The United States produced 407,000 t of ‘Bartlett’ pears (Pyrus communis L.) in 2012 [U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), 2013]. California produces ≈32% of all pears in the nation and exports between 20% and 30% of the fresh crop each year to Canada, Mexico, Costa Rica, Honduras, Guatemala, Brazil, and eastern Russia (California Pear Advisory Board, Pear Pest Management Research Fund, California Specialty Crops Council, University of California Cooperative Extension, 2011; California Foundation for Agriculture in the Classroom, 2011).
A consequence of globalized trade is the risk of introducing or spreading insect pests; therefore, phytosanitary measures are required to disinfest fresh produce leaving a quarantine area (Hallman, 2011). Common pests that affect pears include the codling moth (Cydia pmonella), pear psylla (Cacopsylla pyricola), eriophyid mites (Acarina: Eriophyidae), and oriental fruit moth (Grapholita molesta) (California Pear Advisory Board, Pear Pest Management Research Fund, California Specialty Crops Council, University of California Cooperative Extension, 2011).
Methyl bromide (MB) is a common fumigant for quarantine treatment in the United States (Drake et al., 2003; Environmental Protection Agency, 2014; Methyl Bromide Technical Options Committee, 2011). However, MB has been identified as a controlled ozone-depleting chemical by the Montreal Protocol since 1992. Although the use of postharvest fumigation is not scheduled for a phaseout, the use of MB will continue to decrease; thus, alternative phytosanitary measures to MB are needed.
Ionizing irradiation disrupts the deoxyribonucleic acid , which leads to the inability of the cell to replicate and cell death. Insects are highly vulnerable to irradiation and a dose of 0.05 to 0.15 kiloGray (kGy) is sufficient to sterilize most insects of concern (Miller, 2005). The USDA-APHIS has set an irradiation phytosanitary dose target of 0.15 kGy for the tephritid fruit fly and 0.4 kGy for other insects that do not include the pupa and adult stages of Lepidoptera [USDA–Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service–Plant Protection and Quarantine (USDA APHIS PPQ), 2013]. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) allows a maximum of 1.0-kGy irradiation dose on fresh produce (FDA, 2011); thus, 0.40 to 1.0 kGy is within the permissible dose range for fresh fruit.
Previous studies indicate that irradiation affects the enzymes involved in ripening of pears (Maxie et al., 1966; Wani et al., 2008). ‘Anjou’ and ‘Bosc’ pears ripened at a slower rate after irradiation exposure and allowed for one additional day of shelf life (Drake et al., 1999). Abolhassani et al. (2013) also reported that ‘Bartlett’ pears experienced a delay in ripening of 1 to 2 d when subjected to a minimum dose of 0.4 kGy.
Pears are susceptible to postharvest bruising and become more vulnerable after the mature-green stage when the fruit begin to soften during ripening (Abolhassani et al., 2013; Mitcham et al., 1996). An additional step in the supply chain such as irradiation and the associated handling could potentially elicit a wound response or increase the susceptibility to bruising. The target dose for phytosanitary treatment is 0.4 kGy; however, during commercial treatment, some portions of the fruit can be exposed to dose levels twice as high, depending on the size of the cartons, density of the fruit, packing density, and irradiation modality. Abolhassani et al. (2013) observed increased bruising in early-harvest pears irradiated at a minimum dose of 0.80 kGy. Signs of bruising are manifested as the fruit ripens and handling as would occur in a grocery situation can exacerbate bruising symptoms. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of phytosanitary irradiation on the ripening quality of California-grown ‘Bartlett’ pears under simulated commercial conditions of treatment and retail display where they would be exposed to handling typical in grocery stores. After exposure to irradiation treatment, the pears were evaluated daily during ripening for changes in respiration rate, ethylene production, and quality attributes followed by sensory testing at peak ripeness.
AbolhassaniY.CaporasoF.RakovskiC.PrakashA.2013The effect of gamma irradiation as a phytosanitary treatment on physicochemical and sensory properties of Bartlett pearsJ. Food Sci.78S1437S1444
AgarI.T.BiasiW.V.MitchamE.J.1999Exogenous ethylene accelerates ripening responses in Bartlett pears regardless of maturity or growing regionPostharvest Biol. Technol.176778
California Foundation for Agriculture in the Classroom2011Pears commodity fact sheet. California foundation for agriculture in the classroom. Sacramento. 30 July 2012. <http://www.cfaitc.org/factsheets/pdf/Pears.pdf>
California Pear Advisory Board Pear Pest Management Research Fund California Speciality Crops Council University of California Cooperative Extension2011A pest management strategic plan for pear production in California. California Pear Advisory Board Pear Pest Management Research Fund California Specialty Crops Council University of California Cooperative Extension. 18 Apr. 2012. <http://www.ipmcenters.org/pmsp/pdf/CAPear.pdf>
ChambersE.C.WolfM.B.1996Sensory testing methods. ASTM Manual Series MNL 26. ASTM International West Conshohocken PA
ChervinC.1992Reduction of wound-induced respiration and ethylene production in carrot root tissues by gamma irradiationPostharvest Biol. Technol.2717
CruzJ.N.SoaresC.A.FabbriA.D.T.CordenunsiB.R.SabatoS.F.2012Effect of quarantine treatments on the carbohydrate and organic acid content of mangoes (cv. Tommy Atkins)Radiat. Phys. Chem.8110591063
Delgado-VargasF.2003Natural colorants for food and nutraceutical uses. CRC Press Boca Raton FL
DongC.Z.MontilletJ.L.TriantaphylidesC.1994Effects of gamma-irradiation on the plasma-membrane of suspension-cultured apple cells—Rapid irreversible inhibition of H+-ATPase activityPhysiol. Plant.90307312
DrakeS.R.NevenL.G.SandersonP.G.2003Carbohydrate concentrations of apples and pears as influenced by irradiation as a quarantine treatmentJ. Food Process. Pres.27165172
DrakeS.R.SandersonP.G.NevenL.G.1999Response of apple and winter pear fruit quality to irradiation as a quarantine treatmentJ. Food Process. Pres.23203216
Environmental Protection Agency2014The phaseout of methyl bromide. In: Ozone layer protection—Regulatory program. Washington DC. 5 Aug. 2014. <http://www.epa.gov/ozone/mbr/index.html>
Food and Drug Administration2011Code of federal regulations title 21 volume 3. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Washington DC. 21 June 2012. <http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?CFRPart=179&showFR=1&subpartNode=21:220.127.116.11.10.2>
GunesG.WatkinsC.B.HotchkissJ.H.2000Effects of irradiation on respiration and ethylene production of apple slicesJ. Sci. Food Agr.8011691175
HamidN.A.El-DawlaE.A.NasrI.S.2012Effects of shrink film wrapping and irradiation on storage quality of Leconte pears (Pyrus communis L.)J. Hort. Sci. Orn. Plants4169176
HussainP.R.MeenaR.S.DarM.A.WaniA.M.2008Studies on enhancing the keeping quality of peach (Prunus persica Bausch) cv. Elberta by gamma-irradiationRadiat. Phys. Chem.77473481
HussainP.R.MeenaR.S.DarM.A.WaniA.M.2010Carboxymethyl cellulose coating and low-dose gamma irradiation improves storage quality and shelf life of pear (Pyrus communis L., cv. Bartlett/William)J. Food Sci.75M586M596
LawlessH.T.HeymannH.2010Sensory evaluation of food: Principles and practices. 2nd Ed. Springer New York NY
LesterG.E.WhitakerB.D.1996Gamma-ray-induced changes in hypodermal mesocarp tissue plasma membrane of pre- and post-storage muskmelonPhysiol. Plant.98265270
McDonaldH.McCullochM.CaporasoF.WinborneI.OubichonM.RakovskiC.PrakashA.2012Commercial scale irradiation for insect disinfestation preserves peach qualityRadiat. Phys. Chem.81697704
Methyl Bromide Technical Options Committee2011Montreal protocol on substances that deplete the ozone layer. In: 2010 Report of the Methyl Bromide Technical Options Committee. p. 395. United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP)
MillerR.B.2005Electronic irradiation of foods: An introduction to the technology. Springer New York NY
MitchamE.J.CrisostoC.H.KaderA.A.1996Pear Bartlett: Recommendations for maintaining postharvest quality. In: Perishables handling #86. 31 July 2013. <http://postharvest.ucdavis.edu/PFfruits/PearBartlett/>
NielsenS.S.2010Food analysis laboratory manual. 2nd Ed. Springer Science+Business Media LLC New York NY
R Development Core Team2011R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna Austria. 3 Apr. 2013. <http://www.R-project.org/>
RothmanL.ParkerM.J.2009Just-about-right scale design usage benefits and risks. ASTM Manual MNL63. ASTM International Conshohocken PA
SaltveitM.E.2012Measuring respiration. Postharvest biology and technology (PLS 172) lecture handout. University of California Davis CA. 23 Aug. 2012. <http://ucce.ucdavis.edu/files/datastore/234-20.pdf>
StanleyJ.K.1991Post-harvest physiology of perishable plant products. In: Post-harvest physiology of perishable plant products B2—Post-harvest physiology of perishable plant products. Van Nostrand Reinhold New York NY
StoneH.SidelJ.2004Sensory evaluation practices. 3rd Ed. Elsevier Academic San Diego CA
U.S. Department of Agriculture2013National statistics for pears. In: Pears Bartlett—Production measured in tons. National Agricultural Statistics Service Washington DC. 7 Apr. 2013. <http://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_Subject/result.php?3AA6758B-C347-339E-AB1B-2D97B805CCC0§or=CROPS&group=FRUIT%20%26%20TREE%20NUTS&comm=PEARS>
U.S. Department of Agriculture–Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service–Plant Protection and Quarantine2013Treatment manual. Washington DC. 2013 May 17. <http://www.aphis.usda.gov/import_export/plants/manuals/ports/downloads/treatment.pdf>
WaniA.M.HussainP.R.MeenaR.S.DarM.A.2008Effect of gamma-irradiation and refrigerated storage on the improvement of quality and shelf life of pear (Pyrus communis L., cv. Bartlett/William)Radiat. Phys. Chem.77983989