Defense Mechanisms Involved in Disease Resistance of Grafted Vegetables

in HortScience

Grafting with resistant rootstocks is an effective strategy to manage a variety of soilborne diseases and root-knot nematodes in solanaceous and cucurbitaceous vegetables. In addition, improved resistance to some foliar diseases and viruses has also been reported in grafted plants. Hence, grafting technology is considered an important and innovative practice of integrated pest management and a promising alternative for soil fumigants in vegetable production. Inherent resistance within rootstocks and improved plant nutrient uptake are generally suggested as the main reasons for improved disease control in grafted vegetables. However, increasing evidence indicated that systemic defense mechanisms may also play an important role in plant defense as a result of grafting. This review analyzes current literature on the use of grafting techniques for disease management in vegetable crops, discusses potential mechanisms associated with grafting-conferred plant defense, and identifies needs for future research to promote more effective and efficient use of grafting technology to support sustainable vegetable production.

Abstract

Grafting with resistant rootstocks is an effective strategy to manage a variety of soilborne diseases and root-knot nematodes in solanaceous and cucurbitaceous vegetables. In addition, improved resistance to some foliar diseases and viruses has also been reported in grafted plants. Hence, grafting technology is considered an important and innovative practice of integrated pest management and a promising alternative for soil fumigants in vegetable production. Inherent resistance within rootstocks and improved plant nutrient uptake are generally suggested as the main reasons for improved disease control in grafted vegetables. However, increasing evidence indicated that systemic defense mechanisms may also play an important role in plant defense as a result of grafting. This review analyzes current literature on the use of grafting techniques for disease management in vegetable crops, discusses potential mechanisms associated with grafting-conferred plant defense, and identifies needs for future research to promote more effective and efficient use of grafting technology to support sustainable vegetable production.

Grafting, with selected resistant rootstocks, for the purpose of controlling diseases and pests is an ancient practice widely used in cultivating a variety of woody trees. Some of the well-known examples include controlling tristeza on citrus, fireblight and collar rot on apples, and nematodes on peaches and walnuts (Mudge et al., 2009).

Research on herbaceous vegetable grafting began in the 1920s with watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai] grafted onto squash rootstocks (Cucurbita moschata Duch.) to overcome yield loss caused by fusarium wilt (Sato and Takamatsu, 1930). Since then, grafting has been widely used in Asia and European countries as an effective tool for managing several soilborne diseases and root-knot nematodes in the Solanaceae and Cucurbitaceae. Interest in vegetable grafting has recently grown in the United States as an alternative to soil fumigants and as an integrated pest management practice in various crop production systems (Kubota et al., 2008).

A few reviews have been published recently, which address the integrated use of grafting techniques in vegetable production. Among them, a review by Lee and Oda (2003) covered topics including grafting methods and procedures, grafting physiology, and production status of grafted vegetables and ornamental crops. Cucurbit grafting including the history, current status, and benefits of vegetable grafting were well documented by Davis and colleagues (2008). Louws and coauthors (2010) summarized current literature on use of grafting technology to manage diseases and pests in vegetable production. The review provided up-to-date information on disease cycles, current disease management practices, and effects of rootstocks on controlling different pathotypes. Some important disease resistance mechanisms were mentioned, whereas systematic discussion of this topic was rather limited.

Unlike previous work, the current review explores specifically the defense mechanisms in grafted vegetable plants and discusses future research initiatives needed to advance our understanding of the underlying grafting mechanisms and to enhance vegetable rootstock breeding programs.

Diseases Controlled by Grafting in Vegetable Production

Improved resistances to many soilborne fungal, oomycete, bacterial, and nematode pathogens have been reported in grafted solanaceous and cucurbitaceous crops. Moreover, certain foliar fungal and viral diseases were suppressed when susceptible scions were grafted onto specific rootstocks (Louws et al., 2010). Diseases controlled by grafting in different vegetable crops are listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Diseases reported to be controlled by grafting in different vegetable crops.

Table 1.

Soilborne fungal and oomycete diseases.

The earliest reported use of vegetable grafting for disease control was for management of fusarium wilt in cucurbits (Sakata et al., 2005). Commonly used cucurbitaceous rootstocks are non-hosts to most formae speciales of F. oxysporum, and thus grafting has been successfully used to control fusarium wilt in cucurbit production (Louws et al., 2010). Verticillium wilt, primarily caused by Verticillium dahliae, is another vascular wilt disease that often affects Solanaceae and Cucurbitaceae. Studies with plants grafted onto commercial rootstocks and subjected to infection with V. dahliae indicated that both scions and rootstocks contributed to disease resistance of the grafted combinations in watermelons, melons (Cucumis melo L.), cucumbers (Cucumis sativus L.), and tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.) (Paplomatas et al., 2002). Monosporascus sudden wilt, caused by Monosporascus cannonballus, is an important soilborne disease of melon and watermelon in hot and semiarid areas. Grafting scions of susceptible melon cultivars onto C. maxima Duch. and C. maxima × C. moschata rootstocks improved resistance of melon (Edelstein et al., 1999) although Cucurbita is normally regarded as a host for M. cannonballus (Mertely et al., 1993). However, the improved resistance and better yield with grafted plants was inconsistent. The variable results might be attributed to differences in rootstock–scion combinations and growing conditions. Phytophthora blight, caused by Phytophthora capsici, is regarded as one of the most destructive diseases in production of cucurbits. In P. capsici-infested fields, yields of cucumbers grafted on bottle gourd [Lagenaria siceraria (Mol.) Standl.], C. moschata Duch., and wax gourd [Benincasa hispida (Thunb.) Cogn.] rootstocks were significantly increased and vegetative growth was more vigorous (Wang et al., 2004). Watermelons grafted onto selected bottle gourd rootstocks also exhibited resistance to P. capsici (Kousik and Thies, 2010). Corky root disease caused by Pyrenochaeta lycopersici is a severe problem for Solanaceae. Tomatoes grafted onto ‘Beaufort’ rootstocks (S. lycopersicum × S. habrochaites S. Knapp & D.M. Spooner) had lower disease incidence, higher yield, and larger fruit (Hasna et al., 2009). Similar results were also found in grafted eggplants (S. melongena L.) (Iouannou, 2001).

Soilborne bacterial diseases.

Tomato bacterial wilt, caused by Ralstonia solanacearum, is one of the most destructive diseases of tomato. Resistance to bacterial wilt in tomatoes is a quantitative trait and is closely associated with small fruit size (Louws et al., 2010). Thus, few resistant tomato cultivars are commercially available (King et al., 2010). Grafting scions of susceptible tomato cultivars onto resistant rootstocks has been successful for managing tomato bacterial wilt (Lin et al., 2008; Matsuzoe et al., 1993). The improved resistance in grafted plants may result from limited colonization in the lower stem rather than prevention of bacteria from invading xylem tissues (Grimault and Prior, 1994).

Root-knot nematodes.

Root galling of susceptible plants is a typical response to root-knot nematode (RKN; Meloidogyne spp.) infection, resulting in poor absorption of water and nutrients. In cucurbits, resistance to M. incognita was identified in Cucumis metuliferus Naud., Cucumis ficifolius A. Rich., and bur cucumber (Sicyos angulatus L.) (Fassuliotis, 1970; Gu et al., 2006). Using C. metuliferus as a rootstock to graft RKN-susceptible melons led to lower levels of root galling and nematode numbers at harvest (Sigüenza et al., 2005). Moreover, C. metuliferus showed high graft compatibility with several melon cultivars (Trionfetti Nisini et al., 2002). Cucumbers grafted on the bur cucumber rootstock exhibited increased RKN resistance (Zhang et al., 2006). Promising progress has also been made in developing M. incognita-resistant germplasm lines of wild watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai var. citroides (L. H. Bailey) Mansf.] for use as rootstocks (Thies et al., 2010). However, at present, cucurbit rootstocks with resistance to RKN are not commercially available (Thies et al., 2010). The Mi gene, which provides effective control against RKN in tomato, has been introgressed into cultivated tomatoes and rootstock cultivars (Louws et al., 2010). Grafting of susceptible tomato cultivars on RKN-resistant rootstocks was effective in controlling RKN in fields naturally infested with RKN (Rivard et al., 2010). However, as a result of temperature sensitivity of the Mi gene, such resistance may not be uniformly stable (Cortada et al., 2009). Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) cultivars possessing the N gene, which controls resistance to RKNs (M. incognita, M. arenaria, and M. javanica), have been effective as rootstocks to control RKNs in pepper (Oka et al., 2004; Thies and Fery, 1998, 2000).

Viral diseases.

Vegetable grafting research on resistance to viral diseases yielded mixed results because of the lack of systematic studies in this area. Wang et al. (2002) reported improved antivirus performance in grafted seedless watermelon plants. In Israel, use of resistant rootstocks for controlling the soilborne melon necrotic spot virus in cucurbits was a significant advantage over soil fumigation with methyl bromide, which does not control this viral disease (Cohen et al., 2007). Meanwhile, tomato yellow leaf curl virus, tomato spotted wilt virus, and pepino mosaic virus were also reported to be controlled by grafting (Louws et al., 2010). However, some reports indicated that grafted plants were more vulnerable to viral diseases, possibly as a result of graft incompatibility that weakened the scion plants (Davis et al., 2008).

Other diseases.

Other fungal diseases that have been controlled by grafting include target leaf spot (caused by Corynespora cassiicola) on cucumbers, black root rot (caused by Phomopsis sclerotioides) on cucumbers and melons, gummy stem blight (caused by Didymella bryoniae) on melons, southern blight (caused by Sclerotium rolfsii) on tomatoes, brown root rot (caused by Colletotrichum coccodes) on tomatoes and eggplants, and Rhizoctonia damping off (caused by Rhizoctonia solani) on tomatoes (King et al., 2008; Louws et al., 2010) (Table 1). Grafting has also been reported to improve crop resistance to the foliar fungal diseases such as powdery mildew (caused by Podosphaera xanthii) and downy mildew (caused by Pseudoperonospora cubensis) on cucumbers, when certain rootstocks were used (Louws et al., 2010; Sakata et al., 2006).

Inherent Resistance within Rootstocks as the First Line of Defense

Because grafting is used primarily for controlling soilborne diseases, the defense mechanisms are generally associated with inherent resistance within rootstocks (King et al., 2008). Rootstock selection and breeding has targeted both non-host and host resistance.

Using non-host resistance.

Non-host disease resistance refers to the resistance provided by all members of a plant species against all races of a certain pathogen and it is often considered the most common and durable plant disease resistance (Mysore and Ryu, 2004). Solanaceous vegetables and cucurbits are often grafted onto rootstocks that, although related, are different species or hybrids of different species. Taking advantage of the non-host resistance in these rootstocks is a convenient approach to battling specific pathogens that infect the cultivated scion species but not the rootstock species. For example, F. oxysporum f. sp. niveum causes disease specifically on watermelon and F. oxysporum f. sp. lagenaria typically infects bottle gourd (Namiki et al., 1994). Because all of the bottle gourd genotypes offer resistance to all races of F. oxysporum f. sp. niveum (race 0, 1, 2), non-host resistance has been proven to be a viable mechanism to control fusarium wilt in watermelons when they are grafted onto bottle gourd rootstocks (Yetisir et al., 2007).

Breeding host-resistant rootstocks.

Although interspecific grafting, i.e., grafting between scion and rootstock that are not from the same species, is often conducted to use the non-host resistance in the rootstock, intraspecific grafting, i.e., grafting between scion and rootstock that are from the same species, is also commonly performed, especially when host-resistant rootstocks are available. Sometimes intraspecific grafting may be preferred because it helps enhance graft compatibility and reduce potential detrimental effects on fruit quality in comparison with interspecific grafting.

Host resistance can be generally classified into two categories: vertical resistance and horizontal resistance. Vertical resistance is governed by single genes that lead to large and differential effects, whereas horizontal resistance is controlled by multiple genes with small and nondifferential effects (Fry, 1982). Oftentimes, the horizontal resistance can be unintentionally lost by continuous selection for horticultural characteristics. Many cucurbitaceous and solanaceous rootstocks are selected from wild germplasm, and thus they are more likely to maintain nondifferential resistance to a wide range of pathogens. During the past decades, considerable efforts have been directed into breeding plants with resistance (R) genes against distinct pathogens. However, combining a complete set of desirable traits including horticultural characteristics and resistance to multiple diseases into a single variety is rather challenging and sometimes can be contradictory. The close linkage between resistance against bacterial wilt in the Solanaceae and small fruit size is such an example (Louws et al., 2010). Through the use of grafting, the breeding programs can become more efficient and effective by focusing on above- and belowground traits separately and combining disease resistance and other horticultural traits into a so-called “graft hybrid” (Mudge et al., 2009).

Vertical resistance is often governed by cascade reactions initiated by interactions of R genes of plants with avirulence (avr) genes of pathogens, which is known as a gene-for-gene hypothesis (Flor, 1971). Identification of R genes as well as its downstream signal transduction is always the key to understanding host resistance. R genes have been identified in many cucurbitaceous and solanaceous rootstocks. One of the examples is the Mi gene, which confers resistance to M. incognita, M. javanica, and M. arenaria in tomato. This resistance involves hypersensitive responses and reactive oxygen production at the feeding site, restricting the establishment of the RKN juveniles (Fuller et al., 2008). In the case of combating fusarium wilt of melons caused by four races (0, 1, 2, and 1.2) of F. oxysporum f. sp. melonis (FOM), commercial melon cultivars containing two R genes (Fom-1 and Fom-2) provide resistance to FOM 0, 1, and 2 but fail to control FOM 1.2. With resistance to FOM 1.2 identified in new breeding lines and indigenous cultivars of C. melo (Herman and Perl-Treves, 2007; Hirai et al., 2002), grafting susceptible cultivars onto resistant rootstocks can be an effective and efficient method to control FOM 1.2 given that FOM 1.2 resistance is polygenically inherited.

Proteins encoded by R genes may play a direct role in detoxification of toxins or activation of plant defense by initiating signal transduction. Interestingly, several common features have been identified among R gene-encoded proteins from different species such as the leucine zipper region, nucleotide binding site, and leucine-rich repeats, suggesting a common pathway of plant defense against a variety of pathogens (Hammond-Kosack and Jones, 1997).

Developing transgenic rootstocks.

In addition to use of non-host-resistant rootstocks as well as selection and breeding for host resistance from a wide range of germplasm, transgenic rootstocks with specific disease resistances have been developed. For example, a cucumber green mottle mosaic virus coat protein gene and a cucumber fruit mottle mosaic tobamovirus replicase gene were introduced into watermelon and cucumber rootstocks, respectively. Susceptible scions grafted onto transgenic rootstocks exhibited high resistance against viral pathogens (Gal-On et al., 2005; Park et al., 2005; Yi et al., 2009).

Future prospects.

Using rootstocks with non-host resistance has been shown as an effective tactic in controlling fusarium wilt in cucurbits. However, this method may increase risk of graft incompatibility if rootstocks and scions are not from the same species or genus. For example, figleaf gourd (Cucurbita ficifolia Bouché) is incompatible with oriental melons and watermelons, whereas wax gourd is incompatible with oriental melons (Lee and Oda, 2003). Considering the variation of graft compatibility between even closely related species, it is always suggested to test graft compatibility before considering the use of non-host-resistant rootstocks for soilborne disease control.

Regardless of the advancement in rootstock resistance research, many fundamental areas are still poorly understood, including the effects of grafting and scion feedback on the inherent resistance of rootstocks. Jiang et al. (2010a) observed that grafted peppers had a lower incidence of fusarium root rot than self-rooted scion plants, whereas non-grafted rootstock plants showed the lowest disease incidence. It indicated that scion feedback may potentially influence rootstock resistance. As a result of the lack of in-depth studies on rootstock defense mechanisms, it is even more challenging to determine the effect of various scion cultivars on rootstock resistance. Elucidating the interactions of scions and rootstocks would greatly enhance our understanding of disease resistance of grafted vegetables.

Shift of Rhizosphere Microbial Diversity as a Result of Grafting

Rhizosphere microorganisms can play critical roles in suppressing soilborne diseases through a variety of mechanisms such as nutrient competition, antagonism, and parasitism. Exploring rhizosphere microbial diversity related to plant species and genotypes, therefore, is another approach to understanding soilborne disease incidence and severity (Broeckling et al., 2008; Garbeva et al., 2004; Yao and Wu, 2010).

Studies on cucumbers grafted onto C. moschata indicated that grafting increased the population of bacteria and actinomycetes while reducing the total number of fungi in the rhizosphere (Dong et al., 2010). Research on grafted peppers also showed that actinomycete populations in the rhizosphere were higher in the resistant rootstock and grafted plants compared with the self-rooted scion control when plants were inoculated with F. solani (Jiang et al., 2010a). Incidence of verticillium wilt was reduced when a susceptible eggplant scion was grafted onto Solanum torvum rootstock accompanied by enhanced ratios of bacteria and actinomycetes to fungi in the rhizosphere of grafted plants (Yin et al., 2008). Actinomycetes represent a group of soil microorganisms with great potential to protect plants against pathogens (Doumbou et al., 2001). Although it is still uncertain about the extent to which actinomycetes contribute to plant disease control, higher populations of actinomycetes detected in the rhizosphere of grafted plants could possibly play a role in disease suppression when susceptible scions are grafted onto certain resistant rootstocks.

Future prospects.

Microbial communities in the rhizosphere are highly diversified and influenced by several factors including plant species, soil types, management practices, and environmental conditions (Garbeva et al., 2004). Although microbial shifts in rhizospheres of grafted plants have been observed in some studies and remain an intriguing area for study, little is known about how these shifts are related to the intrinsic resistance of the rootstock and what processes directly cause such shifts. Some of the grafting research has focused on comparison of grafted plants to self-rooted scion plants without including non-grafted rootstock plants as a positive control. To better understand effects of grafting on rhizosphere microbial diversity, non-grafted rootstock plants as well as non-grafted and self-grafted scion control plants should all be evaluated. Furthermore, long-term grafting studies with different resistant rootstocks, soil types, and management practices are warranted to clearly elucidate the influence of grafting on soil microbial diversity as related to soilborne disease control.

Contributions of Vigorous Root Systems of Grafted Vegetables to Plant Defense

Many rootstocks developed for vegetable grafting were selected or bred from wild genotypes. In addition to specific disease resistance, they are characterized by large and vigorous root systems (Davis et al., 2008; Lee, 1994). Soilborne pathogens often infect and damage plant roots, and, as a result, plant nutrient and water uptake can be affected. Therefore, root system size and vigor may be associated with resistance to soilborne diseases. Moreover, vigorous roots help improve nutritional status and thus the overall health of plants, which may augment resistance against foliar diseases.

Improved nutrient uptake in grafted vegetables.

Efficiency of nitrogen uptake and use can be improved by grafting vegetables onto vigorous rootstocks (Colla et al., 2010a). Melon grafted onto C. maxima × C. moschata rootstocks exhibited higher nitrate concentration in xylem sap than that of self-rooted melon plants (Salehi et al., 2010). In addition, foliar nitrate concentrations were lower in grafted watermelons and melons accompanied by higher nitrate reductase activities in comparison with self-rooted plants, which suggests an elevated level of nitrogen assimilation in grafted plants (Pulgar et al., 2000; Ruiz and Romero, 1999). Phosphorus is a macronutrient that often limits plant growth as a result of its low mobility in the soil. Phosphorus uptake can be enhanced by grafting with vigorous rootstocks as confirmed by analyzing phosphorus concentrations in plant tissues of grafted eggplants (Leonardi and Giuffrida, 2006), melons (Salehi et al., 2010), and watermelons (Colla et al., 2010b). However, variable results were obtained when different rootstocks and rootstock/scion combinations were used. In addition, enhanced absorption of potassium, calcium, and magnesium was also observed in grafted vegetables (Fernández-García et al., 2004; Leonardi and Giuffrida, 2006). A recent review by Savvas et al. (2010) summarized the research findings on mineral nutrient uptake in fruit vegetables as a result of grafting with specific rootstocks.

Nutrient uptake in relation to disease development.

Plant nutrients, in addition to their essential roles in plant growth and development, can be directly involved in plant defense pathways. For example, foliar application of phosphate salts can induce systemic protection against anthracnose in cucumbers (Gottstein and Kuć, 1989), and phosphate-mediated resistance induction has been associated with localized cell death (Walters and Murray, 1992). Nitrogen deficiency can compromise elicitor-induced resistance to pathogen infection (Dietrich et al., 2004), whereas excessive nitrogen increases disease incidence by promoting growth of large plant canopies (Simón et al., 2003). In addition, many other mineral nutrients such as potassium, calcium, sulfur, and micronutrients also play significant roles in plant defense mechanisms (Walters and Bingham, 2007).

Future prospects.

Although improved nutrient uptake of grafted vegetable plants might be related to grafting-conferred disease control, direct evidence is missing at present. Most currently reported grafting experiments on nutrient uptake were conducted under growing conditions without disease pressure. It would be interesting to use disease-resistant and vigorous rootstocks to study absorption and functions of critical nutrients in the context of plant defense against specific pathogens. Previous research has demonstrated the influence of mineral nutrients on plant disease development. Several mineral elements, including silicon, have been suggested to play critical roles in plant defense (Savant et al., 1996). Hasama et al. (1993) showed that the increase of susceptibility to target leaf spot in grafted cucumbers with a tested rootstock might be related to reduced uptake of silicon because grafted cucumber plants with the other rootstock demonstrated improved disease resistance and a higher level of silicon absorption. Whether vigorous rootstocks could potentially improve the uptake of silicon and other mineral elements is unknown. Exploring these questions in future research would be an intriguing topic not only for vegetable grafting, but also for plant pathology and nutrition studies.

Grafting-induced Systemic Defense

Plant defense to pathogen attack takes place primarily at two levels. The first level involves the production of physical barriers, e.g., trichomes, to prevent or restrict pathogen invasions. The second level is derived from systemic plant defense mechanisms. A diverse range of defense responses are activated by plant–pathogen recognition. Among these responses are accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), production of antimicrobial compounds, expression of pathogenesis-related genes, synthesis of nitric oxide, and hypersensitive responses (Buchanan et al. 2000). Defense responses are vital for plants; however, these responses are also metabolically expensive. Several pre-conditioning stimuli have been investigated, including pathogen attack, in which infection by a specific type of pathogen may induce long-lasting and broad-spectrum disease resistance to subsequent infections; such resistance is known as systemic acquired resistance (Durrant and Dong, 2004). In addition, pre-conditioning can include plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, which can reduce diseases in aboveground plant parts through the induction of systemic resistance (van Loon, 2007). Moreover, systemic defense responses may be triggered by localized tissue damage in plants (Schilmiller and Howe, 2005).

Does grafting with rootstocks induce systemic defense?

A proteomics study of leaves from cucumber plants grafted onto C. moschata and leaves from self-rooted cucumbers showed that the expression of two types of proteins was significantly higher in grafted plants compared with self-rooted plants. The first protein type was related to plant defense responses, and the second type included photosynthesis-related proteins (Li et al., 2009). Gene expressions of ‘Gala’ apple trees (Malus pumila Mill.) grafted onto two rootstocks, one with moderate resistance to fireblight (caused by Erwinia amylovora) and the other susceptible to fireblight, were examined using cDNA amplified fragment length polymorphism. Interestingly, scions grafted onto the resistant rootstock showed increased expression of stress-related genes, whereas scions grafted onto the susceptible rootstock did not (Jensen et al., 2003). A similar study of eggplants grafted onto tomato rootstocks indicated altered expression of diverse functional genes. Functions of these genes ranged from metabolism, signal transduction, and stress response to cell cycle and transcription/translation (Zhang et al., 2008).

Defense-related enzymes are often induced by a variety of abiotic and biotic stresses. Studies have shown that plants grafted on certain rootstocks generally exhibit a higher activity of defense-related enzymes compared with self-rooted plants under certain stressful conditions (Table 2).

Table 2.

Enzymes reported with higher activities in grafted vegetables compared with self-rooted plants.

Table 2.

Phenylpropanoids are compounds induced by various biotic and abiotic stresses. In response to pathogen infection, phenylpropanoids can increase markedly to levels that are toxic to pathogens (Dixon and Paiva, 1995). Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) plays a key role in the synthesis of phenylpropanoids and this enzyme activity often is considered an indicator of plant defense against pathogen attack. In response to V. dahliae infection, shoots and roots of grafted eggplant had higher PAL activity than self-rooted plants (Zhou et al., 1998). Similarly, PAL activity in roots of grafted pepper was higher in comparison with the self-rooted control both before and after inoculation with F. solani. Phenolic and lignin contents in leaves and roots of grafted plants were also higher than that of self-rooted plants after inoculation with F. solani (Jiang et al., 2010b).

During host–pathogen interactions, ROS can accumulate quickly and may function as antimicrobial agents that are directly toxic to pathogens or are involved in signaling to initiate plant defense cascades (Lamb and Dixon, 1997). A variety of antioxidant enzymes are associated with ROS production after pathogen attacks. Among them, peroxidase, superoxide dismutase, and catalase are directly involved in ROS detoxification. Grafted plants had higher antioxidant enzyme activities than self-rooted plants when subjected to abiotic stresses such as salinity and low temperature (Gao et al., 2008, 2009a, 2009b; He et al., 2009; Wei et al., 2009) (Table 2).

Potential signals associated with grafting-induced systemic defense.

Long-distance signaling is a central aspect of induced systemic resistance. Because grafting allows physical union of root and shoot systems from different genetic backgrounds, long-distance signals may be involved in activating systemic defense in grafted plants.

In grafted cucumber studies, analysis of phloem exudates collected from both the cucumber scions and squash rootstocks provided direct evidence that some of the phloem proteins can move across graft unions (Golecki et al., 1998; Tiedemann and Carstens-Behrens, 1994). Large-scale mass spectrometry has been used to identify individual proteins with diverse functions, including structural proteins, antioxidant defense compounds, proteinase inhibitors, and RNA-binding proteins (Walz et al., 2004). It is likely that some of these mobile proteins might participate in signaling cascades associated with grafting-induced systemic defense.

Long-distance signals also may involve mRNAs and small RNAs (Kehr and Buhtz, 2008). RNA transcripts, which have been identified in the phloem, include transcriptional regulators, genes controlling cell fate and cell cycle, phytohormone responsive genes, and metabolic genes (Lough and Lucas, 2006; Omid et al., 2007). Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) mediate post-transcriptional gene silencing, a gene expression regulation mechanism involved in different layers of plant innate immunity (Padmanabhan et al., 2009). Given that siRNAs are transmissible across grafting unions, this would be an intriguing field in which to explore specific roles of siRNAs in grafting-induced systemic defense.

Defense-related phytohormones, particularly salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA), have been widely studied with respect to their involvement in plant defense responses. SA is commonly associated with systemic acquired resistance and activates plant defense mechanisms against biotrophic and hemibiotrophic pathogens, whereas JA is usually involved in defense pathways against necrotrophic pathogens and herbivorous insects (Bari and Jones, 2009). Although grafting could possibly induce systemic defense, few studies have explored the link between grafting and defense-related phytohormones. Rivard and Louws (2007) showed that the expression of PinII, a JA pathway-mediated proteinase inhibitor, was induced in tomato plants grafted on certain rootstocks.

Cytokinins are a group of plant hormones produced in the roots. It has been reported that more cytokinins could be released into xylem sap of cucumber scions grafted on figleaf gourd rootstocks than in the xylem sap of self-rooted cucumber plants (Lee et al., 2010). Aloni and coworkers (2010) pointed out that the increased level of cytokinins in xylem exudates of scions grafted onto certain vigorous rootstocks was closely linked to the improved growth and fruit yield of grafted plants. However, it is not well recognized that cytokinins are also involved in the regulation of plant defense responses against some pathogens. Global gene expression analysis of Arabidopsis infected by Plasmodiophora brassicae indicated a downregulation of genes governing cytokinin homeostasis, whereas transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressing cytokinin oxidase/dehydrogenase genes showed resistance to the disease (Siemens et al., 2006). The uni-1D mutant in Arabidopsis that induced the expression of pathogenesis-related genes also caused the accumulation of cytokinins in Arabidopsis (Igari et al., 2008). These studies provided evidence for the possible involvement of cytokinins in plant defense responses. Nevertheless, it is still unclear whether and how the cytokinin production is directly related to disease resistance of grafted plants.

Future prospects.

Grafting-induced systemic defense is an exciting field for future study. To achieve a comprehensive understanding of its potential roles in grafting-conferred disease control, it will be critical to identify potential signals involved in the process. Studies on phloem long-distance macromolecular trafficking indicated that the key signals may include proteins, mRNAs, small RNAs, and plant secondary metabolites. However, the individual roles of these signals in plant defense are not well understood. Thus, new information regarding defense related long-distance signals is needed to extend our knowledge of grafting-induced systemic defense.

The distinction between the grafting process and signal transduction between rootstock and scion also should be closely examined. Grafting can result in wounding responses that trigger changes in enzyme activities and hormonal status, and such changes may attenuate with healing of the graft union. In future research, it will be important to distinguish between the effects of the grafting process and rootstock–scion interactions. Changes in both the roots and shoots of grafted plants need to be elucidated to gain a complete understanding of rootstock–scion interactions in induced systemic defense.

Concluding Remarks

Grafting technology has evolved into a unique component in the production of several solanaceous and cucurbitaceous vegetables for pest management and for improvement of crop productivity. The ready availability of disease-resistant rootstocks and development of highly efficient grafting techniques has led to expansion in the use of grafted plants worldwide. Previous studies have provided an enhanced understanding of grafting-conferred defense mechanisms from inherent resistance within rootstocks to induced systemic resistance. However, there is still a lack of in-depth research on rootstock–scion interactions and long-distance signaling as related to improved resistance in grafted plants. In addition to resistance to soilborne diseases and nematodes, foliar and virus disease resistances of grafted plants warrant more studies. To differentiate the grafting effect per se from rootstock–scion interactions, well-designed studies should include a complete set of non-grafted and self-grafted rootstock and scion treatments in addition to the scion–rootstock grafts. Because crosstalk may exist among pathways that cope with biotic and abiotic stresses, a comprehensive understanding of the defense mechanisms in grafted plants will greatly assist with the effective development of desirable rootstocks to serve sustainable agriculture.

Literature Cited

  • AloniB.CohenR.KarniL.AktasH.EdelsteinM.2010Hormonal signaling in rootstock–scion interactionsSci. Hort.127119126

  • BariR.JonesJ.D.G.2009Role of plant hormones in plant defence responsesPlant Mol. Biol.69473488

  • BroecklingC.D.BrozA.K.BergelsonJ.ManterD.K.VivancoJ.M.2008Root exudates regulate soil fungal community composition and diversityAppl. Environ. Microbiol.74738744

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BuchananB.B.GruissemW.JonesR.L.2000Biochemistry and molecular biology of plants. American Society of Plant Biologists John Wiley & Sons Inc. Somerset NJ.

  • CohenR.BurgerY.HorevC.KorenA.EdelsteinM.2007Introducing grafted cucurbits to modern agriculture: The Israeli experiencePlant Dis.91916923

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CollaG.Cardona SuárezC.M.CardarelliM.RouphaelY.2010aImproving nitrogen use efficiency in melon by graftingHortScience45559565

  • CollaG.RouphaelY.CardarelliM.SalernoA.ReaE.2010bThe effectiveness of grafting to improve alkalinity tolerance in watermelonEnviron. Exp. Bot.68283291

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CortadaL.SorribasF.J.OrnatC.AndrésM.F.Verdejo-LucasS.2009Response of tomato rootstocks carrying the Mi-resistance gene to populations of Meloidogyne arenaria, M. incognita and M. javanicaEur. J. Plant Pathol.124337343

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DavisA.R.Perkins-VeazieP.SakataY.López-GalarzaS.MarotoJ.V.LeeS.G.HuhY.C.SunZ.MiguelA.KingS.R.CohenR.LeeJ.M.2008Cucurbit graftingCrit. Rev. Plant Sci.275074

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DietrichR.PloßK.HeilM.2004Constitutive and induced resistance to pathogens in Arabidopsis thaliana depends on nitrogen supplyPlant Cell Environ.27896906

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DixonR.A.PaivaN.L.1995Stress-induced phenylpropanoid metabolismPlant Cell710851097

  • DongL.ZuoY.LiX.WangQ.2010Effects of grafting on cucumber soil biochemistryJ. China Agr. Univ.155156[in Chinese].

  • DoumbouC.L.Hamby SaloveM.K.CrawfordD.L.BeaulieuC.2001Actinomycetes, promising tools to control plant diseases and to promote plant growthPhytoprotection8285102

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DurrantW.E.DongX.2004Systemic acquired resistanceAnnu. Rev. Phytopathol.42185209

  • EdelsteinM.CohenR.BurgerY.ShriberS.PivoniaS.ShtienbergD.1999Integrated management of sudden wilt in melons, caused by Monosporascus cannonballus, using grafting and reduced rates of methyl bromidePlant Dis.8311421145

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FassuliotisG.1970Resistance of Cucumis spp. to the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita acritaJ. Nematol.2174178

  • Fernández-GarcíaN.MartínezV.CarvajalM.2004Effect of salinity on growth, mineral composition, and water relations of grafted tomato plantsJ. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci.167616622

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FlorH.H.1971Current status of the gene-for-gene conceptAnnu. Rev. Phytopathol.9275296

  • FryW.E.1982Principles of plant disease management. Academic Press Inc. New York NY.

  • FullerV.L.LilleyC.J.UrwinP.E.2008Nematode resistanceNew Phytol.1802744

  • Gal-OnA.WolfD.AntignusY.PatlisL.RyuK.H.MinB.E.PearlsmanM.LachmanO.GabaV.WangY.2005Transgenic cucumbers harboring the 54-kDa putative gene of cucumber fruit mottle mosaic tobamovirus are highly resistant to viral infection and protect non-transgenic scions from soil infectionTransgenic Res.148193

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GaoJ.J.QinA.G.YuX.C.2009aEffects of grafting on cucumber leaf SOD and CAT gene expression and activities under low temperature stressChinese J. Appl. Ecol.20213217[in Chinese].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GaoJ.J.QinA.G.YuX.C.2009bEffects of low-temperature stress on the ascorbate-glutathione cycle in the grafted cucumber leavesActa Hort. Sinica.36215220[in Chinese].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GaoJ.J.ZhangL.QinA.G.YuX.C.2008Relative expression of SOD and CAT mRNA and activities of SOD and CAT in grafted cucumber leaves under NaCl stressChinese J. Appl. Ecol.1917541758[in Chinese].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GarbevaP.van VeenJ.A.van ElsasJ.D.2004Microbial diversity in soil: Selection of microbial populations by plant and soil type and implications for disease suppressivenessAnnu. Rev. Phytopathol.42243270

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GoleckiB.SchulzA.Carstens-BehrensU.KollmannR.1998Evidence for graft transmission of structural phloem proteins or their precursors in heterografts of CucurbitaceaePlanta206630640

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GottsteinH.D.KućJ.A.1989Induction of systemic resistance to anthracnose in cucumber by phosphatesPhytopathology79176179

  • GrimaultV.PriorP.1994Grafting tomato cultivars resistant or susceptible to bacterial wilt: Analysis of resistance mechanismsJ. Phytopathol.141330334

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GuX.ZhangS.ZhangS.2006The screening of cucumber rootstocks resistant to southern root-knot nematodeChina Veg.248[in Chinese].

  • Hammond-KosackK.E.JonesJ.D.G.1997Plant disease resistance genesAnnu. Rev. Plant Biol.48575607

  • HasamaW.MoritaS.KatoT.1993Reduction of resistance to Corynespora target leaf spot in cucumber grafted on a bloomless rootstockAnnu. Phytopath. Soc. Japan59243248[in Japanese].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HasnaM.K.ÖgrenE.PerssonP.MártenssonA.RämertB.2009Management of corky root disease of tomato in participation with organic tomato growersCrop Prot.28155161

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HeY.ZhuZ.YangJ.NiX.ZhuB.2009Grafting increases the salt tolerance of tomato by improvement of photosynthesis and enhancement of antioxidant enzymes activityEnviron. Exp. Bot.66270278

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HermanR.Perl-TrevesR.2007Characterization and inheritance of a new source of resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f.sp.melonis race 1.2 in Cucumis meloPlant Dis.9111801186

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HiraiG.NakazumiH.YagiR.NakanoM.2002Fusarium wilt (race 1,2y) resistant melon (Cucumis melo) rootstock cultivars ‘Dodai No.1’ and ‘Dodai No.2’Acta Hort.588155160

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • IgariK.EndoS.HibaraK.AidaM.SakakibaraH.KawasakiT.TasakaM.2008Constitutive activation of a CC-NB-LRR protein alters morphogenesis through the cytokinin pathway in ArabidopsisPlant J.551427

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • IouannouN.2001Integrating soil solarization with grafting on resistant rootstocks for management of soil-borne pathogens of eggplantJ. Hort. Sci. Biotechnol.76396401

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • JensenP.J.RytterJ.DetwilerE.A.TravisJ.W.McNellisT.W.2003Rootstock effects on gene expression patterns in apple tree scionsPlant Mol. Biol.53493511

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • JiangF.LiuY.X.AiX.Z.ZhenN.WangH.T.2010aStudy on relationship among microorganism, enzymes’ activity in rhizosphere soil and root rot resistance of grafted capsicumScientia Agr. Sinica4333673374[in Chinese].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • JiangF.LiuY.X.LiuW.ZhengN.WangH.T.AiX.Z.2010bRelationship between root rot resistance and phenylaprapanoid metabolism in graft capsicumChina Veg.84652[in Chinese].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KehrJ.BuhtzA.2008Long distance transport and movement of RNA through the phloemJ. Expt. Bot.598592

  • KingS.R.DavisA.R.LiuW.LeviA.2008Grafting for disease resistanceHortScience4316731676

  • KingS.R.DavisA.R.ZhangX.P.CrosbyK.2010Genetics, breeding and selection of rootstocks for Solanaceae and CucurbitaceaeSci. Hort.127106111

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KousikC.S.ThiesJ.A.2010Response of U.S. bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria) plant introductions (PI) to crown rot caused by Phytophthora capsiciPhytopathology100S65

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KubotaC.McClureM.A.Kokalis-BurelleN.BausherM.G.RosskopfE.N.2008Vegetable grafting: History, use, and current technology status in North AmericaHortScience4316641669

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LambC.DixonR.A.1997The oxidative burst in plant disease resistanceAnnu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.48251275

  • LeeJ.M.1994Cultivation of grafted vegetables. I. Current status, grafting methods, and benefitsHortScience29235239

  • LeeJ.M.KubotaC.TsaoS.J.BieZ.Hoyos EchevarriaP.MorraL.OdaM.2010Current status of vegetable grafting: Diffusion, grafting techniques, automationSci. Hort.12793105

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LeeJ.M.OdaM.2003Grafting of herbaceous vegetable and ornamental cropsHort. Rev.2861124

  • LeonardiC.GiuffridaF.2006Variation of plant growth and macronutrient uptake in grafted tomatoes and eggplants on three different rootstocksEur. J. Hort. Sci.7197101

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LiN.ZhouB.L.BaiL.P.FuY.W.HuoS.F.2006The change of several protected enzyme's activity on grafted eggplants under salt stressLiaoning Agr. Sci.11012[in Chinese].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LiY.J.LiangG.Y.LiuX.J.LiuD.C.FangC.2009Proteomic study on grafted and non-grafted cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)Acta Hort. Sinica3611471152[in Chinese].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LinC.H.HsuS.T.TzengK.C.WangJ.F.2008Application of a preliminary screen to select locally adapted resistant rootstock and soil amendment for integrated management of tomato bacterial wilt in TaiwanPlant Dis.92909916

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LoughT.J.LucasW.J.2006Integrative plant biology: Role of phloem long-distance macromolecular traffickingAnnu. Rev. Plant Biol.57203232

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LouwsF.J.RivardC.L.KubotaC.2010Grafting fruiting vegetables to manage soilborne pathogens, foliar pathogens, arthropods and weedsSci. Hort.127127146

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MatsuzoeN.OkuboH.FujiedaK.1993Resistance of tomato plants grafted on Solanum rootstocks to bacterial wilt and root-knot nematodeJ. Jpn. Soc. Hort. Sci.61865872

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MertelyJ.C.MartynR.D.MillerM.E.BrutonB.D.1993An expanded host range for the muskmelon pathogen Monosporascus cannonballusPlant Dis.77667673

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MudgeK.JanickJ.ScofieldS.GoldschmidtE.E.2009A history of graftingHort. Rev.35437493

  • MysoreK.S.RyuC.M.2004Nonhost resistance: How much do we know?Trends Plant Sci.997104

  • NamikiF.ShiomiT.KayamuraT.TsugeT.1994Characterization of the formae speciales of Fusarium oxysporum causing wilts of cucurbits by DNA fingerprinting with nuclear repetitive DNA sequencesAppl. Environ. Microbiol.6026842691

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • OkaY.OffenbachR.PivoniaS.2004Pepper rootstock graft compatibility and response to Meloidogyne javanica and M. incognitaJ. Nematol.36137141

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • OmidA.KeilinT.GlassA.LeshkowitzD.WolfS.2007Characterization of phloem-sap transcription profile in melon plantsJ. Expt. Bot.5836453656

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PadmanabhanC.ZhangX.JinH.2009Host small RNAs are big contributors to plant innate immunityCurr. Opin. Plant Biol.12465472

  • PaplomatasE.J.ElenaK.TsagkarakouA.PerdikarisA.2002Control of Verticillium wilt of tomato and cucurbits through grafting of commercial varieties on resistant rootstocksActa Hort.579445449

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ParkS.M.LeeJ.S.JegalS.JeonB.Y.JungM.ParkY.S.HanS.L.ShinY.S.HerN.H.LeeJ.H.LeeM.Y.RyuK.H.YangS.G.HarnC.H.2005Transgenic watermelon rootstock resistant to CGMMV (cucumber green mottle mosaic virus) infectionPlant Cell Rpt.24350356

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PulgarG.VilloraG.MorenoD.A.RomeroL.2000Improving the mineral nutrition in grafted watermelon plants: Nitrogen metabolismBiol. Plant.43607609

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RivardC.L.LouwsF.J.2007Induction of jasmonic acid pathway and elevation of proteinase inhibitor II (PINII) expression as a response to tomato graftingPhytopathology97S99

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RivardC.L.O'ConnellS.PeetM.M.LouwsF.J.2010Grafting tomato with interspecific rootstock to manage diseases caused by Sclerotium rolfsii and southern root-knot nematodePlant Dis.9410151021

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RuizJ.M.RomeroL.1999Nitrogen efficiency and metabolism in grafted melon plantsSci. Hort.81113123

  • SakataY.OharaT.SugiyamaM.2005The history and present state of the grafting of cucurbitaceous vegetables in JapanActa Hort.731159170

  • SakataY.SugiyamaM.OharaT.MorishitaM.2006Influence of rootstocks on the resistance of grafted cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) scions to powdery mildew (Podosphaera xanthii U. Braun & N. Shishkoff)J. Jpn. Soc. Hort. Sci.75135140

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SalehiR.KashiA.LeeJ.M.BabalarM.DelshadM.LeeS.G.HuhY.C.2010Leaf gas exchanges and mineral ion composition in xylem sap of Iranian melon affected by rootstocks and training methodsHortScience45766770

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SatoN.TakamatsuT.1930Grafting culture of watermelonNogyo sekai252428[in Japanese].

  • SavantN.K.SnyderG.H.DatnoffL.E.1996Silicon management and sustainable rice productionAdv. Agron.58151199

  • SavvasD.CollaG.RouphaelY.SchwarzD.2010Amelioration of heavy metal and nutrient stress in fruit vegetables by graftingSci. Hort.127156161

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SchilmillerA.L.HoweG.A.2005Systemic signaling in the wound responseCurr. Opin. Plant Biol.8369377

  • SiemensJ.KellerI.SarxJ.KunzS.SchullerA.NagelW.SchmüllingT.ParniskeM.Ludwig-MüllerJ.2006Transcriptome analysis of Arabidopsis clubroots indicate a key role for cytokinins in disease developmentMol. Plant-Microbe Inter.19480494

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SigüenzaC.SchochowM.TuriniT.PloegA.2005Use of Cucumis metuliferus as a rootstock for melon to manage Meloidogyne incognitaJ. Nematol.37276280

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SimónM.R.CordoC.A.PerellóA.E.StruikP.C.2003Influence of nitrogen supply on the susceptibility of wheat to Septoria triticiJ. Phytopathol.151283289

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ThiesJ.A.ArissJ.J.HassellR.L.OlsonS.KousikC.S.LeviA.2010Grafting for management of southern root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita, in watermelonPlant Dis.9411951199

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ThiesJ.A.FeryR.L.1998Modified expression of the N gene for southern root-knot nematode resistance in pepper at high soil temperaturesJ. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.12310121015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ThiesJ.A.FeryR.L.2000Characterization of resistance conferred by the N gene to Meloidogyne arenaria races 1 and 2, M. hapla, and M. javanica in two sets of isogenic lines of Capsicum annuum LJ. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.1257175

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • TiedemannR.Carstens-BehrensU.1994Influence of grafting on the phloem protein patterns in cucurbitaceae. I: Additional phloem exudate proteins in Cucumis sativus grafted on two Cucurbita speciesJ. Plant Physiol.143189194

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Trionfetti NisiniP.CollaG.GranatiE.TemperiniO.CrinòP.SaccardoF.2002Rootstock resistance to fusarium wilt and effect on fruit yield and quality of two muskmelon cultivarsSci. Hort.93281288

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • van LoonL.C.2007Plant responses to plant growth-promoting rhizobacteriaEur. J. Plant Pathol.119243254

  • WaltersD.R.BinghamI.J.2007Influence of nutrition on disease development caused by fungal pathogens: Implications for plant disease controlAnn. Appl. Biol.151307324

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WaltersD.R.MurrayD.C.1992Induction of systemic resistance to rust in Vicia faba by phosphate and EDTA: Effects of calciumPlant Pathol.41444448

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WalzC.GiavaliscoP.SchadM.JuengerM.KloseJ.KehrJ.2004Proteomics of cucurbit phloem exudate reveals a network of defence proteinsPhytochem.6517951804

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WangH.R.RuS.J.WangL.P.FongZ.M.2004Study on the control of fusarium wilt and phytophthora blight in cucumber by graftingActa Agr. Zhejiangensis16336339[in Chinese].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WangJ.ZhangD.W.FangQ.2002Studies on antivirus disease mechanism of grafted seedless watermelonJ. Anhui Agr. Univ.29336339[in Chinese].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WeiG.P.YangL.F.ZhuY.L.ChenG.2009Changes in oxidative damage, antioxidant enzyme activities and polyamine contents in leaves of grafted and non-grafted eggplant seedlings under stress by excess of calcium nitrateSci. Hort.120443451

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • YaoH.WuF.2010Soil microbial community structure in cucumber rhizosphere of different resistance cultivars to fusarium wiltFEMS Microbiol. Ecol.72456463

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • YetisirH.KurtS.SariN.TokF.M.2007Rootstock potential of Turkish Lagenaria siceraria germplasm for watermelon: Plant growth, graft compatibility, and resistance to fusariumTurk. J. Agr. For.31381388

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • YiH.KimH.J.KimC.G.HarnC.H.KimH.M.ParkS.2009Using T-RFLP to assess the impact on soil microbial communities by transgenic lines of watermelon rootstock resistant to cucumber green mottle mosaic virus (CGMMV)J. Plant Biol.52577584

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • YinY.L.ZhouB.L.LiY.P.FuY.W.2008Allelopathic effects of grafting on rhizosphere microorganisms population of eggplantsActa Hort. Sinica3511311136[in Chinese].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ZhangS.GunX.WangY.2006Effect of bur cucumber (Sicyos angulatus L.) as rootstock on growth physiology and stress resistance of cucumber plantsActa Hort. Sinica3312311236[in Chinese].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ZhangZ.J.WangY.M.LongL.K.LinY.PangJ.LiuB.2008Tomato rootstock effects on gene expression patterns in eggplant scionsRuss. J. Plant Physiol.5593100

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ZhangZ.K.LiuS.Q.LiuS.H.ZhangY.ChenK.HuangZ.J.2010Effects of grafting on root polyamine metabolism of cucumber seedlings under copper stressChinese J. Appl. Ecol.2120512057[in Chinese].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ZhouB.GaoY.LinG.FuY.1998Relationship between disease resistance and electrolytic leakage, proline content and PAL activity in grafted eggplantActa Hort. Sinica25300302[in Chinese].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ZhouB.L.LvN.WangZ.H.YeX.L.2010Effect of grafting to eggplant growth and resistance physiology under NaClChina Veg.204246[in Chinese].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ZhuS.N.GuoS.R.ZhangA.H.LiJ.2008Activities of antioxidant enzymes and photosynthetic characteristics in grafted watermelon seedlings under NaCl stressActa Bot. Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica2822852291[in Chinese].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

Contributor Notes

We thank Drs. Peter J. Dittmar and Guodong Liu for providing comments before the original manuscript was submitted.

To whom reprint requests should be addressed; e-mail zxin@ufl.edu.

  • AloniB.CohenR.KarniL.AktasH.EdelsteinM.2010Hormonal signaling in rootstock–scion interactionsSci. Hort.127119126

  • BariR.JonesJ.D.G.2009Role of plant hormones in plant defence responsesPlant Mol. Biol.69473488

  • BroecklingC.D.BrozA.K.BergelsonJ.ManterD.K.VivancoJ.M.2008Root exudates regulate soil fungal community composition and diversityAppl. Environ. Microbiol.74738744

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • BuchananB.B.GruissemW.JonesR.L.2000Biochemistry and molecular biology of plants. American Society of Plant Biologists John Wiley & Sons Inc. Somerset NJ.

  • CohenR.BurgerY.HorevC.KorenA.EdelsteinM.2007Introducing grafted cucurbits to modern agriculture: The Israeli experiencePlant Dis.91916923

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CollaG.Cardona SuárezC.M.CardarelliM.RouphaelY.2010aImproving nitrogen use efficiency in melon by graftingHortScience45559565

  • CollaG.RouphaelY.CardarelliM.SalernoA.ReaE.2010bThe effectiveness of grafting to improve alkalinity tolerance in watermelonEnviron. Exp. Bot.68283291

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • CortadaL.SorribasF.J.OrnatC.AndrésM.F.Verdejo-LucasS.2009Response of tomato rootstocks carrying the Mi-resistance gene to populations of Meloidogyne arenaria, M. incognita and M. javanicaEur. J. Plant Pathol.124337343

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DavisA.R.Perkins-VeazieP.SakataY.López-GalarzaS.MarotoJ.V.LeeS.G.HuhY.C.SunZ.MiguelA.KingS.R.CohenR.LeeJ.M.2008Cucurbit graftingCrit. Rev. Plant Sci.275074

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DietrichR.PloßK.HeilM.2004Constitutive and induced resistance to pathogens in Arabidopsis thaliana depends on nitrogen supplyPlant Cell Environ.27896906

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DixonR.A.PaivaN.L.1995Stress-induced phenylpropanoid metabolismPlant Cell710851097

  • DongL.ZuoY.LiX.WangQ.2010Effects of grafting on cucumber soil biochemistryJ. China Agr. Univ.155156[in Chinese].

  • DoumbouC.L.Hamby SaloveM.K.CrawfordD.L.BeaulieuC.2001Actinomycetes, promising tools to control plant diseases and to promote plant growthPhytoprotection8285102

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • DurrantW.E.DongX.2004Systemic acquired resistanceAnnu. Rev. Phytopathol.42185209

  • EdelsteinM.CohenR.BurgerY.ShriberS.PivoniaS.ShtienbergD.1999Integrated management of sudden wilt in melons, caused by Monosporascus cannonballus, using grafting and reduced rates of methyl bromidePlant Dis.8311421145

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FassuliotisG.1970Resistance of Cucumis spp. to the root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita acritaJ. Nematol.2174178

  • Fernández-GarcíaN.MartínezV.CarvajalM.2004Effect of salinity on growth, mineral composition, and water relations of grafted tomato plantsJ. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci.167616622

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • FlorH.H.1971Current status of the gene-for-gene conceptAnnu. Rev. Phytopathol.9275296

  • FryW.E.1982Principles of plant disease management. Academic Press Inc. New York NY.

  • FullerV.L.LilleyC.J.UrwinP.E.2008Nematode resistanceNew Phytol.1802744

  • Gal-OnA.WolfD.AntignusY.PatlisL.RyuK.H.MinB.E.PearlsmanM.LachmanO.GabaV.WangY.2005Transgenic cucumbers harboring the 54-kDa putative gene of cucumber fruit mottle mosaic tobamovirus are highly resistant to viral infection and protect non-transgenic scions from soil infectionTransgenic Res.148193

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GaoJ.J.QinA.G.YuX.C.2009aEffects of grafting on cucumber leaf SOD and CAT gene expression and activities under low temperature stressChinese J. Appl. Ecol.20213217[in Chinese].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GaoJ.J.QinA.G.YuX.C.2009bEffects of low-temperature stress on the ascorbate-glutathione cycle in the grafted cucumber leavesActa Hort. Sinica.36215220[in Chinese].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GaoJ.J.ZhangL.QinA.G.YuX.C.2008Relative expression of SOD and CAT mRNA and activities of SOD and CAT in grafted cucumber leaves under NaCl stressChinese J. Appl. Ecol.1917541758[in Chinese].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GarbevaP.van VeenJ.A.van ElsasJ.D.2004Microbial diversity in soil: Selection of microbial populations by plant and soil type and implications for disease suppressivenessAnnu. Rev. Phytopathol.42243270

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GoleckiB.SchulzA.Carstens-BehrensU.KollmannR.1998Evidence for graft transmission of structural phloem proteins or their precursors in heterografts of CucurbitaceaePlanta206630640

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GottsteinH.D.KućJ.A.1989Induction of systemic resistance to anthracnose in cucumber by phosphatesPhytopathology79176179

  • GrimaultV.PriorP.1994Grafting tomato cultivars resistant or susceptible to bacterial wilt: Analysis of resistance mechanismsJ. Phytopathol.141330334

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • GuX.ZhangS.ZhangS.2006The screening of cucumber rootstocks resistant to southern root-knot nematodeChina Veg.248[in Chinese].

  • Hammond-KosackK.E.JonesJ.D.G.1997Plant disease resistance genesAnnu. Rev. Plant Biol.48575607

  • HasamaW.MoritaS.KatoT.1993Reduction of resistance to Corynespora target leaf spot in cucumber grafted on a bloomless rootstockAnnu. Phytopath. Soc. Japan59243248[in Japanese].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HasnaM.K.ÖgrenE.PerssonP.MártenssonA.RämertB.2009Management of corky root disease of tomato in participation with organic tomato growersCrop Prot.28155161

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HeY.ZhuZ.YangJ.NiX.ZhuB.2009Grafting increases the salt tolerance of tomato by improvement of photosynthesis and enhancement of antioxidant enzymes activityEnviron. Exp. Bot.66270278

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HermanR.Perl-TrevesR.2007Characterization and inheritance of a new source of resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f.sp.melonis race 1.2 in Cucumis meloPlant Dis.9111801186

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • HiraiG.NakazumiH.YagiR.NakanoM.2002Fusarium wilt (race 1,2y) resistant melon (Cucumis melo) rootstock cultivars ‘Dodai No.1’ and ‘Dodai No.2’Acta Hort.588155160

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • IgariK.EndoS.HibaraK.AidaM.SakakibaraH.KawasakiT.TasakaM.2008Constitutive activation of a CC-NB-LRR protein alters morphogenesis through the cytokinin pathway in ArabidopsisPlant J.551427

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • IouannouN.2001Integrating soil solarization with grafting on resistant rootstocks for management of soil-borne pathogens of eggplantJ. Hort. Sci. Biotechnol.76396401

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • JensenP.J.RytterJ.DetwilerE.A.TravisJ.W.McNellisT.W.2003Rootstock effects on gene expression patterns in apple tree scionsPlant Mol. Biol.53493511

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • JiangF.LiuY.X.AiX.Z.ZhenN.WangH.T.2010aStudy on relationship among microorganism, enzymes’ activity in rhizosphere soil and root rot resistance of grafted capsicumScientia Agr. Sinica4333673374[in Chinese].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • JiangF.LiuY.X.LiuW.ZhengN.WangH.T.AiX.Z.2010bRelationship between root rot resistance and phenylaprapanoid metabolism in graft capsicumChina Veg.84652[in Chinese].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KehrJ.BuhtzA.2008Long distance transport and movement of RNA through the phloemJ. Expt. Bot.598592

  • KingS.R.DavisA.R.LiuW.LeviA.2008Grafting for disease resistanceHortScience4316731676

  • KingS.R.DavisA.R.ZhangX.P.CrosbyK.2010Genetics, breeding and selection of rootstocks for Solanaceae and CucurbitaceaeSci. Hort.127106111

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KousikC.S.ThiesJ.A.2010Response of U.S. bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria) plant introductions (PI) to crown rot caused by Phytophthora capsiciPhytopathology100S65

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • KubotaC.McClureM.A.Kokalis-BurelleN.BausherM.G.RosskopfE.N.2008Vegetable grafting: History, use, and current technology status in North AmericaHortScience4316641669

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LambC.DixonR.A.1997The oxidative burst in plant disease resistanceAnnu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.48251275

  • LeeJ.M.1994Cultivation of grafted vegetables. I. Current status, grafting methods, and benefitsHortScience29235239

  • LeeJ.M.KubotaC.TsaoS.J.BieZ.Hoyos EchevarriaP.MorraL.OdaM.2010Current status of vegetable grafting: Diffusion, grafting techniques, automationSci. Hort.12793105

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LeeJ.M.OdaM.2003Grafting of herbaceous vegetable and ornamental cropsHort. Rev.2861124

  • LeonardiC.GiuffridaF.2006Variation of plant growth and macronutrient uptake in grafted tomatoes and eggplants on three different rootstocksEur. J. Hort. Sci.7197101

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LiN.ZhouB.L.BaiL.P.FuY.W.HuoS.F.2006The change of several protected enzyme's activity on grafted eggplants under salt stressLiaoning Agr. Sci.11012[in Chinese].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LiY.J.LiangG.Y.LiuX.J.LiuD.C.FangC.2009Proteomic study on grafted and non-grafted cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.)Acta Hort. Sinica3611471152[in Chinese].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LinC.H.HsuS.T.TzengK.C.WangJ.F.2008Application of a preliminary screen to select locally adapted resistant rootstock and soil amendment for integrated management of tomato bacterial wilt in TaiwanPlant Dis.92909916

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LoughT.J.LucasW.J.2006Integrative plant biology: Role of phloem long-distance macromolecular traffickingAnnu. Rev. Plant Biol.57203232

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • LouwsF.J.RivardC.L.KubotaC.2010Grafting fruiting vegetables to manage soilborne pathogens, foliar pathogens, arthropods and weedsSci. Hort.127127146

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MatsuzoeN.OkuboH.FujiedaK.1993Resistance of tomato plants grafted on Solanum rootstocks to bacterial wilt and root-knot nematodeJ. Jpn. Soc. Hort. Sci.61865872

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MertelyJ.C.MartynR.D.MillerM.E.BrutonB.D.1993An expanded host range for the muskmelon pathogen Monosporascus cannonballusPlant Dis.77667673

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • MudgeK.JanickJ.ScofieldS.GoldschmidtE.E.2009A history of graftingHort. Rev.35437493

  • MysoreK.S.RyuC.M.2004Nonhost resistance: How much do we know?Trends Plant Sci.997104

  • NamikiF.ShiomiT.KayamuraT.TsugeT.1994Characterization of the formae speciales of Fusarium oxysporum causing wilts of cucurbits by DNA fingerprinting with nuclear repetitive DNA sequencesAppl. Environ. Microbiol.6026842691

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • OkaY.OffenbachR.PivoniaS.2004Pepper rootstock graft compatibility and response to Meloidogyne javanica and M. incognitaJ. Nematol.36137141

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • OmidA.KeilinT.GlassA.LeshkowitzD.WolfS.2007Characterization of phloem-sap transcription profile in melon plantsJ. Expt. Bot.5836453656

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PadmanabhanC.ZhangX.JinH.2009Host small RNAs are big contributors to plant innate immunityCurr. Opin. Plant Biol.12465472

  • PaplomatasE.J.ElenaK.TsagkarakouA.PerdikarisA.2002Control of Verticillium wilt of tomato and cucurbits through grafting of commercial varieties on resistant rootstocksActa Hort.579445449

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ParkS.M.LeeJ.S.JegalS.JeonB.Y.JungM.ParkY.S.HanS.L.ShinY.S.HerN.H.LeeJ.H.LeeM.Y.RyuK.H.YangS.G.HarnC.H.2005Transgenic watermelon rootstock resistant to CGMMV (cucumber green mottle mosaic virus) infectionPlant Cell Rpt.24350356

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • PulgarG.VilloraG.MorenoD.A.RomeroL.2000Improving the mineral nutrition in grafted watermelon plants: Nitrogen metabolismBiol. Plant.43607609

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RivardC.L.LouwsF.J.2007Induction of jasmonic acid pathway and elevation of proteinase inhibitor II (PINII) expression as a response to tomato graftingPhytopathology97S99

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RivardC.L.O'ConnellS.PeetM.M.LouwsF.J.2010Grafting tomato with interspecific rootstock to manage diseases caused by Sclerotium rolfsii and southern root-knot nematodePlant Dis.9410151021

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • RuizJ.M.RomeroL.1999Nitrogen efficiency and metabolism in grafted melon plantsSci. Hort.81113123

  • SakataY.OharaT.SugiyamaM.2005The history and present state of the grafting of cucurbitaceous vegetables in JapanActa Hort.731159170

  • SakataY.SugiyamaM.OharaT.MorishitaM.2006Influence of rootstocks on the resistance of grafted cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) scions to powdery mildew (Podosphaera xanthii U. Braun & N. Shishkoff)J. Jpn. Soc. Hort. Sci.75135140

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SalehiR.KashiA.LeeJ.M.BabalarM.DelshadM.LeeS.G.HuhY.C.2010Leaf gas exchanges and mineral ion composition in xylem sap of Iranian melon affected by rootstocks and training methodsHortScience45766770

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SatoN.TakamatsuT.1930Grafting culture of watermelonNogyo sekai252428[in Japanese].

  • SavantN.K.SnyderG.H.DatnoffL.E.1996Silicon management and sustainable rice productionAdv. Agron.58151199

  • SavvasD.CollaG.RouphaelY.SchwarzD.2010Amelioration of heavy metal and nutrient stress in fruit vegetables by graftingSci. Hort.127156161

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SchilmillerA.L.HoweG.A.2005Systemic signaling in the wound responseCurr. Opin. Plant Biol.8369377

  • SiemensJ.KellerI.SarxJ.KunzS.SchullerA.NagelW.SchmüllingT.ParniskeM.Ludwig-MüllerJ.2006Transcriptome analysis of Arabidopsis clubroots indicate a key role for cytokinins in disease developmentMol. Plant-Microbe Inter.19480494

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SigüenzaC.SchochowM.TuriniT.PloegA.2005Use of Cucumis metuliferus as a rootstock for melon to manage Meloidogyne incognitaJ. Nematol.37276280

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • SimónM.R.CordoC.A.PerellóA.E.StruikP.C.2003Influence of nitrogen supply on the susceptibility of wheat to Septoria triticiJ. Phytopathol.151283289

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ThiesJ.A.ArissJ.J.HassellR.L.OlsonS.KousikC.S.LeviA.2010Grafting for management of southern root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita, in watermelonPlant Dis.9411951199

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ThiesJ.A.FeryR.L.1998Modified expression of the N gene for southern root-knot nematode resistance in pepper at high soil temperaturesJ. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.12310121015

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ThiesJ.A.FeryR.L.2000Characterization of resistance conferred by the N gene to Meloidogyne arenaria races 1 and 2, M. hapla, and M. javanica in two sets of isogenic lines of Capsicum annuum LJ. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.1257175

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • TiedemannR.Carstens-BehrensU.1994Influence of grafting on the phloem protein patterns in cucurbitaceae. I: Additional phloem exudate proteins in Cucumis sativus grafted on two Cucurbita speciesJ. Plant Physiol.143189194

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • Trionfetti NisiniP.CollaG.GranatiE.TemperiniO.CrinòP.SaccardoF.2002Rootstock resistance to fusarium wilt and effect on fruit yield and quality of two muskmelon cultivarsSci. Hort.93281288

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • van LoonL.C.2007Plant responses to plant growth-promoting rhizobacteriaEur. J. Plant Pathol.119243254

  • WaltersD.R.BinghamI.J.2007Influence of nutrition on disease development caused by fungal pathogens: Implications for plant disease controlAnn. Appl. Biol.151307324

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WaltersD.R.MurrayD.C.1992Induction of systemic resistance to rust in Vicia faba by phosphate and EDTA: Effects of calciumPlant Pathol.41444448

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WalzC.GiavaliscoP.SchadM.JuengerM.KloseJ.KehrJ.2004Proteomics of cucurbit phloem exudate reveals a network of defence proteinsPhytochem.6517951804

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WangH.R.RuS.J.WangL.P.FongZ.M.2004Study on the control of fusarium wilt and phytophthora blight in cucumber by graftingActa Agr. Zhejiangensis16336339[in Chinese].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WangJ.ZhangD.W.FangQ.2002Studies on antivirus disease mechanism of grafted seedless watermelonJ. Anhui Agr. Univ.29336339[in Chinese].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • WeiG.P.YangL.F.ZhuY.L.ChenG.2009Changes in oxidative damage, antioxidant enzyme activities and polyamine contents in leaves of grafted and non-grafted eggplant seedlings under stress by excess of calcium nitrateSci. Hort.120443451

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • YaoH.WuF.2010Soil microbial community structure in cucumber rhizosphere of different resistance cultivars to fusarium wiltFEMS Microbiol. Ecol.72456463

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • YetisirH.KurtS.SariN.TokF.M.2007Rootstock potential of Turkish Lagenaria siceraria germplasm for watermelon: Plant growth, graft compatibility, and resistance to fusariumTurk. J. Agr. For.31381388

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • YiH.KimH.J.KimC.G.HarnC.H.KimH.M.ParkS.2009Using T-RFLP to assess the impact on soil microbial communities by transgenic lines of watermelon rootstock resistant to cucumber green mottle mosaic virus (CGMMV)J. Plant Biol.52577584

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • YinY.L.ZhouB.L.LiY.P.FuY.W.2008Allelopathic effects of grafting on rhizosphere microorganisms population of eggplantsActa Hort. Sinica3511311136[in Chinese].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ZhangS.GunX.WangY.2006Effect of bur cucumber (Sicyos angulatus L.) as rootstock on growth physiology and stress resistance of cucumber plantsActa Hort. Sinica3312311236[in Chinese].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ZhangZ.J.WangY.M.LongL.K.LinY.PangJ.LiuB.2008Tomato rootstock effects on gene expression patterns in eggplant scionsRuss. J. Plant Physiol.5593100

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ZhangZ.K.LiuS.Q.LiuS.H.ZhangY.ChenK.HuangZ.J.2010Effects of grafting on root polyamine metabolism of cucumber seedlings under copper stressChinese J. Appl. Ecol.2120512057[in Chinese].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ZhouB.GaoY.LinG.FuY.1998Relationship between disease resistance and electrolytic leakage, proline content and PAL activity in grafted eggplantActa Hort. Sinica25300302[in Chinese].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ZhouB.L.LvN.WangZ.H.YeX.L.2010Effect of grafting to eggplant growth and resistance physiology under NaClChina Veg.204246[in Chinese].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
  • ZhuS.N.GuoS.R.ZhangA.H.LiJ.2008Activities of antioxidant enzymes and photosynthetic characteristics in grafted watermelon seedlings under NaCl stressActa Bot. Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica2822852291[in Chinese].

    • Search Google Scholar
    • Export Citation
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 614 614 27
PDF Downloads 302 302 12