Blueberry Cultivar Identification Using Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA and Sequence-characterized Amplified Region Markers

in HortScience

Blueberry cultivars have traditionally been identified based on the evaluation of sets of morphological characters; however, distinguishing closely related cultivars remains difficult. In the present study, we developed DNA markers for the genetic fingerprinting of 45 blueberry cultivars, including 31 cultivars introduced from the United States Department of Agriculture. We obtained 210 random amplified of polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers using 43 different primers. The number of polymorphic bands ranged from three (OPG-10 and OPQ-04) to eight (OPR-16), with an average of five. A cluster analysis performed with the unweighted pair group method using arithmetic averages produced genetic similarity values among the blueberry cultivars ranging from 0.53 to 0.85, with an average similarity of 0.68. A dendrogram clustered the 45 blueberry cultivars into two main clusters, with a similarity value of 0.65. Cluster I consisted of four rabbiteye cultivars (Pink Lemonade, Alapaha, Titan, and Vernon) and the Ashworth northern highbush cultivar. Cluster II consisted of 31 northern highbush cultivars, eight southern highbush blueberry cultivars, and Northland half-highbush blueberry cultivar. Fifty five RAPD fragments selected were sequenced to develop sequence-characterized amplified region (SCAR) markers, resulting in the successful conversion of 16 of 55 fragments into SCAR markers. An amplified polymorphic band has the same size as the RAPD fragment or smaller according to the primer combinations in the 16 SCAR markers. Among these markers, a combination of 11 SCAR markers provided sufficient polymorphisms to distinguish the blueberry cultivars investigated in this study. These newly developed markers could be a fast and reliable tool to identify blueberry cultivars.

Abstract

Blueberry cultivars have traditionally been identified based on the evaluation of sets of morphological characters; however, distinguishing closely related cultivars remains difficult. In the present study, we developed DNA markers for the genetic fingerprinting of 45 blueberry cultivars, including 31 cultivars introduced from the United States Department of Agriculture. We obtained 210 random amplified of polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers using 43 different primers. The number of polymorphic bands ranged from three (OPG-10 and OPQ-04) to eight (OPR-16), with an average of five. A cluster analysis performed with the unweighted pair group method using arithmetic averages produced genetic similarity values among the blueberry cultivars ranging from 0.53 to 0.85, with an average similarity of 0.68. A dendrogram clustered the 45 blueberry cultivars into two main clusters, with a similarity value of 0.65. Cluster I consisted of four rabbiteye cultivars (Pink Lemonade, Alapaha, Titan, and Vernon) and the Ashworth northern highbush cultivar. Cluster II consisted of 31 northern highbush cultivars, eight southern highbush blueberry cultivars, and Northland half-highbush blueberry cultivar. Fifty five RAPD fragments selected were sequenced to develop sequence-characterized amplified region (SCAR) markers, resulting in the successful conversion of 16 of 55 fragments into SCAR markers. An amplified polymorphic band has the same size as the RAPD fragment or smaller according to the primer combinations in the 16 SCAR markers. Among these markers, a combination of 11 SCAR markers provided sufficient polymorphisms to distinguish the blueberry cultivars investigated in this study. These newly developed markers could be a fast and reliable tool to identify blueberry cultivars.

Blueberry belongs to the section Cyanococcus of the genus Vaccinium (Ericaceae) (Galletta and Ballington, 1996). The genus Vaccinium contains 400 species and has a mainly circumpolar distribution, with species present in North America, Europe, Asia, and Africa (Ratnaparkhe, 2007). The three major commercially grown blueberry types are highbush (Vaccinium corymbosum), lowbush (Vaccinium angustifolium), and rabbiteye (Vaccinium virgatum) (Ratnaparkhe, 2007). Highbush cultivars are further separated into northern and southern types depending on their chilling requirements and winterhardiness. Southern highbush blueberries are better adapted than northern highbush blueberries to warmer climates (Boches et al., 2006).

Blueberry fruit are among the richest known sources of antioxidants of all fresh fruits and vegetables (Prior et al., 1998). Blueberry cultivars have traditionally been identified based on morphological characters; commercial growers and breeders have difficulty identifying cultivars accurately (Aruna et al., 1995). Morphological characteristics are often influenced by environmental conditions and cultural factors. Therefore, accurate, fast, and reliable identification tools are required for the protection of plant cultivars and for practical breeding purposes. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based DNA markers have become useful in identifying cultivars, analyzing provenance studies, evaluating genetic diversity, and identifying the locations of quantitative trait loci.

Many comparative studies have been conducted to determine which techniques are most suitable and reliable for identifying cultivars (Powell et al., 1996). Representative techniques used for fruit tree species include RAPD, amplified fragment length polymorphisms, single sequence repeats (SSRs), and inter simple sequence repeats (ISSRs) for DNA fingerprinting. The choice of a DNA marker depends on the scale and purpose of cultivar identification; several different DNA marker types have been applied to identify blueberry cultivars and analyze their genetic relationships (Aruna et al., 1995; Bian et al., 2014; Boches et al., 2006; Haghighi and Hancock, 1992; Levi and Rowland, 1997; Rowland and Dhanaraj, 2003). Among DNA-based markers, RAPD markers are easy, simple, and inexpensive to apply. The greatest advantage of the RAPD approach is its technical simplicity, paired with the independence of any prior DNA sequence information (Mu et al., 2012). RAPD markers have been used for the DNA fingerprinting of representative selections and cultivars of the three major commercially grown blueberry types (Aruna et al., 1995; Burgher et al., 2002; Levi and Rowland, 1997). The use of short primers and low annealing temperatures make RAPD markers extremely sensitive to slight changes in reaction conditions (Goulão et al., 2001); the use of RAPD has also been restricted in practical applications because of poor reproducibility and competitive priming (Li and Park, 2012; Williams et al., 1993). To overcome these problems, SCAR markers have been generated by cloning and sequencing RAPD fragments of interest and designing long primers complementary to the ends of the original RAPD fragments (Paran and Michelmore, 1993). The specificity and stability of RAPD markers can be greatly improved by their conversion into SCAR markers. SCAR markers have been used to identify the cultivars of many fruit species, including apple, grapevine, sweet cherry, and olive (Bautista et al., 2002; Hernández et al., 2001; Turkec et al., 2006; Vidal et al., 2000; Xu et al., 2001). In the present study, we developed a reliable PCR-based technique for the identification of blueberry cultivars.

Materials and Methods

Plant material and DNA extraction.

A total of 45 blueberry cultivars, including 31 cultivars introduced from the United States Department of Agriculture, were used for genomic DNA analysis (Table 1). All plants were maintained at the National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science of the Rural Development Administration, Wanju, South Korea. Total genomic DNA was extracted from the young leaves of blueberries using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The quantity and quality of the DNA obtained were assessed using a NanoDrop (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL) and 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis. A working solution of 5 ng·μL−1 genomic DNA was prepared for PCR analysis.

Table 1.

Blueberry cultivars used in this study, including their parentages and types.

Table 1.

RAPD analysis.

To identify suitable primers for this study, four cultivars (Bluejay, Duke, Pioneer, and Spartan) were tested with 250 Operon (Operon Technologies, Alameda, CA) and UBC (University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC) primers. We selected 43 PCR primers from data conducted on four cultivars based on their ability to produce clear and repeatable polymorphic bands. These primers were used to obtain genotype-specific RAPD markers. PCR reactions for RAPD were performed in a 12.5-μL reaction mixture containing 20 ng template DNA, 1 × PCR buffer, 0.36 μm random primer, 200 μm each of deoxynucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs: dATP, dTTP, dGTP, and dCTP), 3 mm MgCl2, and 0.5 units of Taq DNA polymerase (Genetbio, Daejeon, South Korea). Amplifications were performed in a thermal cycler (C1000; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) with the following cycle parameters: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 4 min; 10 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 45 s, 37 °C for 45 s, and 72 °C for 2 min; and then 35 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 45 s, 42 °C for 45 s, and 72 °C for 2 min. The final extension was at 72 °C for 10 min. The amplified products were analyzed with 1.4% agarose gel electrophoresis in 0.5× Tris-borate-EDTA buffer (45 mm Tris-borate, 1 mm EDTA, pH 8.0) at 150 V for 3 h and visualized by ultraviolet illumination after ethidium bromide staining. The amplified bands for all individuals were then scored as 1 (present) or 0 (absent) to determine genetic relationships. Genetic similarity was estimated using a simple matching coefficient (Sokal and Michener, 1958) and MultiVariate Statistical Package Ver. 3.13 (Kovach Computing Services, Wales, UK). A dendrogram was constructed by cluster analysis using the unweighted pair group method of arithmetic averages (UPGMA).

Cloning of RAPD fragments and sequencing.

Selected cultivar-specific RAPD bands were excised with a sterile cutter from agarose gel. The extracts were purified with a QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen) and cloned into the pCR2.1-TOPO vector with a TOPO TA Cloning Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). After cloning, five white colonies from each transformation were selected and cultured overnight in 5 mL Luria–Bertani liquid medium (trypton 10 g·L−1, NaCl 5 g·L−1, and yeast extract 5 g·L−1) containing 100 μg·mL−1 ampicillin. Plasmid DNAs were isolated using a QIAprep-spin Plasmid Miniprep Kit (Qiagen) and sequenced on an ABI 3730xl DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).

Designing of SCAR primers and PCR analysis.

Based on sequence data, specific primers (22–27 mer) were designed using Primer3Plus (http://www.bioinformatics.nl/cgi-bin/primer3plus/primer3plus.cgi/). Some of these primers included the original 10-mer sequence of the RAPD primer used for amplification. For each RAPD marker, four oligonucleotides were designed for use as SCAR primers. PCR was used to amplify cultivar-specific bands in a 15-μL reaction mixture of 20 ng template DNA, 1× PCR buffer, 0.5 μm forward and reverse primers, 200 μm of each dNTP, and 0.5 units of Hot Start Taq DNA polymerase (Genetbio). The amplifications were performed with initial denaturation at 94 °C for 10 min; followed by 30 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 63 to 65 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 1 min; and final extension at 72 °C for 5 min. The SCAR products were resolved electrophoretically in a 1.4% agarose gel.

Results and Discussion

Screening of specific RAPD fragments.

We observed different polymorphic bands in 43 random primers used in the RAPD analysis of 45 blueberry cultivars. In total, 210 distinct markers (200–1200 bp) were obtained from the RAPD analysis. The results obtained for each random primer are summarized in Table 2. The number of polymorphic bands ranged from three to eight, with five bands generated per primer on average. Five random primers (OPA-19, OPR-12, OPR-16, OPU-07, and UBC424) generated seven to eight discrete reproducible bands, whereas the OPA-09, OPG-10, and OPQ-04 primers generated three polymorphic bands. Burgher et al. (2002) reported that 11 primers produced 73 polymorphic RAPD bands among 26 lowbush blueberry cultivars. Carvalho et al. (2014) obtained 118 polymorphic bands using 10 selected primers among 10 highbush blueberry cultivars. Thus, the number of polymorphic bands in our study was smaller than those found in similar studies; the different number of polymorphic bands selected might account for using different primers and the genetic diversity in our blueberry cultivars. In this study, unambiguous amplified DNA bands were chosen carefully and scored for cultivar identification to ensure the absence of artifacts. An example of the RAPD patterns generated with the UBC168 primer is shown in Fig. 1. An approximately 590-bp polymorphic band has been amplified from Patriot, Pink Lemonade, and Titan blueberry cultivars. Aruna et al. (1995) developed a cultivar hierarchical key for the identification of 19 rabbiteye cultivars based on 11 RAPD markers amplified from four RAPD primers (OPC12, OPC17, OPG09, and OPG12). Arce-Johnson et al. (2002) used two RAPD primers to identify the five most important Chilean highbush cultivars. RAPD analysis can be used to identify many useful polymorphisms rapidly and efficiently, and has tremendous potential for cultivar identification (Lu et al., 1996). However, the reproducibility of this technique is affected by many factors, such as experimental conditions (Muralidharan and Wakeland, 1993; Scarano and Rao, 2014). The lack of reproducibility is a pitfall to cultivar identification in routine procedures and to data exchange among laboratories (Büscher et al., 1993). Despite such drawbacks, RAPD is still used widely in cultivar identification and cloning and for genetic analysis of many crops (El-Sayed et al., 2011; Mu et al., 2012; Yu et al., 2013). Among the polymorphic bands, 55 amplified DNA bands (<1000 bp) were selected as RAPD markers to identify the cultivars and for use in subsequent analyses.

Table 2.

Random amplified polymorphic DNA primers used in this study, their sequences, and the numbers of polymorphic fragments produced.

Table 2.
Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

Random amplified polymorphic DNA profiles of 45 blueberry cultivars amplified using UBC168 primer. Lane numbers represent blueberry cultivars as shown in Table 1. M: 100 bp plus DNA ladder.

Citation: HortScience horts 52, 11; 10.21273/HORTSCI12105-17

Cluster analysis.

A dendrogram was constructed to show genetic relationships among the 45 blueberry cultivars based on RAPD data (Fig. 2). A total of 210 RAPD markers were used to calculate simple matching coefficients for cluster analysis by UPGMA. Genetic similarity coefficient values ranged from 0.53 to 0.85, with an average similarity value of 0.68. The degree of similarity was highest (0.85) between ‘Pioneer’ and ‘Olympia’, which is a progeny of ‘Pioneer’, and lowest (0.53) between the northern highbush cultivar Herbert and the rabbiteye cultivar Vernon. The 45 blueberry cultivars were divided into two clusters with a similarity value of 0.65. Cluster I consisted of four rabbiteye cultivars (Pink Lemonade, Alapaha, Titan, and Vernon) and the northern highbush cultivar Ashworth. Most commercially important improved rabbiteye cultivars were developed from only four original native selections from the wild (Aruna et al., 1993). Thus, many rabbiteye cultivars are closely related by lineage. ‘Ashworth’ is a wild selection and has been used as a parent in breeding for hardiness and earliness (Darrow et al., 1960). Bian et al. (2014) used SSR markers to determine that ‘Ashworth’ clusters near lowbush blueberry accessions and is distinct from other highbush accessions. Cluster II consisted of 31 northern highbush cultivars, eight southern highbush blueberry cultivars, and ‘Northland’ half-highbush blueberry cultivar. Among the eight southern highbush blueberry cultivars, Rebel, Star, and Meadowlark clustered together. The northern highbush blueberry cultivars Burlington and Duke clustered with Duke progeny Elliot and Draper, respectively. ‘Brigitta Blue’ clustered with its progeny ‘Aurora’ and ‘Liberty’. Most blueberry cultivars with common parents clustered together and reflected the genetic contributions of their parentage in the dendrogram. Carvalho et al. (2014) clearly separated 10 highbush blueberry cultivars into northern and southern highbush blueberry types using RAPD and ISSR markers. However, northern and southern highbush blueberry cultivars were not clearly separated in this study, and some southern highbush blueberry cultivars clustered with northern highbush blueberry cultivars. The ‘Georgiagem’ southern highbush blueberry clustered among the northern highbush blueberry cultivars, as reported previously (Boches et al., 2006). According to Brevis et al. (2008), southern highbush blueberry cultivars exhibit similar levels of molecular relatedness to historical northern highbush blueberry cultivars. Thus, southern highbush blueberry cultivars are less genetically diverse than previously thought. The accuracy of genetic similarity estimates depends on the number of markers analyzed and their distribution within the genome (Messmer et al., 1993). Further study is needed to analyze genetic relationships among blueberry cultivars more precisely using additional RAPD and other markers.

Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

Dendrogram of 45 blueberry cultivars based on genetic similarity values obtained from random amplified polymorphic DNA data. Scale indicates genetic similarity values.

Citation: HortScience horts 52, 11; 10.21273/HORTSCI12105-17

Conversion of selected RAPD fragments into SCAR markers.

The sequences of the 55 polymorphic fragments identified in this study were determined to convert RAPD markers into SCAR markers. Based on these sequence data, we synthesized specific primer sets to amplify the internal polymorphic fragment region. Of the 55 reproducible RAPD markers, 16 were converted successfully to more specific dominant SCAR markers. Some primer sets resulted in a failure of PCR amplification, whereas others produced unclear polymorphisms (data not shown). SCAR markers were amplified in a single band and were suitable for presence/absence screening by agarose gel electrophoresis. The developed SCAR primer sequences, annealing temperature, and amplicon size are summarized in Table 3. The sequence results showed that the UBC333_561 RAPD fragment had a size of 561 bp and contained the original sequences of the UBC333 primer at the ends of the cloned RAPD fragment. These results clearly demonstrated that the cloned fragment was derived from the amplified RAPD product. The SCAR marker derived from the UBC333_561 RAPD fragment was designated B333_561. A 561-bp fragment was amplified in the cultivars Alapaha, Aron, Berkeley, Bluejay, Brigitta Blue, Camellia, Concord, Emerald, Huron, Ivanhoe, Legacy, Meadowlark, Patriot, Pemberton, Pioneer, Rubel, and Spartan using the B333_561 SCAR marker (Table 4; Fig. 3A). Compared with the RAPD marker, the B333_561 marker amplified using a specific primer set was more useful because only the differential DNA was amplified, making the identification of blueberry cultivars easy. Furthermore, the application of stringent PCR conditions that exclude competition between primer binding sites results in reliable and reproducible bands that are less sensitive to reaction conditions. A single polymorphic band of the same size as the RAPD fragment or smaller was amplified by a combination of primers. The B268_668 SCAR marker produced a 668-bp band in the cultivars Alapaha, Aron, Ashworth, Aurora, Bluejay, Bluetta, Brigitta Blue, Camellia, Chandler, Dixi, Elliot, Herbert, Huron, Laniera, Legacy, Meadowlark, Misty, Olympia, Pacific, Patriot, Pink Lemonade, Sierra, Star, Titan, and Vernon (Table 4; Fig. 3B). The BF07_502 SCAR marker produced a single 502-bp fragment in the cultivars Alapaha and Titan, as expected from the sequence data. The B504_416 SCAR marker was produced only in the Bluetta cultivar. The 16 developed SCAR markers generated two (June cultivar) to 11 (Aron cultivar) bands in the 45 blueberry cultivars (Table 4). The Duke cultivar had four bands of B268_262, BE17_354, BR09_465, and BR09_612 SCAR markers. The Spartan cultivar had seven bands of BE12_175, BE17_354, BR09_465, B333_561, BN03_637, BN07_727, and BE17_831 SCAR markers. A subset of smaller markers is needed for increased efficiency in cultivar identification. The application of 11 SCAR markers (BE12_175, BE17_354, BR09_465, BF07_502, B333_561, BR09_612, BN03_637, B268_668, BN07_727, B550_750, and BE17_831) was sufficient to distinguish the 45 blueberry cultivars according to the present or absent and size of PCR product bands.

Table 3.

Sequence-characterized amplified region (SCAR) primer pairs derived from cloned random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) marker sequences.

Table 3.
Table 4.

Result of polymerase chain reaction for 16 sequence-characterized amplified region (SCAR) markers and 45 blueberry cultivars.

Table 4.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.

Amplified fragment patterns of (A) B333_561 and (B) B268_668 sequence-characterized amplified region (SCAR) markers in 45 blueberry cultivars. Arrows indicate SCAR markers. Lane numbers represent blueberry cultivars as shown in Table 1. M: 100 bp plus DNA ladder.

Citation: HortScience horts 52, 11; 10.21273/HORTSCI12105-17

Of the 55 RAPD markers sequenced, 16 SCAR markers were developed in this study. Some SCAR primer sets experienced the loss of polymorphism or amplification of multiple bands. The low percentage of SCAR marker conversion (29%) was presumably caused by the selection of polymorphic RAPD bands that contained multiple fragments of identical molecular weight in the ethidium bromide–stained agarose gels (Paran and Michelmore, 1993). Only reproducible RAPD bands should be selected under high-resolution electrophoresis, and these bands should be cloned and sequenced to allow for the design of specific primers (Bernet et al., 2003). Furthermore, SCAR markers often fail to reveal original polymorphisms because the original RAPD polymorphisms are caused by mismatches in one or more nucleotides at the priming sites. Similar results have been reported in cranberry (Polashock and Vorsa, 2002), apple (Cho et al., 2010) and grapevine (Vidal et al., 2000) cultivars. Success rates of ≈25% have been reported for the ability of selected RAPD bands to produce useful multiplex SCAR primer sets in cranberry cultivars (Polashock and Vorsa, 2002). Vidal et al. (2000) reported that five putative genotype-specific RAPD markers have been sequenced in grapevine cultivars, and only two primer pairs produced a specific SCAR marker among the 30 sequence-specific primers.

In this study, 16 novel SCAR markers were developed by cloning and sequencing cultivar-specific RAPD bands. A subset of smaller markers was sufficient to identify blueberry cultivars with a high level of accuracy. These SCAR markers can be applied in large-scale screening because they are cost effective, highly reproducible, and easy to use without elaborate electrophoresis methods. We expect that our SCAR markers will complement traditional morphological descriptors used to register new cultivars. The SCAR marker system developed in this study will enable the certification of vegetatively propagated blueberry cultivars.

Literature Cited

  • Arce-JohnsonP.RiosM.ZunigaM.VergaraE.2002Identification of blueberry varieties using random amplified polymorphic DNA markersActa Hort.574221224

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ArunaM.AustinM.E.Ozias-AkinsP.1995Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA fingerprinting for identifying rabbiteye blueberry (Vaccinium ashei Reade) cultivarsJ. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.120710713

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ArunaM.Ozias-AkinsP.AustinM.E.KochertG.1993Genetic relatedness among rabbiteye blueberry (Vaccinium ashei) cultivars determined by DNA amplification using single primers of arbitrary sequenceGenome36710713

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BautistaR.CrespilloR.CánovasF.M.ClarosM.G.2002Identification of olive-tree cultivars with SCAR markersEuphytica1293341

  • BernetG.P.BramardiS.CalvacheD.CarbonellE.A.AsinsM.J.2003Applicability of molecular markers in the context of protection of new varieties of cucumberPlant Breed.122146152

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BianY.BallingtonJ.RajaA.BrouwerC.ReidR.BurkeM.WangX.RowlandL.J.BassilN.BrownA.2014Patterns of simple sequence repeats in cultivated blueberries (Vaccinium section Cyanococcus spp.) and their use in revealing genetic diversity and population structureMol. Breed.34675689

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BochesP.BassilN.V.RowlandL.2006Genetic diversity in the highbush blueberry evaluated with microsatellite markersJ. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.131674686

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BrevisP.A.BassilN.V.BallingtonJ.R.HancockJ.F.2008Impact of wide hybridization on highbush blueberry breedingJ. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.133427437

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BurgherK.L.JamiesonA.R.LuX.2002Genetic relationship among lowbush blueberry genotypes as determined by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysisJ. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.12798103

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BüscherN.ZyprianE.BlaichR.1993Identification of grapevine cultivars by DNA analyses: Pitfalls of random amplified polymorphic DNA techniques using 10-mer primersVitis32187188

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CarvalhoM.MatosM.CarnideV.2014Fingerprinting of Vaccinium corymbosum cultivars using DNA of fruitsHortScience4175184

  • ChoK.H.HeoS.KimH.R.KimJ.H.ShinI.S.HanS.E.KimS.E.KimD.H.2010Discrimination of Korean apple cultivars using combination of RAPD-SCAR markersKor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol.28828835

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DarrowG.M.WhittonL.ScottD.H.1960The Ashworth blueberry as a parent in breeding for hardiness and earlinessJ. Fruit Var. Hort. Digest144346

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • El-SayedN.E.HashadM.M.ShaabanM.M.2011Molecular characterization and discrimination among grapevine cultivars by RAPD markersAustral. J. Basic Appl. Sci.5230235

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GallettaG.J.BallingtonJ.R.1996Blueberries cranberries and lingonberries p. 1–107. In: J. Janick and J.N. Moore (eds.). Fruit breeding Vol. II: Vine and small fruit crops. Prentice Hall New York NY

  • GoulãoL.CabritaL.OliveiraC.M.LeitãoJ.M.2001Comparing RAPD and AFLP™ analysis in discrimination and estimation of genetic similarities among apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) cultivarsEuphytica119259270

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HaghighiK.HancockJ.F.1992DNA restriction fragment length variability in the genomes of highbush blueberryHortScience274447

  • HernándezP.de la RosaR.RalloL.DoradoG.MartínA.2001Development of SCAR markers in olive (Olea europaea) by direct sequencing of RAPD products: Applications in olive germplasm evaluation and mappingTheor. Appl. Genet.103788791

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LeviA.RowlandL.J.1997Identifying blueberry cultivars and evaluating their genetic relationships using randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and simple sequence repeat- (SSR-) anchored primersJ. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.1227478

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LiG.ParkY.-J.2012SCAR markers for discriminating species of two genera of medical plants, Liriope and OphiopogonGenet. Mol. Res.1129872996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LuZ.X.ReighardG.L.BairdW.V.AbbottA.G.RajapakesS.1996Identification of peach rootstock cultivars by RAPD markersHortScience31127129

  • MessmerM.M.MelchingerA.E.HerrmannR.G.BoppenmaierJ.1993Relationship among early European maize inbreds. II. Comparison of pedigree and RFLP dataCrop Sci.33944950

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MuQ.SunX.ZhongG.WangX.SongC.FangJ.2012Employment of a new strategy for identification of lemon (Citrus limon L.) cultivars using RAPD markersAfr. J. Agr. Res.720752082

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MuralidharanK.WakelandE.K.1993Concentration of primer and template qualitatively affects products in random-amplified polymorphic DNA PCRBiotechniques14362364

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ParanI.MichelmoreR.W.1993Development of reliable PCR-based markers linked to downy mildew resistance genes in lettuceTheor. Appl. Genet.85985993

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PolashockJ.J.VorsaN.2002Deveolpment of SCAR markers for DNA fingerprinting and germplasm analysis of American cranberryJ. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.127677684

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PowellW.MorganteM.AndreC.HanafeyM.VogelJ.TingeyS.RafalskiA.1996The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP, and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysisMol. Breed.2225238

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PriorR.L.CaoG.MartineA.SoficE.McEwenJ.O’BrienC.LischnerN.EhlenfeldtM.KaltW.KrewerG.MainlandC.M.1998Antioxidant capacity as influenced by total phenolics and anthocyanin content, maturity and variety of Vaccinium speciesJ. Agr. Food Chem.4626862693

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RatnaparkheM.B.2007Genome mapping and molecular breeding in plants p. 217–227. In: C. Kole (ed.). Vol. 4: Fruits and nuts. Univ. Penn. State PA.

  • RowlandL.J.DhanarajA.L.2003Utility of blueberry-derived EST-PCR primers in related Ericaceae speciesHortScience3814281432

  • ScaranoD.RaoR.2014DNA markers for food products authenticationDiversity6579596

  • SokalRR.MichenerC.D.1958A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. Univ. Kans. Sci. Bull. 38:1409–1438.

  • TurkecA.SayarM.HeinzeB.2006Identification of sweet cherry cultivars (Prunus avium L.) and analysis of their genetic relationships by chloroplast sequence-characterised amplified regions (cpSCAR)Genet. Resources Crop Evol.5316351641

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • VidalJ.R.DelavaultP.CoarerM.DefontaineA.2000Design of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivar-specific SCAR primers for PCR fingerprintingTheor. Appl. Genet.10111941201

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WilliamsJ.G.K.HanafeyM.K.RafalskiJ.A.TingeyS.V.1993Genetic analysis using random amplified polymorphic markersMethods Enzymol.218704740

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • XuM.HuarachaE.KorbanS.S.2001Development of sequence-characterized amplified regions (SCARs) from amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers tightly linked to the Vf gene in appleGenome446370

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • YuM.ChuJ.MaR.ShenZ.FangJ.2013A novel strategy for the identification of 73 Prunus domestica cultivars using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markersAfr. J. Agr. Res.8243250

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

Contributor Notes

This work was carried out with the support of “Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development (Project No. PJ01022805)” Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Corresponding author. E-mail: khc7027@korea.kr.

  • View in gallery

    Random amplified polymorphic DNA profiles of 45 blueberry cultivars amplified using UBC168 primer. Lane numbers represent blueberry cultivars as shown in Table 1. M: 100 bp plus DNA ladder.

  • View in gallery

    Dendrogram of 45 blueberry cultivars based on genetic similarity values obtained from random amplified polymorphic DNA data. Scale indicates genetic similarity values.

  • View in gallery

    Amplified fragment patterns of (A) B333_561 and (B) B268_668 sequence-characterized amplified region (SCAR) markers in 45 blueberry cultivars. Arrows indicate SCAR markers. Lane numbers represent blueberry cultivars as shown in Table 1. M: 100 bp plus DNA ladder.

  • Arce-JohnsonP.RiosM.ZunigaM.VergaraE.2002Identification of blueberry varieties using random amplified polymorphic DNA markersActa Hort.574221224

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ArunaM.AustinM.E.Ozias-AkinsP.1995Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA fingerprinting for identifying rabbiteye blueberry (Vaccinium ashei Reade) cultivarsJ. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.120710713

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ArunaM.Ozias-AkinsP.AustinM.E.KochertG.1993Genetic relatedness among rabbiteye blueberry (Vaccinium ashei) cultivars determined by DNA amplification using single primers of arbitrary sequenceGenome36710713

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BautistaR.CrespilloR.CánovasF.M.ClarosM.G.2002Identification of olive-tree cultivars with SCAR markersEuphytica1293341

  • BernetG.P.BramardiS.CalvacheD.CarbonellE.A.AsinsM.J.2003Applicability of molecular markers in the context of protection of new varieties of cucumberPlant Breed.122146152

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BianY.BallingtonJ.RajaA.BrouwerC.ReidR.BurkeM.WangX.RowlandL.J.BassilN.BrownA.2014Patterns of simple sequence repeats in cultivated blueberries (Vaccinium section Cyanococcus spp.) and their use in revealing genetic diversity and population structureMol. Breed.34675689

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BochesP.BassilN.V.RowlandL.2006Genetic diversity in the highbush blueberry evaluated with microsatellite markersJ. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.131674686

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BrevisP.A.BassilN.V.BallingtonJ.R.HancockJ.F.2008Impact of wide hybridization on highbush blueberry breedingJ. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.133427437

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BurgherK.L.JamiesonA.R.LuX.2002Genetic relationship among lowbush blueberry genotypes as determined by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysisJ. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.12798103

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BüscherN.ZyprianE.BlaichR.1993Identification of grapevine cultivars by DNA analyses: Pitfalls of random amplified polymorphic DNA techniques using 10-mer primersVitis32187188

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CarvalhoM.MatosM.CarnideV.2014Fingerprinting of Vaccinium corymbosum cultivars using DNA of fruitsHortScience4175184

  • ChoK.H.HeoS.KimH.R.KimJ.H.ShinI.S.HanS.E.KimS.E.KimD.H.2010Discrimination of Korean apple cultivars using combination of RAPD-SCAR markersKor. J. Hort. Sci. Technol.28828835

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DarrowG.M.WhittonL.ScottD.H.1960The Ashworth blueberry as a parent in breeding for hardiness and earlinessJ. Fruit Var. Hort. Digest144346

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • El-SayedN.E.HashadM.M.ShaabanM.M.2011Molecular characterization and discrimination among grapevine cultivars by RAPD markersAustral. J. Basic Appl. Sci.5230235

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GallettaG.J.BallingtonJ.R.1996Blueberries cranberries and lingonberries p. 1–107. In: J. Janick and J.N. Moore (eds.). Fruit breeding Vol. II: Vine and small fruit crops. Prentice Hall New York NY

  • GoulãoL.CabritaL.OliveiraC.M.LeitãoJ.M.2001Comparing RAPD and AFLP™ analysis in discrimination and estimation of genetic similarities among apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) cultivarsEuphytica119259270

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HaghighiK.HancockJ.F.1992DNA restriction fragment length variability in the genomes of highbush blueberryHortScience274447

  • HernándezP.de la RosaR.RalloL.DoradoG.MartínA.2001Development of SCAR markers in olive (Olea europaea) by direct sequencing of RAPD products: Applications in olive germplasm evaluation and mappingTheor. Appl. Genet.103788791

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LeviA.RowlandL.J.1997Identifying blueberry cultivars and evaluating their genetic relationships using randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and simple sequence repeat- (SSR-) anchored primersJ. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.1227478

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LiG.ParkY.-J.2012SCAR markers for discriminating species of two genera of medical plants, Liriope and OphiopogonGenet. Mol. Res.1129872996

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LuZ.X.ReighardG.L.BairdW.V.AbbottA.G.RajapakesS.1996Identification of peach rootstock cultivars by RAPD markersHortScience31127129

  • MessmerM.M.MelchingerA.E.HerrmannR.G.BoppenmaierJ.1993Relationship among early European maize inbreds. II. Comparison of pedigree and RFLP dataCrop Sci.33944950

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MuQ.SunX.ZhongG.WangX.SongC.FangJ.2012Employment of a new strategy for identification of lemon (Citrus limon L.) cultivars using RAPD markersAfr. J. Agr. Res.720752082

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MuralidharanK.WakelandE.K.1993Concentration of primer and template qualitatively affects products in random-amplified polymorphic DNA PCRBiotechniques14362364

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ParanI.MichelmoreR.W.1993Development of reliable PCR-based markers linked to downy mildew resistance genes in lettuceTheor. Appl. Genet.85985993

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PolashockJ.J.VorsaN.2002Deveolpment of SCAR markers for DNA fingerprinting and germplasm analysis of American cranberryJ. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.127677684

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PowellW.MorganteM.AndreC.HanafeyM.VogelJ.TingeyS.RafalskiA.1996The comparison of RFLP, RAPD, AFLP, and SSR (microsatellite) markers for germplasm analysisMol. Breed.2225238

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PriorR.L.CaoG.MartineA.SoficE.McEwenJ.O’BrienC.LischnerN.EhlenfeldtM.KaltW.KrewerG.MainlandC.M.1998Antioxidant capacity as influenced by total phenolics and anthocyanin content, maturity and variety of Vaccinium speciesJ. Agr. Food Chem.4626862693

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RatnaparkheM.B.2007Genome mapping and molecular breeding in plants p. 217–227. In: C. Kole (ed.). Vol. 4: Fruits and nuts. Univ. Penn. State PA.

  • RowlandL.J.DhanarajA.L.2003Utility of blueberry-derived EST-PCR primers in related Ericaceae speciesHortScience3814281432

  • ScaranoD.RaoR.2014DNA markers for food products authenticationDiversity6579596

  • SokalRR.MichenerC.D.1958A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. Univ. Kans. Sci. Bull. 38:1409–1438.

  • TurkecA.SayarM.HeinzeB.2006Identification of sweet cherry cultivars (Prunus avium L.) and analysis of their genetic relationships by chloroplast sequence-characterised amplified regions (cpSCAR)Genet. Resources Crop Evol.5316351641

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • VidalJ.R.DelavaultP.CoarerM.DefontaineA.2000Design of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivar-specific SCAR primers for PCR fingerprintingTheor. Appl. Genet.10111941201

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WilliamsJ.G.K.HanafeyM.K.RafalskiJ.A.TingeyS.V.1993Genetic analysis using random amplified polymorphic markersMethods Enzymol.218704740

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • XuM.HuarachaE.KorbanS.S.2001Development of sequence-characterized amplified regions (SCARs) from amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers tightly linked to the Vf gene in appleGenome446370

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • YuM.ChuJ.MaR.ShenZ.FangJ.2013A novel strategy for the identification of 73 Prunus domestica cultivars using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markersAfr. J. Agr. Res.8243250

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 198 121 0
Full Text Views 251 182 5
PDF Downloads 35 28 2