Suaeda glauca Can Be Produced Hydroponically at Moderate NaCl Salinity

in HortScience

Suaeda glauca is an annual halophyte growing in saline–alkali environment in North China. To evaluate the potential of producing S. glauca as a vegetable at moderate NaCl concentrations, plants were grown in nutrient solutions with 6, 8, and 10 mm NaCl, and with 200 mm NaCl as a control. Results showed that main stem length, true leaf number, side branch number, and canopy width of plants in 6–10 mm NaCl were not significantly different from those in 200 mm. Also, no significant differences in fresh and dry weights of individual plants, marketable yield, and water use efficiency of the plants were observed between 6–10 and 200 mm NaCl treatments. Despite remarkable decreases in sodium uptake, similar water consumptions by the plants were obtained in 6–10 vs. 200 mm NaCl. The results suggest that S. glauca is a potential candidate for hydroponic production as a vegetable at moderate NaCl salinity, since growth attributes and biomass accumulation were not reduced when grown at lower salinity levels, despite with decreased sodium uptake.

Abstract

Suaeda glauca is an annual halophyte growing in saline–alkali environment in North China. To evaluate the potential of producing S. glauca as a vegetable at moderate NaCl concentrations, plants were grown in nutrient solutions with 6, 8, and 10 mm NaCl, and with 200 mm NaCl as a control. Results showed that main stem length, true leaf number, side branch number, and canopy width of plants in 6–10 mm NaCl were not significantly different from those in 200 mm. Also, no significant differences in fresh and dry weights of individual plants, marketable yield, and water use efficiency of the plants were observed between 6–10 and 200 mm NaCl treatments. Despite remarkable decreases in sodium uptake, similar water consumptions by the plants were obtained in 6–10 vs. 200 mm NaCl. The results suggest that S. glauca is a potential candidate for hydroponic production as a vegetable at moderate NaCl salinity, since growth attributes and biomass accumulation were not reduced when grown at lower salinity levels, despite with decreased sodium uptake.

Hydroponic vegetable growers are searching for ways to increase on-farm reuse of nutrient solutions and to reduce discharge into the environment (Shannon and Grieve, 2000). Discharge wastes both water and fertilizer, pollutes the environment, and can result in soil salinization (Varlagas et al., 2010). One of the most important factors limiting the reuse of nutrient solutions for hydroponic production of common vegetables (e.g., cucumber, tomato, and pepper) is elevated salinity (Van Os, 1998), resulting mainly from Na+ and Cl accumulation attributable to their low uptake rates by these plant species (Kronzucker and Britto, 2011; Savvas et al., 2005).

One alternative strategy to discharging salinized solutions is to reuse them for hydroponic production of other economically valuable and more salt-tolerant crops (Grieve and Suarez, 1997; Kong and Zheng, 2014a; Pardossi et al., 1999). These types of crop species must have the ability to withstand elevated salinity levels without growth inhibition and reduced productivity, while providing a saleable product (Adler et al., 2003; Grieve and Suarez, 1997).

Suaeda glauca, an annual halophyte growing in saline–alkaline soils in North China (Guan et al., 2013), has a high degree of resistance to salt and alkali stresses (Yang et al., 2008). Consequently, it has been suggested S. glauca be used as pioneer plants for ecological recovery of saline and sodic soils (Guan et al., 2013). In addition, due to its good palatability and medicinal value (An et al., 2008; Yang et al., 2008), S. glauca has been identified as a traditional wild vegetable and/or medicinal plant in countries such as China and Korea (Kefu et al., 2002; Kim and Song, 2013). Moreover, S. glauca has recently been cultivated in China as one kind of seawater-irrigated specialty vegetable, which can be served as salad or stir-fried with other ingredients (Hong et al., 2003; Yancheng Green Garden Saline Soil Agricultural Science Co., 2013).

Can S. glauca be used for hydroponic production using salinized nutrient solutions recovered from the greenhouse production of the salt-intolerant vegetable crops mentioned above? To answer this question, it is necessary to assess at first the growth response of S. glauca to different salinity levels under hydroponic conditions. So far studies have been focused on mere evaluation of S. glauca’s extreme salt tolerance and understanding tolerance mechanisms under soil or sand culture conditions while neglecting the crop’s commercial potential (Guan et al., 2013; Sun and Zhou, 2010; Yang et al., 2008; Zhao et al., 2005). S. glauca has been reported to be able to survive at soil salt concentrations equal to or greater than 2% (≈260 mm NaCl) (Sun and Zhou, 2010), but when root-zone Na+ concentrations increased up to 300 and 450 mm under sand cultivation, the relative growth rate (RGR) and biomass began to show significant decrease (Guan et al., 2013; Yang et al., 2008). The high salt tolerance of S. glauca is associated with its high levels of salt accumulation in the plant tissues. In their native habitat, Xingjiang, China, the plant can accumulate Na+ up to 2.2% of its dry weight (DW) (Zhao et al., 2005). Under sand cultivation, when external Na+ concentrations increased from 75 to 300 mm, Na+ accumulation in fresh shoots increased from around 300 to 400 mm (Yang et al., 2008). However, salt tolerance, Na+ uptake, and biomass accumulation in plants can be affected by the culture medium (Liu, 2002) and no information is available for hydroponic conditions.

In the above studies, the Na+ concentrations were relatively high; ranging from 75 to 600 mm (Guan et al., 2013; Yang et al., 2008). However, Na+ concentration of most nutrient solutions discharged from hydroponic production of common vegetables ranges from 6 to 8 mm, a moderate salinity (Van Os, 1998). Many dicotyledonous halophytes show optimal growth in concentrations of 50–250 mm NaCl (Flowers and Colmer, 2008), and suboptimal NaCl concentration may reduce plant growth of some halophytes in hydroponic systems (Rozema and Schat, 2013). For example, 5 mm NaCl has been shown to reduce plant growth, including biomass accumulation, associated with decreased sodium uptake in hydroponic Salicornia bigelovii compared with 200 mm NaCl (Ayala and O’Leary, 1995). Conversely, Brown et al. (1999) found that Suaeda esteroa, which is in the same genus as S. glauca, showed no significant differences in final DW and RGR between the plants treated by ≈9 and ≈180 mm NaCl under sand culture (Brown et al., 1999). However, S. esteroa and S. glauca are different halophyte species, and plant growth responses to salinity gradient may vary greatly among different halophyte species even in the same genus (Ashraf et al., 2010). Therefore, further study is needed to determine whether hydroponic S. glauca, like S. bigelovii, is negatively affected when cultivated in a low-salinity environment.

The overall objective of this study was to evaluate the potential of producing S. glauca hydroponically as a vegetable at moderate (6–10 mm) NaCl concentrations typically found in the discharged solutions from hydroponic production of common vegetables.

Materials and Methods

Plant materials and growing conditions.

The experiments were conducted in a greenhouse in the Edmund C. Bovey building at the University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada (lat. 43°33′N, long. 80°15′W). Seeds of S. glauca (bought from Yancheng Green Garden Saline Soil Agricultural Science Company, Jiangsu, China) were sown on 25 Apr. 2013, in a soilless medium with peat–perlite mixture of 1:1 by volume. Twenty days after sowing, seedlings with three pairs of true leaves were transplanted into rockwool cubes (3.8 cm Starter Plugs; Grodan Inc., Ontario, Canada), which were embedded in styrofoam discs floating on the nutrient solution in plastic pots (14 cm top and 12 cm bottom diameters × 15 cm high). Each pot had a styrofoam disc with four seedlings growing in individual rockwool cubes, except for the blank control pot that had only a disc and four unplanted rockwool cubes. Each pot contained 1.5 L of solution with the following nutrients (mg·L−1): 278.3 N, 36.7 P, 420 K, 97.6 Ca, 1.58 Mg, 100.8 S, 0.53 Cu, 0.21 B, 0.53 Mn, 0.53 Zn, 0.16 Mo, and 1.05 Fe. Seven days after transplanting, the nutrient solutions were changed for all the pots, and NaCl was added to the solutions to achieve four treatment concentrations: 6, 8, 10, and 200 (control) mm, which indicated the start of treatment. The initial Na+ concentrations of the above four salt-treated nutrient solutions were measured as 6.9 ± 0.1, 8.8 ± 0.2, 10.8 ± 0.3, and 213.3 ± 4.3 mm, with the electrical conductivity of 3.34 ± 0.03, 3.54 ± 0.05, 3.81 ± 0.06, and 21.58 ± 0.71 dS·m−1, respectively. The nutrient solutions were changed every 7 d to reduce nutrient and NaCl concentration variability during the experiment and nutrient solution pH ranged between 5.5 and 7.0. Pots were arranged in a randomized block design with three blocks and four NaCl concentrations within each block.

The greenhouse conditions were set at 18-h light/6-h dark by supplementing natural sunlight with high pressure sodium lamps to achieve a photosynthetic active radiation at canopy level averaging no less than 397 ± 34 μmol·m−2·s–1, and 22 to 28 °C light/20 to 22 °C dark with a relative humidity between 50% and 60%.

Measurement of plant growth.

Two plants were randomly chosen from each pot within each block for growth measurements. Every week the following attributes were measured: main stem length, true leaf number, and side branch number on the main stem, and canopy width. Four weeks after the start of treatment, all the tested seedlings were harvested.

Plant fresh weight (FW) increase during each week was determined by weighing the solutions and plants at the beginning and the end of each week, since the rockwool and styrofoam weights were constant. Then, FW increase rate was calculated as follows:

DE1
where Wft and Wit are the final and initial total weights (g) of each pot together with solution, plants, rockwool cubes, and styrofoam during each week, respectively; Wfps and Wips are the final and initial weights (g) of each pot and solution during each week, respectively; t is the treatment time (d) of each week, and 4 is the number of seedlings in each pot.

At the time of harvest each plant was cut at the base above the rockwool cube, and the remaining plant tissue was separated from the rockwool cube, washed with tap water, and then rinsed with deionized water. FW of plant tissue from above and within the rockwool cube were measured respectively. Plant tissue DWs were determined by drying in an oven at 65 °C until constant weight was achieved.

Marketable yield and water use efficiency were calculated as follows:

DE2
where FWs is the fresh weight (g) of harvested plant tissue above the rockwool cube from each pot and 0.015 is the top area (m2) of each pot.
DE3
where ΔFWi is the increase of fresh weight (g) of plants in each pot during the ith week (i = 1, 2, 3, and 4), which can be estimated from Eq. [1], and ΔVi is the volume (L) of consumed water in each pot during the ith week (i = 1, 2, 3, and 4). The initial and final volume of nutrient solution was measured weekly per pot and the difference in solution volume was assumed to be the weekly volume of water consumed by the four plants in each pot.

Estimation of sodium uptake.

A subsample of the fresh and week-old nutrient solution was analyzed for Na+ concentration using a portable pH/ISE meter and sodium electrode (Thermo Orion model 290A; Waltham, MA). Na+ removal rate of the plants in each pot per week was calculated as follows:

DE4
where Vi and Vf are the initial and final volumes (L) of solution in each pot during each week, respectively; and Ci and Cf are the initial and final Na+ concentrations (mm) in the solution in each pot during each week, respectively. Vi′, Vf ′, Ci′, and Cf′ are the initial and final volumes (L) and the initial and final Na+ concentrations (mm) of solution in blank control pot during each week, respectively. t is the treatment time (d) of each week, and 4 is the number of seedlings in each pot.

At harvest, total Na+ removal amount per plant was calculated as follows:

DE5
where SSRi is the Na+ removal rate (mmol/plant/d) during the ith week (i = 1, 2, 3, and 4), which was determined from Eq. [4], and ti is the treatment time (d) during the ith week (i = 1, 2, 3, and 4). Equation [6] was used for the calculation of total water consumption of each plant (L/plant).
DE6
where ΔVi has been defined in Eq. [3], and the denominator in the formula, 4, is the number of seedlings in each pot.

Na+ removal efficiency (mol·kg−1 DW) and Na+ uptake concentration (mmol·L−1 H2O) were calculated as below:

DE7
DE8

In Eqs. [7] and [8], SRA is the total Na+ removal amount per plant (mmol/plant), which is determined from Eq. [5]. In Eq. [7], DW is the dry weight per plant (g/plant). In Eq. [8], WC is the total water consumption of each plant (L/plant), which can be determined from Eq. [6].

Statistical analysis.

Data were subjected to analysis of variance using the Data Processing System Software (version 7.05; Refine Information Tech. Co., Hangzhou, China) and were presented as mean ± se; separation of means was performed using Duncan’s new multiple range test at the P ≤ 0.05 level.

Results

Plant growth.

Generally, there was no difference in apparent growth among the four NaCl treatments throughout the whole experimental period (Fig. 1), except that immediately before harvest (27 d after the start of treatment) 6 and 8 mm NaCl led to higher main stem length and side branch number than 200 mm NaCl (Fig. 1A and C).

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

Main stem length (A), number of leaves (B), number of side branches on main stem (C), and canopy width (D) of S. glauca grown in hydroponic solutions with different NaCl concentrations and at different growth stages. Data are means ± se (n = 6). Where bars are not visible, se does not exceed the size of the symbol. The bars above the lines indicated the lsd0.05 for each measuring day.

Citation: HortScience horts 50, 6; 10.21273/HORTSCI.50.6.847

Biomass accumulation.

The FW increase rate was similar among the four NaCl treatments during the first 3 weeks of treatment, but it was higher for plants in the 6–10 mm NaCl treatments than in the 200 mm NaCl treatment during the week immediately before harvest (i.e., 21–28 d after the start of treatment) (Fig. 2). At harvest, fresh and dry weight of individual plants, marketable yield, and water use efficiency of the plants grown in 6–10 mm NaCl showed no significant difference from those in 200 mm NaCl (Table 1).

Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

Fresh weight increase rate of S. glauca at different growth stages grown in hydroponic solutions with different NaCl concentrations. Data are means ± se (n = 3). Bars bearing the same letter are not significantly different at P ≤ 0.05 according to Duncan’s new multiple range test.

Citation: HortScience horts 50, 6; 10.21273/HORTSCI.50.6.847

Table 1.

Biomass accumulation, marketable yield, and water use efficiency in S. glauca grown in hydroponic solutions with different NaCl concentrations.

Table 1.

Sodium uptake.

At the final harvest, significant decreases were observed in sodium uptake, but not in water consumption, by plants when solution concentrations of NaCl decreased from 200 to 6–10 mm (Table 2). Plants exposed to 6–10 vs. 200 mm NaCl showed ≈13-, 15-, and 17-fold decrease in Na+ removal amount, Na+ removal efficiency, and Na+ uptake concentration, respectively, but with similar water consumption.

Table 2.

Na+ removal amount, Na+ removal efficiency, Na+ uptake concentration, and water consumption 28 d after the start of treatment for S. glauca grown in hydroponic solutions with different NaCl concentrations.

Table 2.

Discussion

Moderate NaCl salinity did not reduce plant growth and biomass accumulation of hydroponic S. glauca.

The optimal salinity levels for the growth of many halophytes have been shown to be 50–250 mm NaCl (Flowers and Colmer, 2008). Suboptimal NaCl concentration may reduce plant growth, which is especially evident in hydroponic system studies; for example, 5–10 vs. 200 mm NaCl has reduced growth rate and biomass accumulation in hydroponic S. bigelovii (Ayala and O’Leary, 1995; Kong and Zheng, 2014b). However, unlike S. bigelovii, in the present study of hydroponic S. glauca, 6–10 mm NaCl did not inhibit plant growth compared with 200 mm NaCl. Similar results have been reported in S. esteroa under sand culture system where no significant differences in RGR and final DW were observed between the plants treated by ≈9 and ≈180 mm NaCl (Brown et al., 1999). It was suggested Suaeda generally performed better than Salicornia at moderate salinity.

The above differences in plant growth response to salinity gradient between Suaeda and Salicornia are possibly attributed to the fact that these two plant species are different types of halophytes (Ashraf et al., 2010). Salicornioideae and some other genera have been regarded as “obligate halophytes,” since they do not just tolerate high salinity levels in hydroponic culture, but also require considerable salinity levels (e.g., 200 mm NaCl) to attain optimal growth (Rozema and Schat, 2013). Evidently, “obligate halophytes” should include S. bigelovii, but not S. glauca as well as S. esteroa.

For leafy vegetables, yield potential greatly depends on biomass accumulation, and high growth rate (i.e., short production period) is one of the advantages of hydroponic production over soil cultivation (Kaşkar et al., 2008). No growth inhibition at 6−10 vs. 200 mm NaCl would not affect production time and yield potential for hydroponic S. glauca when grown under moderate vs. high NaCl concentrations.

Decreased Na+ uptake in hydroponic S. glauca at moderate NaCl salinity did not affect water consumption and biomass accumulation.

The ability to accumulate NaCl for osmotic adjustment is a nearly universal trait of salt-tolerant plants (Glenn et al., 1999). However, Na+ uptake from the medium by plants was positively related to NaCl concentration of root-zone solution, which might also affect the relative availability of Na+ to the plant root system (Teixeira and Carvalho, 2008). Consequently, in the present study, when the external NaCl concentration decreased from 200 to 6−10 mm, S. glauca significantly reduced Na+ absorption (Table 2).

Halophytes use the controlled uptake of Na+, balanced by Cl and other anions, into cell vacuoles to drive water uptake into the plant against a low external water potential (Glenn et al., 1999). With the decrease of external NaCl concentrations, some halophytes like S. bigelovii not only decrease Na+ absorption, but also reduce water consumption (Kong and Zheng, 2014b). However, water consumption by S. glauca was not reduced when external NaCl concentrations decreased from 200 to 6−10 mm. This difference may be due to a less important role played by Na+ in osmotic adjustment to drive water uptake into the plant at moderate salinity in Suaeda than in Salicornia. A previous study indicated that Na+ was the major osmotica in Salicornia europaea leaves and its tissue Na+ content was increased with higher levels of salinity, but Suaeda maritima plants accumulated higher levels of proline in their leaves at lower NaCl concentrations than S. europaea despite a similar tendency for the tissue Na+ increase with increased external salinity (Moghaieb et al., 2004). Another study indicated that when external Na+ concentration is low, succulent halophytes, such as S. maritima, also accumulate higher levels of K+ (Flowers and Colmer, 2008).

The difference in water uptake response to salinity change between S. glauca and S. bigelovii could directly affect their plant succulence (i.e., amount of water per unit dry mass) and thereby biomass accumulation. When external NaCl concentrations decreased from 200 to 6−10 mm, plant succulence was reduced in S. bigelovii (Kong and Zheng, 2014b), but not in S. glauca since this species showed no differences in both fresh and dry weight among different NaCl treatments. Both Suaeda and Salicornia are succulent halophytes (Brown et al., 1999), and succulence is not only a mechanism to dilute excess NaCl in leaf tissues (Glenn et al., 1999), but could also be a major contributor to biomass accumulation in these halophytes (Flowers and Colmer, 2008; Rozema and Schat, 2013). Consequently, when external NaCl concentration was lower, nonreduced succulence and water uptake in S. glauca, unlike in S. bigelovii, could contribute much to nonreduced biomass accumulation at moderate salinity, despite decreased Na+ uptake in both plant species.

In summary, our results suggest that, at moderate NaCl salinity, S. glauca has the potential to be used for hydroponic production as a vegetable due to nonreduced plant growth and yield, despite decreased Na+ uptake.

Literature Cited

  • AdlerP.R.SummerfeltS.T.GlennD.M.TakedaF.2003Mechanistic approach to phytoremediation of waterEcol. Eng.20251264

  • AnR.-B.SohnD.-H.JeongG.-S.KimY.-C.2008In vitro hepatoprotective compounds from Suaeda glaucaArch. Pharm. Res.31594597

  • AshrafM.OzturkM.AhmadM.S.A.2010Plant adaptation and phytoremediation. Springer New York

  • AyalaF.O'LearyJ.W.1995Growth and physiology of Salicornia bigelovii Torr. at suboptimal salinityIntl. J. Plant Sci.156197205

  • BrownJ.J.GlennE.P.FitzsimmonsK.M.SmithS.E.1999Halophytes for the treatment of saline aquaculture effluentAquaculture175255268

  • FlowersT.J.ColmerT.D.2008Salinity tolerance in halophytesNew Phytol.179945963

  • GlennE.P.BrownJ.J.BlumwaldE.1999Salt tolerance and crop potential of halophytesCrit. Rev. Plant Sci.18227255

  • GrieveC.M.SuarezD.L.1997Purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.): A halophytic crop for drainage water reuse systemsPlant Soil192277283

  • GuanB.LinQ.ZhouD.YuJ.2013Germination strategies of Suaeda species for saline-alkaline environmentsAfr. J. Agr. Res.8690694

  • HongL.ZhouC.WangM.DingJ.YinJ.2003Cultivation techniques for Suaeda glaucaChina Vegetables.352

  • KaşkarÇ.FernándezaJ.A.OchoaJ.NiñirolaD.ConesaE.TüzelY.2008Agronomic behaviour and oxalate and nitrate content of different purslane cultivars (Portulaca oleracea) grown in a hydroponic floating systemActa Hort.807521526

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KefuZ.HaiF.UngarI.A.2002Survey of halophyte species in ChinaPlant Sci.163491498

  • KimH.SongM.-J.2013Ethnobotanical analysis for traditional knowledge of wild edible plants in North Jeolla Province (Korea)Genet. Resources Crop Evol.6015711585

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KongY.ZhengY.2014aHydroponic production of purslane as a sodium-removing vegetable in NaCl-rich nutrient solutionHortScience49201206

  • KongY.ZhengY.2014bPotential of producing Salicornia bigelovii hydroponically as a vegetable at moderate NaCl salinityHortScience4911541157

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KronzuckerH.J.BrittoD.T.2011Sodium transport in plants: A critical reviewNew Phytol.1895481

  • LiuS.2002Modern and practical soilless cultivation technology. China Agricultural Press Beijing

  • MoghaiebR.E.A.SaneokaH.FujitaK.2004Effect of salinity on osmotic adjustment, glycinebetaine accumulation and the betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase gene expression in two halophytic plants, Salicornia europaea and Suaeda maritimaPlant Sci.16613451349

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PardossiA.BagnoliG.MalorgioF.CampiottiC.A.TognoniF.1999NaCl effects on celery (Apium graveolens L.) grown in NFTSci. Hort.81229242

  • RozemaJ.SchatH.2013Salt tolerance of halophytes, research questions reviewed in the perspective of saline agricultureEnviron. Exp. Bot.928395

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SavvasD.PappaV.A.GizasG.MaglarasL.2005Influence of NaCl concentration in the irrigation water on salt accumulation in the root zone and yield in a cucumber crop grown in a closed hydroponic systemActa Hort.6979398

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ShannonM.C.GrieveC.M.2000Options for using low-quality water for vegetable cropsHortScience3510581062

  • SunH.X.ZhouD.W.2010Effect of dietary supplement of seed of a halophyte (Suaeda glauca) on feed and water intake, diet digestibility, animal performance and serum biochemistry in lambsLivest. Sci.128133139

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • TeixeiraM.CarvalhoI.S.2008Effects of salt stress on purslane (Portulaca oleracea) nutritionAnn. Appl. Biol.1547786

  • Van OsE.A.1998Closed soilless growing systems in The Netherlands: The finishing touchActa Hort.458279292

  • VarlagasH.SavvasD.MouzakisG.LiotsosC.KarapanosI.SigrimisN.2010Modelling uptake of Na+ and Cl by tomato in closed-cycle cultivation systems as influenced by irrigation water salinityAgr. Water Mgt.9712421250

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yancheng Green Garden Saline Soil Agricultural Science Co. L.2013Fresh Suaeda Glauca. Jan. 14. 2015. <http://www.21food.com/showroom/732703/product/fresh-suaeda-glauca.html>

  • YangC.ShiD.WangD.2008Comparative effects of salt and alkali stresses on growth, osmotic adjustment and ionic balance of an alkali-resistant halophyte Suaeda glauca (Bge.)Plant Growth Regulat.56179190

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ZhaoK.-F.FanH.SongJ.SunM.-X.WangB.-Z.ZhangS.-Q.UngarI.A.2005Two Na+ and Cl hyperaccumulators of the ChenopodiaceaeJ. Integr. Plant Biol.47311318

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

Contributor Notes

We thank David Llewellyn, Tyson Jennett, Eric Rozema, and Katherine Vinson for their technical support and informative discussions during the experiment. Thanks also to the anonymous reviewers for their very useful suggestions on the revision of this manuscript.

To whom reprint requests should be addressed; e-mail yzheng@uoguelph.ca.

Article Sections

Article Figures

  • View in gallery

    Main stem length (A), number of leaves (B), number of side branches on main stem (C), and canopy width (D) of S. glauca grown in hydroponic solutions with different NaCl concentrations and at different growth stages. Data are means ± se (n = 6). Where bars are not visible, se does not exceed the size of the symbol. The bars above the lines indicated the lsd0.05 for each measuring day.

  • View in gallery

    Fresh weight increase rate of S. glauca at different growth stages grown in hydroponic solutions with different NaCl concentrations. Data are means ± se (n = 3). Bars bearing the same letter are not significantly different at P ≤ 0.05 according to Duncan’s new multiple range test.

Article References

  • AdlerP.R.SummerfeltS.T.GlennD.M.TakedaF.2003Mechanistic approach to phytoremediation of waterEcol. Eng.20251264

  • AnR.-B.SohnD.-H.JeongG.-S.KimY.-C.2008In vitro hepatoprotective compounds from Suaeda glaucaArch. Pharm. Res.31594597

  • AshrafM.OzturkM.AhmadM.S.A.2010Plant adaptation and phytoremediation. Springer New York

  • AyalaF.O'LearyJ.W.1995Growth and physiology of Salicornia bigelovii Torr. at suboptimal salinityIntl. J. Plant Sci.156197205

  • BrownJ.J.GlennE.P.FitzsimmonsK.M.SmithS.E.1999Halophytes for the treatment of saline aquaculture effluentAquaculture175255268

  • FlowersT.J.ColmerT.D.2008Salinity tolerance in halophytesNew Phytol.179945963

  • GlennE.P.BrownJ.J.BlumwaldE.1999Salt tolerance and crop potential of halophytesCrit. Rev. Plant Sci.18227255

  • GrieveC.M.SuarezD.L.1997Purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.): A halophytic crop for drainage water reuse systemsPlant Soil192277283

  • GuanB.LinQ.ZhouD.YuJ.2013Germination strategies of Suaeda species for saline-alkaline environmentsAfr. J. Agr. Res.8690694

  • HongL.ZhouC.WangM.DingJ.YinJ.2003Cultivation techniques for Suaeda glaucaChina Vegetables.352

  • KaşkarÇ.FernándezaJ.A.OchoaJ.NiñirolaD.ConesaE.TüzelY.2008Agronomic behaviour and oxalate and nitrate content of different purslane cultivars (Portulaca oleracea) grown in a hydroponic floating systemActa Hort.807521526

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KefuZ.HaiF.UngarI.A.2002Survey of halophyte species in ChinaPlant Sci.163491498

  • KimH.SongM.-J.2013Ethnobotanical analysis for traditional knowledge of wild edible plants in North Jeolla Province (Korea)Genet. Resources Crop Evol.6015711585

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KongY.ZhengY.2014aHydroponic production of purslane as a sodium-removing vegetable in NaCl-rich nutrient solutionHortScience49201206

  • KongY.ZhengY.2014bPotential of producing Salicornia bigelovii hydroponically as a vegetable at moderate NaCl salinityHortScience4911541157

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KronzuckerH.J.BrittoD.T.2011Sodium transport in plants: A critical reviewNew Phytol.1895481

  • LiuS.2002Modern and practical soilless cultivation technology. China Agricultural Press Beijing

  • MoghaiebR.E.A.SaneokaH.FujitaK.2004Effect of salinity on osmotic adjustment, glycinebetaine accumulation and the betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase gene expression in two halophytic plants, Salicornia europaea and Suaeda maritimaPlant Sci.16613451349

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PardossiA.BagnoliG.MalorgioF.CampiottiC.A.TognoniF.1999NaCl effects on celery (Apium graveolens L.) grown in NFTSci. Hort.81229242

  • RozemaJ.SchatH.2013Salt tolerance of halophytes, research questions reviewed in the perspective of saline agricultureEnviron. Exp. Bot.928395

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SavvasD.PappaV.A.GizasG.MaglarasL.2005Influence of NaCl concentration in the irrigation water on salt accumulation in the root zone and yield in a cucumber crop grown in a closed hydroponic systemActa Hort.6979398

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ShannonM.C.GrieveC.M.2000Options for using low-quality water for vegetable cropsHortScience3510581062

  • SunH.X.ZhouD.W.2010Effect of dietary supplement of seed of a halophyte (Suaeda glauca) on feed and water intake, diet digestibility, animal performance and serum biochemistry in lambsLivest. Sci.128133139

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • TeixeiraM.CarvalhoI.S.2008Effects of salt stress on purslane (Portulaca oleracea) nutritionAnn. Appl. Biol.1547786

  • Van OsE.A.1998Closed soilless growing systems in The Netherlands: The finishing touchActa Hort.458279292

  • VarlagasH.SavvasD.MouzakisG.LiotsosC.KarapanosI.SigrimisN.2010Modelling uptake of Na+ and Cl by tomato in closed-cycle cultivation systems as influenced by irrigation water salinityAgr. Water Mgt.9712421250

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Yancheng Green Garden Saline Soil Agricultural Science Co. L.2013Fresh Suaeda Glauca. Jan. 14. 2015. <http://www.21food.com/showroom/732703/product/fresh-suaeda-glauca.html>

  • YangC.ShiD.WangD.2008Comparative effects of salt and alkali stresses on growth, osmotic adjustment and ionic balance of an alkali-resistant halophyte Suaeda glauca (Bge.)Plant Growth Regulat.56179190

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ZhaoK.-F.FanH.SongJ.SunM.-X.WangB.-Z.ZhangS.-Q.UngarI.A.2005Two Na+ and Cl hyperaccumulators of the ChenopodiaceaeJ. Integr. Plant Biol.47311318

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

Article Information

Google Scholar

Related Content

Article Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 108 108 5
PDF Downloads 26 26 1