Molecular Characterization and Functional Analysis of an AGAMOUS-like Gene CiAG from Pecan

in HortScience

The floral homeotic C-function gene AGAMOUS (AG) has been shown to be critical in the determination of stamen and carpel identity in Arabidopsis. In the present study, a new homologue of AGAMOUS gene from pecan [Carya illinoinensis (Wangenh.) K. Koch], denoted by CiAG, was isolated and its function was characterized. The complementary DNA (cDNA) of CiAG contains an open reading frame of 687 base pairs (bp) encoding 227 amino acids. Multiple sequence comparisons revealed that CiAG had the typical MIKC structure. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that CiAG is closely related to C-lineage AG. The expression of CiAG was highly accumulated in the reproductive tissues (staminate flowers, pistillate flowers, and fruitlets) than in vegetative tissues (leaves and current-growth branches). Arabidopsis overexpressing CiAG exhibited earlier flowering. The homeotic transformations of petals into stamen organs were observed in 35S::CiAG transgenic plants. All these results indicated that CiAG plays a key role in the process of flower development of pecan.

Abstract

The floral homeotic C-function gene AGAMOUS (AG) has been shown to be critical in the determination of stamen and carpel identity in Arabidopsis. In the present study, a new homologue of AGAMOUS gene from pecan [Carya illinoinensis (Wangenh.) K. Koch], denoted by CiAG, was isolated and its function was characterized. The complementary DNA (cDNA) of CiAG contains an open reading frame of 687 base pairs (bp) encoding 227 amino acids. Multiple sequence comparisons revealed that CiAG had the typical MIKC structure. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that CiAG is closely related to C-lineage AG. The expression of CiAG was highly accumulated in the reproductive tissues (staminate flowers, pistillate flowers, and fruitlets) than in vegetative tissues (leaves and current-growth branches). Arabidopsis overexpressing CiAG exhibited earlier flowering. The homeotic transformations of petals into stamen organs were observed in 35S::CiAG transgenic plants. All these results indicated that CiAG plays a key role in the process of flower development of pecan.

A number of MADS-box genes are involved in the control of the development and specification of flower organs in higher plants. In the well-known ABC model (Coen and Meyerowitz, 1991), three classes of genes, A, B, and C functions, specify the four organ types of the typical angiosperm flower. According to this model, sepal identity is specified by the A function alone, petal formation is controlled by A and B functions, stamen development is regulated by the combination of B and C functions, and carpel formation is determined by C function alone. It should be noted that there exists an antagonistic interaction between A and C functions. With the isolation of D function for ovule development (Angenent et al., 1995) and E function (Theissen, 2001), which is required for the specification of petals, stamens, and carpels, the ABC model has been extended to the ABCDE model. All the genes belonging to the ABCDE model are members of the MADS-box gene family except for APETALA2 (AP2) genes (Theissen et al., 2000). MADS-box genes encoding homeotic transcription factors are a highly conserved gene family and these genes widely exist in fungi, plants, and animals (Alvarez-Buylla et al., 2000; Bodt et al., 2003; García-Maroto et al., 2003). All the ABCDE MADS-box genes are of the MIKC type with regard to the presence of four distinct domains, which are a highly conserved MADS-box (M) domain, an intervening (I) domain, a moderately conserved keratin (K) domain, and a C-terminal (C) domain (Theissen et al., 2000).

AG, a class C gene, is required for normal development of third and fourth whorl floral organs. In the third whorl, AG functions in the specification of stamens; in the fourth whorl, AG is required for specification of carpels and provision of determinacy to the floral meristem (Martin et al., 2006; Sieburth et al., 1995).

Ectopic expression of GmGAL2 (Glycine max AGAMOUS Like 2) in Arabidopsis enhances flowering, under both long-day and short-day conditions, by promoting the expression of key flowering genes, CONSTANS (CO) and FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT), and lowering the expression of floral inhibiter FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC) (Xu et al., 2010). HpAG, a Hosta plantaginea Aschers AGAMOUS homologous gene, isolated from developing flowers, plays a crucial role in stamen specification and gynoecium development (Wang et al., 2012). Overexpression of a Brassica rapa MADS-box gene, BrAGL20, induces early flowering time phenotypes in Brassica napus (Hong et al., 2013). Two transcript isoforms of AGAMOUS homologues, PrseAG (Prunus serrulata AGAMOUS) from single and PrseAG-1 from double flower Prunus lannesiana, respectively, showed different functions. The transgenic Arabidopsis containing 35S::PrseAG displayed extremely early flowering, bigger stamens and carpels, and homeotic conversion of petals into staminoid organs, but ectopic expression of PrseAG-1 could not mimic the phenotypic ectopic expression of PrseAG in Arabidopsis (Liu et al., 2013). The legume Medicago truncatula contains three C-lineage genes in its genome: two euAG genes (MtAGa and MtAGb) and one PLENA-like gene (MtSHP). MtAGa and MtAGb were expressed early in the floral meristem, and in the third and fourth floral whorls during floral development. In contrast, MtSHP expression appears late during floral development (Serwatowska et al., 2014). On the basis of the highly conserved domain of MADS, homologues of AG have allowed cloning from a number of species (Zahn et al., 2006) such as apple (Van der Linden et al., 2002), grapevine (Boss et al., 2001), black cherry (Liu et al., 2010), and japanese apricot (Hou et al., 2011).

Pecan (C. illinoinensis), which belongs to the Juglandaceae family, is of great nutritional value (Hal, 2000). It originates from the northern United States and has been introduced in China for ≈100 years. The flower of pecan is unisexual; staminate flower consists of a calyx and androecium, whereas the pistillate flower has a calyx and a pistil; both of them have no petals. The cultivars of pecan can be divided into two categories: protogynous, such as ‘Mahan’, ‘Kanza’, and ‘Posey’; and protandrous such as ‘Pawnee’, ‘Osage’, and ‘Canton’ (Reid and Hunt, 2000; Wood et al., 1997). As C-function MADS-box gene plays a key role both in stamen and carpel formation, we isolated a cDNA sequence of CiAG in this study. The expression profiles of CiAG gene in reproductive tissues (staminate flowers, pistillate flowers, and fruitlets) and vegetative tissues (leaves and current-growth branches) of three varieties (‘Shaoxing’, ‘Pawnee’, and ‘Mahan’), were investigated by quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). We then transformed the CiAG gene into Arabidopsis to study the function of CiAG on flowering.

Materials and Methods

Plant materials.

The grafting seedlings of pecan were grown in Nanjing, Jiangsu province, China. Staminate flowers, pistillate flowers, fruitlets, leaves, and current-growth branches were collected from the 6-year-old cultivars of Mahan, Shaoxing, and Pawnee in May. The tissues were collected from the same direction of each tree, three trees as three replicates. Tissues were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until used.

Cloning of CiAG.

Total RNA was extracted from the staminate flowers of ‘Mahan’ using The Plant Total RNA Extraction Kit (BioTeke, Beijing, China). First-strand cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg total RNA with an oligo(dT)18 adaptor primer using PrimeScript RTase (TaKaRa, Japan). We have obtained eleven highly conserved MADS domain amino acid motifs from pecan previously. In this study, we cloned the full-length cDNA of the fragment 1 which belonged to AGAMOUS group (Mo et al., 2013). The gene-specific primers GSP1 (5′-CACTACTAATCGTCAAGTCACCTTCTGT-3′) and GSP2 (5′-CTTCTGTAAGAGGCGCAACGGCTT-3′) were designed based on the conserved MADS domain nucleotide sequence. Nested PCR was carried out to isolate the 3′ end of the CiAG gene. The gene-specific primer GSP1 and an abridged universal amplification primer AUAP (5′-GGCCACGCGTCGACTAGTAC-3′) were used for first-round PCR, and the gene-specific primer GSP2 (5′-CTTCTGTAAGAGGCGCAACGGCTT-3′) and AUAP were used for second-round PCR using the first-round PCR product. The cycling program consisted of an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 65 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR product was then cloned into the pMD19-T simple vector (TaKaRa, Japan) and sequenced. To ensure the full length of the coding region sequences, RT-PCR was performed using the VvAG-F (5′-ATGGGGAGGGGGAGGATAGAAA-3′) and VvAG-R (5′-CGCCATAACAGGGCAATAACCT-3′), and the PCR product was cloned and sequenced.

Amino acid alignment and phylogenetic analysis.

The deduced amino acid sequences were analyzed in the NCBI BLAST program (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) for searching the protein sequences of homologues. Alignment of deduced amino acid sequences was performed by using the Clustal W multiple alignment program of the BioEdit software. A phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining method in the MEGA 5.1 software with 1000 replication bootstrap tests. The accession numbers of the protein sequences used in this study are as follows: Juglans regia, JrAG (CAC38764); Corylus heterophylla, ChMADS1 (AEU08497); Prunus persica, PpMADS4 (AAU29513); Momordica charantia, McMADS2 (ABC25564); Citrus sinensis, CsAG (ADP02394); Prunus serotina, PsAG (ACH72974); Jatropha curcas, JcAG (AEA11211); Gossypium hirsutum, GhMADS5 (ABM69043); Petunia ×hybrida, FBP7 (CAA57311) and FBP11 (CAA57445); Arabidopsis thaliana, AGAMOUS (NP_567569), AP1 (NP_177074), CAL(Q39081), AGL8/FUL (NP_568929), AGL79 (NP_189645), PI (NP_197524), AP3 (NP_191002), AGL11 (NP_192734), SEP1 (NP_568322), SEP2 (NP_186880), SEP3 (NP_850953), and SEP4 (NP_849930).

Gene expression analysis of CiAG in pecan using qRT-PCR.

Total RNA isolation was done as described above. Reverse transcription was performed using 1 μg of total RNA with the ReverTra Ace qPCR RT Kit (TOYOBO, Code No. FSQ-101) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The gene-specific primers for CiAG were QTAG-F: 5′-AGGCTGCTACTCTACGACAAC-3′ and QTAG-R: 5′-GGTTCCTCTCATTCTCCGCTATC-3′. The CiActin gene was used as a positive internal control with primers ACTIN-F (5′-GCTGAACGGGAAATTGTC-3′), and ACTIN-R (5′-AGAGATGGCTGGAAGAGG-3′). qRT-PCR was carried out on the Applied Biosystems 7300 Real Time PCR System with a 20-μL reaction volume, containing 1 μL 10-fold diluted cDNA, 0.3 μL (10 pm) of each primer, 10 μL SYBR® Premix Ex Taq™ (Perfect Real Time) (TaKaRa Code: DRR041A), and 8.4 μL sterile double-distilled water. The PCR conditions consisted of denaturation at 95 °C for 4 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 20 s, 57 °C for 20 s, and 72 °C for 40 s. The specificity of the individual PCR amplification was checked using a heat dissociation curve from 55 to 95 °C following the final cycle of the PCR. The relative levels of genes to control CiActin messenger RNAs were analyzed using the 7300 system software and the 2−ΔΔCt method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001).

Construction of expression vector and Arabidopsis transformation.

PCR amplified full-length cDNA of CiAG fragments, using primers which introduced a BamH I or Kpn I restriction site, were cloned into pMD19-T, and recombinants were verified by sequence analysis. The fragments were then ligated into the corresponding sites of the binary vector of pCAMBIA1301 under the control of Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter in the sense orientation. The CiAG binary constructs were introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105 using a freeze-thaw method and verified with PCR. The 35S::CiAG constructs were transformed into Arabidopsis (Clough and Bent, 1998). The transgenic Arabidopsis lines were selected in the half-strength MS medium containing hygromycin (20 μg/ml). Survival transgenic plants were grown in the greenhouse at 22 °C under long-day (16-h photoperiod) exposure and further verified by RT-PCR analyses. The T2 and T3 generations were used for phenotypic assessment.

Results

Isolation and sequence analysis of CiAG.

Using RT-PCR and RACE strategy, the full length cDNA of CiAG were obtained. The CiAG amino acid sequence was aligned with its homologues using the NCBI BLAST program, and the best hit was J. regia AGAMOUS, an AG-like gene. This suggested that this isolated cDNA clone represents an AG-like gene from C. illinoinensis, so we named this gene CiAG. The cDNA is 1013 bp, with an open reading frame of 684 bp that encodes a 227–amino acid protein which shares high homology with ChMADS1 from C. heterophylla (88% identities), PsAG from P. serotina (83% identity), and JcAG from J. curcas (83% identity). A multiple alignment of CiAG with other MADS proteins (Fig. 1) indicated that the CiAG contains a highly conserved MADS domain (2–57), a short I region (58–90), a half-conserved K domain (91–173), and the characteristic conserved C-terminal region (174–227), Moreover, CiAG has the AG motifs I and II in the C-terminal (Kramer et al., 2004). Phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 2) showed that CiAG is closely related to C-lineage AG homologues, while sharing low similarity with A, B, D, and E lineages.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

Sequence comparison of CiAG and the AG-related MADS domain proteins. The MADS domain and the K domain are marked. The region between the MADS- and K-domain is I domain. The AG motifs (AG I and II), which are highly conserved regions reported by Kramer et al. (2004), C-terminal regions are boxed. Arabidopsis thaliana, AGAMOUS (NP_567569); Carya illinoinensis, CiAG; Juglans regia, JrAG (CAC38764); Gossypium hirsutum, GhMADS5 (ABM69043); Prunus persica, PpMADS4 (AAU29513); Momordica charantia, McMADS2 (ABC25564); Citrus sinensis, CsAG (ADP02394); Prunus serotina, PsAG (ACH72974); Jatropha curcas, JcAG (AEA11211).

Citation: HortScience horts 51, 6; 10.21273/HORTSCI.51.6.664

Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

Phylogenetic analysis of AG-like MADS-box proteins. CiAG from pecan is boxed. Prunus persica, PpMADS4 (AAU29513); Prunus serotina, PsAG (ACH72974); Momordica charantia, McMADS2 (ABC25564); Jatropha curcas, JcAG (AEA11211); Corylus heterophylla, ChMADS1 (AEU08497); Carya illinoinensis, CiAG; Juglans regia, JrAG (CAC38764); Citrus sinensis, CsAG (ADP02394); Arabidopsis thaliana, AGAMOUS (NP_567569), AGL11 (NP_192734); Gossypium hirsutum, GhMADS5 (ABM69043); Petunia ×hybrida, FBP7 (CAA57311), FBP11 (CAA57445); SEP4 (NP_849930); SEP3 (NP_850953); SEP1 (NP_568322); SEP2 (NP_186880); AGL79 (NP_189645); AGL8/FUL (NP_568929); AP1 (NP_177074); CAL (Q39081); PI (NP_197524); AP3 (NP_191002).

Citation: HortScience horts 51, 6; 10.21273/HORTSCI.51.6.664

CiAG expression pattern.

qRT-PCR was performed to detect the expression pattern of CiAG in vegetative tissues (leaves and branches) and reproductive tissues (staminate flowers, pistillate flowers, and fruitlets) of the three cultivars (Mahan, Pawnee, and Shaoxing). The results indicated that the transcript of CiAG can be detected in both vegetative tissues and reproductive tissues (Fig. 3). In the three different cultivars, the expression levels were strong in reproductive tissues, and were barely detectable in vegetative tissues (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.

Expression pattern of CiAG gene revealed by quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis. Branches-CG, current-growth branches; Flowers-P, pistillate flowers; Flowers-S, staminate flowers.

Citation: HortScience horts 51, 6; 10.21273/HORTSCI.51.6.664

Phenotypes of CiAG overexpression in Arabidopsis.

Functional analysis of CiAG was investigated by its ectopic expression in Arabidopsis. The 35S::CiAG transgenic Arabidopsis was obtained through hygromycin screening, and ectopic expression of CiAG was confirmed by RT-PCR analysis from five independent transformation events (Fig. 4); the flowering time and phenotypic properties of T2 and homozygous T3 plants were studied. Five of 26 independent T2 plants and seven homozygous T3 plants displayed floral homeotic changes and were further analyzed.

Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.

Detection of CiAG gene in transgenic and wide-type Arabidopsis. A: Products of RT-PCR with primers specific for CiAG; B: Products amplified with 18S-specific primers, used as control. WT, wild-type plants; L1–5, transgenic lines.

Citation: HortScience horts 51, 6; 10.21273/HORTSCI.51.6.664

In general, transgenic Arabidopsis flowered earlier (fourth rosette leaf appeared) than wild-type plants, displayed reduced height, small and curled rosette leaves, and cauline leaves (Fig. 5A and B). In wild-type plants at stage 11 (Fig. 5C), flower buds were enclosed, when stigmatic papillae just appeared and the stigma had not extended above the buds (Smyth et al., 1990); however, the stigma of transgenic lines had already reached above the sepals (Fig. 5D). Since sepals could not completely enclose the developing buds (Fig. 5E), 35S::CiAG plants showed prematurely open floral buds. In transgenic plants, long stamens extended above sepals and petals (Fig. 5F); in contrast, the stamens of wild plants were shorter than petals (Fig. 5G). In the late-developing flowers of transgenic lines, the organs of the second whorl was homeotically changed, the bases of the petals were thin and transformed homeotically into filament-like structures (Fig. 5H), whereas the sepals were curled and had no obvious homeotic changes (Fig. 5I). Unexpectedly, three of the T2 transgenic plants have ag-like flowers (Fig. 5J); RT-PCR with primers for CiAG crossing with the endogenous AG (Arabidopsis AG gene) indicated the transcription of AG and CiAG genes (Fig. 5K).

Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.

Floral and vegetative morphology of transgenic and wide-type Arabidopsis. (A) Wild-type Arabidopsis plant (left) and transgenic plants at the same developmental stage over-expressing CiAG (right). (B) Early flowering of 35S::CiAG transgenic plants with four rosette leaves. (C) Flower bud of wild type at developmental stage 11 (Smyth et al., 1990). (D) Flower buds of transgenic plants at the developmental stage 11. (E) Sepals of transgenic-lines could not completely enclose the developing buds. (F) Stamens of transgenic lines extended above sepals and petals. (G) Stamens of wild type were shorter than petals. (H) The base of the petal was converted into filament-like structure in 35S::CiAG transgenic plants. (I) Sepals were curled in 35S::CiAG transgenic plants. (J) ag-like flowers. (K) A: Products of RT-PCR with primers specific for CiAG and endogenous AG (Arabidopsis AG gene); B: Products amplified with 18S-specific primers, used as control. WT, wild-type plants; L1–3, ag-like plants.

Citation: HortScience horts 51, 6; 10.21273/HORTSCI.51.6.664

Discussion

A new MADS-box gene, CiAG, was isolated from pecan, in this study. Deduced amino acid alignment and phylogenetic analysis revealed that CiAG has the typical M, I, K, and C domain and is closer to the AGAMOUS-like gene from walnut (Figs. 1 and 2). However, CiAG lacks the N-terminal domain preceding the MADS-box. The initiator methionine is positioned immediately before the M domain of CiAG1. The additional N-terminal region apparently has no specific function since AG without N-terminal region was still shown to be functionally normal in vitro. AG homologous genes lacking the N-terminal extension have been identified in a few species such as LLAG1 from Lilium longiflorum (Benedito et al., 2004), PrAG1 from Pinus radiata (Liu, 2012), and HpAG from H. plantaginea (Wang et al., 2012).

Among the three cultivars, the maturation time of the staminate and pistillate flowers are different; qRT-PCR analysis demonstrated that CiAG may not be a reason to the heterodichogamy of flowers. Expression patterns of all the three cultivars indicated that CiAG was mainly expressed in reproductive tissues; however, a weak expression in vegetative tissues was also observed. The expression pattern of CiAG is similar to PTAG from poplar (Brunner et al., 2000). It is reported that the AG-lineage genes are generally expressed in reproductive organs, not in the vegetative organs (Chaidamsari et al., 2006; Wu et al., 2004; Yanofsky et al., 1990). This study suggests that AG may participate in regulation of vegetative phase, and the diversity functions of AG gene may exist in different plant species during evolution.

To further analyse the function of CiAG, constitutive overexpression of CiAG was undertaken in Arabidopsis. CiAG gene induced early flowering, reduced plant height and curled leaves, and was able to suppress floral A function in the second whorl in transgenic plants. Ectopic expression of AG orthologs in model plants showed transitions of sepals into carpel-like structures, and petals to filament-like structures (Chaidamsari et al., 2006; Kempin et al., 1993; Pnueli et al., 1994; Rigola et al., 2001), while there are reports that sepals showed almost no obvious conversion into carpel structures (Causier et al., 2002; Wu et al., 2012). In 35S::CiAG transgenic Arabidopsis, flowers homeotically transformed petals to filament-like structures, whereas sepals showed no obvious phenotypic changes. As for the ag-like flowers in T2 transgenic Arabidopsis, the reason may be the cosuppression of CiAG with endogenous AG in Arabidopsis (Napoli et al., 1990) resulting in posttranscriptional gene silencing. This indirectly demonstrates that CiAG is a homologous gene of AMAGOUS.

In the regulatory networks of flower development, AG interacted with multiple genes. AP1 does not inhibit the expression of AG gene (Busch et al., 1999; Wagner et al., 1999). But, AP2 and other five genes in Arabidopsis, LEUNIG (LUG), CURLYLEAF (CLF), STERILE APETALA (SAP), ANT EGUMENTA (ANT) and SEUSS (SEU), negatively regulate AG expression in the first and second whorls (Byzova et al., 1999; Liu and Meyerowitz, 1995). The expression of AG in stamen and pistil is inhibited by AP2 and LEUNIG (LUG) (Deyholos and Sieburth, 2000; Franks et al., 2002). LEY and WUSCHEL (WUS) genes are involved in accurate activation of AG expression in the third and fourth whorls, whereas AG negatively regulates WUS in the late stage of floral organ to end-flower development (Busch et al., 1999; Xu and Chong, 2005). Pecan is a monoecious and allogamous plant. The male and female flowering is not consistent in different varieties. From the result, we can see that CiAG gene was strongly expressed in reproductive organs and CiAG gene overexpression in Arabidopsis could make it flower earlier. It shortened the juvenile phase and promoted the development of stamens. So we speculate that CiAG may be helpful for yield in pecan. However, the mechanism of CiAG gene function is complex and needs to be further studied.

Literature Cited

  • Alvarez-BuyllaE.R.PelazS.LiljegrenS.J.GoldS.E.BurgeffC.DittaG.S.Ribas de PouplanaL.Martínez-CastillaL.YanofskyM.F.2000An ancestral MADS-box gene duplication occurred before the divergence of plants and animalsProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA9753285333

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • AngenentG.C.FrankenJ.BusscherM.van DijkenA.van WentJ.L.DonsH.J.van TunenA.J.1995A novel class of MADS box genes is involved in ovule development in petuniaPlant Cell715691582

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BeneditoV.A.VisserP.B.van TuylJ.M.AngenentG.C.De VriesS.C.KrensF.A.2004Ectopic expression of LLAG1, an AGAMOUS homologue from lily (Lilium longiflorum Thunb.) causes floral homeotic modifications in ArabidopsisJ. Expt. Bot.5513911399

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BodtS.D.PeerR.Y.V.D.TheibenG.2003And then there were many: MADS goes genomicTrends Plant Sci.8475483

  • BossP.K.VivierM.MatsumotoS.DryI.B.ThomasM.R.2001A cDNA from grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.), which shows homology to AGAMOUS and SHATTERPROOF, is not only expressed in flowers but also throughout berry developmentPlant Mol. Biol.45541553

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BrunnerA.M.RottmannW.H.SheppardL.A.KrutovskiiK.DiFazioS.P.LeonardiS.StraussS.H.2000Structure and expression of duplicate AGAMOUS orthologues in poplarPlant Mol. Biol.44619634

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BuschM.A.BombliesK.WeigelD.1999Activation of a floral homeotic gene in ArabidopsisScience285585587

  • ByzovaM.V.FrankenJ.AartsM.G.de Almeida-EnglerJ.EnglerG.MarianiC.Van Lookeren CampagneM.M.AngenentG.C.1999Arabidopsis STERILE APETALA, a multifunctional gene regulating inflorescence, flower, and ovule developmentGenes Dev.1310021014

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CausierB.KiefferM.DaviesB.2002MADS-box genes reach maturityScience296275276

  • ChaidamsariT.SamanhudiSugiartiH.SantosoD.AngenentG.C.de MaagdR.A.2006Isolation and characterization of an AGAMOUS homologue from cocoaPlant Sci.170968975

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CloughS.J.BentA.F.1998Floral dip: A simplified method for Agrobacterium–mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thalianaPlant J.16735743

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CoenE.S.MeyerowitzE.M.1991The war of the whorls: Genetic interactions controlling flower developmentNature3533137

  • DeyholosM.K.SieburthL.E.2000Separable whorl-specific expression and negative regulation by enhancer elements within the AGAMOUS second intronPlant Cell1217991810

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FranksR.G.WangC.LevinJ.Z.LiuZ.2002SEUSS, a member of a novel family of plant regulatory proteins, represses floral homeotic gene expression with LEUNIGDevelopment129253263

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • García-MarotoF.CarmonaM-J.GarridoJ-A.Vilches-FerrónM.Rodríguez-RuizJ.López AlonsoD.2003New roles for MADS-box genes in higher plantsBiol. Plant.46321330

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HalG.D.2000Pecan food potential in prehistoric North AmericaEcon. Bot.54103112

  • HongJ.K.KimS.Y.KimK.S.KwonS.J.KimJ.S.KimJ.A.LeeS.I.LeeY.H.2013Overexpression of a Brassica rapa MADS-box gene, BrAGL20, induces early flowering time phenotypes in Brassica napusPlant Biotechnol. Rep.7231237

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HouJ.H.GaoZ.H.ZhangZ.ChenS.M.AndoT.ZhangJ.Y.WangX.W.2011Isolation and characterization of an AGAMOUS homologue PmAG from the japanese apricot (Prunus mume Sieb. et Zucc.)Plant Mol. Biol. Rpt.29473480

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KempinS.A.MandelM.A.YanofskyM.F.1993Conversion of perianth into reproductive organs by ectopic expression of the tobacco floral homeotic gene NAG1Plant Physiol.10310411046

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KramerE.M.JaramilloM.A.Di StilioV.S.2004Patterns of gene duplication and functional evolution during the diversification of the AGAMOUS subfamily of MADS box genes in angiospermsGenetics16610111023

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LiuJ-J.2012Ectopic expression of a truncated Pinus radiata AGAMOUS homolog (PrAG1) causes alteration of inflorescence architecture and male sterility in Nicotiana tabacumMol. Breed.30453467

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LiuX.AndersonJ.M.PijutP.M.2010Cloning and characterization of Prunus serotina AGAMOUS, a putative flower homeotic genePlant Mol. Biol. Rpt.28193203

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LiuZ.MeyerowitzE.M.1995LEUNIG regulates AGAMOUS expression in Arabidopsis flowersDevelopment121975991

  • LiuZ.X.ZhangD.D.LiuD.LiF.L.LuH.2013Exon skipping of AGAMOUS homolog PrseAG in developing double flowers of Prunus lannesiana (Rosaceae)Plant Cell Rpt.32227237

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LivakK.J.SchmittgenT.D.2001Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCt methodMethods25402408

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MartinT.HuM.LabbeH.McHughS.SvircevA.MikiB.2006PpAG1, a homolog of AGAMOUS, expressed in developing peach flowers and fruitCan. J. Bot.84767776

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MoZ.H.ZhangJ.Y.ZhaiM.JiaX.D.XuanJ.P.LiY.R.GuoZ.R.2013Cloning and sequence analysis of MADS-box gene conservative fragment from pecan (Carya illinoensis)J. Southern Agr.44730734

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NapoliC.LemieuxC.JorgensenR.1990Introduction of a chimeric chalcone synthase gene into petunia results in reversible co-suppression of homologous genes in transPlant Cell4279289

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PnueliL.HarevenD.RounsleyS.D.YanofskyM.F.LifschitzE.1994Isolation of the tomato AGAMOUS gene TAG1 and analysis of its homeotic role in transgenic plantsPlant Cell6163173

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ReidW.HuntK.L.2000Pecan production in the northern United StatesHortTechnology10298301

  • RigolaD.M.E.MizziL.CiampoliniF.Sari-GorlaM.2001CaMADS1, an AGAMOUS homologue from hazelnut, produces floral homeotic conversion when expressed in ArabidopsisSex. Plant Reprod.13185191

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SerwatowskaJ.RoqueE.Gomez-MenaC.ConstantinG.D.WenJ.MysoreK.S.LundO.S.JohansenE.BeltranJ.P.CanasL.A.2014Two euAGAMOUS genes control C-function in Medicago truncatulaPLoS One9e103770

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SieburthL.E.RunningM.P.MeyerowitzE.M.1995Genetic separation of third and fourth whorl functions of AGAMOUSPlant Cell712491258

  • SmythD.R.BowmanJ.L.MeyerowitzE.M.1990Early flower development in ArabidopsisPlant Cell2755767

  • TheissenG.2001Development of floral organ identity: Stories from the MADS houseCurr. Opin. Plant Biol.47585

  • TheissenG.BeckerA.RosaA.D.KannoA.KimJ.T.MünsterT.WinterK.-U.SaedlerH.2000A short history of MADS-box genes in plantsPlant Mol. Biol.42115149

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Van der LindenC.G.VosmanB.SmuldersM.J.M.2002Cloning and characterization of four apple MADS box genes isolated from vegetative tissueJ. Expt. Bot.5310251036

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WagnerD.SablowskiR.W.MeyerowitzE.M.1999Transcriptional activation of APETALA1 by LEAFYScience285582584

  • WangY.ZhangX.M.LiuZ.X.ZhangD.D.WangJ.Z.LiuD.LiF.L.LuH.2012Isolation and characterization of an AGAMOUS-like gene from Hosta plantagineaMol. Biol. Rpt.3928752881

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WoodB.W.SmithM.W.WorleyR.E.AndersonP.C.ThompsonT.T.GraukeL.J.1997Reproductive and vegetative characteristics of pecan cultivarsHortScience3210281033

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WuF.XuY.ChangF.Q.LiX.D.MaR.C.2004Cloning and characterization of two MADS box genes from peach (Prunus persica)Yi Chuan Xue Bao.31908918

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WuW.ChenF.JingD.LiuZ.MaL.2012Isolation and characterization of an AGAMOUS-like gene from Magnolia wufengensis (Magnoliaceae)Plant Mol. Biol. Rpt.30690698

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • XuJ.H.ZhongX.F.ZhangQ.Z.LiH.Y.2010Overexpression of the GmGAL2 gene accelerates flowering in ArabidopsisPlant Mol. Biol. Rpt.28704711

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • XuY.ChongK.2005Progress in research on plant stem cell organizer gene WUSCHELJ. Plant Physiol. Mol. Biol.31461468

  • YanofskyM.F.MaH.BowmanJ.L.DrewsG.N.FeldmannK.A.MeyerowitzE.M.1990The protein encoded by the Arabidopsis homeotic gene agamous resembles transcription factorsNature3463539

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ZahnL.M.Leebens-MackJ.H.ArringtonJ.M.HuY.LandherrL.L.DepamphilisC.W.BeckerA.TheissenG.MaH.2006Conservation and divergence in the AGAMOUS subfamily of MADS-box genes: Evidence of independent sub- and neofunctionalization eventsEvol. Dev.83045

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

Contributor Notes

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 31200502 and 31401854), and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Grant no. BK20150552).

Jiyu Zhang and Min Wang contributed equally to this work.

Corresponding author. E-mail: zhongrenguo@cnbg.net.

Article Sections

Article Figures

  • View in gallery

    Sequence comparison of CiAG and the AG-related MADS domain proteins. The MADS domain and the K domain are marked. The region between the MADS- and K-domain is I domain. The AG motifs (AG I and II), which are highly conserved regions reported by Kramer et al. (2004), C-terminal regions are boxed. Arabidopsis thaliana, AGAMOUS (NP_567569); Carya illinoinensis, CiAG; Juglans regia, JrAG (CAC38764); Gossypium hirsutum, GhMADS5 (ABM69043); Prunus persica, PpMADS4 (AAU29513); Momordica charantia, McMADS2 (ABC25564); Citrus sinensis, CsAG (ADP02394); Prunus serotina, PsAG (ACH72974); Jatropha curcas, JcAG (AEA11211).

  • View in gallery

    Phylogenetic analysis of AG-like MADS-box proteins. CiAG from pecan is boxed. Prunus persica, PpMADS4 (AAU29513); Prunus serotina, PsAG (ACH72974); Momordica charantia, McMADS2 (ABC25564); Jatropha curcas, JcAG (AEA11211); Corylus heterophylla, ChMADS1 (AEU08497); Carya illinoinensis, CiAG; Juglans regia, JrAG (CAC38764); Citrus sinensis, CsAG (ADP02394); Arabidopsis thaliana, AGAMOUS (NP_567569), AGL11 (NP_192734); Gossypium hirsutum, GhMADS5 (ABM69043); Petunia ×hybrida, FBP7 (CAA57311), FBP11 (CAA57445); SEP4 (NP_849930); SEP3 (NP_850953); SEP1 (NP_568322); SEP2 (NP_186880); AGL79 (NP_189645); AGL8/FUL (NP_568929); AP1 (NP_177074); CAL (Q39081); PI (NP_197524); AP3 (NP_191002).

  • View in gallery

    Expression pattern of CiAG gene revealed by quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) analysis. Branches-CG, current-growth branches; Flowers-P, pistillate flowers; Flowers-S, staminate flowers.

  • View in gallery

    Detection of CiAG gene in transgenic and wide-type Arabidopsis. A: Products of RT-PCR with primers specific for CiAG; B: Products amplified with 18S-specific primers, used as control. WT, wild-type plants; L1–5, transgenic lines.

  • View in gallery

    Floral and vegetative morphology of transgenic and wide-type Arabidopsis. (A) Wild-type Arabidopsis plant (left) and transgenic plants at the same developmental stage over-expressing CiAG (right). (B) Early flowering of 35S::CiAG transgenic plants with four rosette leaves. (C) Flower bud of wild type at developmental stage 11 (Smyth et al., 1990). (D) Flower buds of transgenic plants at the developmental stage 11. (E) Sepals of transgenic-lines could not completely enclose the developing buds. (F) Stamens of transgenic lines extended above sepals and petals. (G) Stamens of wild type were shorter than petals. (H) The base of the petal was converted into filament-like structure in 35S::CiAG transgenic plants. (I) Sepals were curled in 35S::CiAG transgenic plants. (J) ag-like flowers. (K) A: Products of RT-PCR with primers specific for CiAG and endogenous AG (Arabidopsis AG gene); B: Products amplified with 18S-specific primers, used as control. WT, wild-type plants; L1–3, ag-like plants.

Article References

  • Alvarez-BuyllaE.R.PelazS.LiljegrenS.J.GoldS.E.BurgeffC.DittaG.S.Ribas de PouplanaL.Martínez-CastillaL.YanofskyM.F.2000An ancestral MADS-box gene duplication occurred before the divergence of plants and animalsProc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA9753285333

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • AngenentG.C.FrankenJ.BusscherM.van DijkenA.van WentJ.L.DonsH.J.van TunenA.J.1995A novel class of MADS box genes is involved in ovule development in petuniaPlant Cell715691582

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BeneditoV.A.VisserP.B.van TuylJ.M.AngenentG.C.De VriesS.C.KrensF.A.2004Ectopic expression of LLAG1, an AGAMOUS homologue from lily (Lilium longiflorum Thunb.) causes floral homeotic modifications in ArabidopsisJ. Expt. Bot.5513911399

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BodtS.D.PeerR.Y.V.D.TheibenG.2003And then there were many: MADS goes genomicTrends Plant Sci.8475483

  • BossP.K.VivierM.MatsumotoS.DryI.B.ThomasM.R.2001A cDNA from grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.), which shows homology to AGAMOUS and SHATTERPROOF, is not only expressed in flowers but also throughout berry developmentPlant Mol. Biol.45541553

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BrunnerA.M.RottmannW.H.SheppardL.A.KrutovskiiK.DiFazioS.P.LeonardiS.StraussS.H.2000Structure and expression of duplicate AGAMOUS orthologues in poplarPlant Mol. Biol.44619634

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BuschM.A.BombliesK.WeigelD.1999Activation of a floral homeotic gene in ArabidopsisScience285585587

  • ByzovaM.V.FrankenJ.AartsM.G.de Almeida-EnglerJ.EnglerG.MarianiC.Van Lookeren CampagneM.M.AngenentG.C.1999Arabidopsis STERILE APETALA, a multifunctional gene regulating inflorescence, flower, and ovule developmentGenes Dev.1310021014

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CausierB.KiefferM.DaviesB.2002MADS-box genes reach maturityScience296275276

  • ChaidamsariT.SamanhudiSugiartiH.SantosoD.AngenentG.C.de MaagdR.A.2006Isolation and characterization of an AGAMOUS homologue from cocoaPlant Sci.170968975

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CloughS.J.BentA.F.1998Floral dip: A simplified method for Agrobacterium–mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thalianaPlant J.16735743

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CoenE.S.MeyerowitzE.M.1991The war of the whorls: Genetic interactions controlling flower developmentNature3533137

  • DeyholosM.K.SieburthL.E.2000Separable whorl-specific expression and negative regulation by enhancer elements within the AGAMOUS second intronPlant Cell1217991810

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FranksR.G.WangC.LevinJ.Z.LiuZ.2002SEUSS, a member of a novel family of plant regulatory proteins, represses floral homeotic gene expression with LEUNIGDevelopment129253263

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • García-MarotoF.CarmonaM-J.GarridoJ-A.Vilches-FerrónM.Rodríguez-RuizJ.López AlonsoD.2003New roles for MADS-box genes in higher plantsBiol. Plant.46321330

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HalG.D.2000Pecan food potential in prehistoric North AmericaEcon. Bot.54103112

  • HongJ.K.KimS.Y.KimK.S.KwonS.J.KimJ.S.KimJ.A.LeeS.I.LeeY.H.2013Overexpression of a Brassica rapa MADS-box gene, BrAGL20, induces early flowering time phenotypes in Brassica napusPlant Biotechnol. Rep.7231237

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HouJ.H.GaoZ.H.ZhangZ.ChenS.M.AndoT.ZhangJ.Y.WangX.W.2011Isolation and characterization of an AGAMOUS homologue PmAG from the japanese apricot (Prunus mume Sieb. et Zucc.)Plant Mol. Biol. Rpt.29473480

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KempinS.A.MandelM.A.YanofskyM.F.1993Conversion of perianth into reproductive organs by ectopic expression of the tobacco floral homeotic gene NAG1Plant Physiol.10310411046

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KramerE.M.JaramilloM.A.Di StilioV.S.2004Patterns of gene duplication and functional evolution during the diversification of the AGAMOUS subfamily of MADS box genes in angiospermsGenetics16610111023

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LiuJ-J.2012Ectopic expression of a truncated Pinus radiata AGAMOUS homolog (PrAG1) causes alteration of inflorescence architecture and male sterility in Nicotiana tabacumMol. Breed.30453467

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LiuX.AndersonJ.M.PijutP.M.2010Cloning and characterization of Prunus serotina AGAMOUS, a putative flower homeotic genePlant Mol. Biol. Rpt.28193203

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LiuZ.MeyerowitzE.M.1995LEUNIG regulates AGAMOUS expression in Arabidopsis flowersDevelopment121975991

  • LiuZ.X.ZhangD.D.LiuD.LiF.L.LuH.2013Exon skipping of AGAMOUS homolog PrseAG in developing double flowers of Prunus lannesiana (Rosaceae)Plant Cell Rpt.32227237

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LivakK.J.SchmittgenT.D.2001Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCt methodMethods25402408

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MartinT.HuM.LabbeH.McHughS.SvircevA.MikiB.2006PpAG1, a homolog of AGAMOUS, expressed in developing peach flowers and fruitCan. J. Bot.84767776

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MoZ.H.ZhangJ.Y.ZhaiM.JiaX.D.XuanJ.P.LiY.R.GuoZ.R.2013Cloning and sequence analysis of MADS-box gene conservative fragment from pecan (Carya illinoensis)J. Southern Agr.44730734

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • NapoliC.LemieuxC.JorgensenR.1990Introduction of a chimeric chalcone synthase gene into petunia results in reversible co-suppression of homologous genes in transPlant Cell4279289

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PnueliL.HarevenD.RounsleyS.D.YanofskyM.F.LifschitzE.1994Isolation of the tomato AGAMOUS gene TAG1 and analysis of its homeotic role in transgenic plantsPlant Cell6163173

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ReidW.HuntK.L.2000Pecan production in the northern United StatesHortTechnology10298301

  • RigolaD.M.E.MizziL.CiampoliniF.Sari-GorlaM.2001CaMADS1, an AGAMOUS homologue from hazelnut, produces floral homeotic conversion when expressed in ArabidopsisSex. Plant Reprod.13185191

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SerwatowskaJ.RoqueE.Gomez-MenaC.ConstantinG.D.WenJ.MysoreK.S.LundO.S.JohansenE.BeltranJ.P.CanasL.A.2014Two euAGAMOUS genes control C-function in Medicago truncatulaPLoS One9e103770

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SieburthL.E.RunningM.P.MeyerowitzE.M.1995Genetic separation of third and fourth whorl functions of AGAMOUSPlant Cell712491258

  • SmythD.R.BowmanJ.L.MeyerowitzE.M.1990Early flower development in ArabidopsisPlant Cell2755767

  • TheissenG.2001Development of floral organ identity: Stories from the MADS houseCurr. Opin. Plant Biol.47585

  • TheissenG.BeckerA.RosaA.D.KannoA.KimJ.T.MünsterT.WinterK.-U.SaedlerH.2000A short history of MADS-box genes in plantsPlant Mol. Biol.42115149

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Van der LindenC.G.VosmanB.SmuldersM.J.M.2002Cloning and characterization of four apple MADS box genes isolated from vegetative tissueJ. Expt. Bot.5310251036

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WagnerD.SablowskiR.W.MeyerowitzE.M.1999Transcriptional activation of APETALA1 by LEAFYScience285582584

  • WangY.ZhangX.M.LiuZ.X.ZhangD.D.WangJ.Z.LiuD.LiF.L.LuH.2012Isolation and characterization of an AGAMOUS-like gene from Hosta plantagineaMol. Biol. Rpt.3928752881

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WoodB.W.SmithM.W.WorleyR.E.AndersonP.C.ThompsonT.T.GraukeL.J.1997Reproductive and vegetative characteristics of pecan cultivarsHortScience3210281033

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WuF.XuY.ChangF.Q.LiX.D.MaR.C.2004Cloning and characterization of two MADS box genes from peach (Prunus persica)Yi Chuan Xue Bao.31908918

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WuW.ChenF.JingD.LiuZ.MaL.2012Isolation and characterization of an AGAMOUS-like gene from Magnolia wufengensis (Magnoliaceae)Plant Mol. Biol. Rpt.30690698

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • XuJ.H.ZhongX.F.ZhangQ.Z.LiH.Y.2010Overexpression of the GmGAL2 gene accelerates flowering in ArabidopsisPlant Mol. Biol. Rpt.28704711

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • XuY.ChongK.2005Progress in research on plant stem cell organizer gene WUSCHELJ. Plant Physiol. Mol. Biol.31461468

  • YanofskyM.F.MaH.BowmanJ.L.DrewsG.N.FeldmannK.A.MeyerowitzE.M.1990The protein encoded by the Arabidopsis homeotic gene agamous resembles transcription factorsNature3463539

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ZahnL.M.Leebens-MackJ.H.ArringtonJ.M.HuY.LandherrL.L.DepamphilisC.W.BeckerA.TheissenG.MaH.2006Conservation and divergence in the AGAMOUS subfamily of MADS-box genes: Evidence of independent sub- and neofunctionalization eventsEvol. Dev.83045

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Article Information

Google Scholar

Related Content

Article Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 70 70 0
Full Text Views 124 124 6
PDF Downloads 18 18 1