013; Zeng et al., 2017).

The objectives of this study were to determine the chromosomal numbers, ploidy levels, and karyotypes of some important cultivars of selected Lonicera species as well as their DNA contents. It is anticipated that information gathered from this study could help improve medicinal and ornamental value of Lonicera species and cultivars through plant breeding.

Materials and Methods

Lonicera cultivars listed in Tables 2 and 3 were grown in a container substrate comprising 60% peat, 20% perlite, and 20% vermiculite in a greenhouse. Root tips were collected and pretreated with 0.1% colchicine (Phytotechnology laboratories, Shawnee Mission, KS) for about 5 h before being fixed in Carnoy I (glacial acetic acid:absolute ethanol = 1:3). The samples were then macerated in a 1:1 mixture of 45% acetic acid (Fisher Scientific Inc., Pittsburgh, PA) and 1 m HCl (Fisher Scientific Inc.) at 60 °C for 4 min and stained and squashed in carbol fuchsin (Sigma-Aldrich Inc., St. Louis, MO). The root tips were squashed with forceps in a drop of 45% acetic acid on a glass slide, then covered with a cover glass, and squashed again. Cover glasses were removed by freezing glass slides in a freezer. The slides were dried at room temperature and passed through three solutions: 50%, 75%, and 100% ethanol (Fisher Scientific Inc.). Slides were sealed with a euparal mounting medium (Asco Laboratories Ltd., Manchester, UK). Metaphase chromosomes were observed, and photographs were taken under the Olympus Motorized Inverted Research Microscope Model IX81 (Olympus Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Chromosome numbers of a minimum of 20 cells of each collection were counted at a well-spread metaphase stage.

Table 2.

Ploidy level, chromosome numbers, and karyotypic characteristics of the 11 studied Lonicera cultivars.

Table 2.
Table 3.

DNA ploidy level, relative DNA content,z and nuclear DNA content in Lonicera cultivars as estimated by flow cytometry.

Table 3.

Karyotype formulae were established by measuring mitotic–metaphase chromosomes taken from photographs. In most cases, measurements of two to four cells were made for karyotypic analysis. The nomenclature used for the description of the chromosome morphology followed the description of Levan et al. (1964) where m = median centromeric chromosome, sm = submedian centromeric chromosome, st = subterminal centromeric chromosome, and t = terminal centromeric chromosome. The karyotype asymmetry was determined using the karyotype asymmetry indices A1 (intrachromosomal asymmetry index), A2 (interchromosomal asymmetry index) (Zarco, 1986), and the categories of Stebbins (1971).

Ploidy levels were analyzed by flow cytometry (Partec PA; Partec GmbH, Münster, Germany). According to the concept of Suda et al. (2006), we used the term “DNA ploidy level.” The prefix “DNA” indicates that ploidy levels are mostly inferred from nuclear DNA content without knowledge of the exact chromosome numbers. Sample treatments followed the method of Cui et al. (2009). A fresh young leaf was chopped with a 0.2 mL drop of nuclei extraction buffer (CyStain ultraviolet precise P; Partec GmbH). After incubation for 2 min at room temperature and filtration through a Partec 50 μm CellTrics disposable filter, DNA ploidy levels were analyzed using flow cytometry. DNA contents were also calculated using leaves of Pisum sativum ‘Ctirad’ (2C = 9.09 pg) (Dolezel and Bartos, 2005) as the internal standard. Ten cultivars from six species were examined. The analysis was considered to be acceptable when the cv was within 5%. For each sample, four replicates of the same plants were performed within 1 d. Relative DNA content was estimated by the ratio between the fluorescence intensity of the sample and internal standard: sample relative DNA content = sample peak mean/standard peak mean. The relative DNA content was then calculated for each sample as the average of the four replications.

Results

Chromosome number.

Chromosome numbers of 11 cultivars across four species are presented in Table 2 and their chromosome morphology and sizes are illustrated in Fig. 1. Five diploid cultivars had the chromosome number 2n = 18: L. japonica ‘Jinfeng 1’, L. macranthoides, L. macranthoides ‘Jincuilei’, L. macranthoides ‘Longhua’, and L. macranthoides ‘Baiyun’. One triploid cultivar, L. sempervirens ‘Magnifera’, had 2n = 27. Four tetraploid cultivars had 2n = 36: L. japonica ‘Jiufeng 1’, L. sempervirens ‘Major Wheeler’, L. sempervirens ‘Crimson cascade’, and L. sempervirens ‘John Clayton’. Lonicera periclymenum ‘Graham Thomas’ was hexaploid with 2n = 54.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

Somatic chromosomes at mitotic metaphase of Lonicera cultivars. (A) Lonicera japonica ‘Jinfeng 1’; (B) L. japonica ‘Jiufeng 1’; (C) Lonicera macranthoides; (D) L. macranthoides ‘Baiyun’; (E) L. macranthoides ‘Longhua’; (F) L. macranthoides ‘Jincuilei’; (G) Lonicera periclymenum ‘Graham Thomas’; (H) Lonicera sempervirens ‘Major Wheeler’; (I) L. sempervirens ‘Crimson Cascade’; (J) L. sempervirens ‘John Clayton’; (K) L. sempervirens ‘Magnifera’. Scale bar = 10 μm.

Citation: HortScience horts 52, 12; 10.21273/HORTSCI12489-17

Karoytype.

Karyotype formulae and related parameters for the 11 cultivars are summarized in Table 2 and their karyotypes are illustrated in Figs. 2 and 3. The karyotypes consisted of median centromeric (m), submedian centromeric (sm) chromosomes, a few subterminal centromeric (st), but no terminal centromeric chromosome (t). Thus, the karyotypes were moderately symmetrical and fell in the Stebbins’ 3B, 3A, or 2B category of asymmetry (Table 2). The A1 values ranged from 0.47 to 0.6. The A2 values differed from 0.2 to 0.26. Most species had small-sized chromosomes (Table 2) according to the classification of Lima de Faría (1980). The chromosome length ranged from 0.77 to 4.09 μm. Total karyotype length (TKL) varied from 33.55 to 78.71 μm.

Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

Karyotypes of different Lonicera cultivars, part I. (A) Lonicera japonica ‘Jinfeng 1’; (B) L. japonica ‘Jiufeng 1’; (C) Lonicera macranthoides; (D) L. macranthoides ‘Baiyun’; (E) L. macranthoides ‘Longhua’; (F) L. macranthoides ‘Jincuilei’. Scale bar = 10 μm.

Citation: HortScience horts 52, 12; 10.21273/HORTSCI12489-17

Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.

Karyotypes of different Lonicera cultivars, part II. (A) Lonicera sempervirens ‘Major Wheeler’; (B) L. sempervirens ‘Crimson Cascade’; (C) L. sempervirens ‘John Clayton’; (D) L. sempervirens ‘Magnifera’. Scale bar = 10 μm.

Citation: HortScience horts 52, 12; 10.21273/HORTSCI12489-17

DNA ploidy level.

The DNA ploidy levels of 10 cultivars representing six species are shown in Table 3. Lonicera japonica, L. japonica ‘Jinfeng 1’, and L. macranthoides ‘Jincuilei’ showed 2Cx DNA content. Lonicera sempervirens ‘Magnifica’ had 3Cx DNA content. Lonicera caerulea ‘Kamchatika’, L. flava, L. japonica ‘Jiufeng 1’, and L. sempervirens had 4Cx DNA content. Lonicera periclymenum ‘Belgia’ and L. periclymenum ‘Graham Thomas’ had 6Cx DNA content. The Cx-value was designated as DNA content of a monoploid genome with chromosome number x according to Greilhuber et al. (2005). The results of the flow cytometric analysis provided additional evidence that diploid (2n = 2x = 18), triploid (2n = 4x = 36), tetraploid (2n = 4x = 36), and hexaploid (2n = 6x = 54) populations exist in the genus Lonicera (Table 2).

DNA content.

DNA contents of 10 cultivars across six species are summarized in Table 3. Most genome size estimates represented novel records; previous C-values were available for only six taxa (Plant DNA C-values Database, 2012). Flow cytometric analyses showed that L. japonica (2n = 2x = 18) had the lowest mean 1C-values and 2C-values, 1.158 and 2.323 pg, respectively. Lonicera periclymenum ‘Graham Thomas’ (2n = 6x = 54) had the highest mean 1C-values and 2C-values, 3.664 and 7.328 pg, respectively, which was 3.16-fold greater than those of L. japonica. 1Cx-value ranged from 1135 Mbp in L. japonica to 1233 Mbp in L. macranthoides ‘Jincuilei’ (2n = 2x =18). cv of G0/G1 peaks varied from 0.57% to 2.33%.

Discussion

The genus Lonicera encompasses a number of medicinally important species (Li et al., 2015; Shang et al., 2011; Zeng et al., 2017) and also some popular ornamental plants that can grow vigorously in a wide range of environments (Wu et al., 2011a). Because of the lack of fundamental genetic information, such as chromosome numbers, karyotypes, and DNA contents, there has been no documented breeding scheme for genetic improvement of Lonicera species. The current effort has been primarily limited to the selection of sports or induced mutations (Chen et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2013; Zeng et al., 2017). The present study investigated some important cultivars of Lonicera species and documented their ploidy levels, karyotypes, and DNA contents, which could be potentially valuable for improving breeding efficiency of Lonicera species.

This study showed that the basic chromosome number of x = 9 is constant as the mitotic number (2n) counts are 18, 27, 36, and 54 (Tables 2 and 3) depending on the investigated cultivars. Our observations agree with the conclusion of Ammal and Saunders (1952) and also the reports of others listed in Table 1 that the basic chromosome number is x = 9, not 8 as suggested by Bedi et al. (1982). Furthermore, these are the first reports of chromosome numbers for L. japonica ‘Jinfeng 1’; L. macranthoides ‘Jincuilei’, ‘Longhua’, and ‘Baiyun’; L. sempervirens ‘Crimson Cascade’, ‘John Clayton’, ‘Magnifera’, and ‘Major Wheeler’; and L. periclymenum ‘Graham Thomas’.

Karyotype formulae and quantitative analysis indicate that there are interspecific and intraspecific instabilities in the studied Lonicera cultivars (Tables 2 and 3), which are different from the observations of Solov’eva and Plekhanova (2003) who reported that karyotypes of 23 natural populations from L. aerulea had considerable generic resemblance because of their similar chromosome morphology and variation range of chromosome length. Both quantitative (Tables 2 and 3) and qualitative (Figs. 2 and 3) data showed interspecific differences, and the most variable characters include the ploidy levels, TKL, and the number of sm chromosomes. At the intraspecific level, different cultivars have different karyotype formulae. The differences in karyotype morphology may represent differences in genetic recombination or gene arrangement (Stebbins, 1971), resulting in morphological, physiological, and biochemical differences in plants. The karyotype of L. macranthoides was in agreement with the observations of Mei et al. (2006). However, ‘Baiyun’, ‘Longhua’, and ‘Jincuilei’ have different karyotypes. The three cultivars were mutants of L. macranthoides; they produce large flowers, but the flowers never open and contain high chlorogenic acid (CGA) content (Chen et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2009, 2013). The karyotype of L. japonica ‘Jinfeng 1’ is closely similar to that of L. japonica ‘Sijijinyinhua’ listed in Table 1, but the latter has four satellite chromosomes. There are 17 karyotype formulas among the reported L. japonica cultivars (Table 1); such a high karyotype variation suggests great genetic diversity of this species, thus possessing a wide range of adaptability. This may partially explain why L. japonica is considered an invasive species in some parts of the world. The B karyotype of L. japonica ‘Jiufeng 1’ in this study differs from the results of Zhang et al. (2017) who reported that it was a 3A type. In addition, the index A1, developed by Zarco (1986), is considered to have a high degree of precision and sensitivity in assessing karyotype asymmetry. In general, higher values of the A1 index are considered to be higher levels of karyotypic heterogeneity. In the present study, all cultivars fell in the Stebbins’ 3B or 3A category of asymmetry, except L. sempervirens ‘John Clayton’ with 2B (Table 2), and the A1 values ranged from 0.47 to 0.6. Therefore, Lonicera is generally characterized by possessing asymmetrical karyotypes, with a predominance of sm chromosomes.

Polyploidy occurred in Lonicera species ranging from triploid to hexaploid. Polyploidy may change breeding systems and cause shifts to asexual reproductions (Negrón-Ortiz, 2007). Polyploid plants generally have larger plant organs (Sasnauskas et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2010) and greater adaptability than diploid plants (Lewis, 1980). Polyploidization is characterized by variations in the amount of nuclear DNA (C-value), with simultaneous changes in chromosome structures and numbers (Negrón-Ortiz, 2007). In the present study, L. caerulea ‘Kamchatika’ and L. flava are tetraploids. Miyashita et al. (2011) reported that both diploid and tetraploid L. caerulea plants exist in Japan, whereas tetraploid plants were much more widely distributed than the diploids, suggesting the increased adaptability of the polyploid plants. Lonicera flava was reported to be a diploid (Rüdenberg and Green, 1966); however, the species in the present study was a tetraploid. Lonicera sempervirens, a native to the eastern United States, is a tetraploid species. It is considered to be an allopolyploid (Ammal and Saunders, 1952), and Schierenbeck et al. (1995) speculated that its likely diploid congeners could be L. flava and Lonicera dioca L. Lonicera dioca was considered to be a diploid (Rüdenberg and Green, 1966). Our study, however, did not include this species, it is unknown if tetraploid L. dioca exists. Among the three tetraploid cultivars of L. sempervirens, karyotype formulas and chromosome morphologies varied (Table 2; Fig. 3), thus each has different phenotypes. ‘Major Wheeler’ is a nonstop bloomer from later spring to fall with showy clusters of large orange-red flowers. ‘Crimson Cascade’ is a selection of ‘Major Wheeler’ and it produces large red flowers. ‘John Clayton’ was discovered on the grounds of an old church in Gloucester, Virginia, and its flowers are yellow. ‘Magnifica’ produces orange-colored flowers. Furthermore, the differences in karyotype formulas and chromosome morphology provide additional evidence supporting high genetic diversity in L. sempervirens as reported by Schierenbeck et al. (1995). The higher genetic variability can result in a more widespread distribution than native diploids; thus, L. sempervirens may be considered as a colonizer (Radford et al., 1968). It appears that there is an increasing trend in polyploidization of Lonicera (L. caerulea, L. flava, L. periclymenum, and L. sempervirens). Polyploidy plays an important role in plant evolution as it could modify both the genotype and phenotype which could alter plant adaptation to habitats and geographical distributions (Madlung, 2013; Soltis et al., 2013). Lonicera japonica ‘Jiufeng 1’, however, is a colchicine-induced tetraploid derived from L. japonica ‘Damaohua’; it produces larger flowers with a higher flower yield compared with the parental type (Le et al., 2014). ‘Jiufeng 1’ was released in 2004 and has been widely produced in China as a medicinal plant.

Most chromosomal changes discussed previously imply genome size variation. The multiplication of chromosome set impacts genome size or the nuclear DNA contents. Nuclear DNA amount variation has strong relationships with many biological factors and implications in plant differentiation and evolution (Bennett and Leitch, 2011; Vallès et al., 2012). Previously reported nuclear DNA contents in seven taxa varied 6-fold, from 1C value = 0.65 pg for Lonicera nigra (Olszewska and Osiecka, 1984) to 3.88 pg for Lonicera vesicarria Komar. (Olszewska and Osiecka, 1984). In the present study, the 1C-value variation was lower, only 3-fold. Meanwhile, genome downsizing is often associated with polyploidization (Leitch and Bennett, 2004). However, it seems clear that L. japonica ‘Jiufeng1’ does not follow this pattern. As mentioned previously, ‘Jiufeng1’ is an artificially induced tetraploid.

Nevertheless, this study provides some fundamental information on economically important species of Lonicera. All investigated cultivars have basic chromosome number of x = 9. All cultivars have their own asymmetric karyotypes, suggesting interspecific and intraspecfic instability, thus there is a possibility to isolate sports from different species, such as the mutants selected from L. macranthoides and sports from L. sempervirens. In addition, there is a potential for developing interspecific hybrids, such as diploid L. japonica with L. macranthoides or tetraploid L. japonica ‘Jiufeng 1’ with tetraploid L. sempervirens. The development of interspecific hybrids of L. japonica and L. macranthoides is particularly important as flowers of L. japonica contain higher luteolin but are lower in CGA, whereas L. macranthoides possesses higher CGA content but is lower in luteolin. New interspecific cultivars with increased contents of both CGA and luteolin could greatly improve the pharmaceutical value of Lonicera. CGA has multiple pharmacological actions including antioxidation, antibacteria, antivirus, anti-inflammatory, and antiliver fibrosis (Yang et al., 2004). The CGA can strongly suppress adeno-associated 3 and 7 viruses, coxsackie B3 and B5 virus, and respiratory syncytia virus (Hu et al., 2001). Luteolin shows antiviral actions and has been used as an influenza virus neuraminidase inhibitor (Liu et al., 2008). Thus, further research on the development of interspecific hybrids is warranted.

Literature Cited

  • AmmalE.K.J.SaundersB.1952Chromosome numbers in species of LoniceraKew Bul.7539541

  • BediY.S.BirS.S.GillB.S.1982Cytological studies in certain woody members of family CaprifoliaceaeJ. Tree Sci.12734

  • Benko-IsepponA.M.MorawetzW.2000Viburnales: Cytological features and a new circumscriptionTaxon49516

  • BennettM.D.1998Plant genome values: How much do we knowProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA9520112016

  • BennettM.D.BhandolP.LeitchI.J.2000Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms and their modern uses: 807 new estimatesAnn. Bot. (Lond.)86859909

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BennettM.D.LeitchI.J.2005Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms-progress, problems and prospectsAnn. Bot. (Lond.)954590

  • BennettM.D.LeitchI.J.2011Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms: Targets, trends and tomorrowAnn. Bot. (Lond.)107467590

  • BennettM.D.LeitchI.J.2012Plant DNA C-values database (release 6.0 Dec. 2012)

  • ChenJ.WangX.CaiN.LiY.ZengH.QiaoZ.2013‘Longhua’ LoniceraHortScience48652653

  • ChenS.J.ChenZ.Y.HuangX.X.HuangS.F.WangY.Q.ZhaoZ.F.1990Fifty taxa chromosome countsGuahaia103337(in Chinese with English summary)

  • CuiJ.ChenJ.HennyR.J.2009Regeneration of Aeschynanthus radicans via direct somatic embryogenesis and analysis of regenerants with flow cytometryIn Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant453443

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DendaT.KojaA.YokotaM.2007Chromosomal studies of insular endemic Lonicera japonica Thunb. var. miyagusukiana Makino (Caprifoliaceae) in the Ryukyu Archipelago of JapanCaryologia60331337

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DolezelJ.BartosJ.2005Plant DNA flow cytometry and estimation of nuclear genome sizeAnn. Bot.9599110

  • GeorgesD.DecourtyeL.OchattS.J.1992Biotechnological breeding of ornamental honeysuckles (Lonicera, Caprifoliaceae)Acta Hort.320127132

  • GorchovD.L.TriselD.E.2003Competitive effects of the invasive shrub, Lonicera maackii (Rupr.) Herder (Caprifoliaceae), on the growth and survival of native tree seedlingsPlant Ecol.1661324

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GreilhuberJ.DoleželJ.LysákM.A.BennettM.D.2005The origin, evolution and proposed stabilization of the terms ‘Genome Size’ and ‘C-Value’ to describe nuclear DNA contentsAnn. Bot. (Lond.)95255260

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GuoZ.H.WangM.LiS.X.1993A study on the idiogram of honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica)J. Hebei Agr. Univ.163335(in Chinese with English summary)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HuK.J.SunK.X.WangJ.L.2001Inhibited effect of chlorogenic acid on virus in vitroJ. Harbin Med. Univ.35430432(in Chinese)

  • IPCN (Index to Plant Chromosome Number)2017IPCN chromosome reports: Lonicera. Missouri Botanical Garden Saint Louis MO. 15 2017. 5 Oct. 2017. <http://www.tropicos.org/NameSearch.aspx?projectid=9>

  • LeD.LiuX.SunX.DingZ.DingF.LiangY.2014Effect of fertilizer on growth and yield of Lonicera japonica Thumb. cultivar Jiufeng 1Modern Agr. Technol.136365(in Chinese)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LeitchI.J.BennettM.D.2004Genome downsizing in polyploid plantsBiol. J. Linn. Soc.82651663

  • LevanA.FredgaK.SandbergA.A.1964Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomesHereditas52201220

  • LewisW.H.1980Polyploidy in species populations p. 103–147. In: W.H. Lewis (ed.). Polyploidy: Biological relevance. Plenum Press New York NY

  • LiX.L.YangJ.WangH.T.LiN.WangX.2009Optimization of chromosome mounting technique and karyotype analysis of tree Lonicera japonicaJ. Henan Agr. Sci.7102106(in Chinese with English summary)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LiY.CaiW.WengX.LiQ.WangY.ChenY.ZhangW.YangQ.GuoY.ZhuX.WangH.2015Lonicerae japonica flos and lonicera flos: A systematic pharmacology reviewEvid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med.2015905063

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lima de FaríaA.1980Classification of genes, rearrangements and chromosomes according to the chromosome fieldHereditas93146

  • LinS.J.SasakiH.2011Cytological study of Lonicera (caprifoliaceae) in Shimane, JapanBul. Fac. Life Environ. Sci. Shimane Univ.1636(in Japanese with English summary)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LiuA.WangH.LeeS.M.WangY.DuG.2008Structure-activity relationship of flavonoids as influenza virus neuraminidase inhibitors and their in vitro anti-viral activitiesBioorg. Med. Chem.1671417147

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MadlungA.2013Polyploidy and its effect on evolutionary success: Old questions revisited with new toolsHeredity11099104

  • MeiS.M.ZhengL.WangZ.XiaoC.Y.2006Karyotype analysis of Lonicera macranthoidesJ. Huaihua Med. College57576 (in Chinese)

  • MiyashitaT.ArakiH.HoshinoY.2011Ploidy distribution and DNA content variations of Lonicera caerulea (Caprifoliaceae) in JapanJ. Plant Res.12419

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NaugžemysD.ŽilinskaitėS.DenkovskijJ.PatamsytėJ.LiterskisJ.ŽvingilaD.2007RAPD based study of genetic variation and relationships among Lonicera germplasm accessionsBiologija (Vilnius)533439

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Negrón-OrtizV.2007Chromosome numbers, nuclear DNA content, and polyploidy in Consolea (Cactaceae), an endemic cactus of the Caribbean islandsAmer. J. Bot.9413601370

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • OlszewskaM.J.OsieckaR.1984Relationship between 2C DNA content, systematic position and level of DNA endoreplication during differentiation of root parenchyma in dicot shrubs and trees: Comparison with herbaceous speciesBiochem. Physiol. Pflanz.179641657

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Plant DNA C-values Database2012RBG Kew DNA C-value query results: Lonicera. 15 Oct. 2017. <http://data.kew.org/cvalues/CvalServlet?querytype=2>

  • RadfordA.E.AhlesH.E.BellC.R.1968Manual of the vascular flora of the Carolinas. The University of North Carolina Press Chapel Hill NC

  • RehderA.1903Synopsis of the genus LoniceraMissouri Bot. Gard. Ann. Rpt.1427232

  • RüdenbergL.GreenP.S.1966A karyological survey of Lonicera, IJ. Arnold Arbor.47222247

  • SasnauskasA.StanienėG.GelvonauskienėD.SiksnianasT.StanysV.BobinasC.RugieniusR.BaniulisD.2007Morphological traits in Ribes nigrum polyploidsActa Hort.760405408

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SchierenbeckK.A.2004Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) as an invasive species: History, ecology, and contextCrit. Rev. Plant Sci.23391400

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SchierenbeckK.A.HamrickJ.L.MackR.N.1995Comparison of allozyme variability in a native and an introduced species of LoniceraHeredity7519

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ShangX.PanH.LiM.MiaoX.DingH.2011Lonicera japonica Thunb.: Ethnopharmacology, phytochemistry and pharmacology of an important traditional Chinese medicineJ. Ethnopharmacol.138121

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Solov’evaL.V.PlekhanovaM.N.2003Karyotype of blue honeysuckle species (Lonicera subset. CaeruleaeCaprifoliaceae. Tsitol. Genet.373442(in Russian with English summary)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SoltisD.E.SoltisP.S.BennettM.D.LeitchI.J.2003Evolution of genome size in the angiospermsAmer. J. Bot.9015961603

  • StebbinsG.L.1971Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. Edward Arnold London UK

  • SudaJ.KrahulcováA.TravničekP.KrahulecF.2006Ploidy level versus DNA ploidy level: An appeal for consistent terminologyTaxon55447450

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • TrutaE.VochitaG.RosuC.M.ZamfiracheM.M.OlteanuZ.OpricaL.2013Karyotype traits in Romanian selections of edible blue honeysuckleTurk. J. Biol.376068

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • VallèsJ.PellicerJ.SánchezjiménezI.HidalgoO.VitalesD.GarciaS.MartínJ.GarnatjeT.2012Polyploidy and other changes at chromosomal level and in genome size: Its role in systematics and evolution exemplified by some genera of Anthemideae and Cardueae (Asteraceae)Taxon61841851

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • van SteenisC.G.G.J.1946Preliminary revision of the genus Lonicera in MalaysiaJ. Arnold Arbor.27442452

  • WangF.WangB.2005Karyotype analysis of Lonicera japonica and L. maackiiChin. Med. Mat.28168170(in Chinese with English summary)

  • WangX.ChenJ.LiY.NieQ.LiJ.2009An efficient procedure for regeneration from leaf derived calluses of Lonicera macranthoides ‘Jincuilei’, an important medicinal plantHortScience44746750

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WangX.ChenJ.LiY.ZengH.CaiN.QiaoZ.2013Lonicera macranthoides ‘Huayao-Wanshu’HortScience4810621064

  • WangZ.T.2014The chromosome karyotype and evolution of Lonicera syringantha MaximHubei Agr. Sci.5310751077(in Chinese with English summary)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WuG.LiM.ZhongF.FuC.SunJ.YuL.2011aLonicera confuse has an anatomical mechanism to respond to calcium-rich environmentPlant Soil338343353

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WuX.MeiS.M.ZhengL.WangY.2011bChromosome and karyotype analysis of Lonicera japonica var. chinensisCentral South Pharm.9416419(in Chinese with English summary)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • YanQ.J.ZouL.J.TianT.T.WangL.ShenX.L.LuoM.H.2014Karyotype analysis of three Lonicera species growth in SichuanChin. Med. Mat.37384387(in Chinese with English summary)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • YangH.YuanB.LiL.ChenH.LiF.2004HPLC determination of pharmacokinetics of chlorogenic acid in rabbit plasma after an oral dose of flos lonicerae extractJ. Chromatogr. Sci.42173176

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • YangJ.LiX.L.LiN.HeA.T.ChenS.2011The karyotype comparative analysis of the wild species and cultivars of Lonicera japonicaHubei Agr. Sci.50328331(in Chinese with English summary)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ZarcoR.C.1986A new method for estimating karyotype asymmetryTaxon35526530

  • ZengH.LiY.ChenJ.WangX.QianZ.LiY.CaiN.LiuS.2017Lonicera japonica ‘Fenglei’HortScience52789791

  • ZhangL.P.JiaS.H.XuZ.K.ZhuZ.F.LuoS.ChenC.B.2017Karyotype analysis of six cultivars of Lonicera japonica ThunbBeifang Yuanyi6103107(in Chinese with English summary)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ZhangW.HaoH.MaL.ZhaoC.YuX.2010Tetraploid muskmelon alters morphological characteristics and improves fruit qualitySci. Hort.125396400

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ZhangZ.Y.ZhouZ.K.GuZ.J.2002Karyomorphology of heptacodium (Caprifoliaceae s.str.) and its phylogenetic implicationsTaxon51499505

  • ZhengLMeiS.M.WangZ.XiaoC.Y.2007Karyotype analysis of Lonicera japonica var. chinensisJ. Huaihua Med. College63537 (in Chinese)

  • ZonneveldB.J.LeitchI.J.BennettM.D.2005First nuclear DNA amounts in more than 300 angiospermsAnn. Bot. (Lond.)96229244

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

Contributor Notes

This study was supported in part by the research and demonstration project on the regulation of vegetative and reproductive growth of honeysuckle plants funded by the Hunan Province Science and Technology Innovation Programs for Renewal and Development of the Chinese Herbal Medicine Industry.

Corresponding authors. E-mail: jjchen@ufl.edu or nhxia@scib.ac.cn.

  • View in gallery

    Somatic chromosomes at mitotic metaphase of Lonicera cultivars. (A) Lonicera japonica ‘Jinfeng 1’; (B) L. japonica ‘Jiufeng 1’; (C) Lonicera macranthoides; (D) L. macranthoides ‘Baiyun’; (E) L. macranthoides ‘Longhua’; (F) L. macranthoides ‘Jincuilei’; (G) Lonicera periclymenum ‘Graham Thomas’; (H) Lonicera sempervirens ‘Major Wheeler’; (I) L. sempervirens ‘Crimson Cascade’; (J) L. sempervirens ‘John Clayton’; (K) L. sempervirens ‘Magnifera’. Scale bar = 10 μm.

  • View in gallery

    Karyotypes of different Lonicera cultivars, part I. (A) Lonicera japonica ‘Jinfeng 1’; (B) L. japonica ‘Jiufeng 1’; (C) Lonicera macranthoides; (D) L. macranthoides ‘Baiyun’; (E) L. macranthoides ‘Longhua’; (F) L. macranthoides ‘Jincuilei’. Scale bar = 10 μm.

  • View in gallery

    Karyotypes of different Lonicera cultivars, part II. (A) Lonicera sempervirens ‘Major Wheeler’; (B) L. sempervirens ‘Crimson Cascade’; (C) L. sempervirens ‘John Clayton’; (D) L. sempervirens ‘Magnifera’. Scale bar = 10 μm.

  • AmmalE.K.J.SaundersB.1952Chromosome numbers in species of LoniceraKew Bul.7539541

  • BediY.S.BirS.S.GillB.S.1982Cytological studies in certain woody members of family CaprifoliaceaeJ. Tree Sci.12734

  • Benko-IsepponA.M.MorawetzW.2000Viburnales: Cytological features and a new circumscriptionTaxon49516

  • BennettM.D.1998Plant genome values: How much do we knowProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA9520112016

  • BennettM.D.BhandolP.LeitchI.J.2000Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms and their modern uses: 807 new estimatesAnn. Bot. (Lond.)86859909

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BennettM.D.LeitchI.J.2005Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms-progress, problems and prospectsAnn. Bot. (Lond.)954590

  • BennettM.D.LeitchI.J.2011Nuclear DNA amounts in angiosperms: Targets, trends and tomorrowAnn. Bot. (Lond.)107467590

  • BennettM.D.LeitchI.J.2012Plant DNA C-values database (release 6.0 Dec. 2012)

  • ChenJ.WangX.CaiN.LiY.ZengH.QiaoZ.2013‘Longhua’ LoniceraHortScience48652653

  • ChenS.J.ChenZ.Y.HuangX.X.HuangS.F.WangY.Q.ZhaoZ.F.1990Fifty taxa chromosome countsGuahaia103337(in Chinese with English summary)

  • CuiJ.ChenJ.HennyR.J.2009Regeneration of Aeschynanthus radicans via direct somatic embryogenesis and analysis of regenerants with flow cytometryIn Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant453443

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DendaT.KojaA.YokotaM.2007Chromosomal studies of insular endemic Lonicera japonica Thunb. var. miyagusukiana Makino (Caprifoliaceae) in the Ryukyu Archipelago of JapanCaryologia60331337

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DolezelJ.BartosJ.2005Plant DNA flow cytometry and estimation of nuclear genome sizeAnn. Bot.9599110

  • GeorgesD.DecourtyeL.OchattS.J.1992Biotechnological breeding of ornamental honeysuckles (Lonicera, Caprifoliaceae)Acta Hort.320127132

  • GorchovD.L.TriselD.E.2003Competitive effects of the invasive shrub, Lonicera maackii (Rupr.) Herder (Caprifoliaceae), on the growth and survival of native tree seedlingsPlant Ecol.1661324

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GreilhuberJ.DoleželJ.LysákM.A.BennettM.D.2005The origin, evolution and proposed stabilization of the terms ‘Genome Size’ and ‘C-Value’ to describe nuclear DNA contentsAnn. Bot. (Lond.)95255260

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GuoZ.H.WangM.LiS.X.1993A study on the idiogram of honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica)J. Hebei Agr. Univ.163335(in Chinese with English summary)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HuK.J.SunK.X.WangJ.L.2001Inhibited effect of chlorogenic acid on virus in vitroJ. Harbin Med. Univ.35430432(in Chinese)

  • IPCN (Index to Plant Chromosome Number)2017IPCN chromosome reports: Lonicera. Missouri Botanical Garden Saint Louis MO. 15 2017. 5 Oct. 2017. <http://www.tropicos.org/NameSearch.aspx?projectid=9>

  • LeD.LiuX.SunX.DingZ.DingF.LiangY.2014Effect of fertilizer on growth and yield of Lonicera japonica Thumb. cultivar Jiufeng 1Modern Agr. Technol.136365(in Chinese)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LeitchI.J.BennettM.D.2004Genome downsizing in polyploid plantsBiol. J. Linn. Soc.82651663

  • LevanA.FredgaK.SandbergA.A.1964Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomesHereditas52201220

  • LewisW.H.1980Polyploidy in species populations p. 103–147. In: W.H. Lewis (ed.). Polyploidy: Biological relevance. Plenum Press New York NY

  • LiX.L.YangJ.WangH.T.LiN.WangX.2009Optimization of chromosome mounting technique and karyotype analysis of tree Lonicera japonicaJ. Henan Agr. Sci.7102106(in Chinese with English summary)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LiY.CaiW.WengX.LiQ.WangY.ChenY.ZhangW.YangQ.GuoY.ZhuX.WangH.2015Lonicerae japonica flos and lonicera flos: A systematic pharmacology reviewEvid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med.2015905063

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Lima de FaríaA.1980Classification of genes, rearrangements and chromosomes according to the chromosome fieldHereditas93146

  • LinS.J.SasakiH.2011Cytological study of Lonicera (caprifoliaceae) in Shimane, JapanBul. Fac. Life Environ. Sci. Shimane Univ.1636(in Japanese with English summary)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LiuA.WangH.LeeS.M.WangY.DuG.2008Structure-activity relationship of flavonoids as influenza virus neuraminidase inhibitors and their in vitro anti-viral activitiesBioorg. Med. Chem.1671417147

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MadlungA.2013Polyploidy and its effect on evolutionary success: Old questions revisited with new toolsHeredity11099104

  • MeiS.M.ZhengL.WangZ.XiaoC.Y.2006Karyotype analysis of Lonicera macranthoidesJ. Huaihua Med. College57576 (in Chinese)

  • MiyashitaT.ArakiH.HoshinoY.2011Ploidy distribution and DNA content variations of Lonicera caerulea (Caprifoliaceae) in JapanJ. Plant Res.12419

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NaugžemysD.ŽilinskaitėS.DenkovskijJ.PatamsytėJ.LiterskisJ.ŽvingilaD.2007RAPD based study of genetic variation and relationships among Lonicera germplasm accessionsBiologija (Vilnius)533439

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Negrón-OrtizV.2007Chromosome numbers, nuclear DNA content, and polyploidy in Consolea (Cactaceae), an endemic cactus of the Caribbean islandsAmer. J. Bot.9413601370

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • OlszewskaM.J.OsieckaR.1984Relationship between 2C DNA content, systematic position and level of DNA endoreplication during differentiation of root parenchyma in dicot shrubs and trees: Comparison with herbaceous speciesBiochem. Physiol. Pflanz.179641657

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Plant DNA C-values Database2012RBG Kew DNA C-value query results: Lonicera. 15 Oct. 2017. <http://data.kew.org/cvalues/CvalServlet?querytype=2>

  • RadfordA.E.AhlesH.E.BellC.R.1968Manual of the vascular flora of the Carolinas. The University of North Carolina Press Chapel Hill NC

  • RehderA.1903Synopsis of the genus LoniceraMissouri Bot. Gard. Ann. Rpt.1427232

  • RüdenbergL.GreenP.S.1966A karyological survey of Lonicera, IJ. Arnold Arbor.47222247

  • SasnauskasA.StanienėG.GelvonauskienėD.SiksnianasT.StanysV.BobinasC.RugieniusR.BaniulisD.2007Morphological traits in Ribes nigrum polyploidsActa Hort.760405408

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SchierenbeckK.A.2004Japanese honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica) as an invasive species: History, ecology, and contextCrit. Rev. Plant Sci.23391400

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SchierenbeckK.A.HamrickJ.L.MackR.N.1995Comparison of allozyme variability in a native and an introduced species of LoniceraHeredity7519

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ShangX.PanH.LiM.MiaoX.DingH.2011Lonicera japonica Thunb.: Ethnopharmacology, phytochemistry and pharmacology of an important traditional Chinese medicineJ. Ethnopharmacol.138121

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Solov’evaL.V.PlekhanovaM.N.2003Karyotype of blue honeysuckle species (Lonicera subset. CaeruleaeCaprifoliaceae. Tsitol. Genet.373442(in Russian with English summary)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SoltisD.E.SoltisP.S.BennettM.D.LeitchI.J.2003Evolution of genome size in the angiospermsAmer. J. Bot.9015961603

  • StebbinsG.L.1971Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. Edward Arnold London UK

  • SudaJ.KrahulcováA.TravničekP.KrahulecF.2006Ploidy level versus DNA ploidy level: An appeal for consistent terminologyTaxon55447450

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • TrutaE.VochitaG.RosuC.M.ZamfiracheM.M.OlteanuZ.OpricaL.2013Karyotype traits in Romanian selections of edible blue honeysuckleTurk. J. Biol.376068

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • VallèsJ.PellicerJ.SánchezjiménezI.HidalgoO.VitalesD.GarciaS.MartínJ.GarnatjeT.2012Polyploidy and other changes at chromosomal level and in genome size: Its role in systematics and evolution exemplified by some genera of Anthemideae and Cardueae (Asteraceae)Taxon61841851

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • van SteenisC.G.G.J.1946Preliminary revision of the genus Lonicera in MalaysiaJ. Arnold Arbor.27442452

  • WangF.WangB.2005Karyotype analysis of Lonicera japonica and L. maackiiChin. Med. Mat.28168170(in Chinese with English summary)

  • WangX.ChenJ.LiY.NieQ.LiJ.2009An efficient procedure for regeneration from leaf derived calluses of Lonicera macranthoides ‘Jincuilei’, an important medicinal plantHortScience44746750

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WangX.ChenJ.LiY.ZengH.CaiN.QiaoZ.2013Lonicera macranthoides ‘Huayao-Wanshu’HortScience4810621064

  • WangZ.T.2014The chromosome karyotype and evolution of Lonicera syringantha MaximHubei Agr. Sci.5310751077(in Chinese with English summary)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WuG.LiM.ZhongF.FuC.SunJ.YuL.2011aLonicera confuse has an anatomical mechanism to respond to calcium-rich environmentPlant Soil338343353

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WuX.MeiS.M.ZhengL.WangY.2011bChromosome and karyotype analysis of Lonicera japonica var. chinensisCentral South Pharm.9416419(in Chinese with English summary)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • YanQ.J.ZouL.J.TianT.T.WangL.ShenX.L.LuoM.H.2014Karyotype analysis of three Lonicera species growth in SichuanChin. Med. Mat.37384387(in Chinese with English summary)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • YangH.YuanB.LiL.ChenH.LiF.2004HPLC determination of pharmacokinetics of chlorogenic acid in rabbit plasma after an oral dose of flos lonicerae extractJ. Chromatogr. Sci.42173176

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • YangJ.LiX.L.LiN.HeA.T.ChenS.2011The karyotype comparative analysis of the wild species and cultivars of Lonicera japonicaHubei Agr. Sci.50328331(in Chinese with English summary)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ZarcoR.C.1986A new method for estimating karyotype asymmetryTaxon35526530

  • ZengH.LiY.ChenJ.WangX.QianZ.LiY.CaiN.LiuS.2017Lonicera japonica ‘Fenglei’HortScience52789791

  • ZhangL.P.JiaS.H.XuZ.K.ZhuZ.F.LuoS.ChenC.B.2017Karyotype analysis of six cultivars of Lonicera japonica ThunbBeifang Yuanyi6103107(in Chinese with English summary)

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ZhangW.HaoH.MaL.ZhaoC.YuX.2010Tetraploid muskmelon alters morphological characteristics and improves fruit qualitySci. Hort.125396400

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ZhangZ.Y.ZhouZ.K.GuZ.J.2002Karyomorphology of heptacodium (Caprifoliaceae s.str.) and its phylogenetic implicationsTaxon51499505

  • ZhengLMeiS.M.WangZ.XiaoC.Y.2007Karyotype analysis of Lonicera japonica var. chinensisJ. Huaihua Med. College63537 (in Chinese)

  • ZonneveldB.J.LeitchI.J.BennettM.D.2005First nuclear DNA amounts in more than 300 angiospermsAnn. Bot. (Lond.)96229244

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 165 164 0
Full Text Views 65 63 9
PDF Downloads 14 14 8