U.S. Peach Producer Preference and Willingness to Pay for Fruit Attributes

in HortScience

This study investigates U.S. peach producers’ willingness to pay (WTP) for potential improvement of peach fruit attributes. Data were collected from 124 U.S. peach producers. The choice experiment and socioeconomic data were analyzed using mixed logit (ML) models to estimate the producer WTP and preferences for peach attributes. The results indicate that the WTP for attribute values vary across peach producers from different production regions (California and eastern United States), with different selling targets (fresh and processed) and different orchard sizes (smaller or larger than 15 acres). These results provide useful information for peach breeders in prioritizing traits in their breeding programs.

Contributor Notes

This research was funded by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Specialty Crop Research Initiative project “RosBREED: Enabling marker-assisted breeding in Rosaceae” (2009-51181-05808).

PhD Student.

Associate Professor and Bachman Endowed Chair in Horticultural Marketing.


Associate Professor and Extension Specialist.

Professor and Associate Director of Agricultural Research Center.


Professor and Director of Agricultural and Food Systems and Integrated Plant Sciences degree programs.

Corresponding author. E-mail: yuechy@umn.edu.

  • ChangJ.B.LuskJ.L.2011Mixed logit models: Accuracy and software choiceJ. Appl. Econ.26167172

  • CrisostoC.H.2002How do we increase peach consumption?Acta Hort.592601605

  • CrisostoC.H.2005Peach quality and postharvest technology. VI International Peach Symposium 713. p. 479–488

  • DandekarA.IezzoniA.2012The United States rosaceae genomics genetics and breeding initiative. 23 Aug. 2015. <http://www.rosaceae.org/>.

  • DayK.R.KlonskyK.M.De MouraR.L.2009Sample costs to establish and produce peaches. University of California Cooperative Extension. 10 Jan. 2016. <http://coststudyfiles.ucdavis.edu/uploads/cs_public/90/2f/902faeaa-5024-413d-92dd-927002909580/peachesvs09.pdf>.

  • DillmanD.SmythJ.D.ChristianL.M.2009Internet mail and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method. John Wiley New York

  • FuglieK.O.WalkerT.S.2001Economic incentives and resource allocation in US public and private plant breedingJ. Agr. Appl. Econ.333459474

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GallardoR.K.NguyenK.McCrackenV.YueC.LubyJ.McFersonJ.R.2012An investigation of trait prioritization in rosaceous fruit breeding programsHortScience47771776

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GradzielT.M.McCaaJ.P.2008Processing peach cultivar development p. 175–192. In: D.R. Layne and D. Bassi (eds.). The peach: Botany production and uses. CAB International Wallingford Oxfordshire UK

  • HardestyS.D.LeffP.2010Determining marketing costs and returns in alternative marketing channelsRenewable Agr. Food Systems2512434

  • HensherD.A.GreeneW.H.2003The mixed logit model: The state of practiceTransportation30133176

  • HilaireC.2003The peach industry in France: State of art research and development p. 27–34. In: F. Marra and F. Sottile (eds.). Proc. First Mediterranean Peach Symp. Agrigento Italy

  • HortonD.BellingerB.PettisG.BrannenP.MitchemW.2003Pest management strategic plan for eastern peaches. USDA-ARS/CSREES. 10 Aug. 2015. <http://www.ipmcenters.org/pmsp/pdf/EastPeach.pdf>.

  • JordanJ.L.ShewfeltR.L.PrussiaS.E.1986The value of peach quality characteristics in the postharvest system. IX Symposium on Horticultural Economics. 203:175–182

  • LuskJ.L.HudsonD.2004Willingness-to-pay estimates and their relevance to agribusiness decision makingRev. Agr. Econ.26152169

  • MacDonaldJ.M.KorbP.HoppeR.A.2013Farm size and the organization of U.S. crop farming. U.S. Department of Agriculture Economics Research Report No. 152 Washington DC. 12 July 2016. <https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/err152/39359_err152.pdf>.

  • OkieW.BaconT.BassiD.2008Fresh market cultivar development p. 139–174. In: D.R. Layne and D. Bassi (eds.). The peach: Botany production and uses. CAB International Wallingford Oxfordshire UK

  • ParkT.A.FlorkowskiW.J.2003Selection of peach varieties and the role of quality attributesJ. Agr. Resource Econ.281138151

  • ParkerD.D.ZilbermanD.MoultonK.1991How quality relates to price in California fresh peachesCalif. Agr.451416

  • PlattnerK.PerezA.WarmD.W.R.U.2013Fruit and tree nuts outlook. United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service report FTS-354. 30 Jan. 2016. <http://www.ers.usda.gov/media/970458/fts354.pdf>.

  • PredieriS.RagazziniP.RondelliP.2006Sensory evaluation and peach fruit quality. Acta Horticulturae. VI International Peach Symposium Santiago Chile 30 July 2006. p. 429–434

  • RavagliaG.SansaviniS.VenturaM.TabanelliD.1966Indici di Maturazione e Miglioramiento Qualitative delle PescheFruitcoltora.36166

  • RitchieD.BarbaM.PaganiM.C.2008Diseases caused By prokaryotes—Bacteria and phytoplasmas p. 407–434. In D.R. Layne and D. Bassi (eds.). The peach: Botany production and uses. CAB International Wallingford Oxfordshire UK

  • United State Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service (USDA NASS)2013Noncitrus fruits and nuts 2012 preliminary summary. 17 Aug. 2015. <http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/nass/NoncFruiNu//2010s/2013/NoncFruiNu-01-25-2013.pdf>.

  • United State Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service. (USDA NASS)2016Noncitrus fruits and nuts 2015 preliminary summary. 13 July 2016. <http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/NoncFruiNu/NoncFruiNu-07-06-2016.pdf>.

  • VilsackT.ClarkC.Z.F.20142012 census of agriculture. United States Department of Agriculture Summary and State Data AC-12-A-51. 13 July 2016. <www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2012/Full_Report/Volume_1_Chapter_1_US/usv1.pdf>.

  • YueC.GallardoR.K.LubyJ.RihnA.L.McFersonJ.R.McCrackenV.GradzielT.GasicK.ReighardG.L.ClarkJ.IezzoniA.2014An evaluation of US peach producers’ trait prioritization: Evidence from audience surveysHortScience4913091314

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • YueC.Y.GallardoR.K.McCrackenV.A.LubyJ.McFersonJ.R.LiuL.IezzoniA.2012Technical and socioeconomic challenges to setting and implementing priorities in North American rosaceous fruit breeding programsHortScience4713201327

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 234 235 2
Full Text Views 71 71 3
PDF Downloads 8 8 0