Corrigendum

in HortScience
Keywords:

In the paper “Growth Responses of Tomato Seedlings to Different Spectra of Supplemental Lighting” by Gomez and Mitchell [HortScience 50:(1)112–118], Figure 4 is incorrect. The corrected Figure 4 appears below:

Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.

Effect daily light integral (DLI) on several growth parameters measured for tomato seedlings propagated in a glass-glazed greenhouse in West Lafayette, IN, under different lighting treatments. The treatments evaluated were natural solar light only (control); natural + supplemental light [SL; 5.1 mol⋅m−2⋅d−1 (23-h photoperiod from 0000 to 2300 HR; 61 ± 2 mmol⋅m−2⋅s−1)] from a high-pressure sodium (HPS) lamp, or natural + SL from light-emitting diodes using different red (R) and blue (B) percentages. Each data point represents the average of 48 seedlings with all measurements taken 14 d after treatment initiation.

Citation: HortScience horts 50, 2; 10.21273/HORTSCI.50.2.326

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • View in gallery

    Effect daily light integral (DLI) on several growth parameters measured for tomato seedlings propagated in a glass-glazed greenhouse in West Lafayette, IN, under different lighting treatments. The treatments evaluated were natural solar light only (control); natural + supplemental light [SL; 5.1 mol⋅m−2⋅d−1 (23-h photoperiod from 0000 to 2300 HR; 61 ± 2 mmol⋅m−2⋅s−1)] from a high-pressure sodium (HPS) lamp, or natural + SL from light-emitting diodes using different red (R) and blue (B) percentages. Each data point represents the average of 48 seedlings with all measurements taken 14 d after treatment initiation.

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 36 36 0
PDF Downloads 24 24 0