Potted foliage plants are high-value ornamental commodities used to decorate indoor and patio environments. In the United States, the wholesale value of potted foliage plant production was $498 million in 2010 (USDA, 2011). Popular genera include Aglaonema, Dieffenbachia, Dracaena, Epipremnum, Ficus, Hedera, Philodendron, and Syngonium (Chen et al., 2002). Most foliage plants used in the trade are endemic to the tropics and show tolerance to drought and low light conditions. With their attractive and diverse leaf forms, colors, and textures, potted foliage plant displays are recognized for enhancing human health, well-being, and productivity (Fjeld et al., 1998).
The marketability of foliage plants is frequently limited by premature leaf abscission, epinasty, and/or senescence during transport and retail display (Conover and Poole, 1984). For some species, this loss in quality has been correlated with exposure to the gaseous phytohormone ethylene (Marousky and Harbaugh, 1982; Woltering, 1987). Ethylene arising from anthropogenic (e.g., auto exhaust fumes) and biological (e.g., ripening fruit) sources can occasionally accumulate to physiologically active concentrations (e.g., 0.1 to 10 μL·L−1) inside enclosed areas used to distribute and store foliage plants (Hoyer, 1995; Skog et al., 2001). Although ethylene sensitivity varies significantly among potted flowering genotypes (Muller et al., 1998; Serek and Reid, 2000; Woltering, 1987), the response of foliage plants to ethylene has been less intensively studied. Identifying the relative ethylene sensitivity of different potted foliage plant genotypes could help optimize postproduction operations and handling procedures that reduce ethylene damage.
Treatment with silver thiosulfate (STS) liquid has long been relied on to extend the longevity of ethylene-sensitive ornamentals (Nowak and Rudnicki, 1990). Silver ions bind to ethylene receptors in plant tissues and block ethylene action (Sisler et al., 1986). However, STS has been criticized on social and environmental grounds owing to concerns associated with handling and disposing silver solutions (Nell, 1992). Moreover, STS is presently not legalized for use on potted plants in the United States (J. Janssen, personal communication). In contrast, an alternative non-toxic gaseous inhibitor of ethylene binding, 1-MCP, is gaining commercial acceptance (Reid and Staby, 2008; Serek et al., 1994). Although treatment with 1-MCP has been reported to protect numerous potted flowering plants such as Kalanchoe blossfeldiana (Serek and Reid, 2000), Rosa ×hybrida (Serek et al., 1994), and Schlumbergera truncata (Serek and Sisler, 2001) against ethylene-induced floral organ abscission and senescence, there are limited publicly available data on its efficacy to protect potted foliage plants. To date, treatment of three potted foliage plant genera (Aglaonema ‘White Tip’, Ficus ‘Green Island’, Ixora coccinea) with 100 to 300 nL·L−1 1-MCP for 2 to 8 h at 20 °C has been shown to prevent ethylene-mediated leaf abscission and/or senescence (Fan et al., 2009; Michaeli et al., 1999; Philosoph-Hadas et al., 2005).
1-MCP is registered as EthylBloc™ (Floralife, Inc., Walterboro, SC) for use on ornamental plants (Reid and Staby, 2008). 1-MCP molecules are encapsulated in the α-cyclodextrin matrix of EthylBloc™ and when dissolved in water release into the air. It is approved for use in closed tents, coolers, and truck trailers. EthylBloc™ is also available in a paper sachet that potentially offers a more convenient mode of application (Kostansek, 2002). We previously reported that the release of 1-MCP from two sachets containing EthylBloc™ in a closed shipping box was sufficient to protect cut rose flowers against ethylene during and immediately after shipment (Macnish et al., 2010). The EthylBloc™ sachet system may also have potential to protect sensitive potted foliage plants during shipment.
In the current study, we quantified the ethylene sensitivity of 20 potted foliage plant genotypes traded in the United States. The efficacy of 1-MCP gas and sachet treatments to protect responsive genotypes against ethylene during simulated transport and retail display was also tested.
CameronA.C.ReidM.S.1981The use of silver thiosulfate anionic complex as a foliar spray to prevent flower abscission of ZygocactusHortScience16761762
CameronA.C.ReidM.S.20011-MCP blocks ethylene-induced petal abscission of Pelargonium peltatum but the effect is transientPostharvest Biol. Technol.22169177
ChenJ.HennyR.J.McConnellD.B.2002Development of new foliage plant cultivars466472JanickJ.WhipkeyA.Trends in new crops and new usesProc. 5th Natl. SympNew Crops and New Uses: Strength in Diversity
ConoverC.A.PooleR.T.1984Influence of temperature and duration on simulated shipping of small potted foliage plantsProc. Fla. State Hort. Soc.97280282
FanS.-T.YehD.-M.WangT.-T.2009Cultivar sensitivity to ethylene during storage and 1-methylcyclopropene protection of AglaonemaHortScience44202205
FjeldT.VeierstedB.SandvikL.RiiseG.LevyF.1998The effect of indoor foliage plants on health and discomfort symptoms among office workersIndoor Built Environ.7204209
FriedmanH.HagiladiA.ResnickH.BarakA.UmielN.2001Ethylene-insensitive related phenotypes exist naturally in a genetically variable population of Dianthus barbatusTheor. Appl. Genet.103282287
HoyerL.1995Investigations of the ethylene build-up during transport of pot plants in controlled temperature trucksPostharvest Biol. Technol.5101108
HuberD.J.HurrB.M.LeeJ.S.LeeJ.H.20101-Methylcyclopropene sorption by tissues and cell-free extracts from fruits and vegetables: Evidence for enzymic 1-MCP metabolismPostharvest Biol. Technol.56123130
MacnishA.J.IrvingD.E.JoyceD.C.VithanageV.WearingA.H.LisleA.T.2004Variation in ethylene-induced postharvest flower abscission responses among Chamelaucium Desf. (Myrtaceae) genotypesSci. Hort.102415432
MacnishA.J.JoyceD.C.HofmanP.J.SimonsD.H.ReidM.S.20001-Methylcyclopropene treatment efficacy in preventing ethylene perception in banana fruit and grevillea and waxflower flowersAust. J. Exp. Agr.40471481
MacnishA.J.LeonardR.T.BordaA.-M.NellT.A.2010Genotypic variation in the postharvest performance and ethylene sensitivity of cut rose flowersHortScience45790796
MarouskyF.J.1979Effects of ethylene in combination with light, temperature and carbon dioxide on leaf abscission in Fittonia verschaffeltii (Lem.) Coem. var. Argyroneura (Coem.)Nichols. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc.92320321
MarouskyF.J.HarbaughB.K.1979Interaction of ethylene and various environmental factors on leaf abscission in Philodendron scanden subsp. oxycardiumJ. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.104876880
MichaeliR.Philosoph-HadasS.RiovJ.MeirS.1999Chilling-induced leaf abscission of Ixora coccinea plants. I. Induction by oxidative stress via increased sensitivity to ethylenePhysiol. Plant.107166173
MullerR.SislerE.C.SerekM.2000Stress induced ethylene production, ethylene binding, and the response to the ethylene action inhibitor 1-MCP in miniature rosesSci. Hort.835159
Nell T.A. 1992. Taking silver safely out of the longevity picture. GrowerTalks June:35–42
Philosoph-HadasS.GolanO.RosenbergerI.SalimS.KochanekB.MeirS.2005Efficiency of 1-MCP in neutralizing ethylene effects in cut flowers and potted plants following simultaneous or sequential applicationActa Hort.669321328
SerekM.SislerE.C.2001Efficacy of inhibitors of ethylene binding in improvement of the postharvest characteristics of potted flowering plantsPostharvest Biol. Technol.23161166
SerekM.SislerE.C.ReidM.S.1994Novel gaseous ethylene binding inhibitor prevents ethylene effects in potted flowering plantsJ. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.11912301233
SislerE.C.DupilleE.SerekM.1996Effect of 1-methylcyclopropene and methylenecyclopropene on ethylene binding and ethylene action on cut carnationsPlant Growth Regulat.187986
SislerE.C.ReidM.S.YangS.F.1986Effect of antagonists of ethylene action on binding of ethylene in cut carnationsPlant Growth Regulat.4213218
SkogL.J.BlomT.SchaeferB.DigweedB.FraserH.BrownW.2001A survey of ethylene contamination in Ontario's floriculture industry and the evaluation of 1-methylcyclopropene and an ethylene absorber as potential solutionsActa Hort.5435562
USDA2011Floriculture Crops 2010 Summary. U.SDept. Agr., Natl. Agr. Stat. Serv.Washington, DC27 July 2011. <http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/FlorCrop/FlorCrop-04-21-2011_revision.pdf>.