Coffee is an economically important crop grown in ≈80 countries across the world (Los Santos-Brones and Hernandez-Sotomayor, 2006). The genus Coffee comprises ≈100 species of which only two species, Arabica coffee and Robusta coffee, are commercially cultivated (Los Santos-Brones and Hernandez-Sotomayor, 2006). Disease control is one of the major constraints to sustainable and economic coffee production (Gichuru et al., 2012). Breeding work in Kenya has resulted in the release of a new improved cultivar—Ruiru 11. Moreover, the hybrid combines resistance to CBD and leaf rust with high yield and good cup quality attributes (Van der Vossen and Walyaro, 1980). The development and dissemination of Ruiru 11 has made a significant contribution not only to the coffee farmers, but also to the Kenyan community as a whole for the following reasons:
- Its availability and use has the potential to reduce the cost of coffee production by up to 30% and thereby saves the Kenyan government considerable amounts of foreign currency usually spent on the importation of fungicides and spraying equipment.
- Its use will increase and stabilize the incomes of small-scale farmers for whom disease control using chemicals is frequently impossible to realize.
- Most importantly it offers potential environmentally friendly approach to the long-term control of coffee diseases and in production of organically grown coffee.
The propagation of Ruiru 11 is by F1 hybrid seed, production through hand artificial cross-pollination (Van der Vossen and Walyaro, 1981), cuttings, and tip grafting (Wamatu and Kingoro, 1991). The number of planting materials produced by the above methods is far below those needed to supply farmer’s demand. Therefore, there is need to accelerate the production of Ruiru11 planting materials by using alternative methods such as tissue culture.
A great deal of work has been carried out on coffee somatic embryogenesis using the indirect method. However, direct somatic embryogenesis (DSE) has not received much attention. This is although DSE is preferred, as it has the potential for maintaining genomic stability of regenerated plants. The former method that is via an intermediate callus phase increases the possibility of somaclonal variations (Tang and Guo, 2001).
Of the several factors that influence the process of somatic embryogenesis, the most important are the origin of the explant and composition of the culture medium, particularly with respect to the type and concentration of growth regulators. Somatic embryogenesis is known to be highly dependent on the explant used. The kind of explant chosen, its size, age, and the manner in which it is placed on the media can all determine whether morphogenesis can be induced (Rossin and Rey, 2011). Explants taken from juvenile plant tissues, particularly those from seedlings, are usually highly responsive. For example, while working on somatic embryogenesis of chickpea, Rao (1991) observed that more embryos were produced from leaf explants of 9-d-old seedlings than from older explants. In general, explants from newly originating organs are known to be more responsive than those taken from older ones (George, 1993). In vitro plant-derived leaves are regarded as rejuvenated plant materials (Nozeran, 1978) in which the endogenous hormonal balance is probably different from that of physiologically older leaves from glasshouse or field-grown plants. The embryogenic potential of this type of explant is considered to be substantially higher than the glasshouse and field-grown explants (Franclet, 1983). Micropropagated leaf explants from C. arabica and Anthurium scherzarium plants were found to be better explants than all the others tested (Bieysse et al., 1993; Hamida et al., 1997).
Most researchers working on coffee somatic embryogenesis have used leaves from the field or glasshouse plants as source of explant (Boxtel and Berthouly, 1996; De Almeida et al., 2014; Tahara et al., 1994). The production of embryos and plantlets from leaf explants offers a number of advantages including, uniform leaf material, and abundantly available and easily renewable source of explants.
Growth in vitro is highly dependent on the interaction between naturally occurring endogenous growth substances and the analogous synthetic growth regulators that may be added to the medium (George, 1993). The induction of DSE in C. arabica is strongly associated with the addition of cytokinins to the culture medium, in the absence of auxins (Almeida and Silvarolla, 2009; De Almeida et al., 2014; Kahia, 1999). The objective of the current study was to evaluate the ideal explant and the best type and concentration of cytokinins (phenylurea-type vs. adenine-type) for induction and regeneration of direct somatic embryos in the new cultivar.
AnushiA.J.AnisM.ArefI.M.2014Relative examination of antioxidative enzymatic activities in plantlets of Cardiospermum halicacabum L. differentiated from hypocotyls in in vivo and ex vitro environmentBiotechnol. Rpt. (Amst.)46672
BacchettaL.RemottiP.C.BernardiniC.SaccardoF.2003Adventitious shoot regeneration from leaf explants and stem nodes of LiliumPlant Cell Tissue Organ Cult.743744
BatesS.PreeceJ.E.NavarreteN.E.Van SambeekJ.W.GaffneyG.R.1992Thidiazuron stimulates shoot organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis in white ash (Fraxinus americana L.)Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult.312129
BieysseD.GofflotA.Michaux-FerriereN.1993Effect of experimental conditions and genotypic variability on somatic embryogenesis of Coffea arabicaCan. J. Bot.7114961502
BoxtelJ.V.BerthoulyM.1996High frequency somatic embryogenesis from coffee leaves. Factors influencing embryogenesis and subsequent proliferation and regeneration in liquid mediumPlant Cell Tissue Organ Cult.44717
CapeloA.M.SilvaS.BritoG.SantosC.2010Somatic embryogenesis induction in leaves and petioles of a mature wild olivePlant Cell Tissue Organ Cult.103237242
ComlekciogluN.MendiY.Y.EldoganS.UnekC.2009Effects of different combinations and concentrations of growth regulators and photoperiod on somatic embryogenesis of cucumis melo var. flexuosusAfr. J. Biotechnol.82262286232
DaiH.ZhangZ.GuoX.2007Adventitious bud regeneration from leaf and cotyledon explants of Chinese hawthorn (Crataegus pinnatifida Bge. var. major N.E.Br.)In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Plant.4328
DaignyG.PaulH.SangwanR.S.Sangwan-NorreelB.S.1996Factors influencing secondary somatic embryogenesis in Malus × domestica Borkh. (cv‘Gloster 69’)Plant Cell Rpt.163–4153157
De AlmeidaJ.A.S.LealR.R.CarmaziniV.C.B.SalomonM.V.Guerreiro FilhoO.2014Effect of temperature and cytokinin on the capacity of direct somatic embryogenesis in Coffea arabica L. genotypesCoffee Sci.93394399
Gallagher-LudemanL.A.CloseK.R.1989Structure-activity relationships of auxin-like plant growth regulators and genetic influences on the culture induction responses in maize (Zea mays L)Plant Sci.61245252
GeorgeE.F.1993Plant propagation by tissue culture. Part 1: The technology. 2nd ed. Exegetics Ltd UK
GichuruE.K.IthiruJ.M.SilvaM.C.PereiraA.P.VarzeaV.M.2012Additional physiological races of coffee leaf rust (Hemileia vastatrix) identified in KenyaTrop. Plant Pathol.376424427
GillR.SaxenaP.K.1992Direct somatic embryogenesis and regeneration of plants from seedlings explant of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.): Promotive role of thidiazuronCan. J. Bot.7011861192
GillR.SaxenaP.K.1993Somatic embryogenesis in Nicotiana tabacum L. induction by thidiazuron and direct embryo differentiation from leaf discsPlant Cell Rpt.12154159
GiridharP.A.KumarV.I.InduE.P.ChandrasekarA.RavishankarG.A.2004Thidiazuron induced somatic embryogenesis in Coffea arabica L. and Coffea CanephoraP Ex Fr. Act. Bot. Croat.632533
GrattapagliaD.MachadoM.A.1998Micropropagation p. 183–247. In: A.C. Torres L.S. Caldas and J.A. Buso (eds.). Cultura de Tecidos e Transformacao Genetica de Plantas. Embrapa-CNPH Brasilia Brazil
HareP.D.Van StadenJ.1994Inhibitory effect of thidiazuron on the activity of cytokinin oxidase isolated from soybean callusPlant Cell Physiol.3511211125
HuaJ.F.ChenJ.T.2014A Novel in vitro protocol for inducing direct somatic embryogenesis in Phalaenopsis aphrodite without taking explantsThe Sci. World J.2014263642
International Coffee Organization (ICO)1986Coffee biotechnol. P. A. Technology London. p. 1–27
KahiaW.J.1999In vitro propagation of the disease resistant cultivar—Ruiru 11. PhD Diss. University of London UK
KhierallahH.S.M.AlHamdanyM.H.S.AbdulkareemA.SalehF.F.2015Influence of sucrose and pacloburtazol on callus growth and somatic embryogenesis in date palm cv. breamIntl. J. Current Res. Academic Rev.3270276
KintziosS.SeretiE.BluchosP.DrossopoulosJ.KitsakiC.Liopa-TsakalidisA.2002Growth regulator pretreatment improves somatic embryogenesis from leaves of squash (Cucurbita pepo L.) and melon (Cucumis melo L.)Plant Cell Rpt.2118
LiZ.TraoreJ.MaximovaA.S.GuiltinanM.J.1998Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from floral explants of cacao (theobroma cacao L.) using thidiazuronIn vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Plant.34293299
MithilaJ.HallJ.VictorJ.M.R.SaxenaP.K.2003Thidiazuron induces shoot organogenesis at low concentrations and somatic embryogenesis at high concentrations on leaf and petiole explants of African violet (Saintpaulia ionantha Wendl.)Plant Cell Rpt.215408414
MokC.M.MokW.S.D.TurnerJ.E.MujerC.V.1987Biological and biochemical effects of cytokinins-active phenylurea derivatives in tissue culture systemsJ. Hort. Sci.2211941197
NeumanM.C.PreeceJ.E.Van SambeekJ.W.GaffneyG.R.1993Somatic Embryogenesis and callus production from cotyledon explants of Eastern black walnutPlant Cell Tissue Organ Cult.32918
NozeranR.1978Polymorphisme des individus issus de la multiplication vegetative des vegetaux inferieurs avec conservation du potentiel genetiquePhysiol. Veg.16177194
RamosR.A.WondyifrawT.MartínezF.GonzalezM.E.EndaleG.AlemayehuT.ZerihunA.2009Plant regeneration through somatic embryogenesis in three Ethiopian Coffea arabica Lin. hybridsBiotecnología Vegetal.91926
RossinC.B.ReyM.E.C.2011Effect of explant source and auxins on somatic embryogenesis of selected cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) cultivarsS. Afr. J. Bot.775965
SanikhaniM.FrelloS.SerekM.2006TDZ induces shoot regeneration in various Kalanchoe blossfeldiana Poelln. Cultivars in the absence of auxinPlant Cell Tissue Organ Cult.857282
SiongP.TahaR.RahimanF.2011Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from hypocotyl and leaf explants of Brassica oleracea var. botrytis (cauliflower)Acta Biol. Cracov. Ser. Bot.532631
TangW.GuoZ.2001In vitro propagation of loblolly pine via direct somatic organogenesis from mature cotyledons and hypocotylsPlant Growth Regulat.332531
Van der VossenH.A.M.WalyaroD.J.1980Breeding for resistance to coffee berry disease in Coffea arbica L. II. Inheritance of the resistanceEuphytica293777791
Van der VossenH.A.M.WalyaroD.J.1981The coffee breeding programme in Kenya: A review of progress made since 1971 and plan of action for the coming yearsKenya coffee46541113130
VisserC.QureshiJ.A.GillR.SaxenaP.K.1992Morphoregulatory role of thidiazuron: Substitution of auxin and cytokinins requirement for the induction of somatic embryogenesis in geranium hypocotyl culturesPlant Physiol.9917041707