The coastal valleys of central California produce nearly 60,000 ha of lettuce annually, more than half of the nation’s supply. In this region, lettuce is typically produced in rotation with other leafy vegetables. Production systems are characterized by two to three crops per year with frequent irrigation and heavy N fertilization. Water quality monitoring in the agricultural watersheds in this region has shown that both surface water and groundwater often exceed the federal drinking water standard of 10 mg·L−1 NO3-N. Vegetable growers are under increasing regulatory pressure to improve both their fertilization and irrigation practices to protect environmental water quality. Recently proposed regulations would require growers to report N fertilization rates and to bring N loading from fertilizer and irrigation water into approximate balance with crop N uptake. In this region, lettuce N uptake has been reported to average 130 kg·ha−1 for iceberg and 107 kg·ha−1 for romaine (Breschini and Hartz, 2002). However, a recent field survey found that lettuce received an average seasonal N fertilization rate of 184 kg N/ha (Hartz et al., 2007), suggesting that significant N rate reduction would be required to meet these new regulations.
Studies on lettuce response to N fertilization have reported widely varying results. Seasonal N rates required to maximize crop yield have ranged from 100 to 150 kg·ha−1 (Gardner and Pew, 1972, 1974, 1979; Tei et al., 2003) to greater than 220 kg·ha−1 (Hoque et al., 2010; Welch et al., 1979). Much of this variability may be attributed to field-specific factors affecting crop yield potential and N fertilizer efficiency; these factors include plant population, precipitation, irrigation efficiency, residual soil NO3-N, and soil N mineralization potential. Given the high crop value and strict market standards for lettuce, growers commonly use standard fertilization programs with little field-specific modification; they are reluctant to modify current N fertilizer practices without a sound understanding of the interaction of these factors and reliable diagnostic techniques to guide field-specific N fertilization.
Adding to the uncertainty regarding efficient N management of lettuce, California growers continue to modify production practices to increase yield. Average lettuce yield rose ≈11% between 2000 and 2010 (Monterey County Agricultural Commissioner, 2000, 2010); factors potentially responsible included modified planting configurations that increased plant population and widespread adoption of drip irrigation. We undertook this study to develop detailed information on lettuce N requirements under current production practices used in California’s central coast region and to critically evaluate the value of soil and plant diagnostic techniques to guide in-season N fertilizer management.
BreschiniS.J.HartzT.K.2002Presidedress soil nitrate testing reduces nitrogen fertilizer use and nitrate leaching hazard in lettuce productionHortScience3710611064
FoxR.H.RothG.W.IversenK.V.PiekielekW.P.1989Soil and tissue nitrate tests compared for predicting soil nitrogen availability to cornAgron. J.81971974
GardnerB.R.PewW.D.1972Response of fall grown head lettuce to nitrogen fertilization. Univ. of Arizona Agr. Expt. Sta. Tech. Bul. 199
GardnerB.R.PewW.D.1974Response of spring grown head lettuce to nitrogen fertilization. Univ. of Arizona Agr. Expt. Sta. Tech. Bul. 210
GardnerB.R.PewW.D.1979Comparison of various nitrogen sources for the fertilization of winter-grown head lettuceJ. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.104534536
GreenwoodD.J.GastalF.LemaireG.DraycottA.MillardP.NeetesonJ.J.1991Growth rate and % N of field grown crops: Theory and experimentsAnn. Bot. (Lond.)67181190
HartzT.K.BendixenW.E.WierdsmaL.2000The value of pre-sidedress soil nitrate testing as a nitrogen management tool in irrigated vegetable productionHortScience35651656
HartzT.K.JohnstoneP.R.WilliamsE.SmithR.F.2007Establishing lettuce leaf nutrient optimum ranges through DRIS analysisHortScience42143146
HeckmanJ.R.MorrisT.SimsJ.T.SieczkaJ.B.KrogmannU.NitzscheP.AshleyR.2002Pre-sidedress soil nitrate test is effective for fall cabbageHortScience37113117
HoqueM.M.AjwaH.OthmanM.2010Yield and postharvest quality of lettuce in response to nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizersHortScience4515391544
JonesJ.B.WolfB.MillsH.A.1991Plant analysis handbook. Macro-Micro Publishing Athens GA
LorenzO.A.TylerK.B.1983Plant tissue analysis of vegetable crops p. 24–29. In: Reisenaur H.M. (ed.). Soil and plant tissue testing in California. California Coop. Ext. Bul. 1879
MaierN.A.DahlenbergA.P.TwigdenT.K.1990Assessment of the nitrogen status of onions (Allium cepa L.) cv. Cream Gold by plant analysisAust. J. Exp. Agr.30853859
MacKerronD.K.L.YoungM.W.DaviesH.V.1995A critical assessment of the value of petiole sap analysis in optimizing the nitrogen nutrition of the potato cropPlant Soil172247260
Monterey County Agricultural Commissioner. 2000 2010. Crop report. <http://www.ag.co.monterey.ca.us/resources/category/crop-reports>
PruittW.D.FereresE.SnyderR.L.1987Reference evapotranspiration (ETo) for California. Univ. of Calif. Coop. Ext. Bul. 1922
WaughD.L.CateR.B.NelsonL.A.1973Discontinuous models for rapid correlation interpretation and utilization of soil analysis and fertilizer response data. Tech. Bull. 7. Int. Soil Fertility Evaluation and Improvement Program. North Carolina State Univ. Raleigh NC
WesterveldS.M.McKeownA.W.Scott-DupreeC.D.McDonaldM.R.2003How well do critical nitrogen concentrations work for cabbage, carrot and onion crops?HortScience3811221128.3